SCCT Rating List - New Statistics

Discussion of computer chess matches and engine tournaments.

Moderator: Ras

Sedat Canbaz
Posts: 3018
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 11:58 am
Location: Antalya/Turkey

SCCT Rating List - New Statistics

Post by Sedat Canbaz »

Hello Chess Friends!


I have created some new comparings, statistics and decided to share here too

Two separate Elo calculations, between both my hardwares:

Code: Select all

i7 980 3.33GHz:
---------------

   # PLAYER                     : RATING    POINTS  PLAYED    (%)
   1 Stockfish 260214 x64 6c    : 3539.5     405.5     486   83.4%
   2 Houdini 4 x64 6c           : 3531.8     374.5     442   84.7%
   3 Komodo TCECr x64 6c        : 3449.5     347.5     442   78.6%
   4 Gull 3 x64 6c              : 3434.2     377.5     500   75.5%
   5 Gull 2.8b x64 6c           : 3432.0     348.0     462   75.3%
   6 Rybka 4.1 x64 6c           : 3399.8     354.0     474   74.7%
   7 Chiron 2 x64 6c            : 3258.4     265.0     486   54.5%
   8 Hannibal 1.4b x64 6c       : 3253.5     262.0     486   53.9%
   9 Protector 1.6.0 x64 6c     : 3239.7     253.5     486   52.2%
  10 Hiarcs 14 WCSC w32 6c      : 3205.9     241.5     501   48.2%
  11 Spike 1.4 x64 6c           : 3185.3     237.5     518   45.8%
  12 Senpai 1.0 x64 6c          : 3177.5     243.5     545   44.7%
  13 Texel 1.03 x64 6c          : 3161.7     207.0     486   42.6%
  14 Junior 13.3 x64 6c         : 3159.9     246.5     575   42.9%
  15 Shredder 12 x64 6c         : 3147.0     213.0     519   41.0%
  16 Zappa Mexico II x64 6c     : 3136.5     205.0     517   39.7%
  17 Spark 1.0 x64 6c           : 3128.9     202.0     520   38.8%
  18 Gaviota 1.0 x64 6c         : 3074.6     156.5     487   32.1%
  19 Sjeng WC2008 x64 6c        : 3029.3     132.0     486   27.2%
  20 Tornado 4.88 x64 6c        : 3017.6     126.0     486   25.9%
  21 Crafty 23.8 x64 6c         : 3010.2     122.5     486   25.2%
  22 Fritz 10.1 w32 6c          : 3000.0     117.5     486   24.2%




i7 970 3.20GHz:
---------------

   # PLAYER                     : RATING    POINTS  PLAYED    (%)
   1 Stockfish 260214 x64 6c    : 3490.0     478.0     591   80.9%
   2 Houdini 4 x64 6c           : 3477.4     496.0     633   78.4%
   3 Komodo TCECr x64 6c        : 3467.6     490.0     632   77.5%
   4 Gull 2.8b x64 6c           : 3410.9     422.5     567   74.5%
   5 Gull 3 x64 6c              : 3406.9     371.5     500   74.3%
   6 Rybka 4.1 x64 6c           : 3356.7     382.5     591   64.7%
   7 Chiron 2 x64 6c            : 3263.5     338.0     592   57.1%
   8 Hannibal 1.4b x64 6c       : 3241.5     321.5     591   54.4%
   9 Protector 1.6.0 x64 6c     : 3223.8     308.0     591   52.1%
  10 Hiarcs 14 WCSC w32 6c      : 3209.6     285.0     570   50.0%
  11 Senpai 1.0 x64 6c          : 3197.2     244.5     505   48.4%
  12 Spike 1.4 x64 6c           : 3177.5     253.5     554   45.8%
  13 Shredder 12 x64 6c         : 3155.1     237.5     553   42.9%
  14 Texel 1.03 x64 6c          : 3144.1     248.5     593   41.9%
  15 Junior 13.3 x64 6c         : 3131.8     197.5     496   39.8%
  16 Spark 1.0 x64 6c           : 3125.2     217.0     553   39.2%
  17 Zappa Mexico II x64 6c     : 3102.7     204.0     556   36.7%
  18 Gaviota 1.0 x64 6c         : 3079.7     203.0     592   34.3%
  19 Crafty 23.8 x64 6c         : 3016.6     160.5     593   27.1%
  20 Sjeng WC2008 x64 6c        : 3008.9     155.5     593   26.2%
  21 Tornado 4.88 x64 6c        : 3000.2     150.5     592   25.4%
  22 Fritz 10.1 w32 6c          : 3000.0     150.0     592   25.3%

*Note: The strongest top 5-6 engines perform better on my i7 980 3.33GHz machine

*********************************************************************************

Games lost on time

SCCT has only 46 games lost on time, played out of more than 11500 games

Mainly lost games on time by:
Chiron 2 = 16 games
Fritz 10.1 = 6 games
Crafty 23.8 = 5 games
Houdini 4 = 4 games
Komodo TCECr = 3 games
Sjeng WC2008 = 3 games
Gull 3 = 3 games
Hannibal 1.4b = 2 games
Hiarcs 14 WCSC = 2 games

*Note: those game forfeits are mainly by Commercial engines!

And I hope those bugs will be fixed in the next new releases!

*********************************************************************************

Record Games...

The below games are record games, impressive performance...


The fastest wins belong to Whites:
Gull 2.8b vs Tornado 4.88 = 1-0 (game finished in 18 moves)
Gaviota 1.0 vs Tornado 4.88 = 1-0 (game finished in 18 moves)
*Note: Tornado lost the above 2 unlucky games exactly with the same D45 opening
As Blacks the records belongs to Houdini:
Crafty 22.8 - Houdini 4 = 0-1 (game finished in 20 moves)
*Note: Crafty loses the above unlucky game with D46 opening

My congrats to the record winners !


*********************************************************************************

Who is stronger? Free or Commercial work for chess ??

I've calculated and compared the Elo differences between Free and Commercial engines

And here are the current new results:
Commercial vs Free + 8 Elo in favor for Commercial engines

*Note: Based on overall top 20 engines, and as we see that the commercial work is still leading over free work, but with a very small Elo difference...
But in case of comparing individually, then there is no doubt that the free Stockfish is the leader over all engines (including commercial engines too)

Note also that the comparings are based on only matches: Free vs Commercial matches
I mean no games between Free vs Free or Commercial vs Commercial


Yes...Well done to Commercial programmers!
But however:
- My BIG congratulations to free program developers too, especially to Marco Costalba!!

For more details (conditions):
http://www.sedatcanbaz.com/chess/?page_id=1224


Have fun,
Sedat