Good Engine Test.....RXN

Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.

Moderator: Ras

rightrook
Posts: 1452
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:45 pm

Good Engine Test.....RXN

Post by rightrook »

[d]r1b1kb1r/1p4pp/p2ppn2/8/2qNP3/2N1B3/PPP3PP/R2Q1RK1 w kq - 0 1


SOS 5.......11 seconds...!

Ruffian 1.0.5..........33 sec.

Diagram from the book

Winning Chess Traps....by CHERNEV......1946
User avatar
Eelco de Groot
Posts: 4697
Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2006 2:40 am
Full name:   Eelco de Groot

Re: Good Engine Test.....RXN

Post by Eelco de Groot »

rightrook wrote:[d]r1b1kb1r/1p4pp/p2ppn2/8/2qNP3/2N1B3/PPP3PP/R2Q1RK1 w kq - 0 1


SOS 5.......11 seconds...!

Ruffian 1.0.5..........33 sec.

Diagram from the book

Winning Chess Traps....by CHERNEV......1946
I think the position is in many computeropeningbooks also, in shredder11.bkt it says Rf6 is from a 1935 game but no information about the players.

Ancalagon plays it a tempo, that does not mean very much I suppose and the evals are very high again in this Build, also for King Safety I have not checked in other positions yet but the values for King Safety could be very high, but nice to see he only needs 557 nodes to play it :)

[d]r1b1kb1r/1p4pp/p2ppn2/8/2qNP3/2N1B3/PPP3PP/R2Q1RK1 w kq -

Engine: Ancalagon 1.08 Beta Build 4 (Athlon 2009 MHz, 256 MB)
by Tord Romstad, Eelco de Groot

2.00 0:00 +0.17 1.a3 e5 (201) 0

2.00 0:00 +1.86 1.Qd3 Qxd3 2.cxd3 (339) 1

2.00 0:00 +6.50 1.Rxf6 Kd8 (557) 1

3.00 0:00 +11.03 1.Rxf6 gxf6 2.Qh5+ Ke7 (939) 3

4.00 0:00 +14.84 1.Rxf6 gxf6 2.Qh5+ Ke7 3.Rf1 (2.379) 7

5.00 0:00 +9.27 1.Rxf6 gxf6 2.Qh5+ Ke7 3.Nf5+ exf5
4.Nd5+ Kd8 5.Bb6+ Kd7 6.Qxf5+ Kc6 (7.500) 22

6.00 0:00 +9.27 1.Rxf6 gxf6 2.Qh5+ Ke7 3.Nf5+ exf5
4.Nd5+ Kd8 5.Bb6+ Kd7 6.Qxf5+ Kc6 (15.259) 44

7.00 0:00 +13.15 1.Rxf6 gxf6 2.Qh5+ Kd8 3.Qf7 Be7
4.Rf1 Bd7 (40.745) 96

8.00 0:00 +11.39 1.Rxf6 gxf6 2.Qh5+ Kd8 3.Qf7 Be7
4.Rf1 Rf8 5.Qxh7 (60.748) 121

9.00 0:00 +13.00 1.Rxf6 gxf6 2.Qh5+ Kd7 3.Qf7+ Be7
4.Nf5 Re8 5.Kh1 d5 6.Nxe7 Rxe7
7.Qxf6 (140.669) 176

10.00 0:01 +11.96 1.Rxf6 gxf6 2.Qh5+ Kd7 3.Qf7+ Be7
4.Nf5 Re8 5.Kh1 h5 6.Ng7 Rf8 (247.610) 217

11.01 0:01 +6.52 1.Rxf6 gxf6 2.Qh5+ Kd8 3.Qf7 Qc7
4.Qxf6+ Qe7 5.Qxh8 Qg7 6.Bg5+ Kc7
7.Qxg7+ Bxg7 8.e5 Kb8 (420.579) 253

12.01 0:02 +6.68 1.Rxf6 gxf6 2.Qh5+ Kd8 3.Qf7 Qc7
4.Qxf6+ Qe7 5.Qxh8 Qg7 6.Bg5+ Kc7
7.Bf6 Qxh8 8.Bxh8 Kb8 9.Bf6 (777.273) 290

13.01 0:05 +5.62 1.Rxf6 gxf6 2.Qh5+ Kd8 3.Qf7 Qc7
4.Qxf6+ Ke8 5.Qxh8 Qg7 6.Qxg7 Bxg7
7.Rf1 Bxd4 8.Bxd4 Bd7 9.e5 d5 (1.636.719) 311

14.01 0:11 +5.64 1.Rxf6 gxf6 2.Qh5+ Kd8 3.Qf7 Qc7
4.Qxf6+ Ke8 5.Qxh8 Qg7 6.Qxg7 Bxg7
7.Rf1 Bd7 8.Nce2 Bxd4 9.Nxd4 e5
10.Nf5 (3.632.296) 324

15.01 0:35 +5.94 1.Rxf6 gxf6 2.Qh5+ Kd8 3.Qf7 Qc7
4.Qxf6+ Ke8 5.Qxh8 Qg7 6.Qxg7 Bxg7
7.Rd1 Bd7 8.Nde2 Be5 9.Bg5 Bxc3
10.Nxc3 h6 11.Bxh6 (11.591.626) 330

16.01 1:36 +6.41 1.Rxf6 gxf6 2.Qh5+ Kd8 3.Qf7 Qc7
4.Nxe6+ Bxe6 5.Qxe6 Qe7 6.Qd5 Ke8
7.Qc4 f5 8.Bd4 Qf7 9.Qa4+ Qd7 10.Qb3 Qf7
11.Qxf7+ Kxf7 12.Bxh8 (32.067.558) 330

17.01 3:29 +7.84 1.Rxf6 gxf6 2.Qh5+ Kd8 3.Qf7 Qc7
4.Nxe6+ Bxe6 5.Qxe6 Qd7 6.Qxf6+ Ke8
7.Qxh8 Qg7 8.Qxg7 Bxg7 9.Nd5 Rc8
10.c3 Rc4 11.Bg5 Rxe4 12.Rf1 (69.725.747) 332


best move: Rf1xf6 time: 3:35.469 min n/s: 332.369 nodes: 71.610.000
Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first
place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you
are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it.
-- Brian W. Kernighan
rightrook
Posts: 1452
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:45 pm

Re: Good Engine Test.....RXN

Post by rightrook »

Thanks Brian...

I also notice that some of the personalities in CM-9000 play it right away and keep it....

regards

Robert
jdart
Posts: 4423
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 5:23 am
Location: http://www.arasanchess.org

Re: Good Engine Test.....RXN

Post by jdart »

This position is from Lasker-Pirc, Moscow 1935. It is in my "arasan9" test suite (position 289).

--Jon