CCRL 40/40, 40/4 and FRC lists updated (7th February 2015)

Discussion of computer chess matches and engine tournaments.

Moderator: Ras

User avatar
Graham Banks
Posts: 45303
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
Location: Auckland, NZ

CCRL 40/40, 40/4 and FRC lists updated (7th February 2015)

Post by Graham Banks »

The latest CCRL Rating Lists and Statistics are available for viewing from the following links:
http://computerchess.org.uk/ccrl/4040/ (40/40)
http://www.computerchess.org.uk/ccrl/404/ (40/4)
http://www.computerchess.org.uk/ccrl/404FRC/ (FRC 40/4)

Please note that the three lists are often updated separately to each other. The FRC list is only updated when a new engine or engine version is being/has been tested.

40/40 testing this week that I'm aware of will include (with live broadcast port for TLCV noted where applicable)

51st Amateur Division 4 (continuing 16053)
51st Amateur Division 5 (continuing 16001)
The February Fracas Tournament (continuing 16002)
Hannibal 1.5 64-bit 64-bit Gauntlet (continuing 16063)
Lozza 1.13 64-bit Gauntlet (continuing 16064)
Sting SF 4.8.2 64-bit Gauntlet (continuing 16066)
Arasan 17.5 64-bit Gauntlet (continuing 16073)
Texel 1.05 64-bit Gauntlet (continuing 16074)
Stockfish 6 64-bit Gauntlet (continuing 16075)
Stockfish 6 64-bit 4CPU Gauntlet (continuing 16083)
Emerging Threats 4CPU Tournament (continuing 16084)
Texel 1.05 64-bit 4CPU Gauntlet
gbanksnz at gmail.com
lech
Posts: 1175
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2010 10:02 pm

Re: CCRL 40/40, 40/4 and FRC lists updated (7th February 201

Post by lech »

Graham, thanks to starting the Gauntlet of Sting-sf-482.

It was my sacrifice to do 64-bit compilation and I hope that exactly my version is tested. In other case it has no sense and please stop the test.

Also, It is very important for me to watch all the games (download at the end).

My idea let (huge possibilities) to get the same (+- few points) ELO result as the previous Sting-sf-47.

I see serious difference and should take the look at this.

best
Marek
Maybe, I can't be friendly, but let me be useful.
User avatar
Graham Banks
Posts: 45303
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
Location: Auckland, NZ

Re: CCRL 40/40, 40/4 and FRC lists updated (7th February 201

Post by Graham Banks »

lech wrote:Graham, thanks to starting the Gauntlet of Sting-sf-482.

It was my sacrifice to do 64-bit compilation and I hope that exactly my version is tested. In other case it has no sense and please stop the test.

Also, It is very important for me to watch all the games (download at the end).

My idea let (huge possibilities) to get the same (+- few points) ELO result as the previous Sting-sf-47.

I see serious difference and should take the look at this.

best
Marek
Yes - it is your compile that is being tested, :)
All the games will be available for download as usual.
gbanksnz at gmail.com
lech
Posts: 1175
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2010 10:02 pm

Re: CCRL 40/40, 40/4 and FRC lists updated (7th February 201

Post by lech »

Graham Banks wrote:
lech wrote:Graham, thanks to starting the Gauntlet of Sting-sf-482.

It was my sacrifice to do 64-bit compilation and I hope that exactly my version is tested. In other case it has no sense and please stop the test.

Also, It is very important for me to watch all the games (download at the end).

My idea let (huge possibilities) to get the same (+- few points) ELO result as the previous Sting-sf-47.

I see serious difference and should take the look at this.

best
Marek
Yes - it is your compile that is being tested, :)
All the games will be available for download as usual.
I think you should stop it If you can, give me a link to the games.
Maybe, I can't be friendly, but let me be useful.
User avatar
Dr.Wael Deeb
Posts: 9773
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:44 pm
Location: Amman,Jordan

Re: CCRL 40/40, 40/4 and FRC lists updated (7th February 201

Post by Dr.Wael Deeb »

lech wrote:
Graham Banks wrote:
lech wrote:Graham, thanks to starting the Gauntlet of Sting-sf-482.

It was my sacrifice to do 64-bit compilation and I hope that exactly my version is tested. In other case it has no sense and please stop the test.

Also, It is very important for me to watch all the games (download at the end).

My idea let (huge possibilities) to get the same (+- few points) ELO result as the previous Sting-sf-47.

I see serious difference and should take the look at this.

best
Marek
Yes - it is your compile that is being tested, :)
All the games will be available for download as usual.
I think you should stop it If you can, give me a link to the games.
Is the x64 version broken and the x32 works :!: :?:

At least this is what I grasped from your statement....
Dr.D
_No one can hit as hard as life.But it ain’t about how hard you can hit.It’s about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward.How much you can take and keep moving forward….
lech
Posts: 1175
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2010 10:02 pm

Re: CCRL 40/40, 40/4 and FRC lists updated (7th February 201

Post by lech »

Dr.Wael Deeb wrote:
lech wrote:
Graham Banks wrote:
lech wrote:Graham, thanks to starting the Gauntlet of Sting-sf-482.

It was my sacrifice to do 64-bit compilation and I hope that exactly my version is tested. In other case it has no sense and please stop the test.

Also, It is very important for me to watch all the games (download at the end).

My idea let (huge possibilities) to get the same (+- few points) ELO result as the previous Sting-sf-47.

I see serious difference and should take the look at this.

best
Marek
Yes - it is your compile that is being tested, :)
All the games will be available for download as usual.
I think you should stop it If you can, give me a link to the games.
Is the x64 version broken and the x32 works :!: :?:

At least this is what I grasped from your statement....
Dr.D
My 64-bit compilation works well and is ~27 % faster than win32.
The reason is in other place.
Maybe, I can't be friendly, but let me be useful.
User avatar
Dr.Wael Deeb
Posts: 9773
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:44 pm
Location: Amman,Jordan

Re: CCRL 40/40, 40/4 and FRC lists updated (7th February 201

Post by Dr.Wael Deeb »

lech wrote:
Dr.Wael Deeb wrote:
lech wrote:
Graham Banks wrote:
lech wrote:Graham, thanks to starting the Gauntlet of Sting-sf-482.

It was my sacrifice to do 64-bit compilation and I hope that exactly my version is tested. In other case it has no sense and please stop the test.

Also, It is very important for me to watch all the games (download at the end).

My idea let (huge possibilities) to get the same (+- few points) ELO result as the previous Sting-sf-47.

I see serious difference and should take the look at this.

best
Marek
Yes - it is your compile that is being tested, :)
All the games will be available for download as usual.
I think you should stop it If you can, give me a link to the games.
Is the x64 version broken and the x32 works :!: :?:

At least this is what I grasped from your statement....
Dr.D
My 64-bit compilation works well and is ~27 % faster than win32.
The reason is in other place.
Thanks Marek....
Dr.D
_No one can hit as hard as life.But it ain’t about how hard you can hit.It’s about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward.How much you can take and keep moving forward….
User avatar
velmarin
Posts: 1600
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2011 9:48 am

Re: CCRL 40/40, 40/4 and FRC lists updated (7th February 201

Post by velmarin »

lech wrote: My 64-bit compilation works well and is ~27 % faster than win32.
The reason is in other place.
Config in Visual Studio for Windows XP,
In General
Platform Toolset = Visual Studio 2013-Windows XP
Use of MFC = Use MFC in Static Library


In C-C++, Code generation
Runtime Library = Multy-Treaded (/MT)

Try and work fine.
lech
Posts: 1175
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2010 10:02 pm

Re: CCRL 40/40, 40/4 and FRC lists updated (7th February 201

Post by lech »

velmarin wrote:
lech wrote: My 64-bit compilation works well and is ~27 % faster than win32.
The reason is in other place.
Config in Visual Studio for Windows XP,
In General
Platform Toolset = Visual Studio 2013-Windows XP
Use of MFC = Use MFC in Static Library


In C-C++, Code generation
Runtime Library = Multy-Treaded (/MT)

Try and work fine.
Thanks Jose, it is not too easy to find someone who has the legal VS 2013 and may let me to do compilations.
If I am able to do it I use these setting. :)
Maybe, I can't be friendly, but let me be useful.
User avatar
velmarin
Posts: 1600
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2011 9:48 am

Re: CCRL 40/40, 40/4 and FRC lists updated (7th February 201

Post by velmarin »

lech wrote: Thanks Jose, it is not too easy to find someone who has the legal VS 2013 and may let me to do compilations.
If I am able to do it I use these setting. :)
He did not understand.
You provide the Visual Studio solution with the code of Sting.
Now there is a free new tool, Visual Studio 2013 Community.
http://www.visualstudio.com/en-us/produ ... ty-vs.aspx