testTour

[Hugo]

Hi All

I am planing a bigger engine tournament with longer time controlls.
To see what book(s) I could use I am running a test tournament.
It is just 10 +10 time, but you can see in the replayzone that the game quality is still high.
All engines 4 cpu ponder ON. 2 games running at the same time. More information at my webpage.

enjoy

regards, Clemens Keck

http://www.clemens-keck.de/base.htm

[Jouni]

Deep Rybka 4.1 x64 T4 is still strong with longer time control!

[Jouni]

1 Deep Rybka 4.1 x64 T4 26.5 / 34
2 Houdini 2.0c x64 T4 23.0 / 34
3 Stockfish 2.2.2 x64 T4 20.5 / 34
4 Critter 1.6 64-bit T4 20 / 34
5 Naum 4.2 T4 17 / 36
6 Deep Shredder 12 x64 T4 14.0 / 35
7 HIARCS 13.2 MP T4 12.5 / 36
8 Deep Junior 13 T4 12.0 / 36
9 Deep Fritz 13 11.5 / 35

[Sedat Canbaz]

Deep Rybka 4.1 x64 T4 is still strong with longer time control!

Interesting tournament,many thanks to Clemens

Agreed that Deep Rybka 4.1 performs better than the bullet time controls

Especially Rybka 32-bit's performance is lower than Rybka 64-bit

But anyway,there are just only 34 games per player,i think the standings will be changed after more games

For example,you can see Rybka 4.1's performance here:
http://www.sedatcanbaz.com/chess/scct-auto232/

Best,
Sedat

[Hugo]

Hello

here are 2 intresting games with verry quick wins:

[Event "HS-Trophy_1"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "2012.06.26"]
[Round "3.7"]
[White "Deep Junior 13 T4"]
[Black "Houdini 2.0c x64 T4"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "B41"]
[Annotator "0.10;0.03"]
[PlyCount "63"]
[EventDate "2012.06.24"]
[EventType "tourn"]
[Source "Doe"]
[TimeControl "600+10"]

{Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2687W 0 @ 3.10GHz 3099 MHz W=18.9 plies; 8.349kN/s;
HS-Masterbook1.1.ctg B=20.8 plies; 9.139kN/s; HS-Masterbook1.1.ctg} 1. e4 {
B/0 0} c5 {B/0 0} 2. Nf3 {B/0 0} e6 {B/0 0} 3. c4 {B/0 0} a6 {B/0 0} 4. d4 {
B/0 0} cxd4 {B/0 0} 5. Nxd4 {B/0 0} Nf6 {B/0 0} 6. Nc3 {B/0 0} Bb4 {B/0 0} 7.
Bd3 {0.10/19 52} Qc7 {(Sc6) 0.03/22 73} 8. O-O {0.25/17 16} Bxc3 {
(Sc6) 0.01/22 49} 9. bxc3 {0.40/18 14} d6 {0.02/23 103} 10. Ba3 {
(Lg5) 0.32/20 0} e5 {(0-0) 0.03/23 60} 11. Nf5 {(Sc2) 0.24/19 12} Bxf5 {
-0.01/21 4} 12. exf5 {0.32/18 5} Nbd7 {-0.02/23 18} 13. Rb1 {(Lc2) 0.29/19 0}
O-O {(0-0-0) -0.03/24 47} 14. g4 {(Lc2) 0.57/19 18} h6 {(Dc6) -0.05/22 18} 15.
h4 {0.48/21 50} e4 {(Sc5) 0.01/24 0} 16. Be2 {0.52/20 30} Nc5 {0.01/22 0} 17.
g5 {(Dd4) 0.45/20 68} hxg5 {0.04/21 18} 18. hxg5 {0.62/19 22} Nh7 {
(Sfd7) 0.11/21 10} 19. Bc1 {0.55/20 55} Rfe8 {(De7) 0.18/22 27} 20. Be3 {
(Lf4) 0.67/19 28} Re5 {0.19/19 28} 21. Bg4 {0.59/19 0} Qe7 {(Tae8) 0.09/21 28}
22. Qd2 {0.71/20 31} Nd3 {0.23/22 9} 23. a4 {(Tb6) 0.69/19 9} Rb8 {
(Ta5) 0.04/20 25} 24. Rfd1 {0.66/17 11} Ra5 {(d5) 0.08/19 17} 25. f4 {
(Le2) 0.74/18 10} Rxa4 {0.67/19 67} 26. Qh2 {(Dg2) 1.67/18 18} Rxc4 {1.59/18 61
} 27. Rd2 {2.51/21 0} Nf6 {3.82/19 57} 28. gxf6 {4.45/19 54} Qxf6 {6.03/18 6}
29. Qh1 {5.31/21 149} Nf2 {(g6) 7.30/19 0} 30. Kxf2 {(Lxf2) 5.76/15 3} Rxc3 {
(Tbc8) 6.85/17 16} 31. Qh5 {(Dxe4) 6.21/16 2} Rbc8 {(Td8) 8.09/18 15} 32. Rh1 {
6.94/19 9} 1-0

[Event "Power-Trophy_1-1"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "2012.06.26"]
[Round "2.8"]
[White "HIARCS 13.2 MP T4"]
[Black "Deep Shredder 12 x64 T4"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "A13"]
[Annotator "-0.67;-0.42"]
[PlyCount "77"]
[EventDate "2012.06.24"]
[EventType "tourn"]
[Source "Doe"]
[TimeControl "600+10"]

{Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2687W 0 @ 3.10GHz 3100 MHz W=20.1 plies; 2.408kN/s;
82.611 TBAs; Powerbook2012.ctg B=19.8 plies; 3.086kN/s; 3.316.384 TBAs;
Powerbook2012.ctg} 1. c4 {B/0 0} c5 {B/0 0} 2. b3 {B/0 0} Nc6 {B/0 0} 3. Nf3 {
B/0 0} e6 {B/0 0} 4. Bb2 {B/0 0} d5 {B/0 0} 5. e3 {B/0 0} Nf6 {B/0 0} 6. g3 {
B/0 0} Bd6 {B/0 0} 7. d4 {-0.67/17 73} cxd4 {-0.42/17 31} 8. exd4 {
(Sxd4) -0.77/17 12} dxc4 {(0-0) -0.36/18 87} 9. Bxc4 {-0.80/18 30} O-O {
(a6) -0.32/19 4} 10. O-O {-0.64/18 27} a6 {(b6) -0.21/18 17} 11. Ne5 {
(Le2) -0.66/19 33} Qc7 {(Sb4) -0.13/18 37} 12. Nxc6 {-0.54/18 22} Qxc6 {
-0.12/19 0} 13. Be2 {-0.56/19 28} Qc7 {(Dd7) -0.09/19 4} 14. Bf3 {-0.42/19 26}
Bd7 {-0.14/19 0} 15. Nd2 {-0.37/19 28} Bc6 {(Sd5) -0.11/20 9} 16. Rc1 {
-0.42/19 25} Bxf3 {-0.18/19 15} 17. Qxf3 {-0.36/20 0} Qd7 {-0.13/20 34} 18. Nc4
{-0.38/21 0} Nd5 {-0.13/20 33} 19. Ne3 {-0.38/20 0} Be7 {(Db5) -0.11/18 41} 20.
Nxd5 {-0.33/18 19} exd5 {-0.11/19 1} 21. Rfe1 {(a4) -0.32/19 20} Rac8 {
(Tfc8) -0.11/17 9} 22. Re5 {-0.28/20 24} Rxc1+ {-0.13/20 0} 23. Bxc1 {
-0.28/19 4} Rd8 {-0.07/19 29} 24. Re2 {(Dd3) -0.25/20 0} Rc8 {0.00/19 79} 25.
Bf4 {-0.18/24 0} Bf6 {(f6) 0.00/19 45} 26. h4 {(Le5) -0.10/19 22} h6 {
(Le7) 0.00/18 25} 27. Bxh6 {(Le5) -0.04/19 29} Bxd4 {0.00/17 9} 28. Bg5 {
0.00/20 12} Rc3 {-0.04/19 50} 29. Qf4 {0.03/23 0} Bc5 {0.00/18 20} 30. Qe5 {
0.00/21 0} Qc8 {(Td3) -0.02/18 20} 31. Be3 {0.08/20 49} Bxe3 {-0.02/21 0} 32.
Rxe3 {0.07/21 27} Rxe3 {-0.01/20 0} 33. Qxe3 {(fxe3) 0.06/22 27} Qe6 {
(f6) 0.00/20 29} 34. Kg2 {(a4) 0.21/20 27} b5 {0.00/20 16} 35. Qxe6 {
(Dd4) 0.10/21 40} fxe6 {1.94/29 44} 36. f4 {0.89/23 22} Kf7 {(g6) 9.73/28 180}
37. g4 {(h5) 2.11/23 24} Kf6 {8.50/27 66} 38. h5 {3.08/24 0} d4 {
(Kf7) 8.11/19 9} 39. Kf3 {8.22/20 27} 1-0

regards, Clemens

[gleperlier]

Nice tournament Clemens !

[Hugo]

Hi All

I am planing a bigger engine tournament with longer time controlls.
To see what book(s) I could use I am running a test tournament.
It is just 10 +10 time, but you can see in the replayzone that the game quality is still high.
All engines 4 cpu ponder ON. 2 games running at the same time. More information at my webpage.

enjoy

regards, Clemens Keck

http://www.clemens-keck.de/base.htm

The tournament is finnished

finally Houdini won, but Rybka 4.1 reached the same score!..

Informations on my webPage

Regards, Clemens Keck

PS: New tour is in progress. Top 4 engines with 8 cores each engine and ponder ON !

cheers