Thinker 5.1D Passive Gauntlet- FINAL RESULTS!

Discussion of computer chess matches and engine tournaments.

Moderators: hgm, Dann Corbit, Harvey Williamson

User avatar
geots
Posts: 4790
Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 12:42 am

Thinker 5.1D Passive Gauntlet- FINAL RESULTS!

Post by geots »

THINKER 5.1D PASSIVE GAUNTLET


Shredder 11 GUI
Intel Dual Core
Single Processor- 3.2ghz
128mb hash
3 & 4 man egtb
HS-Book 2.0.bkt (w/ 12 move CCRL limit)
40 moves in 58 minutes repeating ( Adapted to CCRL 40/40)
All Engines = 32 bit
10 games against each engine
(140 total games)
Run by George Speight



Thinker 5.1D Passive

(4.5-5.5) Naum 3.1
(3.0-7.0) Toga II 3.1.2SE
(4.0-6.0) Hiarcs 12 (Sharpen PV Off)
(3.0-7.0) Zappa Mexico II
(5.0-5.0) Loop 13.6
(4.5-5.5) Fruit 051103
(4.5-5.5) Spike 1.2 Turin
(3.5-6.5) Glaurung 2.0.1
(3.5-6.5) Bright 0.3a
(6.5-3.5) Ktulu 8.0
(5.0-5.0) Chess Tiger 2007.1
(5.0-5.0) Frenzee Feb08
(7.0-3.0) Chessmaster 11
(5.0-5.0) Scorpio 2.0


Gauntlet Completed: Thanks to all the programmers for their hard work.


All PGNs can be downloaded from:
http://kirill-kryukov.com/chess/discuss ... f=7&t=3409
User avatar
Werner
Posts: 2862
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:09 pm
Location: Germany
Full name: Werner Schüle

Re: Thinker 5.1D Passive Gauntlet- FINAL RESULTS!

Post by Werner »

Hi George,
thanks for the results.
I have one question: Do you think, this version is stronger than the version Thinker 5.1c ?
So much stronger that we can sure measure it (+20-30 elos?)

...and what´s the difference to 5.1 e?

best
Werner
User avatar
Graham Banks
Posts: 41183
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
Location: Auckland, NZ

Re: Thinker 5.1D Passive Gauntlet- FINAL RESULTS!

Post by Graham Banks »

Werner wrote: ...and what´s the difference to 5.1 e?
5.1e is a bugfix, not a strength improvement. Ironically though, 5.1e is buggy.
5.1d is therefore best to use.
No idea as to whether 5.1c is stronger than 5.1d.

Regards, Graham.
gbanksnz at gmail.com
User avatar
rhollay
Posts: 150
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:26 pm

Re: Thinker 5.1D Passive Gauntlet- FINAL RESULTS!

Post by rhollay »

There was also a 5.1f version (the "anti-Father" release :D ).
Has anybody tested it against engines?

Regards, Robert


Graham Banks wrote:
Werner wrote: ...and what´s the difference to 5.1 e?
5.1e is a bugfix, not a strength improvement. Ironically though, 5.1e is buggy.
5.1d is therefore best to use.
No idea as to whether 5.1c is stronger than 5.1d.

Regards, Graham.
User avatar
Ovyron
Posts: 4556
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 4:30 am

Re: Thinker 5.1D Passive Gauntlet- FINAL RESULTS!

Post by Ovyron »

rhollay wrote:Has anybody tested it against engines?
I tried but I didn't find a way to deactivate the book, so I went back to 5.1E (That doesn't seem to have problems under Chesspartner.)
User avatar
geots
Posts: 4790
Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 12:42 am

Re: Thinker 5.1D Passive Gauntlet- FINAL RESULTS!

Post by geots »

Werner wrote:Hi George,
thanks for the results.
I have one question: Do you think, this version is stronger than the version Thinker 5.1c ?
So much stronger that we can sure measure it (+20-30 elos?)

...and what´s the difference to 5.1 e?

best
Werner

Hi, Werner. Sorry i did not get to answer your question. But i have been really busy with stuff not pertaining to computer chess and havent been online much lately. I was going to answer your question now, but Graham was kind enough to take care of it for me- and left nothing to really add. Sorry i missed you.


Best Always,