Your preferred terms for the Rybka match?

Graham Banks · Post by **Graham Banks** » Sat Jun 09, 2007 8:16 am

Again just as a matter of interest.

Steve B · Post by **Steve B** » Sat Jun 09, 2007 8:17 am

Graham Banks wrote:Again just as a matter of interest.

and again your choice?

Steve

Terry McCracken · Post by **Terry McCracken** » Sat Jun 09, 2007 8:20 am

Steve B wrote:
Graham Banks wrote:Again just as a matter of interest.
and again your choice?

Steve

Good question

Terry

Terry McCracken · Post by **Terry McCracken** » Sat Jun 09, 2007 8:21 am

Graham Banks wrote:Again just as a matter of interest.

2...Normal match conditions

Graham Banks · Post by **Graham Banks** » Sat Jun 09, 2007 8:22 am

Steve B wrote:
Graham Banks wrote:Again just as a matter of interest.
and again your choice?

Steve

Doesn't worry me either way to be honest.
Under normal match conditions, any of the GMs who were candidates would get wasted, but normal chess is always good to watch.
Under the match conditions agreed, it could be a closer battle though.

Terry McCracken · Post by **Terry McCracken** » Sat Jun 09, 2007 8:31 am

Graham Banks wrote:
Steve B wrote:
Graham Banks wrote:Again just as a matter of interest.
and again your choice?

Steve
Doesn't worry me either way to be honest.
Under normal match conditions, any of the GMs who were candidates would get wasted, but normal chess is always good to watch.
Under the match conditions agreed, it could be a closer battle though.

Then get better! Normal match conditions is the best way to go, or you get a circus act.

Dr.Wael Deeb · Post by **Dr.Wael Deeb** » Sat Jun 09, 2007 8:50 am

Terry McCracken wrote:
Graham Banks wrote:
Steve B wrote:
Graham Banks wrote:Again just as a matter of interest.
and again your choice?

Steve
Doesn't worry me either way to be honest.
Under normal match conditions, any of the GMs who were candidates would get wasted, but normal chess is always good to watch.
Under the match conditions agreed, it could be a closer battle though.
Then get better! Normal match conditions is the best way to go, or you get a circus act.

Fully agreed with Terry

Dirt · Post by **Dirt** » Sat Jun 09, 2007 9:41 am

Terry McCracken wrote:Then get better! Normal match conditions is the best way to go, or you get a circus act.

I'm sure the Rybka people would be happy to play under normal conditions if they could get a GM to agree to it. Unless you're prepared to pay a lot of money even if the GM loses, they don't seem to want to play. Even with a guaranteed prize, Kramnik got an advantage in conditions.

Steve B · Post by **Steve B** » Sat Jun 09, 2007 2:39 pm

hi Graham

a whopping 12% of those voting prefer these match terms(as i write this)

And now On To the Third Poll Regards
Steve

Your preferred terms for the Rybka match?

Which match terms would you prefer?

Your preferred terms for the Rybka match?

Re: Your preferred terms for the Rybka match?

Re: Your preferred terms for the Rybka match?

Re: Your preferred terms for the Rybka match?

Re: Your preferred terms for the Rybka match?

Re: Your preferred terms for the Rybka match?

Re: Your preferred terms for the Rybka match?

Re: Your preferred terms for the Rybka match?

Re: Your preferred terms for the Rybka match?