SCCT Rating List (22.12.2010)

[Sedat Canbaz]

Hello Friends !

Last Updates:
-----------------
Houdini 1.5 x64 T4
Critter 0.90 x64 T4
Spark 1.0 x64 T4
Crafty 23.4 PS x64 T4
Equinox 0.87t x64 T4
Umko 1.1 x64 T4
Tornado 4.4 x64 T4
Francesca 0.15

SCCT Rating List-TOP 20:
http://sedatchess.110mb.com/index.php?p=1_58

SCCT Rating List-All Versions:
http://sedatchess.110mb.com/index.php?p=1_59

Download Games:
http://sedatchess.110mb.com/index.php?p=1_6_Download

Best Wishes,
Sedat

[Frank Quisinsky]

Hi Sedat,

great work you do for us, again and again!

Nice to see that Francesca is in your list. Strong performance from Houdini 1.5.

I have a problem only with Rybka 4 with and without ponder. This should be check with more games I think.

Have thanks and have a nice Xmas.

Best
Frank

[silentshark]

Hi Sedat,

Thanks for including my meagre little engine in your test! Perhaps, with luck and effort I could break into the top 100

Regards,
Tom

[Sedat Canbaz]

Hi Sedat,

great work you do for us, again and again!

Nice to see that Francesca is in your list. Strong performance from Houdini 1.5.

I have a problem only with Rybka 4 with and without ponder. This should be check with more games I think.

Have thanks and have a nice Xmas.

Best
Frank

Hello Frank,

Thank you for your kind words/interesting comments...

What kind of Rybka 4 ponder problems do you have ?
I mean,you are planning to test Rybka like your previous Crafty ponder off/on ?


I wish you happy new year too !!

Greetings,
Sedat

[Sedat Canbaz]

Hello Tom,

Not at all...its my pleasure

You know,Francesca is one of my favorite engines and in almost each of my tournaments,she is as a participant

Happy new year to you !

Best,
Sedat

[Frank Quisinsky]

Hi Sedat,

no, I mean the different in your list between Rybka 4 with and without ponder is interesting. Perhaps with more games will be the different bigger. I don't know.

All other of your ratings are quit clear for me. Nice to have your list and I hope you continue your work on your ratinglist in the next year.

Best
Frank

[Sedat Canbaz]

Hi Sedat,

no, I mean the different in your list between Rybka 4 with and without ponder is interesting. Perhaps with more games will be the different bigger. I don't know.

All other of your ratings are quit clear for me. Nice to have your list and I hope you continue your work on your ratinglist in the next year.

Best
Frank

Hello Frank,

Why...Rybka exp 61 T1 is played with ponder on and performed approx.40 elo better than Rybka 4 T1 ponder off ?!
(just a little joke,probably the setting has played a big role)

Actually i expected too that Rybka 4 (with ponder on) to be ranked at least 15-20 elo better than Rybka 4 (with ponder off)

Normally against each other (in auto232 mode) Rybka 4 (with ponder on) won with clear difference

The both elo standings are almost same,probably due to both Rybka 4 T1 participants have been tested against different participants:
-Rybka 4 T1 ponder off:exception against Rybka ponder on,all of its opponents were MP Engines (using 4 threads)
-Rybka 4 T1 ponder on:played against only single processor engines or against MP engines,but using one thread

Even with Elostat calculation,the both r4 participants (ponder on/off) have almost equal points

Code: Select all

    Program                          Elo    +   -   Games   Score   Av.Op.  Draws

  1 Houdini 1.5 x64 T4             : 3368   27  27   780    85.4 %   3060   19.4 %
  2 Rybka 4 Exp 61 x64 T4          : 3310   30  29   420    75.2 %   3117   31.4 %
  3 Rybka 4 x64 T4                 : 3295   16  15  1460    77.8 %   3077   33.2 %
  4 Rybka 3 x64 T4                 : 3239   17  17  1070    68.6 %   3103   37.1 %
  5 Rybka 4 Exp 61 x64 T1          : 3231   31  31   560    82.9 %   2956   19.1 %
  6 Stockfish 1.9 JA x64 T4        : 3225   15  15  1360    67.7 %   3097   39.5 %
  7 Stockfish 1.8 JA x64 T4        : 3220   19  19   850    70.5 %   3069   37.9 %
  8 Critter 0.90 x64 T4            : 3219   26  26   460    66.2 %   3102   36.7 %
  9 Stockfish 1.7.1 JA x64 T4      : 3201   17  17   930    65.7 %   3088   44.7 %
 10 Rybka 4 x64 T1 Ponder ON       : 3192   16  16  1110    74.2 %   3009   40.1 %
 11 Rybka 4 x64 T1 Ponder OFF      : 3190   16  16  1090    68.8 %   3053   39.4 %

Best,
Sedat

[Frank Quisinsky]

Hi Sedat,

you wrote:
Actually i expected too that Rybka 4 (with ponder on) to be ranked at least 15-20 elo better than Rybka 4 (with ponder off)

Yes, that's is a logical explanation for me. First I have in my brain too. Have thanks for your new message about this topic, very interesting.

Best
Frank

[Sedat Canbaz]

Hi Sedat,

you wrote:
Actually i expected too that Rybka 4 (with ponder on) to be ranked at least 15-20 elo better than Rybka 4 (with ponder off)

Yes, that's is a logical explanation for me. First I have in my brain too. Have thanks for your new message about this topic, very interesting.

Best
Frank

Hello Frank,

You are welcome,its my pleasure...

Btw,i am very much interested to see the performance of Houdini 1.5 in SWCR


Best Wishes,
Sedat