Discussion of computer chess matches and engine tournaments.
Moderator: Ras
Frank Quisinsky
Posts: 7228 Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 7:16 pm
Location: Gutweiler, Germany
Full name: Frank Quisinsky
Post
by Frank Quisinsky » Tue May 26, 2015 1:34 am
After the Critter 1.6a x64 test run!
Now I added 4 older engines with:
1. Sjeng c't 2010 w32
2. Thinker 5.4d Inert x64
3. Nemo 1.01 Beta x64
4. Critter 1.6a x64
In the next months 4 other older engines follow:
1. Murka 3 x64
2. Scorpio 2.7.7 POP x64
3. Booot 5.2.0 x64
4. MinkoChess 1.3 JA POP x64
Have a look in my ToDo Calendar:
http://www.amateurschach.de/main/_todo.htm
Code: Select all
"FCP Rating List"
Will be updated after ~ 1000 new games!
----------------------------------------
Date : May 24th, 2015 (12:00)
Games : 51500, 30600 games sorted out!
Version : 2.07.s9
Hardware : 2x Intel Core i7-4770K *4.3Ghz, 45-minutes games
Engines : Maximum allowed = two versions of same engine
Calculation : Ordo 1.0, "Hiarcs 14 WCSC w32" with 2.825 Elo / News 057 & News 062
Parameter : Ordo_10.exe -a 2825 -A "Hiarcs 14 WCSC w32" -p 1.pgn -o rating.txt -W -s1000 -D -E -V
Conditions : http://www.amateurschach.de/main/_conditions.htm
Program Elo + - Games Score Av.Op. Draw
01. Stockfish 26.04.15 BMI2 x64 3151 16 16 1700 82.9% 2846 30.8%
02. Komodo 9 x64 3149 17 17 1700 82.6% 2847 29.5%
--. Stockfish 6 BMI2 x64 3135 16 16 1700 83.8% 2823 28.9%
--. Komodo 8 x64 3105 15 15 1700 80.9% 2830 31.6%
03. Fire 4 x64 3047 13 13 2000 74.2% 2839 35.5%
04. GullChess 3.0 BMI2 x64 3038 14 14 1850 72.0% 2853 40.8%
05. Equinox 3.30 x64 2990 12 12 2000 68.3% 2841 42.4%
06. Critter 1.6a x64 2981 14 14 1600 67.7% 2841 44.3%
07. Sting SF 4.8.4 x64 2933 12 12 1900 60.8% 2850 45.4%
08. Protector 1.7.0 x64 2911 13 13 1700 55.6% 2870 45.2%
--. Critter 0.90 SSE4 x64 2900 13 13 1800 56.6% 2852 44.9%
09. Chiron 2.0 x64 2897 10 10 3000 61.5% 2809 40.5%
09. Hannibal 1.5 x64 2897 12 12 1900 56.7% 2847 44.9%
11. Texel 1.05 x64 2895 12 12 1950 56.7% 2846 43.0%
12. Naum 4.6 x64 2883 11 11 2200 57.5% 2826 43.3%
--. Hannibal 1.4b x64 2863 10 10 2500 59.2% 2794 43.3%
--. Texel 1.04 x64 2848 10 10 2300 57.5% 2793 42.4%
13. Nirvanachess 2.0a x64 2837 11 11 2250 52.1% 2826 44.8%
14. Senpai 1.0 SSE42 x64 2830 9 9 3000 53.1% 2811 42.5%
15. Hiarcs 14 WCSC w32 2825 9 9 3000 52.4% 2811 42.9%
16. Andscacs 0.72 POP x64 2814 11 11 2200 49.0% 2828 42.5%
17. Sjeng c't 2010 w32 2798 12 12 2100 46.4% 2833 41.8%
18. Shredder 12 x64 2793 12 12 1900 42.8% 2855 42.5%
19. Junior 13.3.00 x64 2785 9 9 2850 46.4% 2818 40.3%
20. Spike 1.4 Leiden w32 2774 12 12 1800 39.4% 2864 41.5%
21. Deuterium 14.3.34.130 POP x64 2758 11 11 2250 42.0% 2827 42.6%
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current TOP-21, FCT0
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
22. Quazar 0.4 x64 2757 13 13 1700 38.0% 2860 39.7%
23. DiscoCheck 5.2.1 x64 2755 12 12 1850 37.7% 2859 37.7%
24. Cheng4 0.38 x64 2753 12 12 1700 43.8% 2809 41.6%
25. iCE 2.0 v2240 POP x64 2752 9 9 3250 44.2% 2802 43.8%
26. SmarThink 1.70 SSE3 x64 2749 9 9 3000 42.4% 2814 37.6%
27. Spark 1.0 x64 2748 9 9 3100 43.5% 2805 41.8%
28. Zappa Mexico II x64 2745 14 14 1450 35.6% 2870 39.7%
29. Fizbo 1.3.1 x64 2742 12 12 1900 41.6% 2815 40.8%
30. Thinker 5.4d Inert x64 2733 12 12 2100 38.2% 2834 41.0%
31. Vajolet2 1.45 POP x64 2727 9 9 3450 41.4% 2800 41.8%
--. Deuterium 14.2.33.276 x64 2722 13 13 1550 42.8% 2781 42.1%
32. Atlas 3.80 x64 2717 13 13 1600 39.8% 2806 40.2%
32. Gaviota 1.0 AVX x64 2717 9 9 3450 40.1% 2800 38.0%
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Qualificated for Special 2900+ test-runs
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
34. Arasan 17.5 POP x64 2715 14 14 1350 42.7% 2774 43.3%
35. Rodent 1.7 Build 1 POP x64 2686 15 15 1150 40.7% 2756 42.7%
--. Nirvanachess 1.7 x64 2686 14 14 1550 36.9% 2794 38.5%
36. Nemo 1.01 Beta POP x64 2686 13 13 1600 38.8% 2770 42.8%
--. Arasan 17.4 POP x64 2683 12 12 1800 38.6% 2772 41.1%
--. Cheng4 0.36c x64 2679 13 13 1600 39.0% 2766 41.9%
--. Fizbo 1.2 x64 2677 14 14 1300 37.0% 2782 38.2%
37. EXchess 7.51b x64 2674 13 13 1650 36.7% 2780 41.2%
38. DisasterArea 1.54 x64 2673 13 13 1500 38.7% 2759 43.6%
39. Pedone 1.1 BMI2 x64 2665 15 15 1200 38.3% 2752 44.3%
--. Rodent 1.6 Build 6 POP x64 2658 15 15 1350 34.8% 2778 37.4%
40. Crafty 24.1 SSE42 x64 2647 12 12 2000 35.7% 2758 37.0%
Move average : 176.43 / 88.21
White advantage : 40.57 +/- 1.23
Draw rate (equal opponents) : 48.68% +/- 0.26
White Wins : 17746 (34.5%)
Black Wins : 12734 (24.7%)
Draws : 21020 (40.8%)
Unfinished : 0
White Perf. : 54.9%
Black Perf. : 45.1%
ECO A = 8632 Games (16.8%)
ECO B = 12126 Games (23.5%)
ECO C = 11140 Games (21.6%)
ECO D = 9945 Games (19.3%)
ECO E = 9657 Games (18.8%)
Frank Quisinsky
Posts: 7228 Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 7:16 pm
Location: Gutweiler, Germany
Full name: Frank Quisinsky
Post
by Frank Quisinsky » Tue May 26, 2015 1:35 am
Code: Select all
"FCP Rating List"
Will be updated after ~ 1000 new games!
----------------------------------------
Date : May 24th, 2015 (12:00)
Games : 82100
Version : apg (all played games)
Hardware : 2x Intel Core i7-4770K *4.3Ghz, 45-minutes games
Engines : All tested engines!
Calculation : Ordo 1.0, "Hiarcs 14 WCSC w32" with 2.825 Elo / News 057 & News 062
Parameter : Ordo_10.exe -a 2825 -A "Hiarcs 14 WCSC w32" -p 1.pgn -o rating.txt -W -s1000 -D -E -V
Conditions : http://www.amateurschach.de/main/_conditions.htm
Program Elo + - Games Score Av.Op. Draw
01. Stockfish 26.04.15 BMI2 x64 3152 17 17 1700 82.9% 2847 30.8%
02. Komodo 9 x64 3149 17 17 1700 82.6% 2847 29.5%
--. Stockfish 6 BMI2 x64 3135 16 16 1700 83.8% 2824 28.9%
--. Stockfish 02.10.14 BMI2 x64 C 3106 19 19 1150 79.5% 2846 34.6%
--. Komodo 8 x64 3104 14 14 2100 79.8% 2837 32.7%
--. Stockfish 03.08.14 BMI2 x64 3104 15 15 2100 81.1% 2824 32.5%
--. Stockfish 26.03.14 SSE42 x64 3084 20 20 1050 81.8% 2800 31.5%
--. Komodo 7a x64 3079 18 18 1250 79.6% 2817 31.9%
--. Stockfish 5 SSE42 x64 3078 20 20 1000 79.6% 2819 35.4%
--. Komodo TCECr x64 3048 19 19 1050 78.5% 2802 33.0%
03. Fire 4 x64 3047 13 13 2350 74.3% 2835 35.1%
04. GullChess 3.0 BMI2 x64 3038 12 12 2500 71.3% 2856 40.5%
--. GullChess 2.8 Beta BMI2 x64 2989 18 18 1050 72.4% 2805 39.3%
05. Equinox 3.30 x64 2989 12 12 2300 67.8% 2841 42.3%
06. Critter 1.6a x64 2981 14 14 1600 67.7% 2841 44.3%
--. Fire 3.0 AVX x64 2953 12 12 2100 64.8% 2832 41.7%
07. Sting SF 4.8.4 x64 2933 12 12 1950 59.9% 2857 45.5%
08. Protector 1.7.0 x64 2910 12 12 1950 54.4% 2878 45.1%
--. Critter 0.90 SSE4 x64 2900 11 11 2150 55.9% 2856 44.6%
09. Hannibal 1.5 x64 2898 12 12 1950 56.0% 2854 45.0%
10. Texel 1.05 x64 2897 12 12 2050 56.5% 2849 42.6%
11. Chiron 2.0 x64 2894 8 8 4050 59.5% 2822 39.9%
12. Naum 4.6 x64 2883 11 11 2300 57.2% 2830 42.8%
--. Protector 1.6.0 x64 2882 14 14 1600 58.7% 2817 44.4%
--. Hannibal 1.4b x64 2862 9 9 3550 56.6% 2813 42.8%
--. Texel 1.04 x64 2848 10 10 3000 55.8% 2807 41.1%
--. Protector 1.5.0 JA x64 2847 16 16 1050 55.0% 2811 45.3%
13. Nirvanachess 2.0a x64 2839 11 11 2350 51.9% 2829 44.2%
14. Senpai 1.0 SSE42 x64 2831 8 8 4050 51.6% 2823 41.1%
15. Hiarcs 14 WCSC w32 2825 8 8 4050 50.9% 2823 42.7%
16. Andscacs 0.72 POP x64 2813 11 11 2250 48.1% 2834 42.0%
17. Sjeng c't 2010 w32 2798 11 11 2100 46.4% 2833 41.8%
18. Shredder 12 x64 2794 10 10 2900 42.6% 2859 40.5%
--. Texel 1.03 x64 2789 16 16 1050 47.1% 2814 41.9%
19. Junior 13.3.00 x64 2784 10 10 3100 45.4% 2826 39.8%
--. Junior 12.5.03 x64 2780 15 15 1400 42.2% 2847 38.4%
--. Junior 13.8.04 Yokohama x64 2776 13 13 1700 42.6% 2841 40.5%
20. Spike 1.4 Leiden w32 2774 10 10 2600 38.9% 2869 40.0%
21. Deuterium 14.3.34.130 POP x64 2759 11 11 2350 41.9% 2831 42.6%
22. iCE 2.0 v2240 POP x64 2756 8 8 4200 47.4% 2782 43.0%
23. DiscoCheck 5.2.1 x64 2755 12 12 2150 36.6% 2869 36.7%
24. Cheng4 0.38 x64 2754 12 12 1700 43.8% 2809 41.6%
25. Quazar 0.4 x64 2752 10 10 2700 37.3% 2862 39.2%
26. Spark 1.0 x64 2751 8 8 4700 45.5% 2794 41.0%
27. SmarThink 1.70 SSE3 x64 2750 9 9 3550 41.8% 2821 37.3%
28. Zappa Mexico II x64 2744 11 11 2250 35.0% 2874 39.1%
--. SmarThink 1.60 x64 2741 16 16 1100 38.0% 2842 36.2%
29. Fizbo 1.3.1 x64 2740 12 12 1950 41.7% 2813 40.9%
30. Thinker 5.4d Inert x64 2733 12 12 2100 38.2% 2834 41.0%
31. Vajolet2 1.45 POP x64 2727 8 8 4500 43.5% 2785 41.1%
--. Vajolet2 1.28 POP x64 2723 14 14 1500 35.5% 2846 38.1%
--. Deuterium 14.2.33.276 x64 2721 10 10 3100 43.8% 2778 39.6%
32. Gaviota 1.0 AVX x64 2721 8 8 5050 42.0% 2791 37.0%
33. Atlas 3.80 x64 2718 13 13 1600 39.8% 2806 40.2%
34. Arasan 17.5 POP x64 2716 15 15 1350 42.7% 2774 43.3%
35. Tornado 5.0 SSE4 x64 2715 12 12 2300 42.9% 2777 37.0%
--. Andscacs 0.70 POP x64 2702 16 16 1150 39.7% 2783 41.1%
--. SmarThink 1.50 SSE3 x64 2699 17 17 1050 35.3% 2818 35.8%
--. Nirvanachess 1.7 x64 2693 11 11 2500 41.4% 2767 38.4%
36. Rodent 1.7 Build 1 POP x64 2687 14 14 1150 40.7% 2756 42.7%
37. Nemo 1.01 Beta POP x64 2686 13 13 1600 38.8% 2770 42.8%
--. Arasan 17.4 POP x64 2683 11 11 2400 43.7% 2734 41.4%
--. Fizbo 1.2 x64 2681 12 12 2100 41.8% 2751 39.0%
--. Nirvanachess 1.6 x64 2676 16 16 1400 29.0% 2856 33.3%
38. EXchess 7.51b x64 2676 13 13 1700 37.1% 2778 41.1%
--. Cheng4 0.36c x64 2674 11 11 2200 43.6% 2726 41.8%
39. DisasterArea 1.54 x64 2671 13 13 1550 38.6% 2757 43.5%
40. Pedone 1.1 BMI2 x64 2665 15 15 1200 38.3% 2753 44.3%
--. Rodent 1.6 Build 6 POP x64 2657 14 14 1400 34.9% 2776 37.4%
41. Crafty 24.1 SSE42 x64 2648 10 10 2600 40.0% 2726 36.7%
--. EXchess 7.31b x64 2644 16 16 1100 45.0% 2688 39.0%
42. Glaurung 2.2 JA x64 2635 16 16 1000 47.1% 2656 40.9%
--. Crafty 24.0 SSE42 x64 2632 18 18 1050 27.3% 2822 33.3%
--. Rodent 1.4 Build 2 POP x64 2631 17 17 1000 46.6% 2656 40.4%
--. Atlas 3.70em x64 2630 16 16 1050 44.6% 2675 38.7%
43. OctoChess r5190 SSE4 x64 2626 17 17 1000 45.9% 2656 45.5%
44. Rhetoric 1.4.1 x64 2600 13 13 2000 31.9% 2754 35.8%
--. Andscacs 0.64 POP x64 2598 16 16 1000 41.9% 2658 39.8%
45. Godel 3.4.9 x64 2587 17 17 1000 40.4% 2658 39.3%
46. Djinn 1.021 POP x64 2518 18 18 1000 31.2% 2662 36.6%
47. ProDeo 1.87 w32 2511 18 18 1000 30.4% 2662 31.3%
Move average : 175.11 / 87.55
White advantage : 40.50 +/- 0.96
Draw rate (equal opponents) : 48.18% +/- 0.20
White Wins : 28651 (34.9%)
Black Wins : 20817 (25.4%)
Draws : 32632 (39.7%)
Unfinished : 0
White Perf. : 54.8%
Black Perf. : 45.2%
ECO A = 14086 Games (17.2%)
ECO B = 19365 Games (23.6%)
ECO C = 17459 Games (21.3%)
ECO D = 16096 Games (19.6%)
ECO E = 15094 Games (18.4%)
Graham Banks
Posts: 45318 Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
Location: Auckland, NZ
Post
by Graham Banks » Tue May 26, 2015 2:10 am
Frank Quisinsky wrote: After the Critter 1.6a x64 test run!
Now I added 4 older engines with:
1. Sjeng c't 2010 w32
2. Thinker 5.4d Inert x64
3. Nemo 1.01 Beta x64
4. Critter 1.6a x64
From an ICGA point of view, isn't Thinker under suspicion of being a clone?
If you include Thinker, you should probably look at including Rybka too.
gbanksnz at gmail.com
Frank Quisinsky
Posts: 7228 Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 7:16 pm
Location: Gutweiler, Germany
Full name: Frank Quisinsky
Post
by Frank Quisinsky » Tue May 26, 2015 2:23 am
Hi Graham,
from which engine Thinker should be a clone?
Thinker 5.4d Inert was available a long time before Igorit was available!
I can see nothing here in stats with Thinker!
The playing style of Thinker is complete an other as all other engines I have in my list. I can see nothing Graham! Thinker is a wonderful engine and I like the interview I made with Lance Perkins in the past (available on Arena webpages).
Thinker 5.4d are available 2009, Igorit 2010!!
At the time Thinker are available ... Thinker are a TOP-8 engine!
And to ICGA:
I not give a f.u.c.k of ICGA!
So many years our organisation do nothing around computer chess. OK, I like the decision to Rybka from ICGA but I dislike 100 other things in the past from ICGA.
For me ICGA isn't existing!
Sorry!
I believe ICGA have a Problem after Lance wrote a lot to Houdini, in the time Houdini 1 was available. Lance and others gave us Information that Houdini 1.0 is to 99% a Robbodini version and based on the sources Norman Schmidt created.
A while later I hear nothing from Lance.
I think we have enough honest programmers scares away and we should scares away this group of programmers which working with sources by others. Lance is the wrong person ... sorry!
Best
Frank
Graham Banks
Posts: 45318 Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
Location: Auckland, NZ
Post
by Graham Banks » Tue May 26, 2015 2:38 am
No problem Frank. I was just teasing you.
gbanksnz at gmail.com
Frank Quisinsky
Posts: 7228 Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 7:16 pm
Location: Gutweiler, Germany
Full name: Frank Quisinsky
Post
by Frank Quisinsky » Tue May 26, 2015 2:57 am
Hi Graham,
you are a bad boy.
But I do the same with you ...
Enough chess for today.
Sittting now 8 hours on my Notebook with updates.
To complicated what I try to display on my older *.html site.
I think I should produced an other chaos.
Perhaps with my girlfriend, I don't know ...
Best
Frank