Playing vs solving with Reckless

Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.

Moderator: Ras

Jouni
Posts: 3693
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:15 pm
Full name: Jouni Uski

Playing vs solving with Reckless

Post by Jouni »

First UHO match

1 reckless090 +30 +65/=87/-48 54.25% 108.5/200
2 reckless080 -30 +48/=87/-65 45.75% 91.5/200

second match

1 reckless090 +19 +20/=171/-9 52.75% 105.5/200
2 reckless080 -19 +9/=171/-20 47.25% 94.5/200

Solving. HTC suite:

reckless080 77/110
reckless090 69/110

private suite:

reckless080 71/97
reckless090 63/97

090 has no TB access, but this don't explain worse solving
Jouni
peter
Posts: 3419
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 7:38 am
Full name: Peter Martan

Re: Playing vs solving with Reckless

Post by peter »

Jouni wrote: Mon Oct 20, 2025 12:53 pm 090 has no TB access
Yes, pity.
JA's .bmi2- compile crashes even in console with setoption name SyzygyPath, at least with this one syntax for value:

C:\Syzygy\dtz;C:\Syzygy\syzygy;C:\Syzygy\wdl

No problem with 0.8 from github, regards
Peter.
Damir
Posts: 2889
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 3:53 pm
Location: Denmark
Full name: Damir Desevac

Re: Playing vs solving with Reckless

Post by Damir »

I don't know why, but Jim's compile of Reckless always crashes. The original compile on github works fine, but not JA compile. :( :(
Jouni
Posts: 3693
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:15 pm
Full name: Jouni Uski

Re: Playing vs solving with Reckless

Post by Jouni »

In my 1000 endgames test 080 with tablebases lost to 090 without :wink: .
Jouni