http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforu ... id=3006#fp
In case this posting got lost in the other strelka thread, I'll insert it here. Vas has now stated more clearly how strelka is a clone and he is claiming it as his own.
I did not notice any testing going on, so maybe everybody has finally agreed it is a clone. I am amazed at how much disagreement this generated, and how confident some people where that it was not a clone, despite lacking the crucial evidence (vas looking at the code.)
I am glad it was finally found out so that the honest engine authors can get the attention they deserve. I hope this does not hurt vas financial prospects too much
best
J
the end of the strelka affair
Moderator: Ras
-
gerold
- Posts: 10121
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:57 am
- Location: van buren,missouri
Re: the end of the strelka affair
We have not found out. We have not heard the other side of theozziejoe wrote:http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforu ... id=3006#fp
In case this posting got lost in the other strelka thread, I'll insert it here. Vas has now stated more clearly how strelka is a clone and he is claiming it as his own.
I did not notice any testing going on, so maybe everybody has finally agreed it is a clone. I am amazed at how much disagreement this generated, and how confident some people where that it was not a clone, despite lacking the crucial evidence (vas looking at the code.)
It is not over. It has just begunNow if Vas release Strelka as
his own will it be a clone of Strelka.Rybka will get more
attendion and sale more copies of Rybka.Nice going Vas.
I am glad it was finally found out so that the honest engine authors can get the attention they deserve. I hope this does not hurt vas financial prospects too much
best
J
story.
-
GenoM
- Posts: 914
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 9:46 pm
- Location: Plovdiv, Bulgaria
- Full name: Evgenii Manev
Re: the end of the strelka affair
Instead of giving statements it's better Rajlich give some evidence, I would say.ozziejoe wrote:Vas has now stated more clearly how strelka is a clone and he is claiming it as his own.
take it easy 
-
LarsA
Re: the end of the strelka affair
Please don't start!GenoM wrote:Instead of giving statements it's better Rajlich give some evidence, I would say.ozziejoe wrote:Vas has now stated more clearly how strelka is a clone and he is claiming it as his own.
What possible interest could Vas have in claiming that Strelka is a clone if it's not??
Edit:
From a business standpoint, if he's not taking legal action (wich he is not), he would be better of leaving the whole "clone question" as, well, a question.
-
GenoM
- Posts: 914
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 9:46 pm
- Location: Plovdiv, Bulgaria
- Full name: Evgenii Manev
Re: the end of the strelka affair
An interresting quote from KasparovChess forum:
Pretty logical, isn't it?WildCat wrote:Бред. Нельзя дизассемблировать постороннюю программу так, чтобы в итоге получился Фрукт.V.Rajlich wrote:Vast sections of these sources started their life as a decompiled Rybka 1.0.
Nonsense. It's impossible to decompile a different program and to get Fruit.
take it easy 
-
Uri Blass
- Posts: 11011
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:37 am
- Location: Tel-Aviv Israel
Re: the end of the strelka affair
Nonsense because strelka is not fruit.GenoM wrote:An interresting quote from KasparovChess forum:
Pretty logical, isn't it?WildCat wrote:Бред. Нельзя дизассемблировать постороннюю программу так, чтобы в итоге получился Фрукт.V.Rajlich wrote:Vast sections of these sources started their life as a decompiled Rybka 1.0.
Nonsense. It's impossible to decompile a different program and to get Fruit.
Big parts of strelka like the move generator and bitboards are not in fruit.
Strelka is not exactly rybka and not exactly fruit so in theory it may include significant parts of both programs when rybka has nothing to do with fruit.
I do not claim that strelka has significant parts of fruit but my point is that even if it has significant parts of fruit we can say nothing about rybka.
Uri
-
Alexander Schmidt
- Posts: 1235
- Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 2:49 pm
Re: the end of the strelka affair
No, really not. You claim, that Rybka ~ Fruit, because Strelka ~ Rybka, and Strelka ~ Fruit and now you want evidence that Rybka ~ Strelka...GenoM wrote:Pretty logical, isn't it?
Alex
-
Zach Wegner
- Posts: 1922
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:51 am
- Location: Earth
Re: the end of the strelka affair
I think it is pretty obvious what has happened, after looking at the sources.
Fruit is a clone of Rybka!!!!
Fruit is a clone of Rybka!!!!
-
slobo
- Posts: 2331
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 5:36 pm
Re: the end of the strelka affair
gerold wrote:We have not found out. We have not heard the other side of theozziejoe wrote:http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforu ... id=3006#fp
In case this posting got lost in the other strelka thread, I'll insert it here. Vas has now stated more clearly how strelka is a clone and he is claiming it as his own.
I did not notice any testing going on, so maybe everybody has finally agreed it is a clone. I am amazed at how much disagreement this generated, and how confident some people where that it was not a clone, despite lacking the crucial evidence (vas looking at the code.)
It is not over. It has just begunNow if Vas release Strelka as
his own will it be a clone of Strelka.Rybka will get more
attendion and sale more copies of Rybka.Nice going Vas.
I am glad it was finally found out so that the honest engine authors can get the attention they deserve. I hope this does not hurt vas financial prospects too much
best
J
story.
That was a good one!
"Well, I´m just a soul whose intentions are good,
Oh Lord, please don´t let me be misunderstood."
Oh Lord, please don´t let me be misunderstood."
-
slobo
- Posts: 2331
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 5:36 pm
Re: the end of the strelka affair
Zach Wegner wrote:I think it is pretty obvious what has happened, after looking at the sources.
Fruit is a clone of Rybka!!!!
please, guys, stop; you´ll kill me!
"Well, I´m just a soul whose intentions are good,
Oh Lord, please don´t let me be misunderstood."
Oh Lord, please don´t let me be misunderstood."