He has asked me to post a link to his latest effort plus the source code:
https://github.com/ehsanrashid/DON/tree/main
He is hoping that some will try it out and post the results here.
Ehsan Rashid and the DON engine (SF based)
Moderator: Ras
-
- Posts: 43213
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
- Location: Auckland, NZ
Ehsan Rashid and the DON engine (SF based)
gbanksnz at gmail.com
-
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2013 8:40 pm
- Full name: Ehsan Rashid
Re: Ehsan Rashid and the DON engine (SF based)
here is the link to exe. "DON 4.5 x64 BMI2"
-
- Posts: 123
- Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2021 3:56 pm
- Location: Bucharest, Romania
- Full name: Metehau Luca
Re: Ehsan Rashid and the DON engine (SF based)
What's the differences between this and SF? As far as I've looked there aren't any. Also pretty funny how in the README, DON replaced Stockfish.
-
- Posts: 3662
- Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2012 11:02 pm
Re: Ehsan Rashid and the DON engine (SF based)
Has he not "tried it out" himself already ?Graham Banks wrote: ↑Fri Dec 27, 2024 8:21 am
He is hoping that some will try it out and post the results here.
-
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2013 8:40 pm
- Full name: Ehsan Rashid
Re: Ehsan Rashid and the DON engine (SF based)
Modern Times wrote: ↑Fri Dec 27, 2024 10:03 amHas he not "tried it out" himself already ?Graham Banks wrote: ↑Fri Dec 27, 2024 8:21 am
He is hoping that some will try it out and post the results here.
Yes I have tested .. and get good results
-
- Posts: 43213
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
- Location: Auckland, NZ
Re: Ehsan Rashid and the DON engine (SF based)
No idea. I just passed on Ehsan's message.lucametehau wrote: ↑Fri Dec 27, 2024 9:41 am What's the differences between this and SF? As far as I've looked there aren't any. Also pretty funny how in the README, DON replaced Stockfish.
gbanksnz at gmail.com
-
- Posts: 1936
- Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2016 6:08 am
- Location: U.S.A
- Full name: Andrew Grant
Re: Ehsan Rashid and the DON engine (SF based)
Unsurprisingly, I would not recommend wasting your time with it. Mildly tweaked Stockfish's are a dime a dozen. Plenty of more interesting things going on that are worth looking into. Some day someone will come around with a very profound Stockfish fork perhaps, but I don't think that day has come yet.
-
- Posts: 43213
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
- Location: Auckland, NZ
Re: Ehsan Rashid and the DON engine (SF based)
I've told Ehsan that it won't be tested for CCRL.AndrewGrant wrote: ↑Fri Dec 27, 2024 11:37 am Unsurprisingly, I would not recommend wasting your time with it. Mildly tweaked Stockfish's are a dime a dozen. Plenty of more interesting things going on that are worth looking into. Some day someone will come around with a very profound Stockfish fork perhaps, but I don't think that day has come yet.
gbanksnz at gmail.com
-
- Posts: 3662
- Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2012 11:02 pm
Re: Ehsan Rashid and the DON engine (SF based)
You personally won't test it but another CCRL tester could do because they are all free to do what they want, although I imagine they all have their hands full without considering yet another derivative.Graham Banks wrote: ↑Fri Dec 27, 2024 11:51 amI've told Ehsan that it won't be tested for CCRL.AndrewGrant wrote: ↑Fri Dec 27, 2024 11:37 am Unsurprisingly, I would not recommend wasting your time with it. Mildly tweaked Stockfish's are a dime a dozen. Plenty of more interesting things going on that are worth looking into. Some day someone will come around with a very profound Stockfish fork perhaps, but I don't think that day has come yet.
-
- Posts: 43213
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
- Location: Auckland, NZ
Re: Ehsan Rashid and the DON engine (SF based)
Let's just say that I know their views regarding such engines.Modern Times wrote: ↑Fri Dec 27, 2024 12:02 pmYou personally won't test it but another CCRL tester could do because they are all free to do what they want, although I imagine they all have their hands full without considering yet another derivative.Graham Banks wrote: ↑Fri Dec 27, 2024 11:51 amI've told Ehsan that it won't be tested for CCRL.AndrewGrant wrote: ↑Fri Dec 27, 2024 11:37 am Unsurprisingly, I would not recommend wasting your time with it. Mildly tweaked Stockfish's are a dime a dozen. Plenty of more interesting things going on that are worth looking into. Some day someone will come around with a very profound Stockfish fork perhaps, but I don't think that day has come yet.
gbanksnz at gmail.com