Anyone tried this?
http://mysite.verizon.net/vzesz4a6/current/id80.html
future mobility evaluation term
Moderator: Ras
-
- Posts: 737
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:08 pm
- Location: Orange County California
- Full name: Stuart Cracraft
-
- Posts: 905
- Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 11:23 am
- Location: Warsza
Re: future mobility evaluation term
this topic pops up from time to time - but now it is the first time when author promises empirical tests. IMHO this isn't going to be competitive within a traditional chess program framework, but might be good for a heuristic searcher (Steven Edwards, where art thou?)
Pawel Koziol
http://www.pkoziol.cal24.pl/rodent/rodent.htm
http://www.pkoziol.cal24.pl/rodent/rodent.htm
-
- Posts: 2251
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:47 pm
- Location: Hattingen, Germany
Re: future mobility evaluation term
Progressive Mobility is on my todo list...
Some implementation hints from cpw:
Multiple Sliding Pieces ...
and Flood Fill Techniques with multiple sliders.For bitsets with multiple sliding pieces one can apply a fill-algorithm in each of the eight ray-directions to determine attacks. Since we keep disjoint directions, there is still a unique 1:1 relation from each bit of the target set to it's source square. This approach is great to determine target sets we may reach in two or more moves.
Keeping distinct ray-directions has some advantages, for instance in determining pinned pieces or discovered checks. Fill-Algorithms are great to feed in line-wise attack sets of single sliders, to determine a progressive mobility on the orthogonal rays, i.e. move targets in two moves, or trajectories against important squares or areas.
Code: Select all
. . . . . . . .
. . . . \ . . .
. . . \ . 1 . .
. . \ . 1 . \ .
. \ . 1 . \ . .
. . 1 . \ . . .
. B . \ . . . .
. . . . . . . .
-
- Posts: 737
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:08 pm
- Location: Orange County California
- Full name: Stuart Cracraft
Re: future mobility evaluation term
Isn't it theorized that Rybka uses future mobility?
-
- Posts: 20943
- Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:30 pm
- Location: Birmingham, AL
Re: future mobility evaluation term
Wild-ass guess, just like most everything "assumed" about Rybka...smcracraft wrote:Isn't it theorized that Rybka uses future mobility?
-
- Posts: 3196
- Joined: Fri May 26, 2006 3:00 am
- Location: WY, USA
- Full name: Michael Sherwin
Re: future mobility evaluation term
Somebody, I forget who, decided by some logic that I can not remember that when the knights were removed from the starting position, Rybka's search slowed way down and therefore Rybka must use future mobility. However, I posted in reply that with the knights on the board the best move (NB3) was more obvious to the search and therefore due to the nature of alpha/beta the trees were smaller and the search faster.smcracraft wrote:Isn't it theorized that Rybka uses future mobility?
If you are on a sidewalk and the covid goes beep beep
Just step aside or you might have a bit of heat
Covid covid runs through the town all day
Can the people ever change their ways
Sherwin the covid's after you
Sherwin if it catches you you're through
Just step aside or you might have a bit of heat
Covid covid runs through the town all day
Can the people ever change their ways
Sherwin the covid's after you
Sherwin if it catches you you're through
-
- Posts: 1922
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:51 am
- Location: Earth
Re: future mobility evaluation term
I don't know about later versions (probably not), but Rybka 1.0 definitely does not.smcracraft wrote:Isn't it theorized that Rybka uses future mobility?