Using Neural Network or Syzygy tables

Discussion of chess software programming and technical issues.

Moderator: Ras

User avatar
Ras
Posts: 2696
Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2016 8:19 pm
Full name: Rasmus Althoff

Re: Using Neural Network or Syzygy tables

Post by Ras »

Moderation: Removed a post (Charter 2. Are not abusive in nature). Andrew, please keep it civilised.
Rasmus Althoff
https://www.ct800.net
AndrewGrant
Posts: 1957
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2016 6:08 am
Location: U.S.A
Full name: Andrew Grant

Re: Using Neural Network or Syzygy tables

Post by AndrewGrant »

OliverBr wrote: Mon Jun 16, 2025 8:02 pm
jp wrote: Mon Jun 16, 2025 10:28 am
AndrewGrant wrote: Mon May 26, 2025 12:03 am I'll just chime in at least to say that Syzygy tablebases are worth almost 0 elo now in the top engines.
So that aspect of "outsourc[ing]" is not really relevant.
OliverBr wrote: Wed May 28, 2025 11:13 pm It may be so for "Top" engines, especially with a neural net.
But: If you consider a "normal" engine, everything hand-crafted, own ideas, no neural network, I really do think, that Syzygy tablebases increase the ELO of such an engine.
Andrew, do you just mean that in practice top engines do not score better with TBs than without? Or do you also mean the much bigger claim that top engines are almost tablebase-like in precision in almost all endgames? (Is Lc0 good at endgames without TBs? That was not the case for a long time in the beginning.)
Thank you. He won't answer this, because he didn't even have the respect to answer to mine.
You are not entitled to my time.
AndrewGrant
Posts: 1957
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2016 6:08 am
Location: U.S.A
Full name: Andrew Grant

Re: Using Neural Network or Syzygy tables

Post by AndrewGrant »

Ras wrote: Thu Jun 19, 2025 4:14 pm Moderation: Removed a post (Charter 2. Are not abusive in nature). Andrew, please keep it civilised.
Disappointing.
jp
Posts: 1481
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2018 7:54 am

Re: Using Neural Network or Syzygy tables

Post by jp »

AndrewGrant wrote: Wed Jun 18, 2025 2:15 pm
jp wrote: Mon Jun 16, 2025 10:28 am Andrew, do you just mean that in practice top engines do not score better with TBs than without? Or do you also mean the much bigger claim that top engines are almost tablebase-like in precision in almost all endgames? (Is Lc0 good at endgames without TBs? That was not the case for a long time in the beginning.)
Can refer to this data from the Stockfish team:
https://github.com/official-stockfish/S ... ing-syzygy
I believe the effect has continued to grow. Diminishing the value of the tablebases even further.
Thanks. Interesting data.

Image