Rybka search vs. Naum search

Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.

Moderator: Ras

Jouni
Posts: 3730
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:15 pm
Full name: Jouni Uski

Rybka search vs. Naum search

Post by Jouni »

I don't think there is a lot difference. Here's solution times for some Arasan suite positions with depth:

Code: Select all

Rybka 3   1.25s / 8         Naum 4   1.63s / 11
Rybka 3   1.12s / 6         Naum 4   1.71s / 9
Rybka 3   2.48s / 8         Naum 4   3.58s / 11
Rybka 3   4.08s / 8         Naum 4   3.25s / 11         
Rybka 3   1.10s / 7         Naum 4   1.43s / 10
Rybka 3   2.71s / 9         Naum 4   1.88s / 12         
Rybka 3   5.75s / 9         Naum 4   4.18s / 12         
Rybka 3   1.12s / 7         Naum 4   1.96s / 10
Rybka 3   1.34s / 7         Naum 4   2.27s / 10
Rybka 3   1.50s / 8         Naum 4   1.60s / 11
Rybka 3   3.25s / 9         Naum 4   6.49s / 12
Rybka 3   1.78s / 7         Naum 4   4.30s / 10
Rybka 3   37.64s / 12       Naum 4   35.50s / 15    
Rybka 3   11.18s / 9        Naum 4   10.26s / 12    
Rybka 3   41.96s / 11       Naum 4   48.90s/ 14
Rybka 3   1.33s / 7         Naum 4   1.75s / 10
Rybka 3   1.96s / 8         Naum 4   1.78s / 11         
Rybka 3   2.29s / 9         Naum 4   6.29s / 12
Rybka 3   2.86s / 7         Naum 4   6.69s / 10
Rybka 3   7.76s / 8         Naum 4   5.09s / 11   

Only difference is Rybkas's -3 in depth display :)

Jouni
kiroje

Re: Rybka search vs. Naum search

Post by kiroje »

Without implying anything its a remarkable coincedence that all of them is solved in the same depth.

Could be quite interesting to test it with a very big set of positions and see the difference.
User avatar
Sylwy
Posts: 4925
Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 4:19 pm
Location: IAȘI - the historical capital of MOLDOVA
Full name: Silvian Rucsandescu

Re: Rybka search vs. Naum search

Post by Sylwy »

Jouni wrote:I don't think there is a lot difference. Here's solution times for some Arasan suite positions with depth:

Code: Select all

Rybka 3   1.25s / 8         Naum 4   1.63s / 11
Rybka 3   1.12s / 6         Naum 4   1.71s / 9
Rybka 3   2.48s / 8         Naum 4   3.58s / 11
Rybka 3   4.08s / 8         Naum 4   3.25s / 11         
Rybka 3   1.10s / 7         Naum 4   1.43s / 10
Rybka 3   2.71s / 9         Naum 4   1.88s / 12         
Rybka 3   5.75s / 9         Naum 4   4.18s / 12         
Rybka 3   1.12s / 7         Naum 4   1.96s / 10
Rybka 3   1.34s / 7         Naum 4   2.27s / 10
Rybka 3   1.50s / 8         Naum 4   1.60s / 11
Rybka 3   3.25s / 9         Naum 4   6.49s / 12
Rybka 3   1.78s / 7         Naum 4   4.30s / 10
Rybka 3   37.64s / 12       Naum 4   35.50s / 15    
Rybka 3   11.18s / 9        Naum 4   10.26s / 12    
Rybka 3   41.96s / 11       Naum 4   48.90s/ 14
Rybka 3   1.33s / 7         Naum 4   1.75s / 10
Rybka 3   1.96s / 8         Naum 4   1.78s / 11         
Rybka 3   2.29s / 9         Naum 4   6.29s / 12
Rybka 3   2.86s / 7         Naum 4   6.69s / 10
Rybka 3   7.76s / 8         Naum 4   5.09s / 11   

Only difference is Rybkas's -3 in depth display :)

Jouni
:lol: ...............and the time of course................ :lol:

Silvian
User avatar
Sylwy
Posts: 4925
Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 4:19 pm
Location: IAȘI - the historical capital of MOLDOVA
Full name: Silvian Rucsandescu

Re: Conclusions wanted !

Post by Sylwy »

So......+3 plies in depth for each position justify the time difference.
Any conclusion ?
Coincidence , know -how import ,the same cycle of the chess engines evolution ( 3 plies handicaped -of course :lol: ), occult co-operation Vas-Alex........................... :lol:

Conclusions wanted !
:lol: Silvian :lol:
kiroje

Re: Rybka search vs. Naum search

Post by kiroje »

SzG wrote:As this is a selected subset of the problems, the coincidence is not at all remarkable.
Which is exactly why I wanted to see it in a very big testset