Zappa joined the WCCC 2007
Moderator: Ras
-
- Posts: 91
- Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 9:32 am
- Location: Amersfoort
Re: Zappa joined the WCCC 2007
Nice to see that Zap! has joined!pijl wrote:http://amsterdam2007.icga.org

Unfortunately now top 10 placement for micro-Max anymore

André
-
- Posts: 10893
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:37 am
- Location: Tel-Aviv Israel
Re: Zappa joined the WCCC 2007
I can see only zappa and not zap in the list of participants.André van Ark wrote:Nice to see that Zap! has joined!pijl wrote:http://amsterdam2007.icga.org![]()
Unfortunately now top 10 placement for micro-Max anymore![]()
André
zappa is the free version of zap so it is misleading if they plan to use zap
and not zappa.
Uri
-
- Posts: 880
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 11:21 pm
- Location: Nederland
Re: Zappa joined the WCCC 2007
not free but:Uri Blass wrote:I can see only zappa and not zap in the list of participants.André van Ark wrote:Nice to see that Zap! has joined!pijl wrote:http://amsterdam2007.icga.org![]()
Unfortunately now top 10 placement for micro-Max anymore![]()
André
zappa is the free version of zap so it is misleading if they plan to use zap
and not zappa.
Uri
zap!chess is the (chessbase) native version.
zappa is the uci version.
Best
Fonzy
Re: Zappa joined the WCCC 2007
Hi Andre...André van Ark wrote:Nice to see that Zap! has joined!pijl wrote:http://amsterdam2007.icga.org![]()
Unfortunately now top 10 placement for micro-Max anymore![]()
André
Is it Erdo that brings Zappa again?
Regards,
-elc.
Re: Zappa joined the WCCC 2007
Entering Zappa and not Zap probably saves 500 Euros!F. Bluemers wrote:not free but:Uri Blass wrote:I can see only zappa and not zap in the list of participants.André van Ark wrote:Nice to see that Zap! has joined!pijl wrote:http://amsterdam2007.icga.org![]()
Unfortunately now top 10 placement for micro-Max anymore![]()
André
zappa is the free version of zap so it is misleading if they plan to use zap
and not zappa.
Uri
zap!chess is the (chessbase) native version.
zappa is the uci version.
Best
Fonzy
-
- Posts: 10893
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:37 am
- Location: Tel-Aviv Israel
Re: Zappa joined the WCCC 2007
I think that it should not be allowed.Harvey Williamson wrote:Entering Zappa and not Zap probably saves 500 Euros!F. Bluemers wrote:not free but:Uri Blass wrote:I can see only zappa and not zap in the list of participants.André van Ark wrote:Nice to see that Zap! has joined!pijl wrote:http://amsterdam2007.icga.org![]()
Unfortunately now top 10 placement for micro-Max anymore![]()
André
zappa is the free version of zap so it is misleading if they plan to use zap
and not zappa.
Uri
zap!chess is the (chessbase) native version.
zappa is the uci version.
Best
Fonzy
It is not fair to use commercial program and pay as amateur.
By the same logic every commercial programmer can enter as an amateur with a new name and Vas can also call his program rybka beta when adding the word beta saves 500 Euros for him.
You can say that there is no justification for high entry fee for commercial programs but rules need to be the same and it is not logical to allow Zap what you do not allow other.
Uri
-
- Posts: 323
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 9:55 pm
- Location: Brighton - UK
Re: Zappa joined the WCCC 2007
I am still gutted I can't buy/get the UCI version - if this was available for download for owners of the CB version I would buy the CB version today.
Obviously I would prefer to buy just the engine as it is a pain having to pay for the GUI multiple times.
Shaun
Obviously I would prefer to buy just the engine as it is a pain having to pay for the GUI multiple times.
Shaun
Re: Zappa joined the WCCC 2007
Fair or not do you not remember the days when Fritz used to enter as Quest?Uri Blass wrote: It is not fair to use commercial program and pay as amateur.
By the same logic every commercial programmer can enter as an amateur with a new name and Vas can also call his program rybka beta when adding the word beta saves 500 Euros for him.
You can say that there is no justification for high entry fee for commercial programs but rules need to be the same and it is not logical to allow Zap what you do not allow other.
Uri