For this example I selected a set of well tested engines in CCRL 40/4 (most of which I tested myself too). "Well tested" here means not only large number of games, but large number of games with the other members in the same group of engines.
Ponder hit table for my selection.
Ponder hit has color background which allows to visually read the table (unless you changed the background colors in your browser). More orange color means more different pair of engines (lower ponder hit), and more green or blue means two engines are similar (higher ponder hit).
Checking the table visually, you can easily recognize some engines which have mostly green/blue cells in their row, and also those which have mostly orange. My hypothesis is: engines with many green/blue colors have "usual", "common", "uninteresting" style. And engines that have many orange colors in their row have "unusual", "fresh", "interesting" style.
Some particularly "common style" engines that I recognized:
- Fritz 5 and 6
- Petir 4.72
- Ktulu 4.2
- Slow Chess Blitz WV2.1
- Pseudo 0.7c
- Delfi 5.1
- Chess Tiger 2007.1
- The Baron 1.8.1
- Jonny 2.83 32-bit
- Smarthink 0.17a
- Little Goliath Evolution 3.12
- Trace 1.37a
What do you think about this logic? Does it make any sense? How does it correlate with your own understanding of those engines? Any comments are welcome.