Uri Blass wrote: ↑Wed Nov 06, 2024 9:21 am
I do not like games with no increment because I like to think in chess so I used only 3+2.
I won 2 additional games so the score now is 6-2 for(won 5 games drew 2 and lost 1 game).
I believe that 2149.56 of LeelaQueenOdds as white 3+2 (Reference) is too high and I believe that humans with this rating should be clearly stronger than LeelaQueenOdds as white 3+2 if they play correctly and are ready for bad trades in order to simplify.
Congratulations Uri Blass. In Good Time!! Welcome to the battlefield!! You are Welcome to the "Promised Land." Now you can fight to reach your fair position in the standings. If you or someone else displaces me from my second place then I will be happy to share with new fighters, I will be obliged to play again, I will return to war after 40 years of pilgrimage through the certainty of life, where I never lacked the protection of "my Programmer" and to the point that in extreme situations I was able to dine on the rich "Manna." In case, Mr. Uri Blass, the "LeelaQueenOdds" dinner would be insufficient for you, there are other delicious dishes on the menu... "LeelanightOdds" is just an example!! This last breakfast I am referring to is delicious, but it kicks us hard against our brain. If the horseback steak breakfast would be then still "light", then we are waiting for the whole horse to run in the Derby, that is, "Leela in its Standard and full mode." Here that computer goes from being a horse to being a lion. But even so, I will battle with my shield and my sword, behind the wall, and if necessary, I will go out and jump over the wall seeking to achieve my dreams, and freedom. Chains cannot hold us free spirits, we only know war to achieve it, we love the indomitable spirit. Free will is our north, determination is part of our path, the prize, and high heaven, our goal. The position tables will then be the maximum marker, where our position will be written higher and firmer than in other media with tinted ink.
I played additional 10 games.
Relatively a bad day because I won only 5.5-4.5.
Note that I take advantage of the fact that the machine is bluffing.
I mean that Leela make sometimes bad sacrifices so I do not believe lc0's sacrifices but calculate so there are cases when I think for a move more than 30 seconds(with 2 seconds increment it is not a risk that is too big).
I also play sacrifices that lose material but in my case they are for good reason to simplify.
Note that place in the standing does not measure ability unless the players played many games and 20 games are clearly not enough.
..Uri, you are now in place # 5 !!
I am thinking chess is in a coin.Human beings for ever playing in one face.Now I am playing in the other face:"Antichess". Computers are as a fortres where owner forgot to close a little door behind. You must enter across this door.Forget the front.
Uri Blass wrote: ↑Wed Nov 06, 2024 9:21 am
I do not like games with no increment because I like to think in chess so I used only 3+2.
I won 2 additional games so the score now is 6-2 for(won 5 games drew 2 and lost 1 game).
I believe that 2149.56 of LeelaQueenOdds as white 3+2 (Reference) is too high and I believe that humans with this rating should be clearly stronger than LeelaQueenOdds as white 3+2 if they play correctly and are ready for bad trades in order to simplify.
Congratulations Uri Blass. In Good Time!! Welcome to the battlefield!! You are Welcome to the "Promised Land." Now you can fight to reach your fair position in the standings. If you or someone else displaces me from my second place then I will be happy to share with new fighters, I will be obliged to play again, I will return to war after 40 years of pilgrimage through the certainty of life, where I never lacked the protection of "my Programmer" and to the point that in extreme situations I was able to dine on the rich "Manna." In case, Mr. Uri Blass, the "LeelaQueenOdds" dinner would be insufficient for you, there are other delicious dishes on the menu... "LeelanightOdds" is just an example!! This last breakfast I am referring to is delicious, but it kicks us hard against our brain. If the horseback steak breakfast would be then still "light", then we are waiting for the whole horse to run in the Derby, that is, "Leela in its Standard and full mode." Here that computer goes from being a horse to being a lion. But even so, I will battle with my shield and my sword, behind the wall, and if necessary, I will go out and jump over the wall seeking to achieve my dreams, and freedom. Chains cannot hold us free spirits, we only know war to achieve it, we love the indomitable spirit. Free will is our north, determination is part of our path, the prize, and high heaven, our goal. The position tables will then be the maximum marker, where our position will be written higher and firmer than in other media with tinted ink.
I played additional 10 games.
Relatively a bad day because I won only 5.5-4.5.
Note that I take advantage of the fact that the machine is bluffing.
I mean that Leela make sometimes bad sacrifices so I do not believe lc0's sacrifices but calculate so there are cases when I think for a move more than 30 seconds(with 2 seconds increment it is not a risk that is too big).
I also play sacrifices that lose material but in my case they are for good reason to simplify.
Note that place in the standing does not measure ability unless the players played many games and 20 games are clearly not enough.
..Uri, you are now in place # 5 !!
**# 4!!
I am thinking chess is in a coin.Human beings for ever playing in one face.Now I am playing in the other face:"Antichess". Computers are as a fortres where owner forgot to close a little door behind. You must enter across this door.Forget the front.
Mistakes of lc0.
1)5.d4 that not only lose a pawn but also allow me to trade knights.
White get some initiative but basically I am not afraid of initiative and if I do not something specific I take material.
2)14.Bxc7 lose material
3)16.Nxf7 another move that lose material so I was happy to sacrifice my queen for a rook and even a blunder of me by 21...Nf4 did not prevent me winning easily.
Edit:I see finally that my rating improved based on the last 2 games to 1746.98 and place 14.
What did Thomas Alva Edison say when inventing the light bulb?
"There were not a thousand failed attempts, it was an invention of a thousand steps" … Man versus machine.!!
I am thinking chess is in a coin.Human beings for ever playing in one face.Now I am playing in the other face:"Antichess". Computers are as a fortres where owner forgot to close a little door behind. You must enter across this door.Forget the front.
What is the idea behind the blunder 27.Bxc6 bxc6 28.Rxe5+?
Does leela hope that I do not see Rxa5
Maybe it is the best practical chance but I usually do not blunder simple captures like that and I played Qa5 for a reason to defend e5 after trading the knight.
I am leading 16-9(today I won 10-7 that is worse than my score yesterday that was 6-2)
What is the idea behind the blunder 27.Bxc6 bxc6 28.Rxe5+?
Does leela hope that I do not see Rxa5
Maybe it is the best practical chance but I usually do not blunder simple captures like that and I played Qa5 for a reason to defend e5 after trading the knight.
I am leading 16-9(today I won 10-7 that is worse than my score yesterday that was 6-2)
It is a blunder in the sense that massive trading is a blunder when way behind. Most likely the net, being trained on knight odds games only, hasn't learned much about how to play when down by a queen. I expect that a net trained for queen odds will eventually appear in the bot and that should show another large jump in performance. One such net already exists but is not available for use or testing.
So now number 1 on the list is a player with a very high bullet rating, probably a master, number 2 is "father", number 3 is a famous Backgammon grandmaster (and a close personal friend of mine), and number 4 is Uri!
What is the idea behind the blunder 27.Bxc6 bxc6 28.Rxe5+?
Does leela hope that I do not see Rxa5
Maybe it is the best practical chance but I usually do not blunder simple captures like that and I played Qa5 for a reason to defend e5 after trading the knight.
I am leading 16-9(today I won 10-7 that is worse than my score yesterday that was 6-2)
It is a blunder in the sense that massive trading is a blunder when way behind. Most likely the net, being trained on knight odds games only, hasn't learned much about how to play when down by a queen. I expect that a net trained for queen odds will eventually appear in the bot and that should show another large jump in performance. One such net already exists but is not available for use or testing.
So now number 1 on the list is a player with a very high bullet rating, probably a master, number 2 is "father", number 3 is a famous Backgammon grandmaster (and a close personal friend of mine), and number 4 is Uri!
...Good morning Mr. Larry Kaufman. I have been observing the performance and behavior of LeelaQueenOdds and I have been able to verify that LeelaQueenOdds has already taken on its back even players with a Master title and an elo greater than 2800!! I have also been able to verify the construction of beautiful symphonies by the computer against strong players whom it defeats in the entire musical line. If the team that manages LeelaQueenOdds manages to make this machine jump higher than the racing obstacles, LeelaQueenOdds will begin to be a real candidate to achieve great achievements in important racing circuits. On the other hand, the competition between different machines will be fascinating in or after the search for the best "QueenOdds in the world" in the variables of Machine against machine and machine against man, and of course the search for the human world champion in confrontation between humans. Personally, I look forward to the participation and combat of Masters and players against LeelaQueenOdds in order to observe the positions in the table of the hundred best human players against LeelaQueenOdds. On the other hand, Lichess will be able to create hybrid tournaments, where "machine Odds" participate among humans, including my favorite cybernetic queen: "LeelaQueenOdds." Sincerely, Pablo Ignacio Restrepo
I am thinking chess is in a coin.Human beings for ever playing in one face.Now I am playing in the other face:"Antichess". Computers are as a fortres where owner forgot to close a little door behind. You must enter across this door.Forget the front.
What is the idea behind the blunder 27.Bxc6 bxc6 28.Rxe5+?
Does leela hope that I do not see Rxa5
Maybe it is the best practical chance but I usually do not blunder simple captures like that and I played Qa5 for a reason to defend e5 after trading the knight.
I am leading 16-9(today I won 10-7 that is worse than my score yesterday that was 6-2)
It is a blunder in the sense that massive trading is a blunder when way behind. Most likely the net, being trained on knight odds games only, hasn't learned much about how to play when down by a queen. I expect that a net trained for queen odds will eventually appear in the bot and that should show another large jump in performance. One such net already exists but is not available for use or testing.
So now number 1 on the list is a player with a very high bullet rating, probably a master, number 2 is "father", number 3 is a famous Backgammon grandmaster (and a close personal friend of mine), and number 4 is Uri!
In summary: "We are facing a great challenge regarding the expectations about where the evolutionary journey of the great LeelaQueenOdds and the human opponents, in "Man Against Machine", open tournament aspects, and other alternatives of battlefields.
I am thinking chess is in a coin.Human beings for ever playing in one face.Now I am playing in the other face:"Antichess". Computers are as a fortres where owner forgot to close a little door behind. You must enter across this door.Forget the front.
What is the idea behind the blunder 27.Bxc6 bxc6 28.Rxe5+?
Does leela hope that I do not see Rxa5
Maybe it is the best practical chance but I usually do not blunder simple captures like that and I played Qa5 for a reason to defend e5 after trading the knight.
I am leading 16-9(today I won 10-7 that is worse than my score yesterday that was 6-2)
It is a blunder in the sense that massive trading is a blunder when way behind. Most likely the net, being trained on knight odds games only, hasn't learned much about how to play when down by a queen. I expect that a net trained for queen odds will eventually appear in the bot and that should show another large jump in performance. One such net already exists but is not available for use or testing.
So now number 1 on the list is a player with a very high bullet rating, probably a master, number 2 is "father", number 3 is a famous Backgammon grandmaster (and a close personal friend of mine), and number 4 is Uri!
In summary: "We are facing a great challenge regarding the expectations about where the evolutionary journey of the great LeelaQueenOdds and the human opponents, in "Man Against Machine", open tournament aspects, and other alternatives of battlefields.
LeelaQueenOdds versus a player superior to 2600 elo, some months ago, when LeelaQueenOdds was wirh minus power than Newdays …
I am thinking chess is in a coin.Human beings for ever playing in one face.Now I am playing in the other face:"Antichess". Computers are as a fortres where owner forgot to close a little door behind. You must enter across this door.Forget the front.
What is the idea behind the blunder 27.Bxc6 bxc6 28.Rxe5+?
Does leela hope that I do not see Rxa5
Maybe it is the best practical chance but I usually do not blunder simple captures like that and I played Qa5 for a reason to defend e5 after trading the knight.
I am leading 16-9(today I won 10-7 that is worse than my score yesterday that was 6-2)
It is a blunder in the sense that massive trading is a blunder when way behind. Most likely the net, being trained on knight odds games only, hasn't learned much about how to play when down by a queen. I expect that a net trained for queen odds will eventually appear in the bot and that should show another large jump in performance. One such net already exists but is not available for use or testing.
So now number 1 on the list is a player with a very high bullet rating, probably a master, number 2 is "father", number 3 is a famous Backgammon grandmaster (and a close personal friend of mine), and number 4 is Uri!
In summary: "We are facing a great challenge regarding the expectations about where the evolutionary journey of the great LeelaQueenOdds and the human opponents, in "Man Against Machine", open tournament aspects, and other alternatives of battlefields.
LeelaQueenOdds versus a player superior to 2600 elo, some months ago, when LeelaQueenOdds was wirh minus power than Newdays …
It has indeed won some bullet games against players rated above 2600, even 2700, while in blitz it has won against at most 2503 rating. I find that it is too easy for me to win against it at 3'2" (that's about the fastest I can play decently), but that probably won't be true once it gets upgraded to a net trained specifically for queen odds, which may happen this month. Meanwhile the knight odds bot has done amazing things, playing 190 games at 1' + 1" against a player rated over 3100 without a single loss (!!), just 26 draws.
What is the idea behind the blunder 27.Bxc6 bxc6 28.Rxe5+?
Does leela hope that I do not see Rxa5
Maybe it is the best practical chance but I usually do not blunder simple captures like that and I played Qa5 for a reason to defend e5 after trading the knight.
I am leading 16-9(today I won 10-7 that is worse than my score yesterday that was 6-2)
It is a blunder in the sense that massive trading is a blunder when way behind. Most likely the net, being trained on knight odds games only, hasn't learned much about how to play when down by a queen. I expect that a net trained for queen odds will eventually appear in the bot and that should show another large jump in performance. One such net already exists but is not available for use or testing.
So now number 1 on the list is a player with a very high bullet rating, probably a master, number 2 is "father", number 3 is a famous Backgammon grandmaster (and a close personal friend of mine), and number 4 is Uri!
In summary: "We are facing a great challenge regarding the expectations about where the evolutionary journey of the great LeelaQueenOdds and the human opponents, in "Man Against Machine", open tournament aspects, and other alternatives of battlefields.
LeelaQueenOdds versus a player superior to 2600 elo, some months ago, when LeelaQueenOdds was wirh minus power than Newdays …
It has indeed won some bullet games against players rated above 2600, even 2700, while in blitz it has won against at most 2503 rating. I find that it is too easy for me to win against it at 3'2" (that's about the fastest I can play decently), but that probably won't be true once it gets upgraded to a net trained specifically for queen odds, which may happen this month. Meanwhile the knight odds bot has done amazing things, playing 190 games at 1' + 1" against a player rated over 3100 without a single loss (!!), just 26 draws.
...these are two great news for everyone, Mr. Larry Kaufman. Thank you for allowing us to enter the combat of men against machines. In this way, now I will fight to occupy a position among the hundred best players who face LeelaKnightOdds. Of course that does not mean in any way that I am going to abandon the fight against modules in their "standard forms." I wonder: There is already a list, Mr. Larry Kaufman, that informs us about the Top 100 human contenders of LeelaKnight. If this list exists, I will fight to be part of it. !! My current priorities in chess warfare objectives are called: "Oddsmachines."
I am thinking chess is in a coin.Human beings for ever playing in one face.Now I am playing in the other face:"Antichess". Computers are as a fortres where owner forgot to close a little door behind. You must enter across this door.Forget the front.
a player superior to 2600 elo, some months ago, when LeelaQueenOdds was wirh minus power than Newdays …