Pawn rule

Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.

Moderator: Ras

fullhardcore

Pawn rule

Post by fullhardcore »

I am teaching a beginner chess class. I have been reviewing different material for the class, but can not find anything about the pawn having to attack another piece if they are able. I have always played that way, but the question was asked if the pawn could be moved forward without attacking another piece when it had the choice, could it? I can not find an official rule on this. So Chess world lend me your knowledge and let me know what is the correct way to move pawns.
Zlaire

Re: Pawn rule

Post by Zlaire »

fullhardcore wrote:I am teaching a beginner chess class. I have been reviewing different material for the class, but can not find anything about the pawn having to attack another piece if they are able. I have always played that way, but the question was asked if the pawn could be moved forward without attacking another piece when it had the choice, could it? I can not find an official rule on this. So Chess world lend me your knowledge and let me know what is the correct way to move pawns.
No, you don't have to capture with a pawn if you can. You can move forward as well.

Take a look at the opening Queen's Gambit declined for example (1.d4 d5 2. c4 and black does not capture the pawn), that opening would be hard to play with your rules. :)
User avatar
Mike S.
Posts: 1480
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 5:33 am

Re: Pawn rule

Post by Mike S. »

If you are teaching a beginner's class, you need as a reference for your students

:arrow: http://www.fide.com/official/handbook.asp?level=EE101

These are the official rules, or laws of chess, by FIDE. Articles 1 to 5 are the basic rules required to play.

Positions where a particular move is forced by the rules, are rare: Either if you are in check and there is only one move which defends the check or only one king move out of check, or if you have only one legal move at all. Except for that, the choice between several moves is basically free. Your pawn could capture, or move forward, or you could decide to not move it at all but another piece.
Regards, Mike
Gandalf

Re: Pawn rule

Post by Gandalf »

Definitely not, for example in an endgame like the following it can make the difference between losing and winning:
[d] 8/1K3p2/6p1/7P/8/3k4/8/8 w - - 0 1
User avatar
Bill Rogers
Posts: 3562
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 3:54 am
Location: San Jose, California

Re: Pawn rule

Post by Bill Rogers »

David
There is nothing in the rules of Chess that say that you have to capture an enemy man everytime the opportunity presents itself.
I think you are confusing the rules of checkers with those of chess.
Bill