TESTING Bouquet Beta1.7= 480 GAMES.
7 980 3.33 Ghz.
6 real cores
Ponder: Off.
GUI: Fritz 12
Book: Perfect 2012
Time control: 4 min +0 sec/ game
No tablebases
Relative Speed: 28.66
Knodes per second: 13.759
Time control 4+0
Bouquet beta.1 x64_1.7x6 - Critter 1.6 64-bitx6_nob 19.5 - 20.5 +6/=27/-7 48.75%
Bouquet beta.1 x64_1.7x6 - Deep Rybka 4.1 SSE42 x64 25.5 - 14.5 +15/=21/-4 63.75%
Bouquet beta.1 x64_1.7x6 - Houdini 3 Pro x64_6 13.5 - 26.5 +6/=15/-19 33.75%
Time control: 2+2
Bouquet beta.1 x64_1.7x6 - Critter 1.6 64-bitx6_nob 18.0 - 22.0 +6/=24/-10 45.00%
Bouquet beta.1 x64_1.7x6 - Deep Rybka 4.1 SSE42 x64 (x6) 20.0 - 20.0 +8/=24/-8 50.00%
Bouquet beta.1 x64_1.7x6 - Houdini 3 Pro x64_6 13.0 - 27.0 +2/=22/-16 32.50%
Global Score with 6 cores= 109.5-130.5 = 45.62%
http://www.mediafire.com/?1116d8xd8j1gzub
i7 975 3.33 Ghz.
4 real cores
GUI: Fritz 11
Book: Perfect 2012
Ponder: Off
No tablebases
Relative Speed: 20.62
Knodes per second: 9.899
Bouquet beta.1 x64x4 - Critter 1.6a 64-bitnob_4 19.5 - 20.5 +6/-7/=27 48.75%
Bouquet beta.1 x64x4 - Deep Rybka 4 x64 (x4) 26.5 - 13.5 +16/-3/=21 66.25%
Bouquet beta.1 x64x4 - Houdini 3 Pro x64_4 13.0 - 27.0 +4/-18/=18 32.50%
Bouquet beta.1 x64x4 - Critter 1.6a 64-bitnob_4 19.0 - 21.0 +4/-6/=30 47.50%
Bouquet beta.1 x64x4 - Deep Rybka 4 x64 (x4) 22.5 - 17.5 +13/-8/=19 56.25%
Bouquet beta.1 x64x4 - Houdini 3 Pro x64_4 11.0 - 29.0 +3/-21/=16 27.50%
Global Score with 4 cores = 111.5-128.5 = 46.46%
http://www.mediafire.com/?gb6xm0kk49eu3eg
Global Score: = 221.0 - 259.0 = 46.04%
Against Critter 1.6: 47.50 % Deep Rybka 4: 59.06% Houdini 3.0: 31.56%
Estimated ELO Performance: 3066
This is an excellent performance.
----------------------------------
Only as a reference I have compared the part of this test that is homogeneous with the previous test of Bouquet 1.6.
I7 980 3.33 Ghz.
6 real cores*
GUI Fritz 12
Book: Perfect 2012
Time control: 2 minutes +2 sec/ game.
201210Bouquet1.6_120 games 2012
Bouquet _1.6 pop64_x6 - Critter 1.6 64-bitx6_nob 17.5 - 22.5 +2/=31/-7 43.75%
Bouquet _1.6 pop64_x6 - Deep Rybka 4.1 SSE42 x64(x6) 19.0 - 21.0 +11/=16/-13 47.50%
Bouquet _1.6 pop64_x6 - Houdini 3 Pro x64_6 8.5 - 31.5 +1/=15/-24 21.25%
Games:http://www.mediafire.com/?fddfbja36i2z75v
Average Score: 37.50%
Estimated Elo Performance= 3007
Time control: 2+2
Bouquet beta.1 x64_1.7x6 - Critter 1.6 64-bitx6_nob 18.0 - 22.0 +6/=24/-10 45.00%
Bouquet beta.1 x64_1.7x6 - Deep Rybka 4.1 SSE42 x64 (x6) 20.0 - 20.0 +8/=24/-8 50.00%
Bouquet beta.1 x64_1.7x6 - Houdini 3 Pro x64_6 13.0 - 27.0 +2/=22/-16 32.50%
Average Score: 42.50%
Estimated Elo Performance= 3042
You will notice that according with my tests the improvement over Bouquet 1.6 is 35 Elo Points (!!). Very well done, Velmarin!.
Regards,
Tom
Testing Bouquet 1.7 Beta = 480 games.
Moderator: Ras
-
velmarin
- Posts: 1600
- Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2011 9:48 am
Re: Testing Bouquet 1.7 Beta = 480 games.
Thanks Tom, for the above test.
I did not expect, being a beta.
I see a difference in the management of time, without increment or with increment, try to improve it.
Gracias, Tom.
I did not expect, being a beta.
I see a difference in the management of time, without increment or with increment, try to improve it.
Gracias, Tom.
-
Graham Banks
- Posts: 45246
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
- Location: Auckland, NZ
-
Dr.Wael Deeb
- Posts: 9773
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:44 pm
- Location: Amman,Jordan
Re: Testing Bouquet 1.7 Beta = 480 games.
A big thanks to the programmer and the tester in question
Cheers,
Dr.D
Cheers,
Dr.D
_No one can hit as hard as life.But it ain’t about how hard you can hit.It’s about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward.How much you can take and keep moving forward….