Most implementations seem to avoid.. has anyone tried permitting LMR on PV nodes? If so, what were the results?
fyi, my quick testing seems to show a slight reduction in ELO if lmr is done on PV nodes, but margin of error is still high
lmr at PV nodes?
Moderator: Ras
-
- Posts: 20943
- Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:30 pm
- Location: Birmingham, AL
Re: lmr at PV nodes?
I do it everywhere, just like null-move, and have found that trying to restrict it always hurts in my testing, however I try to do the restriction.silentshark wrote:Most implementations seem to avoid.. has anyone tried permitting LMR on PV nodes? If so, what were the results?
fyi, my quick testing seems to show a slight reduction in ELO if lmr is done on PV nodes, but margin of error is still high
Seems to me that if a move is bad and deserves reducing, it deserves the same treatment everywhere.
-
- Posts: 327
- Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2010 7:15 pm
Re: lmr at PV nodes?
that's really interesting - I like the look of the speedup doing lmr everywhere gives, but I'm not seeing any elo gain (or loss) yet. More testgames needed..bob wrote:I do it everywhere, just like null-move, and have found that trying to restrict it always hurts in my testing, however I try to do the restriction.silentshark wrote:Most implementations seem to avoid.. has anyone tried permitting LMR on PV nodes? If so, what were the results?
fyi, my quick testing seems to show a slight reduction in ELO if lmr is done on PV nodes, but margin of error is still high
Seems to me that if a move is bad and deserves reducing, it deserves the same treatment everywhere.
-
- Posts: 20943
- Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:30 pm
- Location: Birmingham, AL
Re: lmr at PV nodes?
I believe you are going to need in the 100K+ game range to measure the difference. It is not very big.silentshark wrote:that's really interesting - I like the look of the speedup doing lmr everywhere gives, but I'm not seeing any elo gain (or loss) yet. More testgames needed..bob wrote:I do it everywhere, just like null-move, and have found that trying to restrict it always hurts in my testing, however I try to do the restriction.silentshark wrote:Most implementations seem to avoid.. has anyone tried permitting LMR on PV nodes? If so, what were the results?
fyi, my quick testing seems to show a slight reduction in ELO if lmr is done on PV nodes, but margin of error is still high
Seems to me that if a move is bad and deserves reducing, it deserves the same treatment everywhere.
-
- Posts: 454
- Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 6:44 pm
- Location: Bulgaria
Re: lmr at PV nodes?
I spent a month in testing some time ago and the results in my implementation was really bad when LMR and nullmove was restricted at pv nodes. The only exception i had was FP - 5 elo better when restricted.
-
- Posts: 388
- Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 6:57 pm
- Location: Washington, DC
Re: lmr at PV nodes?
My experience showed a definite bonus if you do LMR at all nodes, including at the root.silentshark wrote:Most implementations seem to avoid.. has anyone tried permitting LMR on PV nodes? If so, what were the results?
fyi, my quick testing seems to show a slight reduction in ELO if lmr is done on PV nodes, but margin of error is still high
-
- Posts: 613
- Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2009 7:03 am
Re: lmr at PV nodes?
For Stockfish the optimal solution has been to do more aggressive LMR on non-pv nodes and less aggressive LRM on pv nodes (and on root). Null move is only done in non-pv nodes.silentshark wrote:Most implementations seem to avoid.. has anyone tried permitting LMR on PV nodes? If so, what were the results?
fyi, my quick testing seems to show a slight reduction in ELO if lmr is done on PV nodes, but margin of error is still high
Joona Kiiski
-
- Posts: 65
- Joined: Thu Jul 08, 2010 9:16 am
Re: lmr at PV nodes?
Hi,
with Spike the same, slightly better with lmr at pv nodes.
Greetings Volker
with Spike the same, slightly better with lmr at pv nodes.
Greetings Volker
Mangar Spike Chess