FCP: Nemo 1.01 Beta POP x64 is still running ...

[Frank Quisinsky]

Hi there,

at the moment I added older engines in my list.
Here now the next one: Nemo 1.01 Beta POP x64 ...

1.600 games are to Play vs. FCP place 08-39 ...
http://www.amateurschach.de/ftptrigger/ ... p-x64.html

Best
Frank

[Desperado]

[Frank Quisinsky]

Hi Michael,

I saw a lot of very fast lost games.
In the night I will have a look in detail in the first games I have.

Since minutes I am ready with the K9 and SF dev. stats.
I will write a bit about it and closed this event.

So I have more time for Nemo in the still running test-run.

I am sure you can find out with the games most problems Nemo have. This one fixed and after this one the ideas you have for the further development. Think so ... the reason I am added very late now Nemo 1.01 in my list. Later we can compare with a current version if you have.

Good luck!

Best
Frank

[Frank Quisinsky]

Hi,

correction:

It seems I saw the once two very fast lost games (31, 32 moves) live. No other very fast lost games, but with king safty Nemo have a bit problems. Different lost games after king attacks between move number 50-60.

No technical problems, time managment is good.

One "lost on time" game from Nemo after 266 games.
No fast draw games up to move number 20 ... it seems Nemo try to avoid fast draw games ... very small quantity of fast draw games after 20 moves. That is interesting!

With other words ... all works fine.
Move average is 91.
I saw different games Nemo made in bad position points in endgames. Seens endgame could be a strength. Not enough games I have. I should be wait before I say more about it.

Two bad lines I found in my opening book after the first 260 games. Two x the opponents from Nemo started bad with -0.8 (vs. Chiron and Junior), lines cancelt in my book and games are replayed at the moment ... my book is better and better ... I like that.

Let us look of the first Elo ...
Stronger as Crafty seems to be clear!
A right decision to added Nemo.

2.700 should be the goal.



All is possible ...
Nice program!

Code: Select all

   # PLAYER                           : RATING  ERROR   POINTS  PLAYED    (%)
   1 Stockfish 26.04.15 BMI2 x64      : 3149.7   17.0   1371.5    1650   83.1%
   2 Komodo 9 x64                     : 3146.3   16.2   1367.0    1650   82.8%
   3 Stockfish 6 BMI2 x64             : 3134.5   16.6   1424.0    1700   83.8%
   4 Komodo 8 x64                     : 3104.4   14.9   1375.5    1700   80.9%
   5 Fire 4 x64                       : 3044.8   13.1   1451.0    1950   74.4%
   6 GullChess 3.0 BMI2 x64           : 3037.9   13.6   1304.5    1800   72.5%
   7 Equinox 3.30 x64                 : 2990.8   12.7   1341.5    1950   68.8%
   8 Sting SF 4.8.4 x64               : 2933.1   12.3   1134.0    1850   61.3%
   9 Protector 1.7.0 x64              : 2910.5   12.6    925.5    1650   56.1%
  10 Critter 0.90 SSE4 x64            : 2899.4   12.5    986.5    1759   56.1%
  11 Hannibal 1.5 x64                 : 2896.1   12.5   1027.5    1809   56.8%
  12 Chiron 2.0 x64                   : 2894.8    9.9   1790.0    2908   61.6%
  13 Texel 1.05 x64                   : 2894.5   11.7   1055.0    1859   56.8%
  14 Naum 4.6 x64                     : 2884.0   11.6   1221.5    2109   57.9%
  15 Hannibal 1.4b x64                : 2862.1   10.1   1479.0    2500   59.2%
  16 Texel 1.04 x64                   : 2847.3   10.4   1321.5    2300   57.5%
  17 Nirvanachess 2.0a x64            : 2836.7   11.2   1128.0    2159   52.2%
  18 Senpai 1.0 SSE42 x64             : 2829.5    9.2   1548.0    2909   53.2%
  19 Hiarcs 14 WCSC w32               : 2825.0    9.3   1531.0    2909   52.6%
  20 Andscacs 0.72 POP x64            : 2812.9   11.3   1032.5    2108   49.0%
  21 Sjeng c't 2010 w32               : 2796.3   11.8    931.5    2009   46.4%
  22 Shredder 12 x64                  : 2793.5   12.0    776.0    1809   42.9%
  23 Junior 13.3.00 x64               : 2783.4    9.9   1279.0    2758   46.4%
  24 Spike 1.4 Leiden w32             : 2773.3   12.8    671.5    1709   39.3%
  25 Quazar 0.4 x64                   : 2758.1   13.6    613.0    1609   38.1%
  26 Deuterium 14.3.34.130 POP x64    : 2757.4   11.2    910.5    2159   42.2%
  27 DiscoCheck 5.2.1 x64             : 2756.5   12.7    665.5    1758   37.9%
  28 iCE 2.0 v2240 POP x64            : 2751.5    9.1   1403.5    3158   44.4%
  29 Cheng4 0.38 x64                  : 2751.4   12.7    706.0    1608   43.9%
  30 Spark 1.0 x64                    : 2748.0    9.6   1316.0    3008   43.8%
  31 SmarThink 1.70 SSE3 x64          : 2747.2    9.4   1232.5    2908   42.4%
  32 Zappa Mexico II x64              : 2744.7   14.8    480.5    1358   35.4%
  33 Fizbo 1.3.1 x64                  : 2739.7   12.7    752.5    1808   41.6%
  34 Thinker 5.4d Inert x64           : 2735.1   12.0    775.5    2008   38.6%
  35 Vajolet2 1.45 POP x64            : 2725.8    9.2   1393.0    3358   41.5%
  36 Deuterium 14.2.33.276 x64        : 2722.1   12.6    664.0    1550   42.8%
  37 Atlas 3.80 x64                   : 2718.3   13.0    607.5    1508   40.3%
  38 Gaviota 1.0 AVX x64              : 2717.2    8.9   1355.0    3358   40.4%
  39 Arasan 17.5 POP x64              : 2712.9   14.4    551.0    1308   42.1%
  40 Nirvanachess 1.7 x64             : 2686.0   13.6    571.5    1550   36.9%
  41 Rodent 1.7 Build 1 POP x64       : 2685.9   15.1    448.0    1108   40.4%
  42 Arasan 17.4 POP x64              : 2682.2   12.4    695.5    1800   38.6%
  43 Cheng4 0.36c x64                 : 2678.8   13.0    624.0    1600   39.0%
  44 Fizbo 1.2 x64                    : 2676.4   14.3    481.0    1300   37.0%
  45 Nemo 1.01 Beta POP x64           : 2674.6   30.9     98.5     266   37.0%
  46 EXchess 7.51b x64                : 2673.6   12.9    586.0    1608   36.4%
  47 DisasterArea 1.54 x64            : 2672.6   14.1    559.5    1457   38.4%
  48 Pedone 1.1 BMI2 x64              : 2663.7   15.0    439.5    1157   38.0%
  49 Rodent 1.6 Build 6 POP x64       : 2657.1   14.2    469.5    1350   34.8%
  50 Crafty 24.1 SSE42 x64            : 2645.3   11.8    694.0    1958   35.4%

White advantage = 40.87 +/- 1.24
Draw rate (equal opponents) = 48.41 % +/- 0.26

[Frank Quisinsky]

Again Hannibal ...
Vs. Komodo 9 also Hannibal won a very nice game after 41 moves.
Now vs. Nemo ...

I like that game very much.
Replaying three times ...

[pgn][Event "FCP, 40/10, p=off, i7-4770k, 4.3GHz"]
[Site "Trier"]
[Date "2015.05.10"]
[Round "1.2"]
[White "Hannibal 1.5 x64"]
[Black "Nemo 1.01 Beta POP x64"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "E61"]
[PlyCount "67"]
[EventDate "2015.??.??"]
[EventType "rapid"]
[EventRounds "50"]
[EventCountry "GER"]
[Source "Frank Quisinsky"]
[SourceDate "2015.05.12"]

1. d4 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} Nf6 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} 2. c4 {
[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} g6 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} 3. Nc3 {[%eval 0,0]
[%emt 0:00:00]} c5 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} 4. d5 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:
00]} Bg7 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} 5. Nf3 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} O-O {
[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} 6. Bg5 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} d6 {[%eval 0,0]
[%emt 0:00:00]} 7. Nd2 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} h6 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:
00]} 8. Bh4 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} a6 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} 9. e3
{[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} e6 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} 10. a4 {[%eval 0,
0] [%emt 0:00:00]} a5 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} 11. Be2 {[%eval 33,22]
[%emt 0:00:34]} Na6 {[%eval 25,19] [%emt 0:00:27] (exd5)} 12. f4 {[%eval 38,21]
[%emt 0:00:19] (Sde4)} Nb4 {[%eval 14,18] [%emt 0:00:27] (Db6)} 13. O-O {
[%eval 22,22] [%emt 0:00:47]} Qc7 {[%eval 26,18] [%emt 0:00:31] (De7)} 14. e4 {
[%eval 52,22] [%emt 0:00:18]} Qb8 {[%eval 40,17] [%emt 0:00:50] (Ld7)} 15. dxe6
{[%eval 54,20] [%emt 0:00:22] (Kh1)} fxe6 {[%eval 28,18] [%emt 0:00:27]} 16.
Bg3 {[%eval 80,20] [%emt 0:00:12]} e5 {[%eval 36,19] [%emt 0:00:28]} 17. f5 {
[%eval 73,24] [%emt 0:00:15] (Kh1)} Kh7 {[%eval 56,17] [%emt 0:00:24] (gxf5)}
18. fxg6+ {[%eval 165,21] [%emt 0:00:17]} Kxg6 {[%eval 108,18] [%emt 0:00:26]}
19. Nd5 {[%eval 174,24] [%emt 0:00:14] (Lh4)} Kh7 {[%eval 116,18] [%emt 0:01:
06]} 20. Bh4 {[%eval 207,25] [%emt 0:00:29]} Ng8 {[%eval 142,19] [%emt 0:00:22]
(Sbxd5)} 21. Rxf8 {[%eval 297,23] [%emt 0:00:30]} Bxf8 {[%eval 163,19] [%emt 0:
00:19]} 22. Bh5 {[%eval 310,25] [%emt 0:00:12]} Nd3 {[%eval 186,20] [%emt 0:00:
44] (Sxd5)} 23. Bf7 {[%eval 555,21] [%emt 0:00:14] (Df3)} Nf4 {[%eval 296,18]
[%emt 0:00:20]} 24. Ra3 {[%eval 598,21] [%emt 0:00:13] (Sxf4)} Bg7 {[%eval 170,
18] [%emt 0:00:14] (h5)} 25. Rg3 {[%eval 774,24] [%emt 0:00:41]} b6 {[%eval
286,16] [%emt 0:01:44] (Ta7)} 26. Nxf4 {[%eval 2186,20] [%emt 0:00:14]} Kh8 {
[%eval 1052,12] [%emt 0:00:15] (Ld7)} 27. Qh5 {[%eval 32744,16] [%emt 0:00:00]
(Sh5)} Bf5 {[%eval 32756,14] [%emt 0:00:03] (Ld7)} 28. Qxf5 {[%eval 32748,13]
[%emt 0:00:00] (Txg7)} Ne7 {[%eval 32758,16] [%emt 0:00:02]} 29. Bxe7 {[%eval
32750,11] [%emt 0:00:00]} Qg8 {[%eval 32760,29] [%emt 0:00:03] (Dc8)} 30. Ng6+
{[%eval 32758,9] [%emt 0:00:00] (Lxg8)} Kh7 {[%eval 32760,10] [%emt 0:00:00]}
31. Nxe5+ {[%eval 32760,9] [%emt 0:00:00] (Lxg8+)} Kh8 {[%eval 32762,20] [%emt
0:00:00]} 32. Bxg8 {[%eval 32762,7] [%emt 0:00:00]} Kxg8 {[%eval 32764,255]
[%emt 0:00:00]} 33. Qf7+ {[%eval 32764,8] [%emt 0:00:00]} Kh7 {[%eval 32766,
255] [%emt 0:00:00]} 34. Qxg7# {[%eval 32766,8] [%emt 0:00:00]} 1-0
[/pgn]

[Frank Quisinsky]

Hi there,

final result = 2685 Elo after 1.600 games.
Games are online, new rating list are online too.

Final Nero 1.01 Beta POP x64 results can be found under:
http://www.amateurschach.de/ftptrigger/ ... p-x64.html

Best
Frank

[Desperado]

Hi there,

final result = 2685 Elo after 1.600 games.
Games are online, new rating list are online too.

Final Nero 1.01 Beta POP x64 results can be found under:
http://www.amateurschach.de/ftptrigger/ ... p-x64.html

Best
Frank

Hello, Frank,

thank you very much for testing Nemo

[Frank Quisinsky]

Hi Michael,

I found 21 bad lines in my book.
Games are replayed!

Thats good ...
Now we can compare a bit with my list too if you released a newer version.

Best
Frank