NAUM 4.2

Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.

Moderator: Ras

User avatar
George Bodkin
Posts: 160
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:46 pm
Location: Selden, NY

NAUM 4.2

Post by George Bodkin »

NAUM 4.2 is now out.
wolfv
Posts: 106
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 5:15 am
Location: Nis, Serbia

Re: NAUM 4.2

Post by wolfv »

Just played my first game on Playchess against a monster Rybka. My machine is an i5-750 stock speed:


[Event "Rated game, 3m + 0s"]
[Site "Engine Room"]
[Date "2010.03.20"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Kulgan, Naum 4.2"]
[Black "Phil Harris, Rybka 3"]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
[ECO "E04"]
[WhiteElo "2590"]
[BlackElo "2671"]
[Annotator "-0.20;0.03"]
[PlyCount "165"]
[EventDate "2010.03.20"]
[TimeControl "180"]

{Rybka 3 (6 cores): 16.8 plies; 589kN/s Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU X 980
@ 3.33GHz 4418MHz, 512 MB} 1. d4 {[%eval 1,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} Nf6 {[%eval 0,0]
[%emt 0:00:00]} 2. c4 {[%eval 1,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} e6 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:
00]} 3. Nf3 {[%eval 1,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} d5 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} 4. g3
{[%eval 1,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} dxc4 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} 5. Bg2 {[%eval
1,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} a6 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} 6. O-O {[%eval 1,0] [%emt
0:00:00]} Nc6 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} 7. Be3 {[%eval 1,0] [%emt 0:00:00]}
Nd5 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} 8. Qc1 {[%eval 1,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} Be7 {
[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} 9. Qxc4 {[%eval 1,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} Nxe3 {[%eval
0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} 10. fxe3 {[%eval 1,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} O-O {[%eval 0,0]
[%emt 0:00:00]} 11. Nc3 {[%eval 1,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} Rb8 {[%eval 3,14] [%emt 0:
00:03]} 12. Ne4 {[%eval 1,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} Qd5 {[%eval 3,16] [%emt 0:00:07]}
13. Qc2 {[%eval 1,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} Qh5 {[%eval 0,16] [%emt 0:00:07]} 14. a3 {
[%eval 1,0] [%emt 0:00:00] (Rac1)} Qh6 {[%eval -2,15] [%emt 0:00:03]} 15. Qd2 {
[%eval 1,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} Rd8 {[%eval -5,15] [%emt 0:00:02]} 16. Qc3 {[%eval
-20,17] [%emt 0:00:03]} f6 {[%eval -2,15] [%emt 0:00:01] (f5)} 17. Ne1 {[%eval
-13,18] [%emt 0:00:09] (Rac1)} Bd7 {[%eval -17,14] [%emt 0:00:02]} 18. Nc2 {
[%eval -10,17] [%emt 0:00:03]} Be8 {[%eval -8,15] [%emt 0:00:01]} 19. b4 {
[%eval -2,16] [%emt 0:00:02]} Bg6 {[%eval 0,15] [%emt 0:00:15]} 20. Rf4 {
[%eval 3,19] [%emt 0:00:00] (Rac1)} Bh5 {[%eval -6,13] [%emt 0:00:03] (Be8)}
21. Nc5 {[%eval 8,16] [%emt 0:00:02] (Re1)} Bxc5 {[%eval -18,13] [%emt 0:00:02]
} 22. Qxc5 {[%eval 16,17] [%emt 0:00:01] (bxc5)} Bxe2 {[%eval -13,14] [%emt 0:
00:01]} 23. d5 {[%eval 44,16] [%emt 0:00:09] (Bxc6)} Ne5 {[%eval 29,12] [%emt
0:00:02]} 24. Nd4 {[%eval 51,16] [%emt 0:00:01]} Nd3 {[%eval 0,14] [%emt 0:00:
03] (g5)} 25. Qxc7 {[%eval 50,16] [%emt 0:00:03]} Nxf4 {[%eval 0,15] [%emt 0:
00:01] (Bg4)} 26. exf4 {[%eval 20,18] [%emt 0:00:09]} Bg4 {[%eval 0,17] [%emt
0:00:00]} 27. dxe6 {[%eval 13,18] [%emt 0:00:05] (Nxe6)} Qg6 {[%eval 0,16]
[%emt 0:00:01]} 28. Qc3 {[%eval 15,18] [%emt 0:00:07]} Rbc8 {[%eval 0,15]
[%emt 0:00:00] (Qe8)} 29. Qe3 {[%eval 15,16] [%emt 0:00:02]} Qe8 {[%eval 0,16]
[%emt 0:00:02]} 30. h3 {[%eval 3,16] [%emt 0:00:01] (Bxb7)} Rc4 {[%eval -15,13]
[%emt 0:00:01]} 31. e7 {[%eval 11,17] [%emt 0:00:00] Kulgan,Naum 4.2 offers a
draw} Rdxd4 {[%eval 50,15] [%emt 0:00:18]} 32. hxg4 {[%eval 56,20] [%emt 0:00:
00]} Kh8 {[%eval 76,16] [%emt 0:00:08]} 33. g5 {[%eval 64,20] [%emt 0:00:04]}
f5 {[%eval 76,15] [%emt 0:00:00]} 34. Re1 {[%eval 69,19] [%emt 0:00:10]} Rd7 {
[%eval 75,16] [%emt 0:00:00]} 35. Bf3 {[%eval 69,19] [%emt 0:00:10]} Re4 {
[%eval 86,17] [%emt 0:00:00]} 36. Bxe4 {[%eval 69,20] [%emt 0:00:09]} Rxe7 {
[%eval 86,18] [%emt 0:00:00]} 37. Qc5 {[%eval 69,19] [%emt 0:00:01]} fxe4 {
[%eval 86,18] [%emt 0:00:00]} 38. Rc1 {[%eval 77,20] [%emt 0:00:07]} h6 {
[%eval 86,17] [%emt 0:00:07] (h5)} 39. gxh6 {[%eval 77,17] [%emt 0:00:02]} gxh6
{[%eval 89,16] [%emt 0:00:00]} 40. Qd6 {[%eval 77,19] [%emt 0:00:02]} Kg7 {
[%eval 89,16] [%emt 0:00:10] (Kh7)} 41. Rc7 {[%eval 77,17] [%emt 0:00:01]} Rxc7
{[%eval 86,17] [%emt 0:00:10]} 42. Qxc7+ {[%eval 78,22] [%emt 0:00:00]} Kg6 {
[%eval 86,18] [%emt 0:00:02]} 43. g4 {[%eval 78,19] [%emt 0:00:00]} e3 {[%eval
86,18] [%emt 0:00:03]} 44. Qb6+ {[%eval 78,21] [%emt 0:00:00]} Kf7 {[%eval 88,
18] [%emt 0:00:03] (Kg7)} 45. Qxb7+ {[%eval 77,19] [%emt 0:00:01]} Kf8 {[%eval
88,19] [%emt 0:00:01]} 46. Qh1 {[%eval 77,20] [%emt 0:00:00]} Kg7 {[%eval 88,
18] [%emt 0:00:02]} 47. Qh5 {[%eval 78,20] [%emt 0:00:00]} Qd7 {[%eval 88,17]
[%emt 0:00:00]} 48. Qe5+ {[%eval 78,19] [%emt 0:00:00]} Kf7 {[%eval 88,17]
[%emt 0:00:00]} 49. Qxe3 {[%eval 78,20] [%emt 0:00:01]} Qxg4+ {[%eval 87,18]
[%emt 0:00:00]} 50. Kf2 {[%eval 78,20] [%emt 0:00:01]} Qh4+ {[%eval 87,18]
[%emt 0:00:00]} 51. Qg3 {[%eval 78,20] [%emt 0:00:01]} Qf6 {[%eval 87,18]
[%emt 0:00:00]} 52. Qb3+ {[%eval 78,19] [%emt 0:00:01]} Kg7 {[%eval 87,18]
[%emt 0:00:00]} 53. Qe3 {[%eval 77,18] [%emt 0:00:03] (Qf3)} Kf7 {[%eval 79,16]
[%emt 0:00:01]} 54. Kf3 {[%eval 77,20] [%emt 0:00:02] (Qf3)} Qc6+ {[%eval 80,
16] [%emt 0:00:01]} 55. Kg3 {[%eval 77,20] [%emt 0:00:00] (Kg4)} Qg6+ {[%eval
68,17] [%emt 0:00:01]} 56. Kh4 {[%eval 70,20] [%emt 0:00:01] (Kh2)} Qf6+ {
[%eval 67,18] [%emt 0:00:01]} 57. Kg4 {[%eval 62,20] [%emt 0:00:01] (Kh3)} Qg6+
{[%eval 67,18] [%emt 0:00:01]} 58. Kh3 {[%eval 62,21] [%emt 0:00:00]} Qh5+ {
[%eval 66,19] [%emt 0:00:04]} 59. Kg2 {[%eval 62,22] [%emt 0:00:00]} Qg6+ {
[%eval 66,19] [%emt 0:00:01]} 60. Kf1 {[%eval 64,20] [%emt 0:00:02] (Qg3)} Qc6
{[%eval 67,16] [%emt 0:00:01]} 61. Ke1 {[%eval 64,20] [%emt 0:00:00] (Ke2)} h5
{[%eval 67,16] [%emt 0:00:01]} 62. Kf2 {[%eval 64,20] [%emt 0:00:00]} h4 {
[%eval 67,16] [%emt 0:00:01]} 63. Qd3 {[%eval 64,19] [%emt 0:00:00] (Qc5)} Kg7
{[%eval 67,15] [%emt 0:00:01]} 64. Qd4+ {[%eval 60,19] [%emt 0:00:03] (Qf5)}
Kf7 {[%eval 67,18] [%emt 0:00:01]} 65. Qc5 {[%eval 60,20] [%emt 0:00:00]} Qg6 {
[%eval 67,17] [%emt 0:00:00] (Qe6)} 66. Qd5+ {[%eval 73,17] [%emt 0:00:01]
(Qc7+)} Ke8 {[%eval 67,17] [%emt 0:00:01]} 67. Qf3 {[%eval 73,18] [%emt 0:00:
01]} Ke7 {[%eval 67,17] [%emt 0:00:01] (Kf7)} 68. Qb7+ {[%eval 70,19] [%emt 0:
00:02]} Kf8 {[%eval 67,19] [%emt 0:00:00] (Kd8)} 69. Qb8+ {[%eval 70,20] [%emt
0:00:01] (Qc8+)} Kg7 {[%eval 67,18] [%emt 0:00:01] (Kf7)} 70. Qe5+ {[%eval 70,
19] [%emt 0:00:01]} Kf7 {[%eval 67,19] [%emt 0:00:00]} 71. Qc7+ {[%eval 70,20]
[%emt 0:00:00]} Ke8 {[%eval 67,18] [%emt 0:00:05]} 72. Qb8+ {[%eval 60,21]
[%emt 0:00:00] (Qe5+)} Ke7 {[%eval 49,17] [%emt 0:00:01] (Kf7)} 73. Qa7+ {
[%eval 60,18] [%emt 0:00:01] (Qc7+)} Ke8 {[%eval 49,16] [%emt 0:00:01] (Kd8)}
74. Qe3+ {[%eval 60,21] [%emt 0:00:02]} Kf7 {[%eval 49,18] [%emt 0:00:00]} 75.
Qb3+ {[%eval 60,20] [%emt 0:00:00]} Kf8 {[%eval 49,18] [%emt 0:00:01] (Kf6)}
76. Qc3 {[%eval 60,21] [%emt 0:00:02]} Kf7 {[%eval 49,17] [%emt 0:00:02]} 77.
Qc4+ {[%eval 60,20] [%emt 0:00:02]} Ke8 {[%eval 24,17] [%emt 0:00:00] (Kf8)}
78. Qc8+ {[%eval 70,18] [%emt 0:00:04] (Qe2+)} Ke7 {[%eval 8,14] [%emt 0:00:00]
} 79. Qc7+ {[%eval 3,18] [%emt 0:00:03] (Qh3)} Ke8 {[%eval 0,16] [%emt 0:00:00]
} 80. Ke3 {[%eval 9,16] [%emt 0:00:02] (f5)} Qg3+ {[%eval 0,14] [%emt 0:00:00]}
81. Ke4 {[%eval 3,17] [%emt 0:00:01]} Qg2+ {[%eval 0,16] [%emt 0:00:00]} 82.
Kf5 {[%eval 0,18] [%emt 0:00:01] (Ke5)} h3 {[%eval 0,17] [%emt 0:00:00]} 83.
Qc8+ {[%eval 0,19] [%emt 0:00:00] (Lag: Av=0.21s, max=0.5s)} 1/2-1/2
----------

Djordje
User avatar
Werner
Posts: 2995
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:09 pm
Location: Germany
Full name: Werner Schüle

Re: NAUM 4.2

Post by Werner »

George Bodkin wrote:NAUM 4.2 is now out.
Thanks a lot Alex for the update!

I have just started to test the new version and I found a speedup till 50 %.
It´s not easy to measure, as I saw the search is different - e.g. different selective depths.

wish you all the best
Werner
User avatar
George Bodkin
Posts: 160
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:46 pm
Location: Selden, NY

Re: NAUM 4.2

Post by George Bodkin »

Does anybody have a logo for Naum 4.2

Thanks George
User avatar
Werner
Posts: 2995
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:09 pm
Location: Germany
Full name: Werner Schüle

Re: NAUM 4.2

Post by Werner »

Hi,
I think this is the first match Rybka 3 looses ever in our tests for CEGT 40/20:

Code: Select all

1   Naum 4.2 x64 4CPU  +16/-9/=25 57.00%   28.5/50
2   Rybka 3 x64 4CPU   +9/-16/=25 43.00%   21.5/50
Werner
govert
Posts: 270
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 12:52 pm

Re: NAUM 4.2

Post by govert »

Werner wrote:Hi,
I think this is the first match Rybka 3 looses ever in our tests for CEGT 40/20:

Code: Select all

1   Naum 4.2 x64 4CPU  +16/-9/=25 57.00%   28.5/50
2   Rybka 3 x64 4CPU   +9/-16/=25 43.00%   21.5/50
Impressive!
And this is _wihout_ Ippo* inspired improvements, right?
Jouni
Posts: 3673
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:15 pm
Full name: Jouni Uski

Re: NAUM 4.2

Post by Jouni »

Big difference to IPON list:

Naum 4.2 - Rybka 3 mp (2905) 27.5 - 58.5 31.98% :o

Jouni
Damir
Posts: 2886
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 3:53 pm
Location: Denmark
Full name: Damir Desevac

Re: NAUM 4.2

Post by Damir »

Yes if you include 1+1 testings... :lol: :lol:
User avatar
Dr.Wael Deeb
Posts: 9773
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:44 pm
Location: Amman,Jordan

Re: NAUM 4.2

Post by Dr.Wael Deeb »

Damir wrote:Yes if you include 1+1 testings... :lol: :lol:
:lol:

:wink:
_No one can hit as hard as life.But it ain’t about how hard you can hit.It’s about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward.How much you can take and keep moving forward….
User avatar
Werner
Posts: 2995
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:09 pm
Location: Germany
Full name: Werner Schüle

Re: NAUM 4.2

Post by Werner »

:D
maybe Naum 4.2 was a bit lucky here - we will make more games of course. A match against Rybka 3 x64 2CPU is running. After 12 games Rybka leads 7,5-4,5!
Here is the next result:

Code: Select all

1   Stockfish 1.6 x64 4CPU  +13/-13/=24 50.00%   25.0/50  625.00
2   Naum 4.2 x64 4CPU       +13/-13/=24 50.00%   25.0/50  625.00
Werner