Hi to all !
In my mind there is no need to blame the
CCRL for their decision not to test Houdini.
The CCRL makes a fine job in my view.
Best wishes,
G.S.
A personal remark about the CCRL
Moderator: Ras
-
Graham Banks
- Posts: 44607
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
- Location: Auckland, NZ
Re: A personal remark about the CCRL
Thanks Gerhard for your kind words.ThatsIt wrote:Hi to all !
In my mind there is no need to blame the
CCRL for their decision not to test Houdini.
The CCRL makes a fine job in my view.
Best wishes,
G.S.
CEGT has always done a fine job too and continues to do so.
Cheers,
Graham.
gbanksnz at gmail.com
-
Kaj Soderberg
- Posts: 137
- Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2011 7:33 pm
Re: A personal remark about the CCRL
I agree.
It is the good right of a private/voluntary testing group to define their criteria of what types of engines to test and what types not. One can disagree with the criteria, but without further consequence.
Personally i would be in favour of testing both R and I engines, or not to test either of them. This as the engine origins of both are dubious. Now it feels a bit like having double standards. But then again, it is only a personal idea, without any consequence for CCRL.
The amount of man hours it must take to do all the testing stuff on an on-going basis, must be huge. I take my hat off for that. I will follow the test results of CCRL with great interest as always.
Best regards,
Kaj
It is the good right of a private/voluntary testing group to define their criteria of what types of engines to test and what types not. One can disagree with the criteria, but without further consequence.
Personally i would be in favour of testing both R and I engines, or not to test either of them. This as the engine origins of both are dubious. Now it feels a bit like having double standards. But then again, it is only a personal idea, without any consequence for CCRL.
The amount of man hours it must take to do all the testing stuff on an on-going basis, must be huge. I take my hat off for that. I will follow the test results of CCRL with great interest as always.
Best regards,
Kaj