I have done a study of the Latvian Gambit. For this variation (1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 f5 3.Nxe5 Qf6 4.d4 d6 5.Nc4 fxe4 6. Nc3 Qg6 7. f3 Be7),Harvey Williamson wrote:You might like this from a recent postal game of mine. It is a no draw knockout competition so a draw and both players go out.Dr.Wael Deeb wrote:There is no doubt that this opening is bad for black when playing eng-eng matchs,I've tried several times to find and tune particular opening lines which at least will equalize the black position,but with no sign of successArmyBridge wrote:Dr. Wael, what dou you think about the leton gambit?,is it unsound? I read in several page that discussion... in Human level seems like the leton gambit is a bad opening (atleast for black) and is very rare see this opening in Comp. Chess, let me know u opinion
REgards![]()
OTOH,in human tournaments you can use it against equal or weaker opponents as a surprise and you can gain success.....
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 f5 3.Nxe5 Qf6 4.d4 d6
5.Nc4
fxe4 6. Nc3 Qg6 7. f3 Be7 8.fxe4 Nh6 9. Bxh6
Qxh6
10.g3 0-0 11. Bg2 Nc6 12.a3 b5 13.d5 bxc4
14.dxc6
Rb8 15. Rb1?? Qe3+!! 16.Ne2 Qf2+ 17.Kd2 Bg5 18.Kc3
Qe3 19. resign 0-1
Well played. I am afraid 15.Rb1? meant doom for me and
I can see no escape. (A comment from my opponent)
In Kosten's book on the Latvian he gives 7...Be7 as?! but I quite liked this combined with Nh6 and 0-0 giving the open f file to the Rook.
Best Wishes,
Harvey
I consider 8. Ne3 to the the critical test.
Chris