First UHO match
1 reckless090 +30 +65/=87/-48 54.25% 108.5/200
2 reckless080 -30 +48/=87/-65 45.75% 91.5/200
second match
1 reckless090 +19 +20/=171/-9 52.75% 105.5/200
2 reckless080 -19 +9/=171/-20 47.25% 94.5/200
Solving. HTC suite:
reckless080 77/110
reckless090 69/110
private suite:
reckless080 71/97
reckless090 63/97
090 has no TB access, but this don't explain worse solving
Playing vs solving with Reckless
Moderator: Ras
-
Jouni
- Posts: 3693
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:15 pm
- Full name: Jouni Uski
-
peter
- Posts: 3419
- Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 7:38 am
- Full name: Peter Martan
Re: Playing vs solving with Reckless
Yes, pity.
JA's .bmi2- compile crashes even in console with setoption name SyzygyPath, at least with this one syntax for value:
C:\Syzygy\dtz;C:\Syzygy\syzygy;C:\Syzygy\wdl
No problem with 0.8 from github, regards
Peter.
-
Damir
- Posts: 2889
- Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 3:53 pm
- Location: Denmark
- Full name: Damir Desevac
Re: Playing vs solving with Reckless
I don't know why, but Jim's compile of Reckless always crashes. The original compile on github works fine, but not JA compile.

-
Jouni
- Posts: 3693
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:15 pm
- Full name: Jouni Uski
Re: Playing vs solving with Reckless
In my 1000 endgames test 080 with tablebases lost to 090 without
.
Jouni