Which Engines would you like to see now with added UCI/WB?

Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.

Moderator: Ras

Old engines in the list below you would *most* like to see now with added UCI/WB support?(Any 5)

Poll ended at Thu Jun 19, 2008 12:26 pm

Sargon
11
11%
Chess System Tal
22
21%
Centaur
2
2%
Chess Genius
19
18%
Kallisto
4
4%
Virtual Chess
10
10%
Virtual Chess
10
10%
Mirage
2
2%
MChess Pro
18
17%
Check Check
0
No votes
Socrates
5
5%
 
Total votes: 103

User avatar
WinPooh
Posts: 276
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 8:01 am
Location: Russia
Full name: Vladimir Medvedev

Re: Which Engines would you like to see now with added UCI/W

Post by WinPooh »

1. Kaissa (ported from mainframe to PC in early 90's).

Source code is available, and was published somewhere in Computer Chess Museum. Unfortunately, it is in Borland C++ dialect, with a lot of low-level hacks (for DOS memory models, BGI graphics, etc.) And I am too lazy to deal with all that stuff and separate chess core from interface parts...

2. Psion Chess - the first chess program I played on PC (8086) which suddenly proved to be a very tough opponent for me!

3. Alan Kotok's chess program. I am not sure was it exactly the same program I played against in my childhood at school on PDP-11, but its ASCII board looked very like to this one: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Koto ... gure-1.png
chrisw

Re: Which Engines would you like to see now with added UCI/W

Post by chrisw »

Dr.Wael Deeb wrote:The undisputed 5 in my opinion:

Chess System Tal

Chess Genius

Virtual Chess

MChess Pro

Socrates
Wael,

You got very close to the final result ;-) and thank you everybody who voted for not anymore my pile of old junk CSTal ;-) better not tell Thorsten, he might get ideas on the development front .....

Best wishes,

Chris
User avatar
Dr.Wael Deeb
Posts: 9773
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:44 pm
Location: Amman,Jordan

Re: Which Engines would you like to see now with added UCI/W

Post by Dr.Wael Deeb »

chrisw wrote:
Dr.Wael Deeb wrote:The undisputed 5 in my opinion:

Chess System Tal

Chess Genius

Virtual Chess

MChess Pro

Socrates
Wael,

You got very close to the final result ;-) and thank you everybody who voted for not anymore my pile of old junk CSTal ;-) better not tell Thorsten, he might get ideas on the development front .....

Best wishes,

Chris
Thanks Chris for one of the most important milestones in the computer chess history and it's an old junk,it's a master piece of art :D
_No one can hit as hard as life.But it ain’t about how hard you can hit.It’s about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward.How much you can take and keep moving forward….
chrisw

Re: Which Engines would you like to see now with added UCI/W

Post by chrisw »

Dr.Wael Deeb wrote:
chrisw wrote:
Dr.Wael Deeb wrote:The undisputed 5 in my opinion:

Chess System Tal

Chess Genius

Virtual Chess

MChess Pro

Socrates
Wael,

You got very close to the final result ;-) and thank you everybody who voted for not anymore my pile of old junk CSTal ;-) better not tell Thorsten, he might get ideas on the development front .....

Best wishes,

Chris
Thanks Chris for one of the most important milestones in the computer chess history and it's an old junk,it's a master piece of art :D
Thanks for saying so, but I remember when it was first released it was met on the CCC by waves of criticism, complaints of bugs and then by a poor review in the Chessbase magazine a bit later. Only very few were complimentary. Strange world ;-)
User avatar
mclane
Posts: 18956
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 6:40 pm
Location: US of Europe, germany
Full name: Thorsten Czub

Re: Which Engines would you like to see now with added UCI/W

Post by mclane »

actually this is not really true. there was a big CSS magazin edition where Hiarcs and CSTAL were on the title and the headline was kind of: Intelligent chess programs or stuff like this.

there both programs were reviewed in a very positive way.

moment i look it up...

Edition 3/june-july 1999 of computer-schach and spiele:

"die intelligenten Programme: Chess System Tal 2.0 und Hiarcs7.32"

translation: the intelligent programs: CSTAL 2.0 and Hiarcs7.32


only the very FIRST appearences were critisized.

Later the programs and the efforts in making it intelligent were honored.

The article about CSTAL2.0 e.g. (page 15)
had the title: Anders denken ~ think different.

btw: CSTAL2.0 was sold at this time for 79 DM = 40 EURO.


i still think a version cstal3 with bitboards, 64bit, multi-cpu support as UCI would be interesting !
El Gringo
Posts: 118
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2007 4:01 pm

Re: Which Engines would you like to see now with added UCI/W

Post by El Gringo »

Hi,

Thorsten wrote :
I still think a version cstal3 with bitboards, 64bit, multi-cpu support as UCI would be interesting !

I say , the sooner , the better.
It will make my coillection complete...
I have tem from chess champion 2150, to 2175 and so on...

Best
Johan
User avatar
Dr.Wael Deeb
Posts: 9773
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:44 pm
Location: Amman,Jordan

Re: Which Engines would you like to see now with added UCI/W

Post by Dr.Wael Deeb »

mclane wrote:actually this is not really true. there was a big CSS magazin edition where Hiarcs and CSTAL were on the title and the headline was kind of: Intelligent chess programs or stuff like this.

there both programs were reviewed in a very positive way.

moment i look it up...

Edition 3/june-july 1999 of computer-schach and spiele:

"die intelligenten Programme: Chess System Tal 2.0 und Hiarcs7.32"

translation: the intelligent programs: CSTAL 2.0 and Hiarcs7.32


only the very FIRST appearences were critisized.

Later the programs and the efforts in making it intelligent were honored.

The article about CSTAL2.0 e.g. (page 15)
had the title: Anders denken ~ think different.

btw: CSTAL2.0 was sold at this time for 79 DM = 40 EURO.


i still think a version cstal3 with bitboards, 64bit, multi-cpu support as UCI would be interesting !
Me think the same,but when is this is going to happen :!: :?:
Come on Thorsten,stop torturing the poor computer chess freaks :lol:
_No one can hit as hard as life.But it ain’t about how hard you can hit.It’s about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward.How much you can take and keep moving forward….