Alright, we've seen Rybka 3 crush the strongest contenders, Fritz 11, Hiarc 12, Shredder 11 etc. with lopsided scores. Now can we see some matches vs the 'middle-tier' engines like Chessmaster, Chesstiger, Gandalf, Bright, Twisted logic, etc.? and see just how much more lopsided the results would be?
Also, if Fritz 11 just won 4 games out of a hundred, then it would be nice and fun to see which engine from the 'middle class' can outperform it by winning more games than that.
A match Rybka v Crafty was played in where Rybka gave Crafty knight odds, and Crafty was slaughtered. Rybka used very high contempt, and it seems to work quite well against weaker opposition.
GenoM wrote:Who really cares about such handicap-matches (without a pawn, knight etc...)?
In any case, I do not. My view is that such matches are pointless.
I strongly second that Geno
_No one can hit as hard as life.But it ain’t about how hard you can hit.It’s about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward.How much you can take and keep moving forward….
R3 is devastating against engines that were once top (in their time). I will not name the engines because I think it is both unfair and irrelevant ... but in one of my tournies it had more than 40 wins in a row against 2 of those engines at 5 0 time control and 7 move book. You have to realize that R3 is also a multi processor engine using 64bit OS. It would be interesting to see how those engines would do against a "dumbed" down version of R3 ... mainly SP and 32bit. However I would think it would also be quite brutal.
M ANSARI wrote:R3 is devastating against engines that were once top (in their time). I will not name the engines because I think it is both unfair and irrelevant ... but in one of my tournies it had more than 40 wins in a row against 2 of those engines at 5 0 time control and 7 move book. You have to realize that R3 is also a multi processor engine using 64bit OS. It would be interesting to see how those engines would do against a "dumbed" down version of R3 ... mainly SP and 32bit. However I would think it would also be quite brutal.
Hala Majd,
That is amazing to say the least,it looks like Rybka 3 is playing in a league of it's own far far away from the competition
_No one can hit as hard as life.But it ain’t about how hard you can hit.It’s about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward.How much you can take and keep moving forward….
M ANSARI wrote:R3 is devastating against engines that were once top (in their time). I will not name the engines because I think it is both unfair and irrelevant ... but in one of my tournies it had more than 40 wins in a row against 2 of those engines at 5 0 time control and 7 move book. You have to realize that R3 is also a multi processor engine using 64bit OS. It would be interesting to see how those engines would do against a "dumbed" down version of R3 ... mainly SP and 32bit. However I would think it would also be quite brutal.
Quite a few computer chess enthusiasts still have 32-bit OS and are looking forward to trying out their "dumbed down" Rybka.
M ANSARI wrote:R3 is devastating against engines that were once top (in their time). I will not name the engines because I think it is both unfair and irrelevant ... but in one of my tournies it had more than 40 wins in a row against 2 of those engines at 5 0 time control and 7 move book. You have to realize that R3 is also a multi processor engine using 64bit OS. It would be interesting to see how those engines would do against a "dumbed" down version of R3 ... mainly SP and 32bit. However I would think it would also be quite brutal.
Quite a few computer chess enthusiasts still have 32-bit OS and are looking forward to trying out their "dumbed down" Rybka.
And I am one of those dummies who seem to think that single CPU tournaments are better at measuring pure engine improvements.