about weaker engines

Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.

Moderator: Ras

Togga

about weaker engines

Post by Togga »

mostly the weaker engines are not really weaker , these are mostly only much slower, but not weaker in chess knowledge/ AI:

less nodes per second
less depth per time

or what are the differences between top engines and lower rated engines?
User avatar
hgm
Posts: 28359
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 10:06 am
Location: Amsterdam
Full name: H G Muller

Re: about weaker engines

Post by hgm »

In can be anything. Some engines are weak because they have low nps, due to inefficient coding, use of an inferior programming language, or use of inefficient algorithms. Other engines are weak because they contain bugs. Most detrimental to strength is poor move ordering. Having poor or wrong knowledge in their evaluation can also be a reason. Some engines simply lack features (e.g. no hash table).

Micro-Max is weak because of a combination of effects: very poor strategic knowledge, (e.g. it cannot recognize passers, it does not have a mobility term in its evaluation), no move ordering to speak of, (causing a high effective branching factor), no piece list (slowing down its nps).