16 GB is quickly filled with 16 cores.
64 GB should be a minimum in 2015 !
Why Komodo 9 support only 16 GB hash ?
Moderator: Ras
-
Vinvin
- Posts: 5334
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 9:40 am
- Full name: Vincent Lejeune
-
mjlef
- Posts: 1494
- Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 2:08 pm
Re: Why Komodo 9 support only 16 GB hash ?
Komodo 9 does support up to 64 GB hash tables (in linux, Mac and Windows 64 bit compile). In 32 bit mode, the memory models do limit it to less. But you really should run Komodo in 64 bit mode. Note that older versions of Komodo did have the 16 GB limit. I try to adjust things as computers improve.Vinvin wrote:16 GB is quickly filled with 16 cores.
64 GB should be a minimum in 2015 !
-
Dann Corbit
- Posts: 12870
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:57 pm
- Location: Redmond, WA USA
Re: Why Komodo 9 support only 16 GB hash ?
Unless you are doing a really long (multiple day) search for (perhaps) correspondence chess or deep analysis, searches with 64 GB will fare much worse than smaller hash tables.mjlef wrote:Komodo 9 does support up to 64 GB hash tables (in linux, Mac and Windows 64 bit compile). In 32 bit mode, the memory models do limit it to less. But you really should run Komodo in 64 bit mode. Note that older versions of Komodo did have the 16 GB limit. I try to adjust things as computers improve.Vinvin wrote:16 GB is quickly filled with 16 cores.
64 GB should be a minimum in 2015 !
Of course, the exact performance will depend on the system since on chip cache varies a lot from machine to machine.
-
Vinvin
- Posts: 5334
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 9:40 am
- Full name: Vincent Lejeune
Re: Why Komodo 9 support only 16 GB hash ?
Good to know, you should ask Chessbase to correct here : http://shop.chessbase.com/en/products/k ... 5OH0EFN840mjlef wrote:Komodo 9 does support up to 64 GB hash tables (in linux, Mac and Windows 64 bit compile). In 32 bit mode, the memory models do limit it to less. But you really should run Komodo in 64 bit mode. Note that older versions of Komodo did have the 16 GB limit. I try to adjust things as computers improve.Vinvin wrote:16 GB is quickly filled with 16 cores.
64 GB should be a minimum in 2015 !
The Komodo 9.02 engine which can support up to 64 processor cores and 16 GB of hash memory
-
Vinvin
- Posts: 5334
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 9:40 am
- Full name: Vincent Lejeune
Re: Why Komodo 9 support only 16 GB hash ?
Why 64 GB should slower than 4 GB ?Dann Corbit wrote:Unless you are doing a really long (multiple day) search for (perhaps) correspondence chess or deep analysis, searches with 64 GB will fare much worse than smaller hash tables.mjlef wrote:Komodo 9 does support up to 64 GB hash tables (in linux, Mac and Windows 64 bit compile). In 32 bit mode, the memory models do limit it to less. But you really should run Komodo in 64 bit mode. Note that older versions of Komodo did have the 16 GB limit. I try to adjust things as computers improve.Vinvin wrote:16 GB is quickly filled with 16 cores.
64 GB should be a minimum in 2015 !
Of course, the exact performance will depend on the system since on chip cache varies a lot from machine to machine.
64 GB should be filled in less than 30 min on 16 cores.
For an overnight analyze, we need more !
-
reflectionofpower
- Posts: 1669
- Joined: Fri Mar 01, 2013 5:28 pm
- Location: USA
Re: Why Komodo 9 support only 16 GB hash ?
yeah, what happens if I get a 32 core machine? I suppose I'll have to use an 8GB hash for better performance?Vinvin wrote:Why 64 GB should slower than 4 GB ?Dann Corbit wrote:Unless you are doing a really long (multiple day) search for (perhaps) correspondence chess or deep analysis, searches with 64 GB will fare much worse than smaller hash tables.mjlef wrote:Komodo 9 does support up to 64 GB hash tables (in linux, Mac and Windows 64 bit compile). In 32 bit mode, the memory models do limit it to less. But you really should run Komodo in 64 bit mode. Note that older versions of Komodo did have the 16 GB limit. I try to adjust things as computers improve.Vinvin wrote:16 GB is quickly filled with 16 cores.
64 GB should be a minimum in 2015 !
Of course, the exact performance will depend on the system since on chip cache varies a lot from machine to machine.
64 GB should be filled in less than 30 min on 16 cores.
For an overnight analyze, we need more !
I could fill up 16GB hash on my i7 4 core rather quickly. IF I had a 16 core I would get at least a 128GB for optimal results.
"Without change, something sleeps inside us, and seldom awakens. The sleeper must awaken." (Dune - 1984)
Lonnie
Lonnie