The latest CCRL Rating Lists and Statistics are available for viewing from the following links:
http://computerchess.org.uk/ccrl/4040/ (40/40)
http://www.computerchess.org.uk/ccrl/404/ (40/4)
http://www.computerchess.org.uk/ccrl/404FRC/ (FRC 40/4)
Please note that the three lists are often updated separately to each other. The FRC list is only updated when a new engine or engine version is being/has been tested.
40/40 testing this week that I'm aware of will include (with live broadcast port for TLCV noted where applicable)
51st Amateur Division 4 (continuing 16053)
51st Amateur Division 5 (continuing 16001)
The February Fracas Tournament (continuing 16002)
Hannibal 1.5 64-bit 64-bit Gauntlet (continuing 16063)
Lozza 1.13 64-bit Gauntlet (continuing 16064)
Sting SF 4.8.2 64-bit Gauntlet (continuing 16066)
Arasan 17.5 64-bit Gauntlet (continuing 16073)
Texel 1.05 64-bit Gauntlet (continuing 16074)
Stockfish 6 64-bit Gauntlet (continuing 16075)
Stockfish 6 64-bit 4CPU Gauntlet (continuing 16083)
Emerging Threats 4CPU Tournament (continuing 16084)
Texel 1.05 64-bit 4CPU Gauntlet
CCRL 40/40, 40/4 and FRC lists updated (7th February 2015)
Moderator: Ras
-
Graham Banks
- Posts: 45303
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
- Location: Auckland, NZ
CCRL 40/40, 40/4 and FRC lists updated (7th February 2015)
gbanksnz at gmail.com
-
lech
- Posts: 1175
- Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2010 10:02 pm
Re: CCRL 40/40, 40/4 and FRC lists updated (7th February 201
Graham, thanks to starting the Gauntlet of Sting-sf-482.
It was my sacrifice to do 64-bit compilation and I hope that exactly my version is tested. In other case it has no sense and please stop the test.
Also, It is very important for me to watch all the games (download at the end).
My idea let (huge possibilities) to get the same (+- few points) ELO result as the previous Sting-sf-47.
I see serious difference and should take the look at this.
best
Marek
It was my sacrifice to do 64-bit compilation and I hope that exactly my version is tested. In other case it has no sense and please stop the test.
Also, It is very important for me to watch all the games (download at the end).
My idea let (huge possibilities) to get the same (+- few points) ELO result as the previous Sting-sf-47.
I see serious difference and should take the look at this.
best
Marek
Maybe, I can't be friendly, but let me be useful.
-
Graham Banks
- Posts: 45303
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
- Location: Auckland, NZ
Re: CCRL 40/40, 40/4 and FRC lists updated (7th February 201
Yes - it is your compile that is being tested,lech wrote:Graham, thanks to starting the Gauntlet of Sting-sf-482.
It was my sacrifice to do 64-bit compilation and I hope that exactly my version is tested. In other case it has no sense and please stop the test.
Also, It is very important for me to watch all the games (download at the end).
My idea let (huge possibilities) to get the same (+- few points) ELO result as the previous Sting-sf-47.
I see serious difference and should take the look at this.
best
Marek
All the games will be available for download as usual.
gbanksnz at gmail.com
-
lech
- Posts: 1175
- Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2010 10:02 pm
Re: CCRL 40/40, 40/4 and FRC lists updated (7th February 201
I think you should stop it If you can, give me a link to the games.Graham Banks wrote:Yes - it is your compile that is being tested,lech wrote:Graham, thanks to starting the Gauntlet of Sting-sf-482.
It was my sacrifice to do 64-bit compilation and I hope that exactly my version is tested. In other case it has no sense and please stop the test.
Also, It is very important for me to watch all the games (download at the end).
My idea let (huge possibilities) to get the same (+- few points) ELO result as the previous Sting-sf-47.
I see serious difference and should take the look at this.
best
Marek![]()
All the games will be available for download as usual.
Maybe, I can't be friendly, but let me be useful.
-
Dr.Wael Deeb
- Posts: 9773
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:44 pm
- Location: Amman,Jordan
Re: CCRL 40/40, 40/4 and FRC lists updated (7th February 201
Is the x64 version broken and the x32 workslech wrote:I think you should stop it If you can, give me a link to the games.Graham Banks wrote:Yes - it is your compile that is being tested,lech wrote:Graham, thanks to starting the Gauntlet of Sting-sf-482.
It was my sacrifice to do 64-bit compilation and I hope that exactly my version is tested. In other case it has no sense and please stop the test.
Also, It is very important for me to watch all the games (download at the end).
My idea let (huge possibilities) to get the same (+- few points) ELO result as the previous Sting-sf-47.
I see serious difference and should take the look at this.
best
Marek![]()
All the games will be available for download as usual.
At least this is what I grasped from your statement....
Dr.D
_No one can hit as hard as life.But it ain’t about how hard you can hit.It’s about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward.How much you can take and keep moving forward….
-
lech
- Posts: 1175
- Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2010 10:02 pm
Re: CCRL 40/40, 40/4 and FRC lists updated (7th February 201
My 64-bit compilation works well and is ~27 % faster than win32.Dr.Wael Deeb wrote:Is the x64 version broken and the x32 workslech wrote:I think you should stop it If you can, give me a link to the games.Graham Banks wrote:Yes - it is your compile that is being tested,lech wrote:Graham, thanks to starting the Gauntlet of Sting-sf-482.
It was my sacrifice to do 64-bit compilation and I hope that exactly my version is tested. In other case it has no sense and please stop the test.
Also, It is very important for me to watch all the games (download at the end).
My idea let (huge possibilities) to get the same (+- few points) ELO result as the previous Sting-sf-47.
I see serious difference and should take the look at this.
best
Marek![]()
All the games will be available for download as usual.![]()
![]()
At least this is what I grasped from your statement....
Dr.D
The reason is in other place.
Maybe, I can't be friendly, but let me be useful.
-
Dr.Wael Deeb
- Posts: 9773
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:44 pm
- Location: Amman,Jordan
Re: CCRL 40/40, 40/4 and FRC lists updated (7th February 201
Thanks Marek....lech wrote:My 64-bit compilation works well and is ~27 % faster than win32.Dr.Wael Deeb wrote:Is the x64 version broken and the x32 workslech wrote:I think you should stop it If you can, give me a link to the games.Graham Banks wrote:Yes - it is your compile that is being tested,lech wrote:Graham, thanks to starting the Gauntlet of Sting-sf-482.
It was my sacrifice to do 64-bit compilation and I hope that exactly my version is tested. In other case it has no sense and please stop the test.
Also, It is very important for me to watch all the games (download at the end).
My idea let (huge possibilities) to get the same (+- few points) ELO result as the previous Sting-sf-47.
I see serious difference and should take the look at this.
best
Marek![]()
All the games will be available for download as usual.![]()
![]()
At least this is what I grasped from your statement....
Dr.D
The reason is in other place.
Dr.D
_No one can hit as hard as life.But it ain’t about how hard you can hit.It’s about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward.How much you can take and keep moving forward….
-
velmarin
- Posts: 1600
- Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2011 9:48 am
Re: CCRL 40/40, 40/4 and FRC lists updated (7th February 201
Config in Visual Studio for Windows XP,lech wrote: My 64-bit compilation works well and is ~27 % faster than win32.
The reason is in other place.
In General
Platform Toolset = Visual Studio 2013-Windows XP
Use of MFC = Use MFC in Static Library
In C-C++, Code generation
Runtime Library = Multy-Treaded (/MT)
Try and work fine.
-
lech
- Posts: 1175
- Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2010 10:02 pm
Re: CCRL 40/40, 40/4 and FRC lists updated (7th February 201
Thanks Jose, it is not too easy to find someone who has the legal VS 2013 and may let me to do compilations.velmarin wrote:Config in Visual Studio for Windows XP,lech wrote: My 64-bit compilation works well and is ~27 % faster than win32.
The reason is in other place.
In General
Platform Toolset = Visual Studio 2013-Windows XP
Use of MFC = Use MFC in Static Library
In C-C++, Code generation
Runtime Library = Multy-Treaded (/MT)
Try and work fine.
If I am able to do it I use these setting.
Maybe, I can't be friendly, but let me be useful.
-
velmarin
- Posts: 1600
- Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2011 9:48 am
Re: CCRL 40/40, 40/4 and FRC lists updated (7th February 201
He did not understand.lech wrote: Thanks Jose, it is not too easy to find someone who has the legal VS 2013 and may let me to do compilations.
If I am able to do it I use these setting.
You provide the Visual Studio solution with the code of Sting.
Now there is a free new tool, Visual Studio 2013 Community.
http://www.visualstudio.com/en-us/produ ... ty-vs.aspx