1. Kaissa (ported from mainframe to PC in early 90's).
Source code is available, and was published somewhere in Computer Chess Museum. Unfortunately, it is in Borland C++ dialect, with a lot of low-level hacks (for DOS memory models, BGI graphics, etc.) And I am too lazy to deal with all that stuff and separate chess core from interface parts...
2. Psion Chess - the first chess program I played on PC (8086) which suddenly proved to be a very tough opponent for me!
3. Alan Kotok's chess program. I am not sure was it exactly the same program I played against in my childhood at school on PDP-11, but its ASCII board looked very like to this one: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Koto ... gure-1.png
Which Engines would you like to see now with added UCI/WB?
Moderator: Ras
-
WinPooh
- Posts: 276
- Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 8:01 am
- Location: Russia
- Full name: Vladimir Medvedev
-
chrisw
Re: Which Engines would you like to see now with added UCI/W
Wael,Dr.Wael Deeb wrote:The undisputed 5 in my opinion:
Chess System Tal
Chess Genius
Virtual Chess
MChess Pro
Socrates
You got very close to the final result
Best wishes,
Chris
-
Dr.Wael Deeb
- Posts: 9773
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:44 pm
- Location: Amman,Jordan
Re: Which Engines would you like to see now with added UCI/W
Thanks Chris for one of the most important milestones in the computer chess history and it's an old junk,it's a master piece of artchrisw wrote:Wael,Dr.Wael Deeb wrote:The undisputed 5 in my opinion:
Chess System Tal
Chess Genius
Virtual Chess
MChess Pro
Socrates
You got very close to the final resultand thank you everybody who voted for not anymore my pile of old junk CSTal
better not tell Thorsten, he might get ideas on the development front .....
Best wishes,
Chris
_No one can hit as hard as life.But it ain’t about how hard you can hit.It’s about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward.How much you can take and keep moving forward….
-
chrisw
Re: Which Engines would you like to see now with added UCI/W
Thanks for saying so, but I remember when it was first released it was met on the CCC by waves of criticism, complaints of bugs and then by a poor review in the Chessbase magazine a bit later. Only very few were complimentary. Strange worldDr.Wael Deeb wrote:Thanks Chris for one of the most important milestones in the computer chess history and it's an old junk,it's a master piece of artchrisw wrote:Wael,Dr.Wael Deeb wrote:The undisputed 5 in my opinion:
Chess System Tal
Chess Genius
Virtual Chess
MChess Pro
Socrates
You got very close to the final resultand thank you everybody who voted for not anymore my pile of old junk CSTal
better not tell Thorsten, he might get ideas on the development front .....
Best wishes,
Chris
-
mclane
- Posts: 18956
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 6:40 pm
- Location: US of Europe, germany
- Full name: Thorsten Czub
Re: Which Engines would you like to see now with added UCI/W
actually this is not really true. there was a big CSS magazin edition where Hiarcs and CSTAL were on the title and the headline was kind of: Intelligent chess programs or stuff like this.
there both programs were reviewed in a very positive way.
moment i look it up...
Edition 3/june-july 1999 of computer-schach and spiele:
"die intelligenten Programme: Chess System Tal 2.0 und Hiarcs7.32"
translation: the intelligent programs: CSTAL 2.0 and Hiarcs7.32
only the very FIRST appearences were critisized.
Later the programs and the efforts in making it intelligent were honored.
The article about CSTAL2.0 e.g. (page 15)
had the title: Anders denken ~ think different.
btw: CSTAL2.0 was sold at this time for 79 DM = 40 EURO.
i still think a version cstal3 with bitboards, 64bit, multi-cpu support as UCI would be interesting !
there both programs were reviewed in a very positive way.
moment i look it up...
Edition 3/june-july 1999 of computer-schach and spiele:
"die intelligenten Programme: Chess System Tal 2.0 und Hiarcs7.32"
translation: the intelligent programs: CSTAL 2.0 and Hiarcs7.32
only the very FIRST appearences were critisized.
Later the programs and the efforts in making it intelligent were honored.
The article about CSTAL2.0 e.g. (page 15)
had the title: Anders denken ~ think different.
btw: CSTAL2.0 was sold at this time for 79 DM = 40 EURO.
i still think a version cstal3 with bitboards, 64bit, multi-cpu support as UCI would be interesting !
-
El Gringo
- Posts: 118
- Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2007 4:01 pm
Re: Which Engines would you like to see now with added UCI/W
Hi,
Thorsten wrote :
I still think a version cstal3 with bitboards, 64bit, multi-cpu support as UCI would be interesting !
I say , the sooner , the better.
It will make my coillection complete...
I have tem from chess champion 2150, to 2175 and so on...
Best
Johan
Thorsten wrote :
I still think a version cstal3 with bitboards, 64bit, multi-cpu support as UCI would be interesting !
I say , the sooner , the better.
It will make my coillection complete...
I have tem from chess champion 2150, to 2175 and so on...
Best
Johan
-
Dr.Wael Deeb
- Posts: 9773
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:44 pm
- Location: Amman,Jordan
Re: Which Engines would you like to see now with added UCI/W
Me think the same,but when is this is going to happenmclane wrote:actually this is not really true. there was a big CSS magazin edition where Hiarcs and CSTAL were on the title and the headline was kind of: Intelligent chess programs or stuff like this.
there both programs were reviewed in a very positive way.
moment i look it up...
Edition 3/june-july 1999 of computer-schach and spiele:
"die intelligenten Programme: Chess System Tal 2.0 und Hiarcs7.32"
translation: the intelligent programs: CSTAL 2.0 and Hiarcs7.32
only the very FIRST appearences were critisized.
Later the programs and the efforts in making it intelligent were honored.
The article about CSTAL2.0 e.g. (page 15)
had the title: Anders denken ~ think different.
btw: CSTAL2.0 was sold at this time for 79 DM = 40 EURO.
i still think a version cstal3 with bitboards, 64bit, multi-cpu support as UCI would be interesting !
Come on Thorsten,stop torturing the poor computer chess freaks
_No one can hit as hard as life.But it ain’t about how hard you can hit.It’s about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward.How much you can take and keep moving forward….