Open Source Blitz Rating List: IvanHoe

Discussion of computer chess matches and engine tournaments.

Moderator: Ras

lucasart
Posts: 3241
Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 1:29 pm
Full name: lucasart

Open Source Blitz Rating List: IvanHoe

Post by lucasart »

Conditions
* Open Source and Portable engines only: not interested in closed source, commercial, or windows only programs.
* Copyleft: Ideally licensed under the GNU GPL, or with copyright restrictions that are not excessive.
* 1min+1sec/move, 64 MB Hash, 1 Thread, 64-bit, Ponder off.
* 8 book moves: neither to little, nor too much. Allows engines to develop their own plan, while offering a large enough number of opening positions.
* Bayeselo, offset Fruit 2.1 = 2700 elo

Results

Code: Select all

Rank Name                  Elo    +    - games score oppo. draws 
   1 IvanHoe 999946a      3223   44   41   250   83%  2914   20% 
   2 Stockfish 2.2.1      3200   42   40   250   81%  2919   24% 
   3 Protector 1.4        2945   33   33   300   53%  2925   24% 
   4 Umko 1.2             2870   29   29   400   51%  2877   25% 
   5 Toga 1.4.1           2845   29   29   400   48%  2880   24% 
   6 Daydreamer 1.75      2726   32   33   250   46%  2758   34% 
   7 Crafty 23.4          2712   30   30   400   30%  2897   23% 
   8 Fruit 2.1            2700   31   31   300   38%  2794   28% 
   9 GNU Chess 5.07.173b  2664   34   34   250   35%  2771   26% 
IvanHoe 999946a is the new open source champion ! I had a look at the game, no time losses, no illegal move bugs, IvanHoe really won fair and square against StockFish and destroyed the others
User avatar
Graham Banks
Posts: 44589
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
Location: Auckland, NZ

Re: Open Source Blitz Rating List: IvanHoe

Post by Graham Banks »

Lucas - I'm reliably informed that the KLO versions of Ivanhoe only come with the original Ippolit source code, not the modified source code compiled to create the new exe.
If that is correct, does it still meet your open source criteria?
gbanksnz at gmail.com
User avatar
geots
Posts: 4790
Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 12:42 am

Re: Open Source Blitz Rating List: IvanHoe

Post by geots »

lucasart wrote:Conditions
* Open Source and Portable engines only: not interested in closed source, commercial, or windows only programs.
* Copyleft: Ideally licensed under the GNU GPL, or with copyright restrictions that are not excessive.
* 1min+1sec/move, 64 MB Hash, 1 Thread, 64-bit, Ponder off.
* 8 book moves: neither to little, nor too much. Allows engines to develop their own plan, while offering a large enough number of opening positions.
* Bayeselo, offset Fruit 2.1 = 2700 elo

Results

Code: Select all

Rank Name                  Elo    +    - games score oppo. draws 
   1 IvanHoe 999946a      3223   44   41   250   83%  2914   20% 
   2 Stockfish 2.2.1      3200   42   40   250   81%  2919   24% 
   3 Protector 1.4        2945   33   33   300   53%  2925   24% 
   4 Umko 1.2             2870   29   29   400   51%  2877   25% 
   5 Toga 1.4.1           2845   29   29   400   48%  2880   24% 
   6 Daydreamer 1.75      2726   32   33   250   46%  2758   34% 
   7 Crafty 23.4          2712   30   30   400   30%  2897   23% 
   8 Fruit 2.1            2700   31   31   300   38%  2794   28% 
   9 GNU Chess 5.07.173b  2664   34   34   250   35%  2771   26% 
IvanHoe 999946a is the new open source champion ! I had a look at the game, no time losses, no illegal move bugs, IvanHoe really won fair and square against StockFish and destroyed the others

Amazing considering you do not have the strongest 46a version, as we discussed, due to no Linux available. That just goes to show you how strong the engine is- in any form.

Good work here, Lucas. Any way I can assist you in the future with Ivanhoe versions, I will be more than happy to help.

geotsp8@yahoo.com- reach me there.



Best regards, and again very good work,

george


PM: Any time you have a concern about "open-source", contact me and I will not advise you wrong.
lucasart
Posts: 3241
Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 1:29 pm
Full name: lucasart

Re: Open Source Blitz Rating List: IvanHoe

Post by lucasart »

Graham Banks wrote:Lucas - I'm reliably informed that the KLO versions of Ivanhoe only come with the original Ippolit source code, not the modified source code compiled to create the new exe.
If that is correct, does it still meet your open source criteria?
I've got a fine compile and the source code of IvanHoe 999946a here. So why would I need KLO's compile ? I seriously doubt his compile is better than what I have here...
Besides *.exe files are Windows executables
lucasart
Posts: 3241
Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 1:29 pm
Full name: lucasart

Re: Open Source Blitz Rating List: IvanHoe

Post by lucasart »

geots wrote:
lucasart wrote:Conditions
* Open Source and Portable engines only: not interested in closed source, commercial, or windows only programs.
* Copyleft: Ideally licensed under the GNU GPL, or with copyright restrictions that are not excessive.
* 1min+1sec/move, 64 MB Hash, 1 Thread, 64-bit, Ponder off.
* 8 book moves: neither to little, nor too much. Allows engines to develop their own plan, while offering a large enough number of opening positions.
* Bayeselo, offset Fruit 2.1 = 2700 elo

Results

Code: Select all

Rank Name                  Elo    +    - games score oppo. draws 
   1 IvanHoe 999946a      3223   44   41   250   83%  2914   20% 
   2 Stockfish 2.2.1      3200   42   40   250   81%  2919   24% 
   3 Protector 1.4        2945   33   33   300   53%  2925   24% 
   4 Umko 1.2             2870   29   29   400   51%  2877   25% 
   5 Toga 1.4.1           2845   29   29   400   48%  2880   24% 
   6 Daydreamer 1.75      2726   32   33   250   46%  2758   34% 
   7 Crafty 23.4          2712   30   30   400   30%  2897   23% 
   8 Fruit 2.1            2700   31   31   300   38%  2794   28% 
   9 GNU Chess 5.07.173b  2664   34   34   250   35%  2771   26% 
IvanHoe 999946a is the new open source champion ! I had a look at the game, no time losses, no illegal move bugs, IvanHoe really won fair and square against StockFish and destroyed the others

Amazing considering you do not have the strongest 46a version, as we discussed, due to no Linux available. That just goes to show you how strong the engine is- in any form.

Good work here, Lucas. Any way I can assist you in the future with Ivanhoe versions, I will be more than happy to help.

geotsp8@yahoo.com- reach me there.



Best regards, and again very good work,

george


PM: Any time you have a concern about "open-source", contact me and I will not advise you wrong.
46a is the one I have no ? I mean v 999946a. Is that not the latest ?
User avatar
Graham Banks
Posts: 44589
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
Location: Auckland, NZ

Re: Open Source Blitz Rating List: IvanHoe

Post by Graham Banks »

lucasart wrote:
Graham Banks wrote:Lucas - I'm reliably informed that the KLO versions of Ivanhoe only come with the original Ippolit source code, not the modified source code compiled to create the new exe.
If that is correct, does it still meet your open source criteria?
I've got a fine compile and the source code of IvanHoe 999946a here. So why would I need KLO's compile ? I seriously doubt his compile is better than what I have here...
Besides *.exe files are Windows executables
Okay. Thanks for answering. 8-)
gbanksnz at gmail.com
User avatar
Graham Banks
Posts: 44589
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
Location: Auckland, NZ

Re: Open Source Blitz Rating List: IvanHoe

Post by Graham Banks »

lucasart wrote:46a is the one I have no ? I mean v 999946a. Is that not the latest ?
Pretty sure that 999946h is the latest. I'm sure that George will correct me if I'm wrong.
gbanksnz at gmail.com
lucasart
Posts: 3241
Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 1:29 pm
Full name: lucasart

Re: Open Source Blitz Rating List: IvanHoe

Post by lucasart »

Graham Banks wrote:Lucas - I'm reliably informed that the KLO versions of Ivanhoe only come with the original Ippolit source code, not the modified source code compiled to create the new exe.
If that is correct, does it still meet your open source criteria?
I'm afraid Ippolit source + compiled version of a much improved but closed source version doesn't work for me. For the same reason I won't even test Fruit 05/11/03 (latest version of Fabien) unless Fabien decides to release the source code. I'm perfectly happy to test derivatives, clones or whatever people call them so long as they are open source. Most people aren't engine programmers so they don't understand this. All they care about is elo, which is a shame...
But taking an open source program and making improvements in a closed source form is somewhat unethical: you take from the open source community and give nothing in return. Progress in the field of computer chess has only been achieved by open source software being published and articles being written about chess algorithms. No closed source program has ever contributed anything towards the community. So I don't see why I should make any publicity for them or use their software. All other rating lists test these so I don't need to duplicate their work anyway.
When you release a good open source software (like Fruit 2.1) it allows others to study your source code, and make improvements, or find recipies they can apply in their code. Ignorants call this cloning, I call it progress, as it's the only method by which the field has made so much progress over the years. If there hadn't been great programs like Crafty, Fruit StockFish, no one would even have anything above 2500 elo today...
Anyway, I would be happy if more people could understand this, and stop these idiotic debates about cloning...

Food for thoughts 8-)
User avatar
geots
Posts: 4790
Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 12:42 am

Re: Open Source Blitz Rating List: IvanHoe

Post by geots »

lucasart wrote:
geots wrote:
lucasart wrote:Conditions
* Open Source and Portable engines only: not interested in closed source, commercial, or windows only programs.
* Copyleft: Ideally licensed under the GNU GPL, or with copyright restrictions that are not excessive.
* 1min+1sec/move, 64 MB Hash, 1 Thread, 64-bit, Ponder off.
* 8 book moves: neither to little, nor too much. Allows engines to develop their own plan, while offering a large enough number of opening positions.
* Bayeselo, offset Fruit 2.1 = 2700 elo

Results

Code: Select all

Rank Name                  Elo    +    - games score oppo. draws 
   1 IvanHoe 999946a      3223   44   41   250   83%  2914   20% 
   2 Stockfish 2.2.1      3200   42   40   250   81%  2919   24% 
   3 Protector 1.4        2945   33   33   300   53%  2925   24% 
   4 Umko 1.2             2870   29   29   400   51%  2877   25% 
   5 Toga 1.4.1           2845   29   29   400   48%  2880   24% 
   6 Daydreamer 1.75      2726   32   33   250   46%  2758   34% 
   7 Crafty 23.4          2712   30   30   400   30%  2897   23% 
   8 Fruit 2.1            2700   31   31   300   38%  2794   28% 
   9 GNU Chess 5.07.173b  2664   34   34   250   35%  2771   26% 
IvanHoe 999946a is the new open source champion ! I had a look at the game, no time losses, no illegal move bugs, IvanHoe really won fair and square against StockFish and destroyed the others

Amazing considering you do not have the strongest 46a version, as we discussed, due to no Linux available. That just goes to show you how strong the engine is- in any form.

Good work here, Lucas. Any way I can assist you in the future with Ivanhoe versions, I will be more than happy to help.

geotsp8@yahoo.com- reach me there.



Best regards, and again very good work,

george


PM: Any time you have a concern about "open-source", contact me and I will not advise you wrong.
46a is the one I have no ? I mean v 999946a. Is that not the latest ?


Yes and no. 46 is the latest- but following 46a you have 46e (along with 46a probably KLO's strongest 46 versions)- then you have 46f and 46h.
He is going to put "9." before each one of course. 46h is the latest- but my guess is the one you are using and 46e arestrongest- but not latest.

Remember- latest version is smallest number and largest letter!


Best,

george
lucasart
Posts: 3241
Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 1:29 pm
Full name: lucasart

Re: Open Source Blitz Rating List: IvanHoe

Post by lucasart »

geots wrote:
lucasart wrote:
geots wrote:
lucasart wrote:Conditions
* Open Source and Portable engines only: not interested in closed source, commercial, or windows only programs.
* Copyleft: Ideally licensed under the GNU GPL, or with copyright restrictions that are not excessive.
* 1min+1sec/move, 64 MB Hash, 1 Thread, 64-bit, Ponder off.
* 8 book moves: neither to little, nor too much. Allows engines to develop their own plan, while offering a large enough number of opening positions.
* Bayeselo, offset Fruit 2.1 = 2700 elo

Results

Code: Select all

Rank Name                  Elo    +    - games score oppo. draws 
   1 IvanHoe 999946a      3223   44   41   250   83%  2914   20% 
   2 Stockfish 2.2.1      3200   42   40   250   81%  2919   24% 
   3 Protector 1.4        2945   33   33   300   53%  2925   24% 
   4 Umko 1.2             2870   29   29   400   51%  2877   25% 
   5 Toga 1.4.1           2845   29   29   400   48%  2880   24% 
   6 Daydreamer 1.75      2726   32   33   250   46%  2758   34% 
   7 Crafty 23.4          2712   30   30   400   30%  2897   23% 
   8 Fruit 2.1            2700   31   31   300   38%  2794   28% 
   9 GNU Chess 5.07.173b  2664   34   34   250   35%  2771   26% 
IvanHoe 999946a is the new open source champion ! I had a look at the game, no time losses, no illegal move bugs, IvanHoe really won fair and square against StockFish and destroyed the others

Amazing considering you do not have the strongest 46a version, as we discussed, due to no Linux available. That just goes to show you how strong the engine is- in any form.

Good work here, Lucas. Any way I can assist you in the future with Ivanhoe versions, I will be more than happy to help.

geotsp8@yahoo.com- reach me there.



Best regards, and again very good work,

george


PM: Any time you have a concern about "open-source", contact me and I will not advise you wrong.
46a is the one I have no ? I mean v 999946a. Is that not the latest ?


Yes and no. 46 is the latest- but following 46a you have 46e (along with 46a probably KLO's strongest 46 versions)- then you have 46f and 46h.
He is going to put "9." before each one of course. 46h is the latest- but my guess is the one you are using and 46e arestrongest- but not latest.

Remember- latest version is smallest number and largest letter!


Best,

george
i thought it was smallest number and smallest letter. my bad !
but you have to admit that it's not very obvious...