Hi there,
I will have different of the older engines in my list. Will have again a look in Critter 1.6a with the stats I can do today with tools I have (most created by Ferdinand).
So I have added: Sjeng, Thinker, Nemo and the latest Critter.
After this one I am testing current engines.
The newest strong releases of Vajolet2 and Nirvanachess will be follow.
Main prio since a while my opening book!!
Before I start the next rating list with other conditions I will have an really good book and I am to 95% happy with the book I have or better the engines I used optimated itself. I think I will start with other conditions a new rating list start of the next year.
After a while a rating list can be very boring. I will learn with different conditions and I am thinking that I should double the time control.
40 moves in 20 minutes is one idea!
An other idea is to play not on a rating list, interesting could be different tournaments with lesser games.
Best
Frank
FCP: Nemo 1.01 and Critter 1.6a will be follow ...
Moderator: Ras
-
Frank Quisinsky
- Posts: 7228
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 7:16 pm
- Location: Gutweiler, Germany
- Full name: Frank Quisinsky
-
Ferdy
- Posts: 4851
- Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2008 3:15 pm
- Location: Philippines
Re: FCP: Nemo 1.01 and Critter 1.6a will be follow ...
Frank Quisinsky wrote:Hi there,
I will have different of the older engines in my list. Will have again a look in Critter 1.6a with the stats I can do today with tools I have (most created by Ferdinand).
So I have added: Sjeng, Thinker, Nemo and the latest Critter.
After this one I am testing current engines.
The newest strong releases of Vajolet2 and Nirvanachess will be follow.
Main prio since a while my opening book!!
Before I start the next rating list with other conditions I will have an really good book and I am to 95% happy with the book I have or better the engines I used optimated itself. I think I will start with other conditions a new rating list start of the next year.
After a while a rating list can be very boring. I will learn with different conditions and I am thinking that I should double the time control.
You may try a TC with increment, say 15' + 3". Towards the end the engine will be somewhat time-pressured, this would challenge the programmer to improve its time management.40 moves in 20 minutes is one idea!
Try swiss system, you can enter the weakest and the strongest.An other idea is to play not on a rating list, interesting could be different tournaments with lesser games.