At this point- the only 2 things I see that are not what I expected: Texel doing much better than I thought- and Thinker not playing as well as I thought he would.
Again- if there is anyone left who doesn't realize this- you don't have to come in 1st place. 2nd place is just as good. When all RRs are completed- Numbers 1 & 2 in each group will play a match for the group championship.
On to the games:
Inspiron 620 Intel i5-4 True Cores
Fritz 11 gui/Fritz 13 gui
1CPU/64-bit where available
128MB hash
Bases=NONE
Ponder_Learning=OFF
Perfect 2012b.ctg w/12-move limit
40/21 Repeating (Benched to adapt to CCRL 40/40)
RR with 2 cycles
Group 2
----------
Round 25
-----------
Cyclone xTreme v Glaurung 2.2 x64 (1-0)
Grapefruit 1.0 v Texel 1.01 64-bit (draw)
Toga II 3.1.2SE v Tornado 4.88 x64 SSE42 (1-0)
Booot 5.1.0 v Hannibal 1.2 x64 (0-1)
Nemo SP64o 1.0.1b v Spike 1.4 (0-1)
MinkoChess x64 1.3 Popcnt v Protector 1.4.0 x64 (0-1)
Thinker 5.4c Inert 64-bit v spark 1.0 corei x64 (0-1)
Doch64 1.3.4 v Quazar 0.4 x64 (1-0)
Round 26
-----------
Glaurung 2.2 x64 v Doch64 1.3.4 (0-1)
Quazar 0.4 x64 v Thinker 5.4c Inert 64-bit (1-0)
spark 1.0 corei x64 v MinkoChess x64 1.3 Popcnt (0-1)
Protector 1.4.0 x64 v Nemo SP64o 1.0.1b (draw)
Spike 1.4 v Booot 5.1.0 (draw)
Hannibal 1.2 x64 v Toga II 3.1.2SE (1-0)
Tornado 4.88 x64 SSE42 v Grapefruit 1.0 (draw)
Texel 1.01 64-bit v Cyclone xTreme (draw)
Code: Select all
Standings after Round 26
-------------------------
1.Hannibal 1.2 x64 18.5
2.Quazar 0.4 x64 18.5
3.Doch64 1.3.4 16.0
4.Protector 1.4.0 x64 15.5
5.Spike 1.4 14.5
6.MinkoChess x64 1.3 Popcnt 14.5
7.spark 1.0 corei x64 14.0
8.Toga II 3.1.2SE 12.5
9.Booot 5.1.0 12.5
10.Texel 1.01 64-bit 12.5
11.Nemo SP64o 1.0.1b 12.5
12.Glaurung 2.2 x64 10.5
13.Grapefruit 1.0 10.5
14.Thinker 5.4c Inert 64-bit 10.0
15.Cyclone xTreme 8.0
16.Tornado 4.88 x64 SSE42 7.54 rounds remaining......... can anyone overtake Hannibal or Quazar? And then to the final RR- Group 1.
george
