This is a serious accusation Rolf,do you have any scientific proof for this nonsenseRolf wrote:So nobody understood how brave and ingenious Hou played that game for the second time right now. The first game, people suffer of too weak longterm memory as it seems, was normally won for Hou. In my books if both couldnt win their won games, but Hou failed only 1 time, then Hou must be the better practical player of the two. She will win tomorrow(today) and then also fantastically win in the ties.Eelco de Groot wrote:Yes, Susan is critical of White's play around move 42, 43, 44, 45. I only watched the game later on Playchess, a computer program analyzing gives Kosteniuk the advantage but there is no progress in the scores. So the programs are of limited use to judge the endgame, but I could not see any way foward. Usually I understand nothing about Rook endgames though. And I believe Susan is something of an endgame specialist! Judith is also very tough to beat in an endgame. It's often the hallmark of a true champion. I'm glad that it seems Judith will not be alone anymore in a class of her own for women's chess. Alexandra Kosteniuk has also made more progress than I thought she would a couple of years ago, she has become really good!Jérémy Pages wrote:This endgame is commented on Susan Polgar's blog :
http://susanpolgar.blogspot.com/2008/09 ... lchik.html.
It seems that both sides made mistakes.
Eelco
As a true computerchess freak I must make a confession. In too many cases Hou played exactly what Rybka advised and that were difficult moves. So what is with this metal radio receiver, Hou wears on her head? Just asking.



P.S.You can get your @ss sued by China for this statement....