[d] 8/8/6K1/8/8/8/8/R4qkr w - - 0 73
Although this position is clearly lost for white because of material, white can hold out longer with 73.Rxf1. I was surprised to find out that Shredder 10 doesn't find this simple move but Rybka 3 and Chessmaster 9000 find it immediately.
Shredder 10 doesn't see 73.Rxf1
Moderator: Ras
-
- Posts: 4675
- Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 7:43 pm
Re: Shredder 10 doesn't see 73.Rxf1
From bad to worst, the moves ranked:
- Rxf1+ TBScore: LoseIn15
Ra5 TBScore: LoseIn8
Ra7 TBScore: LoseIn8
Ra2 TBScore: LoseIn7
Ra3 TBScore: LoseIn7
Ra4 TBScore: LoseIn7
Ra8 TBScore: LoseIn7
Kg5 TBScore: LoseIn6
Rb1 TBScore: LoseIn6
Rc1 TBScore: LoseIn6
Rd1 TBScore: LoseIn6
Kg7 TBScore: LoseIn5
Ra6 TBScore: LoseIn5
Re1 TBScore: LoseIn5
-
- Posts: 4851
- Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2008 3:15 pm
- Location: Philippines
Re: Shredder 10 doesn't see 73.Rxf1
The decision to retain the rook is also reasonable, how can white win if white rook is goneUri wrote:[d] 8/8/6K1/8/8/8/8/R4qkr w - - 0 73
Although this position is clearly lost for white because of material, white can hold out longer with 73.Rxf1. I was surprised to find out that Shredder 10 doesn't find this simple move but Rybka 3 and Chessmaster 9000 find it immediately.

-
- Posts: 20943
- Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:30 pm
- Location: Birmingham, AL
Re: Shredder 10 doesn't see 73.Rxf1
I'd bet it is caused by endgame tables. After Rxf1 Kxf1 it probably probably sees the mate due to endgame tables, while keeping all 5 pieces on the board causes it to not see the forced mate.Uri wrote:[d] 8/8/6K1/8/8/8/8/R4qkr w - - 0 73
Although this position is clearly lost for white because of material, white can hold out longer with 73.Rxf1. I was surprised to find out that Shredder 10 doesn't find this simple move but Rybka 3 and Chessmaster 9000 find it immediately.
Do you have all or some endgame tables?
-
- Posts: 509
- Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 9:34 pm
Re: Shredder 10 doesn't see 73.Rxf1
No i don't use any endgame tables. My computer is slow and they take a lot of access time.bob wrote:Do you have all or some endgame tables?
-
- Posts: 1831
- Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 11:08 pm
Re: Shredder 10 doesn't see 73.Rxf1
contempt factor settong?
-
- Posts: 509
- Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 9:34 pm
Re: Shredder 10 doesn't see 73.Rxf1
No. There is no contempt factor in Shredder 10Nimzovik wrote:contempt factor settong?
-
- Posts: 1154
- Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 5:18 am
Re: Shredder 10 doesn't see 73.Rxf1
Shredder just has a big eval bonus for KR v. K as a known won situation. Quite a reasonable thing to do. Its as simple as that.
-Sam
-Sam
-
- Posts: 169
- Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 10:31 pm
- Location: Switzerland
Re: Shredder 10 doesn't see 73.Rxf1
I think you are right. Such positions are in some way interesting but of not much practical relevance.BubbaTough wrote:Shredder just has a big eval bonus for KR v. K as a known won situation. Quite a reasonable thing to do. Its as simple as that.
-Sam
Kurt
-
- Posts: 44665
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
- Location: Auckland, NZ
Re: Shredder 10 doesn't see 73.Rxf1
Agreed.Kurt Utzinger wrote:I think you are right. Such positions are in some way interesting but of not much practical relevance.BubbaTough wrote:Shredder just has a big eval bonus for KR v. K as a known won situation. Quite a reasonable thing to do. Its as simple as that.
-Sam
Kurt
gbanksnz at gmail.com