Rising Stars v Fading Warriors 2009 (The Decider)

Discussion of computer chess matches and engine tournaments.

Moderator: Ras

Which team will win this decider?

Poll ended at Mon Dec 07, 2009 5:02 am

Rising Stars
9
90%
Fading Warriors
1
10%
Tie
0
No votes
 
Total votes: 10

User avatar
Graham Banks
Posts: 45119
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
Location: Auckland, NZ

Rising Stars v Fading Warriors 2009 (The Decider)

Post by Graham Banks »

RISING STARS v FADING WARRIORS (THE DECIDER)

AMD64x2 Dual Core
Deep Shredder 11 GUI
128mb hash each
3-4-5 piece tablebases
Ponder off
Xmas2640b.bkt book
40 moves in 38 minutes repeating (adapted for the CCRL)
2 cycles 30 rounds
All engines 32-bit 1CPU


Rising Stars

Scorpio 2.2
Tornado 3.42a
Brutus 8.04
Arasan 11.6
Hermann 2.5
Xpdnt 091007
NanoSzachy 3.8
N2 0.1

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image


Fading Warriors

Petir 4.9999
SOS 5.1
Ufim 8.02
Tao 5.6
Little Goliath Evolution 3.12
Yace 0.99.87
Pepito 1.59
Quark 2.35

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image
gbanksnz at gmail.com
User avatar
Graham Banks
Posts: 45119
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
Location: Auckland, NZ

Re: Rising Stars v Fading Warriors 2009 (The Decider)

Post by Graham Banks »

I will post updates here after every five rounds. For those who wish to follow the tournament more closely, you can do so from the following link:
http://www.kirill-kryukov.com/chess/dis ... f=7&t=4733
Games will be available after every round.
gbanksnz at gmail.com
User avatar
beachknight
Posts: 3533
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 8:33 pm
Location: Antalya, Turkey

Re: Rising Stars v Fading Warriors 2009 (The Decider)

Post by beachknight »

Remarkable achievements are on the side of rising stars.
On the other hand, fading warriors have still the same power.

My vote is clear.

Best,
hi, merhaba, hallo HT
User avatar
Graham Banks
Posts: 45119
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
Location: Auckland, NZ

Rising Stars off to a great start!

Post by Graham Banks »

RISING STARS v FADING WARRIORS (THE DECIDER)

AMD64x2 Dual Core
Deep Shredder 11 GUI
128mb hash each
3-4-5 piece tablebases
Ponder off
Xmas2640b.bkt book
40 moves in 38 minutes repeating (adapted for the CCRL)
2 cycles 30 rounds
All engines 32-bit 1CPU


Standings after Round 5

4.0 - Little Goliath Evolution 3.12
4.0 - Brutus 8.04
4.0 - N2 0.1
4.0 - Petir 4.9999
3.5 - Tornado 3.42a 32bit
3.0 - SOS 5.1
3.0 - Scorpio 2.2 32-bit
2.5 - Xpdnt 091007
2.0 - NanoSzachy 3.8
2.0 - Ufim 8.02
2.0 - Hermann 2.5
2.0 - Quark 2.35
1.5 - Arasan 11.6 32-bit
1.5 - Tao 5.6
1.0 - Pepito 1.59
0.0 - Yace 0.99.87
22.5 - Rising Stars
17.5 - Fading Warriors
gbanksnz at gmail.com
User avatar
Graham Banks
Posts: 45119
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
Location: Auckland, NZ

Rising Stars maintaining stranglehold

Post by Graham Banks »

RISING STARS v FADING WARRIORS (THE DECIDER)

AMD64x2 Dual Core
Deep Shredder 11 GUI
128mb hash each
3-4-5 piece tablebases
Ponder off
Xmas2640b.bkt book
40 moves in 38 minutes repeating (adapted for the CCRL)
2 cycles 30 rounds
All engines 32-bit 1CPU


Standings after Round 10

8.0 - Petir 4.9999
7.0 - N2 0.1
7.0 - Little Goliath Evolution 3.12
7.0 - Brutus 8.04
7.0 - Scorpio 2.2 32-bit
6.0 - Xpdnt 091007
5.5 - SOS 5.1
5.5 - Tornado 3.42a 32bit
4.5 - Ufim 8.02
4.5 - Quark 2.35
4.5 - Hermann 2.5
4.0 - NanoSzachy 3.8
3.5 - Pepito 1.59
3.0 - Tao 5.6
2.0 - Arasan 11.6 32-bit
1.0 - Yace 0.99.87
43.0 - Rising Stars
37.0 - Fading Warriors
gbanksnz at gmail.com
User avatar
Graham Banks
Posts: 45119
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
Location: Auckland, NZ

Rising Stars looking good at the halfway stage

Post by Graham Banks »

RISING STARS v FADING WARRIORS (THE DECIDER)

AMD64x2 Dual Core
Deep Shredder 11 GUI
128mb hash each
3-4-5 piece tablebases
Ponder off
Xmas2640b.bkt book
40 moves in 38 minutes repeating (adapted for the CCRL)
2 cycles 30 rounds
All engines 32-bit 1CPU


Standings after Round 15

11.5 - Petir 4.9999
10.5 - Scorpio 2.2 32-bit
10.0 - Xpdnt 091007
10.0 - Little Goliath Evolution 3.12
10.0 - Brutus 8.04
9.0 - N2 0.1
8.0 - Tao 5.6
7.0 - Tornado 3.42a 32bit
6.5 - Quark 2.35
6.5 - SOS 5.1
6.5 - Hermann 2.5
6.0 - Pepito 1.59
6.0 - Ufim 8.02
5.0 - NanoSzachy 3.8
5.0 - Arasan 11.6 32-bit
2.5 - Yace 0.99.87
63.0 - Rising Stars
57.0 - Fading Warriors
gbanksnz at gmail.com
User avatar
beachknight
Posts: 3533
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 8:33 pm
Location: Antalya, Turkey

Re: Rising Stars looking good at the halfway stage

Post by beachknight »

We lost this match only by a small margin.
Victory will be with us next time.

Best,
hi, merhaba, hallo HT
User avatar
Graham Banks
Posts: 45119
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
Location: Auckland, NZ

Re: Rising Stars looking good at the halfway stage

Post by Graham Banks »

beachknight wrote:We lost this match only by a small margin.
Victory will be with us next time.

Best,
Only halfway through Harun. :wink:
gbanksnz at gmail.com
User avatar
Graham Banks
Posts: 45119
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
Location: Auckland, NZ

Fading Warriors with an uphill battle after Round 20.

Post by Graham Banks »

RISING STARS v FADING WARRIORS (THE DECIDER)

AMD64x2 Dual Core
Deep Shredder 11 GUI
128mb hash each
3-4-5 piece tablebases
Ponder off
Xmas2640b.bkt book
40 moves in 38 minutes repeating (adapted for the CCRL)
2 cycles 30 rounds
All engines 32-bit 1CPU


Standings after Round 20

15.0 - Brutus 8.04
15.0 - Petir 4.9999
13.0 - Scorpio 2.2 32-bit
12.5 - N2 0.1
11.5 - Little Goliath Evolution 3.12
11.0 - Xpdnt 091007
10.0 - Tornado 3.42a 32bit
9.5 - Ufim 8.02
9.5 - Tao 5.6
9.0 - SOS 5.1
8.5 - Hermann 2.5
8.0 - Quark 2.35
7.0 - NanoSzachy 3.8
7.0 - Pepito 1.59
7.0 - Arasan 11.6 32-bit
6.5 - Yace 0.99.87
84.0 - Rising Stars
76.0 - Fading Warriors
gbanksnz at gmail.com
User avatar
Kirk
Posts: 5702
Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 3:44 am

Re: Fading Warriors with an uphill battle after Round 20.

Post by Kirk »

Graham Banks wrote:RISING STARS v FADING WARRIORS (THE DECIDER)

AMD64x2 Dual Core
Deep Shredder 11 GUI
128mb hash each
3-4-5 piece tablebases
Ponder off
Xmas2640b.bkt book
40 moves in 38 minutes repeating (adapted for the CCRL)
2 cycles 30 rounds
All engines 32-bit 1CPU


Standings after Round 20

15.0 - Brutus 8.04
15.0 - Petir 4.9999
13.0 - Scorpio 2.2 32-bit
12.5 - N2 0.1
11.5 - Little Goliath Evolution 3.12
11.0 - Xpdnt 091007
10.0 - Tornado 3.42a 32bit
9.5 - Ufim 8.02
9.5 - Tao 5.6
9.0 - SOS 5.1
8.5 - Hermann 2.5
8.0 - Quark 2.35
7.0 - NanoSzachy 3.8
7.0 - Pepito 1.59
7.0 - Arasan 11.6 32-bit
6.5 - Yace 0.99.87
84.0 - Rising Stars
76.0 - Fading Warriors
Hi Graham,

Is the Quark the one that was formally known as Lambchop?
“He knew all the tricks, dramatic irony, metaphor, pathos, puns, parody, litotes and... satire. He was vicious”