CEGT - rating lists September 07th 2014

Discussion of computer chess matches and engine tournaments.

Moderator: Ras

User avatar
Werner
Posts: 3016
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:09 pm
Location: Germany
Full name: Werner Schüle

CEGT - rating lists September 07th 2014

Post by Werner »

Hi all, :D

our actual rating lists are online and can be found under the attached links.

40 / 20:
New games: 2611; 41 different engines
Total: 767.010

NEW Engines
1 Komodo 8.0 x64 4CPU: 3239 - 91 games (startrating)
12 Komodo 8.0 x64 1CPU: 3144 - 800 games (+42 to Komodo 7.0 - best single now)
422 Nirvana Chess 1.8 x64: 2670 - 1352 games (-17 to version 1.7 here too)
310 DiscoCheck 5.2.1 x64: 2734 - 113 games (startrating under v. 5.2)

UPDATES
6 Gull 3.0 x64 4CPU: 3197 - 2984 games (+1)

40 / 4:
no update; we are testing Komodo 8.0 x64 1CPU: 3172/400 games and Komodo 8.0 x64 on 8 and 12 CPUs (see more in our forum or on Leto´s posts)

40/120
See here our single-list:
http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn//40120new/40_120_ratinglist/40_120_AllVersion/rangliste.html.
Last update was September 01st with 59 engines and 16050 games:

Code: Select all

1 Stockfish 5.0 x64 3097 36 36 300 
2 Stockfish DD x64 3081 34 34 300 
3 Houdini 4.0 x64 3077 30 30 400 
4 Komodo 7.0a x64 3075 34 34 300


5'+3'' pb=on
no update - we are testing Komodo 8.0 x64: +22 out of 900 games

A big „Thank you“ to all testers as usual!!

Links

40/20: http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/rating.htm
Blitz: http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/blitz.htm
40/120: http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/rating120.htm
Tester: http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/testers/testers.htm
40/20 pb=on: http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/rating4020PBON.htm
5+3 pb=on: http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/rating5plus3pbon.htm
Games of the week: http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/40_40%2 ... on/gow.jpg

Werner Schuele
CEGT-Team
Jesse Gersenson
Posts: 593
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2011 9:43 am

Re: CEGT - rating lists September 07th 2014

Post by Jesse Gersenson »

From what I hear that +22 number you're advertising is not accurate. It was arrived at using flawed logic. The good news is, the number, after all games are finished and rerun through Ordo the number will be much higher.
User avatar
Leto
Posts: 2139
Joined: Thu May 04, 2006 3:40 am
Location: Dune

Re: CEGT - rating lists September 07th 2014

Post by Leto »

Jesse Gersenson wrote:From what I hear that +22 number you're advertising is not accurate. It was arrived at using flawed logic. The good news is, the number, after all games are finished and rerun through Ordo the number will be much higher.
It turned out to be +42.
ThatsIt
Posts: 992
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 2:11 pm

Re: CEGT - rating lists September 07th 2014

Post by ThatsIt »

Using Ordo v0.8-cegt23, Komodo 8.0 is the new number 1 after 900 games @ CEGT 5'+3" pb=on !

http://cegt.forumieren.com/t202-testing-komodo-80-x64

But still 1000 games to play ...

Best wishes,
G.S.
(CEGT team)
User avatar
Leto
Posts: 2139
Joined: Thu May 04, 2006 3:40 am
Location: Dune

Re: CEGT - rating lists September 07th 2014

Post by Leto »

That'd make it the third list that shows the 1cpu version of Komodo 8 has become the new king. Ingo's, Frank's, and now CEGT 5'3".
Frank Quisinsky
Posts: 7226
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 7:16 pm
Location: Gutweiler, Germany
Full name: Frank Quisinsky

Re: CEGT - rating lists September 07th 2014

Post by Frank Quisinsky »

Hi Leto,

very friendly from yourself that you mention me.

My FCT1 is very new and more important is the Features "Continuous Tourney". Yes, I can produce with FCT1 a rating list and I do that (list of all FCT1 games) but if you compare this new work with the great work CEGT, CCRL, IPON, others do I think it's not OK to name it with the others. At the moment I have nothing, 23 engines and 22.800 games only.

My older SWCR1 yes, here I had also a lot of systems and most important was to created a rating list (with the feature to see the differents from w32/x64 in Elo). But this work is closed since around two years.

Again, very friendly from yourself.
But perhaps in one or two years it make more sense to name my list. Will working on it.

For the following point my list could be interesting:
Different users (me too) don't like clones / derivates. Such users have the possibility to compare now results a bit. Only one IPP with Fire I will use in the future. Norman do the most work here in the beginning. Similiar engines I will also not have in my list (example: Rybka / Naum). And I try to test actual engines only.

Best
Frank