A tournament !David Carteau wrote: ↑Tue Dec 24, 2024 2:11 pm
Thanks Selwy! If you play several games against Zoe, I will be curious to see the results!

viewtopic.php?p=974384#p974384
Merry Christmas !
Moderator: Ras
A tournament !David Carteau wrote: ↑Tue Dec 24, 2024 2:11 pm
Thanks Selwy! If you play several games against Zoe, I will be curious to see the results!
Hi Tibono,Tibono wrote: ↑Sat Sep 20, 2025 7:00 pm Hi David,
refreshing experiment. So eccentric! Thanks for sharing.
Yet I am still using v0.2 thanks to Jim Ablett's Win executable, as I had no clue how to install and run v0.3, despite some instructions you included within the package. I did try, but was definitely puzzled.
My mistake, sorry, I forgot Numpy
After spending some time trying to understand what is going on, I suspect that there is different behaviour when loading with PyTorch 2.7.1+CPU a network saved with PyTorch 2.7.1+CUDA, resulting in a lot more illegal moves. Perhaps this is because I used BFloat16 for training? I'll investigate.Tibono wrote: ↑Sun Sep 21, 2025 12:05 pm My first test game was again itself without openings book, ended with a mate after 57 played moves (so yes, it can give a mate!) but the final stats say: 87/114 random moves (76.32%). Is that the order of magnitude to be expected? I suspect there is an issue with my setup. It plays instantly (whilst v0.2 uses few seconds thinking time before moving). Maybe another python library I should install, even if not preventing the engine to run?
Ha ha! I suspect a bug in my code! I'm investigating...David Carteau wrote: ↑Sun Sep 21, 2025 5:52 pm @Community: help needed there! If anyone has already encountered a CUDA-to-CPU problem, assistance would be very helpful!