Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.
Moderator: Ras
Jouni
Posts: 3730 Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:15 pm
Full name: Jouni Uski
Post
by Jouni » Wed Jan 21, 2009 6:25 pm
I don't think there is a lot difference. Here's solution times for some Arasan suite positions with depth:
Code: Select all
Rybka 3 1.25s / 8 Naum 4 1.63s / 11
Rybka 3 1.12s / 6 Naum 4 1.71s / 9
Rybka 3 2.48s / 8 Naum 4 3.58s / 11
Rybka 3 4.08s / 8 Naum 4 3.25s / 11
Rybka 3 1.10s / 7 Naum 4 1.43s / 10
Rybka 3 2.71s / 9 Naum 4 1.88s / 12
Rybka 3 5.75s / 9 Naum 4 4.18s / 12
Rybka 3 1.12s / 7 Naum 4 1.96s / 10
Rybka 3 1.34s / 7 Naum 4 2.27s / 10
Rybka 3 1.50s / 8 Naum 4 1.60s / 11
Rybka 3 3.25s / 9 Naum 4 6.49s / 12
Rybka 3 1.78s / 7 Naum 4 4.30s / 10
Rybka 3 37.64s / 12 Naum 4 35.50s / 15
Rybka 3 11.18s / 9 Naum 4 10.26s / 12
Rybka 3 41.96s / 11 Naum 4 48.90s/ 14
Rybka 3 1.33s / 7 Naum 4 1.75s / 10
Rybka 3 1.96s / 8 Naum 4 1.78s / 11
Rybka 3 2.29s / 9 Naum 4 6.29s / 12
Rybka 3 2.86s / 7 Naum 4 6.69s / 10
Rybka 3 7.76s / 8 Naum 4 5.09s / 11
Only difference is Rybkas's -3 in depth display
Jouni
kiroje
Post
by kiroje » Wed Jan 21, 2009 7:10 pm
Without implying anything its a remarkable coincedence that all of them is solved in the same depth.
Could be quite interesting to test it with a very big set of positions and see the difference.
Sylwy
Posts: 4925 Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 4:19 pm
Location: IAȘI - the historical capital of MOLDOVA
Full name: Silvian Rucsandescu
Post
by Sylwy » Thu Jan 22, 2009 7:59 am
Jouni wrote: I don't think there is a lot difference. Here's solution times for some Arasan suite positions with depth:
Code: Select all
Rybka 3 1.25s / 8 Naum 4 1.63s / 11
Rybka 3 1.12s / 6 Naum 4 1.71s / 9
Rybka 3 2.48s / 8 Naum 4 3.58s / 11
Rybka 3 4.08s / 8 Naum 4 3.25s / 11
Rybka 3 1.10s / 7 Naum 4 1.43s / 10
Rybka 3 2.71s / 9 Naum 4 1.88s / 12
Rybka 3 5.75s / 9 Naum 4 4.18s / 12
Rybka 3 1.12s / 7 Naum 4 1.96s / 10
Rybka 3 1.34s / 7 Naum 4 2.27s / 10
Rybka 3 1.50s / 8 Naum 4 1.60s / 11
Rybka 3 3.25s / 9 Naum 4 6.49s / 12
Rybka 3 1.78s / 7 Naum 4 4.30s / 10
Rybka 3 37.64s / 12 Naum 4 35.50s / 15
Rybka 3 11.18s / 9 Naum 4 10.26s / 12
Rybka 3 41.96s / 11 Naum 4 48.90s/ 14
Rybka 3 1.33s / 7 Naum 4 1.75s / 10
Rybka 3 1.96s / 8 Naum 4 1.78s / 11
Rybka 3 2.29s / 9 Naum 4 6.29s / 12
Rybka 3 2.86s / 7 Naum 4 6.69s / 10
Rybka 3 7.76s / 8 Naum 4 5.09s / 11
Only difference is Rybkas's -3 in depth display
Jouni
...............and the time of course................
Silvian
Sylwy
Posts: 4925 Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 4:19 pm
Location: IAȘI - the historical capital of MOLDOVA
Full name: Silvian Rucsandescu
Post
by Sylwy » Thu Jan 22, 2009 8:36 am
So......+3 plies in depth for each position justify the time difference.
Any conclusion ?
Coincidence , know -how import ,the same cycle of the chess engines evolution ( 3 plies handicaped -of course
), occult co-operation Vas-Alex...........................
Conclusions wanted !
Silvian
kiroje
Post
by kiroje » Thu Jan 22, 2009 4:47 pm
SzG wrote: As this is a selected subset of the problems, the coincidence is not at all remarkable.
Which is exactly why I wanted to see it in a very big testset