Hi ALL
I am running a match between Stockfish 170315 and Komodo 1400.
I decided to use a high number of CPUs for this match. Lot of MP improvements by Stockfish makes this match hopefully intresting.
CONDITIONS:
Fritz GUI in engine match mode (openings will be repeated with alternate colors)
Harry Schnapp 7moves book , book option set to normal ( I hope for unbalanced outcome of book in a few games)
Timer 30 +15, ponder OFF, 100 games to play!
both engines 24 cpu (Intel E5-2697 v2 @ 3.0GHz), no HT
8192MB hashtables
full 3-4-5-6 Tablebase set for engines and gui
I will setup a ReplayZone soon and try to keep it updated often.
intresting 1-0 and 0-1 games I will post here.
Special thx to Larry Kaufmann and Mark Leffler for let me do this match in public!
kind regards, Clemens Keck
Status Quo, Stockfish 170315 vs Komodo 1400
Moderator: Ras
-
Vinvin
- Posts: 5312
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 9:40 am
- Full name: Vincent Lejeune
Re: Status Quo, Stockfish 170315 vs Komodo 1400
Yeah ! Great !
Big fight !!
Big fight !!
-
Ozymandias
- Posts: 1537
- Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 2:30 am
Re: Status Quo, Stockfish 170315 vs Komodo 1400
Kind of a TCEC 8 warm-up.
-
Isaac
- Posts: 265
- Joined: Sat Feb 22, 2014 8:37 pm
Re: Status Quo, Stockfish 170315 vs Komodo 1400
I would tend to think that Stockfish has very little chances, considering the results posted at https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgr ... -amP5Lbm3A , https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgr ... WeOIHBLkVM and several other threads in the same forum.
But on 100 games who knows...
Also the time control is 30 +15, do you mean 30 minutes per side with an additional 15 seconds per move?
Thanks.
But on 100 games who knows...
Also the time control is 30 +15, do you mean 30 minutes per side with an additional 15 seconds per move?
Thanks.
-
Hugo
- Posts: 782
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:10 am
Re: Status Quo, Stockfish 170315 vs Komodo 1400
30 min +15 sec = 2 hrs per gameIsaac wrote:I would tend to think that Stockfish has very little chances, considering the results posted at https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgr ... -amP5Lbm3A , https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgr ... WeOIHBLkVM and several other threads in the same forum.
But on 100 games who knows...
Also the time control is 30 +15, do you mean 30 minutes per side with an additional 15 seconds per move?
Thanks.
-
Modern Times
- Posts: 3806
- Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2012 11:02 pm
Re: Status Quo, Stockfish 170315 vs Komodo 1400
Fantastic, look forward to the results !
-
cdani
- Posts: 2204
- Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 10:24 am
- Location: Andorra
Re: Status Quo, Stockfish 170315 vs Komodo 1400
+1Modern Times wrote:Fantastic, look forward to the results !
Daniel José - 
http://www.andscacs.com
http://www.andscacs.com-
Dr.Wael Deeb
- Posts: 9773
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:44 pm
- Location: Amman,Jordan
Re: Status Quo, Stockfish 170315 vs Komodo 1400
On this monstrous hardware,it's actually a considerable long time control....Modern Times wrote:Fantastic, look forward to the results !
Dr.D
_No one can hit as hard as life.But it ain’t about how hard you can hit.It’s about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward.How much you can take and keep moving forward….
-
Modern Times
- Posts: 3806
- Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2012 11:02 pm
Re: Status Quo, Stockfish 170315 vs Komodo 1400
Yes it is indeed.Dr.Wael Deeb wrote: On this monstrous hardware,it's actually a considerable long time control....
Dr.D
And I wouldn't want to put money on who will win either.
-
Dr.Wael Deeb
- Posts: 9773
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:44 pm
- Location: Amman,Jordan
Re: Status Quo, Stockfish 170315 vs Komodo 1400
Agreed on that....Modern Times wrote:Yes it is indeed.Dr.Wael Deeb wrote: On this monstrous hardware,it's actually a considerable long time control....
Dr.D
And I wouldn't want to put money on who will win either.
Dr.D
_No one can hit as hard as life.But it ain’t about how hard you can hit.It’s about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward.How much you can take and keep moving forward….