Amazing results of LeelaKnightOdds-Dev

[Father]

LeelaQueenOdds as white 5+3 (Reference) 2291.4
1 Master_Unknown 2266.6 38
LeelaQueenOdds as black 5+3 (Reference) 2241.4
2 Omnivor 2223.6 22
3 nn1133 2223.3 6167
LeelaQueenOdds as white 10+5 (Reference) 2210.9
4 Ajktulm 2197.7 181
5 uriblass 2180.9 134
LeelaQueenOdds as black 10+5 (Reference) 2160.9
LeelaQueenOdds as white 15+10 (Reference) 2155.2
6 Catecan 2123.0 272
7 Brunetticus 2110.3 404
LeelaQueenOdds as black 15+10 (Reference) 2105.2
8 Orichess88 2093.8 19
9 Respectful_Dave 2050.2 51
10 Hissha 2047.1 54
11 KentGoulding 2011.9 256
12 TheLlamaLord 2010.3 22

It seems that the rating of LeelaQueenOdds changed and the result is also changes in the rating of the players like Orichess88 without changing the number of games(I do not understand why my rating improved to 2217.1 with only one additional game relative to previous list.

My performance is certainly not 100 elo better than the last rating of LeelaQueenOdds as white

1 Master_Unknown 2448.3 38
2 Omnivor 2349.5 25
LeelaQueenOdds as black 3+2 (Reference) 2349.4
LeelaQueenOdds as white 5+3 (Reference) 2316.4(earlier 2291.4)
3 Orichess88 2263.8 19
4 Respectful_Dave 2248.6 62
5 Ajktulm 2228.1 195
6 uriblass 2217.1 135
LeelaQueenOdds as black 5+3 (Reference) 2216.4(earlier 2241.4)
7 Brunetticus 2202.5 421
8 TheLlamaLord 2194.6 22
9 nn1133 2175.4 6167
10 Jagen 2115.2 55
11 Catecan 2113.8 272
LeelaQueenOdds as white 10+5 (Reference) 2110.2(earlier 2210.9)
12 Forgive1219 2098.9 64
13 Punypawn315 2079.5 19
14 jzm 2047.6 15
15 Hissha 2047.1 54
16 KentGoulding 2026.0 258
LeelaQueenOdds as black 10+5 (Reference) 2010.2(earlier 2160.9)
17 susiedent 2003.1 14
18 desperado64 1990.1 41
19 SilverMitt 1975.5 13
20 SerbianPigeon 1971.9 17
21 junglegame 1958.3 9
22 OjaiJoao 1949.7 4
LeelaQueenOdds as white 15+10 (Reference) 1948.2(earlier 2155.2)
LeelaQueenOdds as black 15+10 (Reference) 1848.2(earlier 2105.2)

There was a bug, thanks for reporting!

Marcus91. My time checks on my references have been 3-0. Are they okay? Thank you faith in advance.

[Father]

LeelaQueenOdds as white 5+3 (Reference) 2291.4
1 Master_Unknown 2266.6 38
LeelaQueenOdds as black 5+3 (Reference) 2241.4
2 Omnivor 2223.6 22
3 nn1133 2223.3 6167
LeelaQueenOdds as white 10+5 (Reference) 2210.9
4 Ajktulm 2197.7 181
5 uriblass 2180.9 134
LeelaQueenOdds as black 10+5 (Reference) 2160.9
LeelaQueenOdds as white 15+10 (Reference) 2155.2
6 Catecan 2123.0 272
7 Brunetticus 2110.3 404
LeelaQueenOdds as black 15+10 (Reference) 2105.2
8 Orichess88 2093.8 19
9 Respectful_Dave 2050.2 51
10 Hissha 2047.1 54
11 KentGoulding 2011.9 256
12 TheLlamaLord 2010.3 22

It seems that the rating of LeelaQueenOdds changed and the result is also changes in the rating of the players like Orichess88 without changing the number of games(I do not understand why my rating improved to 2217.1 with only one additional game relative to previous list.

My performance is certainly not 100 elo better than the last rating of LeelaQueenOdds as white

1 Master_Unknown 2448.3 38
2 Omnivor 2349.5 25
LeelaQueenOdds as black 3+2 (Reference) 2349.4
LeelaQueenOdds as white 5+3 (Reference) 2316.4(earlier 2291.4)
3 Orichess88 2263.8 19
4 Respectful_Dave 2248.6 62
5 Ajktulm 2228.1 195
6 uriblass 2217.1 135
LeelaQueenOdds as black 5+3 (Reference) 2216.4(earlier 2241.4)
7 Brunetticus 2202.5 421
8 TheLlamaLord 2194.6 22
9 nn1133 2175.4 6167
10 Jagen 2115.2 55
11 Catecan 2113.8 272
LeelaQueenOdds as white 10+5 (Reference) 2110.2(earlier 2210.9)
12 Forgive1219 2098.9 64
13 Punypawn315 2079.5 19
14 jzm 2047.6 15
15 Hissha 2047.1 54
16 KentGoulding 2026.0 258
LeelaQueenOdds as black 10+5 (Reference) 2010.2(earlier 2160.9)
17 susiedent 2003.1 14
18 desperado64 1990.1 41
19 SilverMitt 1975.5 13
20 SerbianPigeon 1971.9 17
21 junglegame 1958.3 9
22 OjaiJoao 1949.7 4
LeelaQueenOdds as white 15+10 (Reference) 1948.2(earlier 2155.2)
LeelaQueenOdds as black 15+10 (Reference) 1848.2(earlier 2105.2)

There was a bug, thanks for reporting!

Marcus91. My time checks on my references have been 3-0. Are they okay? Thank you faith in advance.

Father 143
LeelaQueenOdds 129
All ganes 3-0

[Father]

LeelaQueenOdds as white 5+3 (Reference) 2291.4
1 Master_Unknown 2266.6 38
LeelaQueenOdds as black 5+3 (Reference) 2241.4
2 Omnivor 2223.6 22
3 nn1133 2223.3 6167
LeelaQueenOdds as white 10+5 (Reference) 2210.9
4 Ajktulm 2197.7 181
5 uriblass 2180.9 134
LeelaQueenOdds as black 10+5 (Reference) 2160.9
LeelaQueenOdds as white 15+10 (Reference) 2155.2
6 Catecan 2123.0 272
7 Brunetticus 2110.3 404
LeelaQueenOdds as black 15+10 (Reference) 2105.2
8 Orichess88 2093.8 19
9 Respectful_Dave 2050.2 51
10 Hissha 2047.1 54
11 KentGoulding 2011.9 256
12 TheLlamaLord 2010.3 22

It seems that the rating of LeelaQueenOdds changed and the result is also changes in the rating of the players like Orichess88 without changing the number of games(I do not understand why my rating improved to 2217.1 with only one additional game relative to previous list.

My performance is certainly not 100 elo better than the last rating of LeelaQueenOdds as white

1 Master_Unknown 2448.3 38
2 Omnivor 2349.5 25
LeelaQueenOdds as black 3+2 (Reference) 2349.4
LeelaQueenOdds as white 5+3 (Reference) 2316.4(earlier 2291.4)
3 Orichess88 2263.8 19
4 Respectful_Dave 2248.6 62
5 Ajktulm 2228.1 195
6 uriblass 2217.1 135
LeelaQueenOdds as black 5+3 (Reference) 2216.4(earlier 2241.4)
7 Brunetticus 2202.5 421
8 TheLlamaLord 2194.6 22
9 nn1133 2175.4 6167
10 Jagen 2115.2 55
11 Catecan 2113.8 272
LeelaQueenOdds as white 10+5 (Reference) 2110.2(earlier 2210.9)
12 Forgive1219 2098.9 64
13 Punypawn315 2079.5 19
14 jzm 2047.6 15
15 Hissha 2047.1 54
16 KentGoulding 2026.0 258
LeelaQueenOdds as black 10+5 (Reference) 2010.2(earlier 2160.9)
17 susiedent 2003.1 14
18 desperado64 1990.1 41
19 SilverMitt 1975.5 13
20 SerbianPigeon 1971.9 17
21 junglegame 1958.3 9
22 OjaiJoao 1949.7 4
LeelaQueenOdds as white 15+10 (Reference) 1948.2(earlier 2155.2)
LeelaQueenOdds as black 15+10 (Reference) 1848.2(earlier 2105.2)

There was a bug, thanks for reporting!

Marcus91. My time checks on my references have been 3-0. Are they okay? Thank you faith in advance.

Father 143
LeelaQueenOdds 129
All ganes 3-0

Catecan

[lkaufman]

LeelaQueenOdds as white 5+3 (Reference) 2291.4
1 Master_Unknown 2266.6 38
LeelaQueenOdds as black 5+3 (Reference) 2241.4
2 Omnivor 2223.6 22
3 nn1133 2223.3 6167
LeelaQueenOdds as white 10+5 (Reference) 2210.9
4 Ajktulm 2197.7 181
5 uriblass 2180.9 134
LeelaQueenOdds as black 10+5 (Reference) 2160.9
LeelaQueenOdds as white 15+10 (Reference) 2155.2
6 Catecan 2123.0 272
7 Brunetticus 2110.3 404
LeelaQueenOdds as black 15+10 (Reference) 2105.2
8 Orichess88 2093.8 19
9 Respectful_Dave 2050.2 51
10 Hissha 2047.1 54
11 KentGoulding 2011.9 256
12 TheLlamaLord 2010.3 22

It seems that the rating of LeelaQueenOdds changed and the result is also changes in the rating of the players like Orichess88 without changing the number of games(I do not understand why my rating improved to 2217.1 with only one additional game relative to previous list.

My performance is certainly not 100 elo better than the last rating of LeelaQueenOdds as white

1 Master_Unknown 2448.3 38
2 Omnivor 2349.5 25
LeelaQueenOdds as black 3+2 (Reference) 2349.4
LeelaQueenOdds as white 5+3 (Reference) 2316.4(earlier 2291.4)
3 Orichess88 2263.8 19
4 Respectful_Dave 2248.6 62
5 Ajktulm 2228.1 195
6 uriblass 2217.1 135
LeelaQueenOdds as black 5+3 (Reference) 2216.4(earlier 2241.4)
7 Brunetticus 2202.5 421
8 TheLlamaLord 2194.6 22
9 nn1133 2175.4 6167
10 Jagen 2115.2 55
11 Catecan 2113.8 272
LeelaQueenOdds as white 10+5 (Reference) 2110.2(earlier 2210.9)
12 Forgive1219 2098.9 64
13 Punypawn315 2079.5 19
14 jzm 2047.6 15
15 Hissha 2047.1 54
16 KentGoulding 2026.0 258
LeelaQueenOdds as black 10+5 (Reference) 2010.2(earlier 2160.9)
17 susiedent 2003.1 14
18 desperado64 1990.1 41
19 SilverMitt 1975.5 13
20 SerbianPigeon 1971.9 17
21 junglegame 1958.3 9
22 OjaiJoao 1949.7 4
LeelaQueenOdds as white 15+10 (Reference) 1948.2(earlier 2155.2)
LeelaQueenOdds as black 15+10 (Reference) 1848.2(earlier 2105.2)

There was a bug, thanks for reporting!

Marcus91. My time checks on my references have been 3-0. Are they okay? Thank you faith in advance.

Father 143
LeelaQueenOdds 129
All ganes 3-0

Catecan

The changes and the bug, now fixed, only affected games played since the Nov. 12 upgrade to using the queen odds net, so it didn't change ratings based on games before the upgrade. It should be correct now, and the ratings for players with over 100 games look quite reasonable now to me. It is probably a bit strict now, except perhaps for Rapid games, which is sensible since players may learn how to
score better so it's good to allow a bit for this.

[Father]

LeelaQueenOdds as white 5+3 (Reference) 2291.4
1 Master_Unknown 2266.6 38
LeelaQueenOdds as black 5+3 (Reference) 2241.4
2 Omnivor 2223.6 22
3 nn1133 2223.3 6167
LeelaQueenOdds as white 10+5 (Reference) 2210.9
4 Ajktulm 2197.7 181
5 uriblass 2180.9 134
LeelaQueenOdds as black 10+5 (Reference) 2160.9
LeelaQueenOdds as white 15+10 (Reference) 2155.2
6 Catecan 2123.0 272
7 Brunetticus 2110.3 404
LeelaQueenOdds as black 15+10 (Reference) 2105.2
8 Orichess88 2093.8 19
9 Respectful_Dave 2050.2 51
10 Hissha 2047.1 54
11 KentGoulding 2011.9 256
12 TheLlamaLord 2010.3 22

It seems that the rating of LeelaQueenOdds changed and the result is also changes in the rating of the players like Orichess88 without changing the number of games(I do not understand why my rating improved to 2217.1 with only one additional game relative to previous list.

My performance is certainly not 100 elo better than the last rating of LeelaQueenOdds as white

1 Master_Unknown 2448.3 38
2 Omnivor 2349.5 25
LeelaQueenOdds as black 3+2 (Reference) 2349.4
LeelaQueenOdds as white 5+3 (Reference) 2316.4(earlier 2291.4)
3 Orichess88 2263.8 19
4 Respectful_Dave 2248.6 62
5 Ajktulm 2228.1 195
6 uriblass 2217.1 135
LeelaQueenOdds as black 5+3 (Reference) 2216.4(earlier 2241.4)
7 Brunetticus 2202.5 421
8 TheLlamaLord 2194.6 22
9 nn1133 2175.4 6167
10 Jagen 2115.2 55
11 Catecan 2113.8 272
LeelaQueenOdds as white 10+5 (Reference) 2110.2(earlier 2210.9)
12 Forgive1219 2098.9 64
13 Punypawn315 2079.5 19
14 jzm 2047.6 15
15 Hissha 2047.1 54
16 KentGoulding 2026.0 258
LeelaQueenOdds as black 10+5 (Reference) 2010.2(earlier 2160.9)
17 susiedent 2003.1 14
18 desperado64 1990.1 41
19 SilverMitt 1975.5 13
20 SerbianPigeon 1971.9 17
21 junglegame 1958.3 9
22 OjaiJoao 1949.7 4
LeelaQueenOdds as white 15+10 (Reference) 1948.2(earlier 2155.2)
LeelaQueenOdds as black 15+10 (Reference) 1848.2(earlier 2105.2)

There was a bug, thanks for reporting!

Marcus91. My time checks on my references have been 3-0. Are they okay? Thank you faith in advance.

Father 143
LeelaQueenOdds 129
All ganes 3-0

Catecan

The changes and the bug, now fixed, only affected games played since the Nov. 12 upgrade to using the queen odds net, so it didn't change ratings based on games before the upgrade. It should be correct now, and the ratings for players with over 100 games look quite reasonable now to me. It is probably a bit strict now, except perhaps for Rapid games, which is sensible since players may learn how to
score better so it's good to allow a bit for this.

… Should I start playing again? If I start, for example, 3-0, how many games do I play?

[lkaufman]

LeelaQueenOdds as white 5+3 (Reference) 2291.4
1 Master_Unknown 2266.6 38
LeelaQueenOdds as black 5+3 (Reference) 2241.4
2 Omnivor 2223.6 22
3 nn1133 2223.3 6167
LeelaQueenOdds as white 10+5 (Reference) 2210.9
4 Ajktulm 2197.7 181
5 uriblass 2180.9 134
LeelaQueenOdds as black 10+5 (Reference) 2160.9
LeelaQueenOdds as white 15+10 (Reference) 2155.2
6 Catecan 2123.0 272
7 Brunetticus 2110.3 404
LeelaQueenOdds as black 15+10 (Reference) 2105.2
8 Orichess88 2093.8 19
9 Respectful_Dave 2050.2 51
10 Hissha 2047.1 54
11 KentGoulding 2011.9 256
12 TheLlamaLord 2010.3 22

It seems that the rating of LeelaQueenOdds changed and the result is also changes in the rating of the players like Orichess88 without changing the number of games(I do not understand why my rating improved to 2217.1 with only one additional game relative to previous list.

My performance is certainly not 100 elo better than the last rating of LeelaQueenOdds as white

1 Master_Unknown 2448.3 38
2 Omnivor 2349.5 25
LeelaQueenOdds as black 3+2 (Reference) 2349.4
LeelaQueenOdds as white 5+3 (Reference) 2316.4(earlier 2291.4)
3 Orichess88 2263.8 19
4 Respectful_Dave 2248.6 62
5 Ajktulm 2228.1 195
6 uriblass 2217.1 135
LeelaQueenOdds as black 5+3 (Reference) 2216.4(earlier 2241.4)
7 Brunetticus 2202.5 421
8 TheLlamaLord 2194.6 22
9 nn1133 2175.4 6167
10 Jagen 2115.2 55
11 Catecan 2113.8 272
LeelaQueenOdds as white 10+5 (Reference) 2110.2(earlier 2210.9)
12 Forgive1219 2098.9 64
13 Punypawn315 2079.5 19
14 jzm 2047.6 15
15 Hissha 2047.1 54
16 KentGoulding 2026.0 258
LeelaQueenOdds as black 10+5 (Reference) 2010.2(earlier 2160.9)
17 susiedent 2003.1 14
18 desperado64 1990.1 41
19 SilverMitt 1975.5 13
20 SerbianPigeon 1971.9 17
21 junglegame 1958.3 9
22 OjaiJoao 1949.7 4
LeelaQueenOdds as white 15+10 (Reference) 1948.2(earlier 2155.2)
LeelaQueenOdds as black 15+10 (Reference) 1848.2(earlier 2105.2)

There was a bug, thanks for reporting!

Marcus91. My time checks on my references have been 3-0. Are they okay? Thank you faith in advance.

Father 143
LeelaQueenOdds 129
All ganes 3-0

Catecan

The changes and the bug, now fixed, only affected games played since the Nov. 12 upgrade to using the queen odds net, so it didn't change ratings based on games before the upgrade. It should be correct now, and the ratings for players with over 100 games look quite reasonable now to me. It is probably a bit strict now, except perhaps for Rapid games, which is sensible since players may learn how to
score better so it's good to allow a bit for this.

… Should I start playing again? If I start, for example, 3-0, how many games do I play?

Sure, you can play as many as you like. With your rating established and with the bot rated 2628 playing White and 2528 playing Black at 3+0, you only need to make an occasional draw to hold your rating. If you want to actually win games you'll probably have to play Rapid rather than blitz.
I want to make special mention of the queen for knight bot, because "Respectful_Dave", the streamer with the 2802 bullet rating who played so many games with LeelaQueenOdds, has been playing it at 1'1", with the unbelievable score of 100 wins for LeelaQueenForKnight, ONE win for Dave, and two draws!!! This is a 3483 performance rating at bullet WITH INCREMENT, way above all human ratings, even Magnus or Hikaru, giving a "Six point" material handicap by traditional count. This has to be the most amazing result in all of chess history, something unimaginable even a year ago.

[Father]

LeelaQueenOdds as white 5+3 (Reference) 2291.4
1 Master_Unknown 2266.6 38
LeelaQueenOdds as black 5+3 (Reference) 2241.4
2 Omnivor 2223.6 22
3 nn1133 2223.3 6167
LeelaQueenOdds as white 10+5 (Reference) 2210.9
4 Ajktulm 2197.7 181
5 uriblass 2180.9 134
LeelaQueenOdds as black 10+5 (Reference) 2160.9
LeelaQueenOdds as white 15+10 (Reference) 2155.2
6 Catecan 2123.0 272
7 Brunetticus 2110.3 404
LeelaQueenOdds as black 15+10 (Reference) 2105.2
8 Orichess88 2093.8 19
9 Respectful_Dave 2050.2 51
10 Hissha 2047.1 54
11 KentGoulding 2011.9 256
12 TheLlamaLord 2010.3 22

It seems that the rating of LeelaQueenOdds changed and the result is also changes in the rating of the players like Orichess88 without changing the number of games(I do not understand why my rating improved to 2217.1 with only one additional game relative to previous list.

My performance is certainly not 100 elo better than the last rating of LeelaQueenOdds as white

1 Master_Unknown 2448.3 38
2 Omnivor 2349.5 25
LeelaQueenOdds as black 3+2 (Reference) 2349.4
LeelaQueenOdds as white 5+3 (Reference) 2316.4(earlier 2291.4)
3 Orichess88 2263.8 19
4 Respectful_Dave 2248.6 62
5 Ajktulm 2228.1 195
6 uriblass 2217.1 135
LeelaQueenOdds as black 5+3 (Reference) 2216.4(earlier 2241.4)
7 Brunetticus 2202.5 421
8 TheLlamaLord 2194.6 22
9 nn1133 2175.4 6167
10 Jagen 2115.2 55
11 Catecan 2113.8 272
LeelaQueenOdds as white 10+5 (Reference) 2110.2(earlier 2210.9)
12 Forgive1219 2098.9 64
13 Punypawn315 2079.5 19
14 jzm 2047.6 15
15 Hissha 2047.1 54
16 KentGoulding 2026.0 258
LeelaQueenOdds as black 10+5 (Reference) 2010.2(earlier 2160.9)
17 susiedent 2003.1 14
18 desperado64 1990.1 41
19 SilverMitt 1975.5 13
20 SerbianPigeon 1971.9 17
21 junglegame 1958.3 9
22 OjaiJoao 1949.7 4
LeelaQueenOdds as white 15+10 (Reference) 1948.2(earlier 2155.2)
LeelaQueenOdds as black 15+10 (Reference) 1848.2(earlier 2105.2)

There was a bug, thanks for reporting!

Marcus91. My time checks on my references have been 3-0. Are they okay? Thank you faith in advance.

Father 143
LeelaQueenOdds 129
All ganes 3-0

Catecan

The changes and the bug, now fixed, only affected games played since the Nov. 12 upgrade to using the queen odds net, so it didn't change ratings based on games before the upgrade. It should be correct now, and the ratings for players with over 100 games look quite reasonable now to me. It is probably a bit strict now, except perhaps for Rapid games, which is sensible since players may learn how to
score better so it's good to allow a bit for this.

… Should I start playing again? If I start, for example, 3-0, how many games do I play?

Sure, you can play as many as you like. With your rating established and with the bot rated 2628 playing White and 2528 playing Black at 3+0, you only need to make an occasional draw to hold your rating. If you want to actually win games you'll probably have to play Rapid rather than blitz.
I want to make special mention of the queen for knight bot, because "Respectful_Dave", the streamer with the 2802 bullet rating who played so many games with LeelaQueenOdds, has been playing it at 1'1", with the unbelievable score of 100 wins for LeelaQueenForKnight, ONE win for Dave, and two draws!!! This is a 3483 performance rating at bullet WITH INCREMENT, way above all human ratings, even Magnus or Hikaru, giving a "Six point" material handicap by traditional count. This has to be the most amazing result in all of chess history, something unimaginable even a year ago.

Congratulations Mr. Larry Kaufman on the Odds LeelaQueenOdds and LeelaKnightOdds. To the entire human team that has achieved this technological development, in my capacity as a "chess computer street fighter" I offer a sincere thank you. I extend my gratitude to all the people who have given us the shield and the protective sword of machine chess, which represent a true survival medicine that is very useful to humans at all stages of our lives. When in a recent post I referred to repairs to my hardware, I was referring to my health problems. I would like to return to the "street ring after searching for a place to occupy in the top 100" but it is not possible on this moment. So if my beloved Programmer from Heaven wants to restore my strength with His help, here I will be again. I will face LeelaKnightOdds 100 times at 1+1 and LeelaQueenOdds 100 times at 3-0 and LeelaQueenOdds 100 times at 1+1 and 100 in 1.
If my programmer owns the
Life and death still have me for the fight, I express to Mr. Larry Kaufman and the Leela team, that they can count on me, with my arms, with my blows, and with my steps. And don't forget: LeelaQueenOdds has the potential to be a Super GM. and this, very soon. I look forward to the Greats Magnus Carlsen and Nakamura in and in the fight of the "Street ring." To all the Masters and high-ranking players who have dared to be gladiators of the Roman Circus of the Odds. "Thank you with all my heart" and to the other young players in the elos who enter the battle, I want to say: Thank you for your courage and greatness that the battle gives you.
Sincerely,
Cacatecan - Father- Grand-Father—Pablo
(In memory of my Parents)

[Father]

LeelaQueenOdds as white 5+3 (Reference) 2291.4
1 Master_Unknown 2266.6 38
LeelaQueenOdds as black 5+3 (Reference) 2241.4
2 Omnivor 2223.6 22
3 nn1133 2223.3 6167
LeelaQueenOdds as white 10+5 (Reference) 2210.9
4 Ajktulm 2197.7 181
5 uriblass 2180.9 134
LeelaQueenOdds as black 10+5 (Reference) 2160.9
LeelaQueenOdds as white 15+10 (Reference) 2155.2
6 Catecan 2123.0 272
7 Brunetticus 2110.3 404
LeelaQueenOdds as black 15+10 (Reference) 2105.2
8 Orichess88 2093.8 19
9 Respectful_Dave 2050.2 51
10 Hissha 2047.1 54
11 KentGoulding 2011.9 256
12 TheLlamaLord 2010.3 22

It seems that the rating of LeelaQueenOdds changed and the result is also changes in the rating of the players like Orichess88 without changing the number of games(I do not understand why my rating improved to 2217.1 with only one additional game relative to previous list.

My performance is certainly not 100 elo better than the last rating of LeelaQueenOdds as white

1 Master_Unknown 2448.3 38
2 Omnivor 2349.5 25
LeelaQueenOdds as black 3+2 (Reference) 2349.4
LeelaQueenOdds as white 5+3 (Reference) 2316.4(earlier 2291.4)
3 Orichess88 2263.8 19
4 Respectful_Dave 2248.6 62
5 Ajktulm 2228.1 195
6 uriblass 2217.1 135
LeelaQueenOdds as black 5+3 (Reference) 2216.4(earlier 2241.4)
7 Brunetticus 2202.5 421
8 TheLlamaLord 2194.6 22
9 nn1133 2175.4 6167
10 Jagen 2115.2 55
11 Catecan 2113.8 272
LeelaQueenOdds as white 10+5 (Reference) 2110.2(earlier 2210.9)
12 Forgive1219 2098.9 64
13 Punypawn315 2079.5 19
14 jzm 2047.6 15
15 Hissha 2047.1 54
16 KentGoulding 2026.0 258
LeelaQueenOdds as black 10+5 (Reference) 2010.2(earlier 2160.9)
17 susiedent 2003.1 14
18 desperado64 1990.1 41
19 SilverMitt 1975.5 13
20 SerbianPigeon 1971.9 17
21 junglegame 1958.3 9
22 OjaiJoao 1949.7 4
LeelaQueenOdds as white 15+10 (Reference) 1948.2(earlier 2155.2)
LeelaQueenOdds as black 15+10 (Reference) 1848.2(earlier 2105.2)

There was a bug, thanks for reporting!

Marcus91. My time checks on my references have been 3-0. Are they okay? Thank you faith in advance.

Father 143
LeelaQueenOdds 129
All ganes 3-0

Catecan

The changes and the bug, now fixed, only affected games played since the Nov. 12 upgrade to using the queen odds net, so it didn't change ratings based on games before the upgrade. It should be correct now, and the ratings for players with over 100 games look quite reasonable now to me. It is probably a bit strict now, except perhaps for Rapid games, which is sensible since players may learn how to
score better so it's good to allow a bit for this.

… Should I start playing again? If I start, for example, 3-0, how many games do I play?

Sure, you can play as many as you like. With your rating established and with the bot rated 2628 playing White and 2528 playing Black at 3+0, you only need to make an occasional draw to hold your rating. If you want to actually win games you'll probably have to play Rapid rather than blitz.
I want to make special mention of the queen for knight bot, because "Respectful_Dave", the streamer with the 2802 bullet rating who played so many games with LeelaQueenOdds, has been playing it at 1'1", with the unbelievable score of 100 wins for LeelaQueenForKnight, ONE win for Dave, and two draws!!! This is a 3483 performance rating at bullet WITH INCREMENT, way above all human ratings, even Magnus or Hikaru, giving a "Six point" material handicap by traditional count. This has to be the most amazing result in all of chess history, something unimaginable even a year ago.

Congratulations Mr. Larry Kaufman on the Odds LeelaQueenOdds and LeelaKnightOdds. To the entire human team that has achieved this technological development, in my capacity as a "chess computer street fighter" I offer a sincere thank you. I extend my gratitude to all the people who have given us the shield and the protective sword of machine chess, which represent a true survival medicine that is very useful to humans at all stages of our lives. When in a recent post I referred to repairs to my hardware, I was referring to my health problems. I would like to return to the "street ring after searching for a place to occupy in the top 100" but it is not possible on this moment. So if my beloved Programmer from Heaven wants to restore my strength with His help, here I will be again. I will face LeelaKnightOdds 100 times at 1+1 and LeelaQueenOdds 100 times at 3-0 and LeelaQueenOdds 100 times at 1+1 and 100 in 1.
If my programmer owns the
Life and death still have me for the fight, I express to Mr. Larry Kaufman and the Leela team, that they can count on me, with my arms, with my blows, and with my steps. And don't forget: LeelaQueenOdds has the potential to be a Super GM. and this, very soon. I look forward to the Greats Magnus Carlsen and Nakamura in and in the fight of the "Street ring." To all the Masters and high-ranking players who have dared to be gladiators of the Roman Circus of the Odds. "Thank you with all my heart" and to the other young players in the elos who enter the battle, I want to say: Thank you for your courage and greatness that the battle gives you.
Sincerely,
Cacatecan - Father- Grand-Father—Pablo
(In memory of my Parents)

** Catecan.

[Marcus91]

The leaderboard has been updated once again; I'm always looking for better models

[Father]

The leaderboard has been updated once again; I'm always looking for better models

Good morning Mr. Larry Kaufman and Marcus91. I hope you are well and continue well. Today is a new day, and the strength of love for the memory of my deceased Parents gave me the strength to go out to the street ring to fight against LeelaQueenForKnight. I played 15 time control games, all of them with black chips in 1.1 and my result is: A draw for me as a human, 15 losses. The machine beat me 14.5 to 0.5. The love for my Parents overcomes my pain. Machines will always be my target.