The Stockfish-Contempt-Experiment is finished. Really interesting results IMHO.
Endless RoundRobin-tournament updated, too.
http://spcc.beepworld.de
(Perhaps you have to clear your browsercache or reload the website)
SPCC: Stockfish Contempt-Experiment finished
Moderator: Ras
-
pohl4711
- Posts: 2904
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2011 7:25 am
- Location: Berlin, Germany
- Full name: Stefan Pohl
-
JJJ
- Posts: 1346
- Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2014 1:47 pm
Re: SPCC: Stockfish Contempt-Experiment finished
That's mean Stockfish is now so better than Komodo that he can play with Contempt and make a better score.pohl4711 wrote:The Stockfish-Contempt-Experiment is finished. Really interesting results IMHO.
Endless RoundRobin-tournament updated, too.
http://spcc.beepworld.de
(Perhaps you have to clear your browsercache or reload the website)
-
JJJ
- Posts: 1346
- Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2014 1:47 pm
Re: SPCC: Stockfish Contempt-Experiment finished
It could also be interesting to experiment with Contempt 75 and Even 100.
-
Ozymandias
- Posts: 1537
- Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 2:30 am
Re: SPCC: Stockfish Contempt-Experiment finished
Nice experiment. Can you provide average game duration, for each contempt setting?
-
pohl4711
- Posts: 2904
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2011 7:25 am
- Location: Berlin, Germany
- Full name: Stefan Pohl
Re: SPCC: Stockfish Contempt-Experiment finished
Average game-duration of all games with all Contempts was 250 seconds per game(displayed by LittleBlitzerGUI). I cannot say, how much longer (moves or time) the games with higher Contempt were, but I can say, that they were a bit longer.Ozymandias wrote:Nice experiment. Can you provide average game duration, for each contempt setting?
If you want more information, contact me on my website and I will send the 5000 games to your email. I am very busy in the next days, so I cant do more analysis on this database by my own.
Stefan
-
Vinvin
- Posts: 5312
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 9:40 am
- Full name: Vincent Lejeune
Re: SPCC: Stockfish Contempt-Experiment finished
http://spcc.beepworld.de/experiments.htm
I did find no logical reason to justify +0.35 is worse than +0.25 and +0.50 ...
Probably not enough games to have reliable numbersC=+25 - 580.5/1000
C=+35 - 565.0/1000
C=+50 - 579.0/1000
I did find no logical reason to justify +0.35 is worse than +0.25 and +0.50 ...
-
JJJ
- Posts: 1346
- Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2014 1:47 pm
Re: SPCC: Stockfish Contempt-Experiment finished
Me too. But we can notice than almost any contempt improved the score.Vinvin wrote:http://spcc.beepworld.de/experiments.htmProbably not enough games to have reliable numbersC=+25 580.5/1000
C=+35 565.0/1000
C=+50 579.0/1000![]()
I did find no logical reason to justify +0.35 is worse than +0.25 and +0.50 ...
-
Ozymandias
- Posts: 1537
- Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 2:30 am
Re: SPCC: Stockfish Contempt-Experiment finished
I was interested in seeing the correlation, between 3folds and number of moves, but if you're using LittleBlitzer, reconstructing the full games would be a lot of work.pohl4711 wrote:Average game-duration of all games with all Contempts was 250 seconds per game(displayed by LittleBlitzerGUI).
If you want more information, contact me on my website and I will send the 5000 games to your email.