Collectors Corner: New ELo-List for dedicated computers

[HoodooGuru]

Hello,

tonight, after almost two years we have released a new ELO-Rating list for dedicated chesscomputers on tournament level (40 mvs/2 hrs) at

schachcomputer.info

enjoy it

Stefan

[Steve B]

Hello,

tonight, after almost two years we have released a new ELO-Rating list for dedicated chesscomputers on tournament level (40 mvs/2 hrs) at

schachcomputer.info

enjoy it

Stefan

Hi Stefan

Excellent Work!
the Res-Fruit looks a little low but i was happy to see this....

33 Novag Citrine 2084

i have been saying Le Citrine was 2075-2100 ever since it was released

2000-2050...Pfffft Regards
Steve

[Alainza]

Thanks for this work Stefan !

And I am happy to see that three of Paris 2007 participants have the exact same rating

+9=6-6 against the Risc I regards,

Alain

[Karmazen & Oliver]

Hello,

tonight, after almost two years we have released a new ELO-Rating list for dedicated chesscomputers on tournament level (40 mvs/2 hrs) at

schachcomputer.info

enjoy it

Stefan

Hi Stefan

Excellent Work!
the Res-Fruit looks a little low but i was happy to see this....

33 Novag Citrine 2084

i have been saying Le Citrine was 2075-2100 ever since it was released

2000-2050...Pfffft Regards
Steve

hi,

we need Be more exactly:

33
Novag Citrine F 2084 (+87 / -86) 50 50 7 56,0% 2042 24,0% new

and his oponent AVERAGE are poor 2042 ¡¡ ?

you can read that OTHER computer of NOVAG DIAMOND, sahippire II, star, etc..

have a BETTER and more exactly ELO... ( +50 / - 49 ) ... not the DOUBLE ¡¡¡

and it posible that NOVAG citrine "play" versus other novag computer... and NOVAG versus NOVAG... win THE last book ... obviusly...

Don´t remember ? ...

Oliver said CITRINE have 2025 points in the BEST case... and 2002 in the BAD case...

ERIC say that have 2045 points...

and NOVAG say that HAVE practical similar LEVEL that ruby... ¡

USCF 2300 versus USCF 2320... not a lot of diferents... isn´t it ?ç

bye since SPAIN.

in other models I think similar opinion ALAIN.. it´s good TEST and a great JOB.

[HoodooGuru]

Thanks for this work Stefan !

And I am happy to see that three of Paris 2007 participants have the exact same rating

+9=6-6 against the Risc I regards,

Alain

Alain,

well I guess this is just by chance. In speed chess I think is different. The updated speed (active chess) list will be issued soon, but maybe not before our big event the coming weekend.

... need to did up the score at active chess for RISC against SPARC regards
Stefan

[Georg Langrath]

Hello,

tonight, after almost two years we have released a new ELO-Rating list for dedicated chesscomputers on tournament level (40 mvs/2 hrs) at

schachcomputer.info

enjoy it

Stefan

Happy days are here again!
Now my MMll got 200 ELO ratings better-
Compared to SSDF.
I have had the feeling that SSDF is 100 ELO ratings to low at the bottom field playing against other computers.
And 200 ELO ratings to low, playing against human.

Sorry SSDF. Only a feeling.I have also the feeling that there is a God. but no proofs. And this is no forum of religion of course.

Georg

[Robert Weck]

33 Novag Citrine 2084

i have been saying Le Citrine was 2075-2100 ever since it was released

I knew, he would say that!

yes, we all remember it!


highest respect for your wise prognosis,
Robert

[HoodooGuru]

Hello,

tonight, after almost two years we have released a new ELO-Rating list for dedicated chesscomputers on tournament level (40 mvs/2 hrs) at

schachcomputer.info

enjoy it

Stefan

Happy days are here again!
Now my MMll got 200 ELO ratings better-
Compared to SSDF.
I have had the feeling that SSDF is 100 ELO ratings to low at the bottom field playing against other computers.
And 200 ELO ratings to low, playing against human.

Sorry SSDF. Only a feeling.I have also the feeling that there is a God. but no proofs. And this is no forum of religion of course.

Georg

Georg,

please note that we started our very first calibration back in 2004 based on an average weighted SSDF value of 30 machines +100 points (!), i. e. without the intended decrease of the SSDF list 2000. This expalins at least a part of the difference to the current SSDF list.

But again: Do not look so much at absolute numbers, focus more on the relative distance between the machines. This is explained in more detail in the text for the release of the list (in german only ).

best regards
Stefan

[Karmazen & Oliver]

... of course ...

[Steve B]

But again: Do not look so much at absolute numbers, focus more on the relative distance between the machines. This is explained in more detail in the text for the release of the list (in german only ).

yes yes
spoken like a true moderator for .info


33 Novag Citrine 2084 !!

YES!! Regards
Steve