FCP: Nirvanachess 2.1c POP x64 is still running ...

Discussion of computer chess matches and engine tournaments.

Moderator: Ras

Frank Quisinsky
Posts: 7232
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 7:16 pm
Location: Gutweiler, Germany
Full name: Frank Quisinsky

FCP: Nirvanachess 2.1c POP x64 is still running ...

Post by Frank Quisinsky »

Hi there,

as next one is Nirvanachess 2.1c POP x64 still running.
Note: This is an "Special 2900+" test-run, the first for Nirvanachess.
1600 games are to play.

Nirvanachess will be sorted out for my FCT1 tourney. Murka 3 x64 will be replaced Nirvanachess. After the results by others, Elo should go around to 2900 Elo.

If you have interest to follow:
http://www.amateurschach.de/ftptrigger/ ... p-x64.html

Have fun with work!

Best
Frank
Frank Quisinsky
Posts: 7232
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 7:16 pm
Location: Gutweiler, Germany
Full name: Frank Quisinsky

Re: FCP: Crazy game, Nirvana vs. Quazar, 0:1

Post by Frank Quisinsky »

[pgn][Event "FCP, 40/10, p=off, i7-4770k, 4.3GHz"]
[Site "Trier"]
[Date "2015.05.31"]
[Round "2.22"]
[White "Nirvanachess 2.1c POP x64"]
[Black "Quazar 0.4 x64"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "B12"]
[PlyCount "156"]
[EventDate "2015.??.??"]
[EventType "rapid"]
[EventRounds "50"]
[EventCountry "GER"]
[Source "Frank Quisinsky"]
[SourceDate "2015.05.31"]

1. e4 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} c6 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} 2. d4 {
[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} d5 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} 3. e5 {[%eval 0,0]
[%emt 0:00:00]} Bf5 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} 4. Nc3 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:
00:00]} Qb6 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} 5. Bd3 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]}
Bxd3 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} 6. Qxd3 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} e6 {
[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} 7. Nge2 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} Ne7 {[%eval 0,
0] [%emt 0:00:00]} 8. O-O {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} Qa6 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt
0:00:00]} 9. Qh3 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} Nd7 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]}
10. a4 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} h5 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} 11. Bg5 {
[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} g6 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} 12. Rfd1 {[%eval 0,
0] [%emt 0:00:00]} Nf5 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} 13. Ng3 {[%eval 56,23]
[%emt 0:00:48]} c5 {[%eval 36,20] [%emt 0:00:14] (Sxg3)} 14. Nb5 {[%eval 229,
23] [%emt 0:00:24] (Sxf5)} Qb6 {[%eval 140,21] [%emt 0:00:21]} 15. Nxf5 {
[%eval 233,23] [%emt 0:00:13]} gxf5 {[%eval 158,19] [%emt 0:00:06]} 16. c4 {
[%eval 256,24] [%emt 0:00:22]} a6 {[%eval 172,21] [%emt 0:00:15]} 17. a5 {
[%eval 265,25] [%emt 0:00:32]} Qc6 {[%eval 167,21] [%emt 0:00:12]} 18. Nc3 {
[%eval 292,25] [%emt 0:00:15]} dxc4 {[%eval 164,21] [%emt 0:00:17]} 19. d5 {
[%eval 274,25] [%emt 0:00:24]} Qc7 {[%eval 180,21] [%emt 0:00:18]} 20. f4 {
[%eval 284,25] [%emt 0:00:29]} b5 {[%eval 192,20] [%emt 0:00:16] (Lg7)} 21.
axb6 {[%eval 341,20] [%emt 0:00:10]} Nxb6 {[%eval 166,21] [%emt 0:00:21]} 22.
Bf6 {[%eval 322,21] [%emt 0:00:10] (Td2)} Rh6 {[%eval 175,23] [%emt 0:00:16]}
23. Bg5 {[%eval 382,23] [%emt 0:00:21] (d6)} Rh7 {[%eval 200,22] [%emt 0:00:37]
(Th8)} 24. d6 {[%eval 326,21] [%emt 0:00:15] (Td2)} Qc6 {[%eval 201,24] [%emt
0:01:08] (Db7)} 25. Qh4 {[%eval 354,22] [%emt 0:00:23] (Ta5)} Nd7 {[%eval 168,
25] [%emt 0:00:30] (Lg7)} 26. Rd2 {[%eval 398,19] [%emt 0:00:08]} Rb8 {[%eval
160,23] [%emt 0:00:22]} 27. Re1 {[%eval 398,21] [%emt 0:00:18] (Le7)} Rb3 {
[%eval 164,22] [%emt 0:00:20] (Db6)} 28. Be7 {[%eval 389,21] [%emt 0:00:29]}
Qb7 {[%eval 169,24] [%emt 0:00:54] (Tb8)} 29. Ree2 {[%eval 376,22] [%emt 0:00:
06] (Lxf8)} Rh6 {[%eval 161,21] [%emt 0:00:17]} 30. Bg5 {[%eval 351,22] [%emt
0:00:18] (Ld8)} Rh7 {[%eval 157,22] [%emt 0:00:18]} 31. h3 {[%eval 363,21]
[%emt 0:00:06] (Ld8)} Rh8 {[%eval 172,22] [%emt 0:00:41] (Lg7)} 32. Rf2 {
[%eval 363,22] [%emt 0:00:07]} a5 {[%eval 160,20] [%emt 0:00:09] (Th7)} 33. Rc2
{[%eval 320,21] [%emt 0:00:37] (Ld8)} Rh7 {[%eval 141,19] [%emt 0:00:15] (a4)}
34. Rfe2 {[%eval 347,19] [%emt 0:00:10] (Le7)} Qa8 {[%eval 145,17] [%emt 0:00:
10] (Sb6)} 35. Be7 {[%eval 336,17] [%emt 0:00:05]} Bg7 {[%eval 130,19] [%emt 0:
00:12]} 36. Kh1 {[%eval 294,19] [%emt 0:00:12] (Tc1)} a4 {[%eval 121,18] [%emt
0:00:11]} 37. Kh2 {[%eval 275,20] [%emt 0:00:30] (Sb1)} Bh6 {[%eval 116,19]
[%emt 0:00:19]} 38. Re3 {[%eval 266,20] [%emt 0:00:11] (Sb1)} Nb6 {[%eval 130,
18] [%emt 0:00:13] (Lg7)} 39. Bg5 {[%eval 317,19] [%emt 0:00:11] (g3)} Bf8 {
[%eval 141,19] [%emt 0:00:22]} 40. Rd2 {[%eval 260,19] [%emt 0:00:08] (Tee2)}
Kd7 {[%eval 116,19] [%emt 0:00:09]} 41. Be7 {[%eval 205,23] [%emt 0:00:27]
(Lf6)} Bh6 {[%eval 98,21] [%emt 0:00:25]} 42. Rg3 {[%eval 163,24] [%emt 0:00:
33]} Bg7 {[%eval 100,20] [%emt 0:00:20] (a3)} 43. Rf3 {[%eval 217,23] [%emt 0:
00:29] (Te2)} Bh6 {[%eval 87,23] [%emt 0:00:42]} 44. Qf2 {[%eval 220,23] [%emt
0:00:27]} Qc6 {[%eval 70,21] [%emt 0:00:31] (a3)} 45. Rg3 {[%eval 192,23]
[%emt 0:01:17] (g3)} Rh8 {[%eval 0,22] [%emt 0:00:17] (Lg7)} 46. Bf6 {[%eval
89,21] [%emt 0:00:22] (Tf3)} Ra8 {[%eval 79,23] [%emt 0:00:35] (Tf8)} 47. Bg5 {
[%eval 157,22] [%emt 0:00:19]} h4 {[%eval 108,22] [%emt 0:00:42]} 48. Bxh4 {
[%eval 155,24] [%emt 0:00:21]} a3 {[%eval 148,21] [%emt 0:00:51]} 49. bxa3 {
[%eval 196,24] [%emt 0:00:30]} Qc8 {[%eval 102,19] [%emt 0:00:15] (Sd5)} 50.
Rd1 {[%eval 159,21] [%emt 0:00:33] (Ta2)} Raxa3 {[%eval 109,19] [%emt 0:00:11]
(Dc6)} 51. Nb5 {[%eval 133,21] [%emt 0:00:20]} Ra4 {[%eval 107,21] [%emt 0:00:
24]} 52. Nc7 {[%eval 197,23] [%emt 0:00:20]} c3 {[%eval 59,20] [%emt 0:00:16]
(Txg3)} 53. Qc2 {[%eval 169,21] [%emt 0:00:28] (Lg5)} Raa3 {[%eval 118,20]
[%emt 0:00:10] (Tba3)} 54. Qf2 {[%eval 177,23] [%emt 0:00:20] (Tb1)} Ra4 {
[%eval 0,26] [%emt 0:00:12]} 55. Bg5 {[%eval 195,21] [%emt 0:00:08] (Dxc5)} Rb2
{[%eval 64,21] [%emt 0:00:28] (Lxg5)} 56. Qe3 {[%eval 136,23] [%emt 0:00:22]
(Df1)} Bxg5 {[%eval 76,20] [%emt 0:00:19] (c2)} 57. Rxg5 {[%eval 187,22] [%emt
0:00:09]} c2 {[%eval 181,18] [%emt 0:00:08]} 58. Rc1 {[%eval 220,23] [%emt 0:
00:10]} Rc4 {[%eval 183,19] [%emt 0:00:08] (Kc6)} 59. Qf3 {[%eval 283,21]
[%emt 0:00:07] (Tg7)} Re4 {[%eval 260,22] [%emt 0:00:21] (Df8)} 60. Rg7 {
[%eval 419,22] [%emt 0:00:15] (Sxe6)} Qf8 {[%eval 365,21] [%emt 0:00:07]} 61.
Qg3 {[%eval 351,22] [%emt 0:00:08]} Kc6 {[%eval 320,20] [%emt 0:00:07]} 62. Qg5
{[%eval 412,23] [%emt 0:00:11]} f6 {[%eval 399,20] [%emt 0:00:11]} 63. Qh6 {
[%eval 472,22] [%emt 0:00:08] (Dg6)} fxe5 {[%eval 429,20] [%emt 0:00:07]} 64.
fxe5 {[%eval 535,22] [%emt 0:00:12]} Nd7 {[%eval 498,21] [%emt 0:00:12]} 65.
Nxe6 {[%eval 578,22] [%emt 0:00:06]} Qe8 {[%eval 456,17] [%emt 0:00:06]} 66.
Re7 {[%eval 586,22] [%emt 0:00:06]} Qc8 {[%eval 622,16] [%emt 0:00:06]} 67. Ng7
{[%eval 601,22] [%emt 0:00:10]} Kb5 {[%eval 668,17] [%emt 0:00:12]} 68. e6 {
[%eval 651,18] [%emt 0:00:04]} Nb6 {[%eval 853,18] [%emt 0:00:17]} 69. Nxf5 {
[%eval 665,19] [%emt 0:00:04] (Tc7)} Nc4 {[%eval 701,16] [%emt 0:00:07] (Ta2)}
70. Qg7 {[%eval 1145,18] [%emt 0:00:06]} Kb6 {[%eval 1060,18] [%emt 0:00:04]
(Ta2)} 71. Rc7 {[%eval 1279,18] [%emt 0:00:03] (Te8)} Qb8 {[%eval 1607,17]
[%emt 0:00:08] (Da8)} 72. Ne7 {[%eval 1483,18] [%emt 0:00:04]} Ne5 {[%eval
2092,17] [%emt 0:00:14] (Kb5)} 73. Nd5+ {[%eval 2017,17] [%emt 0:00:03] (Sc8+)}
Ka6 {[%eval 2318,17] [%emt 0:00:03] (Ka5)} 74. Ra1+ {[%eval 2345,18] [%emt 0:
00:04]} Kb5 {[%eval 1983,16] [%emt 0:00:02]} 75. Nc3+ {[%eval 2517,19] [%emt 0:
00:07]} Kb4 {[%eval 2427,17] [%emt 0:00:05] (Kb6)} 76. Nxe4 {[%eval 3124,16]
[%emt 0:00:03]} Nf3+ {[%eval 2616,16] [%emt 0:00:03]} 77. Kh1 {[%eval 32744,17]
[%emt 0:00:03] (Kg3)} Rb1+ {[%eval -32763,100] [%emt 0:00:00] (Tb3)} 78. Rxb1+
{[%eval 32756,20] [%emt 0:00:04]} cxb1=Q# {[%eval -32765,100] [%emt 0:00:00]}
0-1[/pgn]
Frank Quisinsky
Posts: 7232
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 7:16 pm
Location: Gutweiler, Germany
Full name: Frank Quisinsky

Re: FCP: Nirvana 2.1c POP x64 after 480 / 1600 = +57

Post by Frank Quisinsky »

Code: Select all

 FCP version  : 2.08.0480.s9a
 Time         : May 30th 2015 - June 05th, 2015
 Performance  : Nirvanachess 2.1c POP x64, +57 Elo


 Calculated with Ordo 1.0
 Stats after 100, 200 ... games!       Elo   Games  Score  Draws   White Black Points   w/ d/ l
 13. Nirvanachess 2.0a x64             2838   2300  predecessor
 --. Nirvanachess 2.1c POP x64         ----   1600  --.-%  --.-%   --,-  --,-  ---,-    --/--/--
 --. Nirvanachess 2.1c POP x64         ----   1440  --.-%  --.-%   --,-  --,-  ---,-    --/--/--
 --. Nirvanachess 2.1c POP x64         ----   1280  --.-%  --.-%   --,-  --,-  ---,-    --/--/--
 --. Nirvanachess 2.1c POP x64         ----   1120  --.-%  --.-%   --,-  --,-  ---,-    --/--/--
 --. Nirvanachess 2.1c POP x64         ----    960  --.-%  --.-%   --,-  --,-  ---,-    --/--/--
 --. Nirvanachess 2.1c POP x64         ----    800  --.-%  --.-%   --,-  --,-  ---,-    --/--/--
 --. Nirvanachess 2.1c POP x64         ----    640  --.-%  --.-%   --,-  --,-  ---,-    --/--/--
 11. Nirvanachess 2.1c POP x64         2895    480  56.7%  44.5%   50,5  42,5   93,0    55/76/29
 12. Nirvanachess 2.1c POP x64         2889    320  55.9%  47.5%   52,0  39,0   91,0    51/80/29
 13. Nirvanachess 2.1c POP x64         2881    160  55.0%  45.0%   48,5  39,5   88,0    52/72/36


Current FCP "TOP 21"

     Program                           Elo    +    -  Games   Score  Av.Op.  Draw
 01. Stockfish 26.04.15 BMI2 x64       3150   17   17  1765   83.0%   2844   30.7%
 02. Komodo 9 x64                      3147   16   16  1765   82.7%   2845   29.6%
 03. Fire 4 x64                        3045   13   13  2015   73.8%   2841   36.0%
 04. GullChess 3.0 BMI2 x64            3038   13   13  1865   72.0%   2855   40.9%
 05. Equinox 3.30 x64                  2989   13   13  2015   67.9%   2843   42.5%
 06. Critter 1.6a x64                  2981   13   13  1665   67.9%   2839   44.2%
 07. Sting SF 4.8.4 x64                2933   12   12  1965   61.0%   2848   45.4%
 08. Protector 1.7.0 x64               2909   13   13  1765   55.8%   2867   45.5%
 09. Chiron 2.0 x64                    2896    9    9  3015   61.3%   2810   40.7%
 09. Hannibal 1.5 x64                  2896   12   12  1965   56.9%   2846   45.4%
 11. Nirvanachess 2.1c POP x64         2895   24   24   480   56.7%   2846   47.5%
 12. Texel 1.05 x64                    2893   12   12  2015   56.7%   2844   43.0%
 13. Naum 4.6 x64                      2882   11   11  2265   57.6%   2825   43.1%
 --. Nirvanachess 2.0a x64             2838   11   11  2300   52.4%   2824   44.7%
 14. Senpai 1.0 SSE42 x64              2829    9    9  3015   52.7%   2813   42.6%
 15. Hiarcs 14 WCSC w32                2825    9    9  3015   52.2%   2813   43.1%
 16. Andscacs 0.72 POP x64             2814   11   11  2265   49.1%   2827   42.6%
 17. Sjeng c't 2010 w32                2797   11   11  2165   46.4%   2831   41.8%
 18. Shredder 12 x64                   2794   12   12  1915   42.6%   2857   42.3%
 19. Vajolet2 2.0 POP x64              2785   12   12  1665   44.6%   2832   40.8%
 20. Junior 13.3.00 x64                2783   10   10  2915   46.2%   2818   40.3%
 21. Spike 1.4 Leiden w32              2770   12   12  1815   38.6%   2866   41.7%
Frank Quisinsky
Posts: 7232
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 7:16 pm
Location: Gutweiler, Germany
Full name: Frank Quisinsky

Re: FCP: Nirvana 2.1c POP x64 after 640 / 1600 = +63

Post by Frank Quisinsky »

Code: Select all

 FCP version  : 2.08.0640.s9a
 Time         : May 30th 2015 - June 05th, 2015
 Performance  : Nirvanachess 2.1c POP x64, +63 Elo


 Calculated with Ordo 1.0
 Stats after 100, 200 ... games!       Elo   Games  Score  Draws   White Black Points   w/ d/ l
 13. Nirvanachess 2.0a x64             2838   2300  predecessor
 --. Nirvanachess 2.1c POP x64         ----   1600  --.-%  --.-%   --,-  --,-  ---,-    --/--/--
 --. Nirvanachess 2.1c POP x64         ----   1440  --.-%  --.-%   --,-  --,-  ---,-    --/--/--
 --. Nirvanachess 2.1c POP x64         ----   1280  --.-%  --.-%   --,-  --,-  ---,-    --/--/--
 --. Nirvanachess 2.1c POP x64         ----   1120  --.-%  --.-%   --,-  --,-  ---,-    --/--/--
 --. Nirvanachess 2.1c POP x64         ----    960  --.-%  --.-%   --,-  --,-  ---,-    --/--/--
 --. Nirvanachess 2.1c POP x64         ----    800  --.-%  --.-%   --,-  --,-  ---,-    --/--/--
 09. Nirvanachess 2.1c POP x64         2901    640  57.4%  46.4%   49,5  46,0   95,5    61/69/30
 11. Nirvanachess 2.1c POP x64         2895    480  56.7%  47.5%   50,5  42,5   93,0    55/76/29
 12. Nirvanachess 2.1c POP x64         2889    320  55.9%  47.5%   52,0  39,0   91,0    51/80/29
 13. Nirvanachess 2.1c POP x64         2881    160  55.0%  45.0%   48,5  39,5   88,0    52/72/36

 

Current FCP "TOP 21"

     Program                           Elo    +    -  Games   Score  Av.Op.  Draw
 01. Stockfish 26.04.15 BMI2 x64       3149   16   16  1770   82.9%   2845   30.7%
 02. Komodo 9 x64                      3147   17   17  1770   82.7%   2845   29.5%
 03. Fire 4 x64                        3045   13   13  2020   73.8%   2842   35.9%
 04. GullChess 3.0 BMI2 x64            3038   13   13  1870   71.9%   2856   41.0%
 05. Equinox 3.30 x64                  2989   13   13  2020   67.9%   2843   42.6%
 06. Critter 1.6a x64                  2980   13   13  1670   67.8%   2839   44.3%
 07. Sting SF 4.8.4 x64                2933   12   12  1970   61.0%   2848   45.5%
 08. Protector 1.7.0 x64               2909   12   12  1770   55.8%   2867   45.6%
 09. Nirvanachess 2.1c POP x64         2901   20   20   640   57.4%   2846   46.4%
 10. Hannibal 1.5 x64                  2897   12   12  1970   57.0%   2846   45.4%
 11. Chiron 2.0 x64                    2896   10   10  3020   61.3%   2810   40.8%
 12. Texel 1.05 x64                    2893   12   12  2020   56.6%   2844   43.0%
 13. Naum 4.6 x64                      2882   11   11  2270   57.6%   2826   43.2%
 --. Nirvanachess 2.0a x64             2838   11   11  2300   52.4%   2824   44.7%
 14. Senpai 1.0 SSE42 x64              2829    9    9  3020   52.7%   2813   42.6%
 15. Hiarcs 14 WCSC w32                2825    9    9  3020   52.2%   2813   43.0%
 16. Andscacs 0.72 POP x64             2815   11   11  2270   49.1%   2827   42.6%
 17. Sjeng c't 2010 w32                2797   11   11  2170   46.3%   2832   41.9%
 18. Shredder 12 x64                   2794   12   12  1920   42.6%   2857   42.3%
 19. Vajolet2 2.0 POP x64              2785   13   13  1670   44.5%   2833   40.8%
 20. Junior 13.3.00 x64                2783    9    9  2920   46.2%   2818   40.2%
 21. Spike 1.4 Leiden w32              2770   13   13  1820   38.6%   2866   41.7%
Frank Quisinsky
Posts: 7232
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 7:16 pm
Location: Gutweiler, Germany
Full name: Frank Quisinsky

Re: FCP: Nirvana 2.1c POP x64 Blunder ...

Post by Frank Quisinsky »

Have a look on the end of the game ...
White move 34!

[pgn][Event "FCP, 40/10, p=off, i7-4770k, 4.3GHz"]
[Site "Trier"]
[Date "2015.06.02"]
[Round "20.14"]
[White "Nirvanachess 2.1c POP x64"]
[Black "Hiarcs 14 WCSC w32"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "E36"]
[PlyCount "72"]
[EventDate "2015.??.??"]
[EventType "rapid"]
[EventRounds "50"]
[EventCountry "GER"]
[Source "Frank Quisinsky"]
[SourceDate "2015.06.02"]

1. d4 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} Nf6 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} 2. c4 {
[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} e6 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} 3. Nc3 {[%eval 0,0]
[%emt 0:00:00]} Bb4 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} 4. Qc2 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:
00:00]} O-O {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} 5. Nf3 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} d5
{[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} 6. a3 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} Bxc3+ {[%eval
0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} 7. Qxc3 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} Nbd7 {[%eval 0,0]
[%emt 0:00:00]} 8. Bg5 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} h6 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:
00]} 9. Bh4 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} c5 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} 10. e3
{[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} g5 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} 11. Bg3 {[%eval 6,
19] [%emt 0:00:20]} Ne4 {[%eval 53,18] [%emt 0:00:18]} 12. Qc2 {[%eval 32,21]
[%emt 0:00:31]} Qa5+ {[%eval 54,18] [%emt 0:00:23] (cxd4)} 13. Nd2 {[%eval 22,
21] [%emt 0:00:15]} Qxd2+ {[%eval 54,18] [%emt 0:00:21] (f5)} 14. Qxd2 {[%eval
36,22] [%emt 0:00:15]} Nxd2 {[%eval 55,18] [%emt 0:00:02]} 15. Kxd2 {[%eval 32,
24] [%emt 0:00:15]} cxd4 {[%eval 55,19] [%emt 0:00:17]} 16. exd4 {[%eval 36,26]
[%emt 0:00:33]} dxc4 {[%eval 60,19] [%emt 0:00:15]} 17. Bd6 {[%eval 30,26]
[%emt 0:00:22] (h4)} Re8 {[%eval 74,21] [%emt 0:00:17]} 18. h4 {[%eval 31,26]
[%emt 0:00:30]} g4 {[%eval 68,20] [%emt 0:00:18]} 19. Bxc4 {[%eval 16,26]
[%emt 0:00:29]} Nb6 {[%eval 68,20] [%emt 0:00:16]} 20. Be2 {[%eval 21,23]
[%emt 0:00:12]} Bd7 {[%eval 68,19] [%emt 0:00:19] (Td8)} 21. Rac1 {[%eval 43,
20] [%emt 0:00:16] (b3)} Rec8 {[%eval 62,19] [%emt 0:00:31] (Tac8)} 22. h5 {
[%eval 63,21] [%emt 0:00:17] (Le5)} Kh7 {[%eval 46,18] [%emt 0:00:14] (f5)} 23.
Rhg1 {[%eval 61,21] [%emt 0:00:15] (Le5)} f5 {[%eval 40,20] [%emt 0:00:12]} 24.
Rc7 {[%eval 39,25] [%emt 0:00:34] (f3)} Rxc7 {[%eval 35,23] [%emt 0:00:21]} 25.
Bxc7 {[%eval 48,26] [%emt 0:00:09]} Nd5 {[%eval 35,24] [%emt 0:00:12]} 26. Be5
{[%eval 39,27] [%emt 0:00:13]} Be8 {[%eval 35,24] [%emt 0:00:13]} 27. Rh1 {
[%eval 55,26] [%emt 0:00:19]} Rc8 {[%eval 35,24] [%emt 0:00:21]} 28. f3 {
[%eval 49,26] [%emt 0:00:09]} Ba4 {[%eval 37,24] [%emt 0:00:18]} 29. Bd3 {
[%eval 45,27] [%emt 0:00:09] (Tc1)} gxf3 {[%eval 31,22] [%emt 0:00:24] (Tg8)}
30. g4 {[%eval 56,24] [%emt 0:00:06] (gxf3)} Rg8 {[%eval 0,23] [%emt 0:00:25]
(Ld7)} 31. gxf5 {[%eval 110,25] [%emt 0:00:07]} Rg2+ {[%eval -59,24] [%emt 0:
00:27]} 32. Kc1 {[%eval 117,27] [%emt 0:00:06]} f2 {[%eval -57,24] [%emt 0:00:
15]} 33. fxe6+ {[%eval 113,27] [%emt 0:00:07] (Tf1)} Kg8 {[%eval -185,22]
[%emt 0:00:13]} 34. Be4 {[%eval 113,29] [%emt 0:00:07] (Lh2)} Rg1+ {[%eval
-1209,20] [%emt 0:00:14]} 35. Rxg1+ {[%eval 113,28] [%emt 0:00:13] (Kd2)}
fxg1=Q+ {[%eval -32763,62] [%emt 0:00:00]} 36. Kd2 {[%eval -32765,30] [%emt 0:
00:07]} Qd1# {[%eval -32765,62] [%emt 0:00:00]} 0-1
[/pgn]
Frank Quisinsky
Posts: 7232
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 7:16 pm
Location: Gutweiler, Germany
Full name: Frank Quisinsky

Re: FCP: Nirvana 2.1c POP x64 next Blunder ...

Post by Frank Quisinsky »

Again ... the end of the game!

[pgn][Event "FCP, 40/10, p=off, i7-4770k, 4.3GHz"]
[Site "Trier"]
[Date "2015.06.02"]
[Round "21.17"]
[White "Nirvanachess 2.1c POP x64"]
[Black "Shredder 12 x64"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "B04"]
[PlyCount "94"]
[EventDate "2015.??.??"]
[EventType "rapid"]
[EventRounds "50"]
[EventCountry "GER"]
[Source "Frank Quisinsky"]
[SourceDate "2015.06.02"]

1. e4 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} Nf6 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} 2. e5 {
[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} Nd5 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} 3. c4 {[%eval 0,0]
[%emt 0:00:00]} Nb6 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} 4. d4 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:
00]} d6 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} 5. Nf3 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} dxe5 {
[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} 6. Nxe5 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} g6 {[%eval 0,
0] [%emt 0:00:00]} 7. Nc3 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} Bg7 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt
0:00:00]} 8. Be3 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} O-O {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]}
9. Qb3 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} Be6 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} 10. O-O-O
{[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} a5 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} 11. h4 {[%eval 56,
21] [%emt 0:01:23]} a4 {[%eval 71,16] [%emt 0:00:43] (h5)} 12. Qa3 {[%eval 58,
21] [%emt 0:00:17]} Nc6 {[%eval 73,16] [%emt 0:00:24] (h5)} 13. h5 {[%eval 104,
21] [%emt 0:00:35]} Nxe5 {[%eval 69,15] [%emt 0:00:23] (Tc8)} 14. dxe5 {[%eval
25,21] [%emt 0:00:13]} Qe8 {[%eval 77,16] [%emt 0:00:15]} 15. c5 {[%eval 43,22]
[%emt 0:00:12] (Th4)} Nc4 {[%eval 111,7] [%emt 0:00:07]} 16. Bxc4 {[%eval 35,
24] [%emt 0:00:26]} Bxc4 {[%eval 82,10] [%emt 0:00:04]} 17. Qb4 {[%eval 19,24]
[%emt 0:00:29]} Be6 {[%eval 56,15] [%emt 0:00:36]} 18. Qh4 {[%eval 30,21]
[%emt 0:00:13] (f3)} f6 {[%eval 33,15] [%emt 0:00:27]} 19. Nd5 {[%eval 41,23]
[%emt 0:00:11] (De4)} a3 {[%eval 49,14] [%emt 0:00:33] (g5)} 20. b3 {[%eval 49,
22] [%emt 0:00:13]} Bxd5 {[%eval 49,14] [%emt 0:00:04] (g5)} 21. Rxd5 {[%eval
75,17] [%emt 0:00:11]} g5 {[%eval 67,15] [%emt 0:00:31]} 22. Qh3 {[%eval 61,22]
[%emt 0:00:10] (Db4)} h6 {[%eval 47,17] [%emt 0:00:48]} 23. Qe6+ {[%eval 63,23]
[%emt 0:00:18]} Qf7 {[%eval 56,16] [%emt 0:00:03]} 24. Qxf7+ {[%eval 74,26]
[%emt 0:00:21]} Kxf7 {[%eval 53,11] [%emt 0:00:03]} 25. exf6 {[%eval 70,27]
[%emt 0:00:14]} Bxf6 {[%eval 56,19] [%emt 0:00:12]} 26. Rhd1 {[%eval 65,27]
[%emt 0:00:19]} Ke6 {[%eval 64,18] [%emt 0:00:39] (Lb2+)} 27. Kc2 {[%eval 85,
24] [%emt 0:00:19] (T5d3)} Rfb8 {[%eval 81,16] [%emt 0:00:15] (Le5)} 28. Rd7 {
[%eval 84,20] [%emt 0:00:12] (T5d3)} Be5 {[%eval 89,18] [%emt 0:00:19]} 29.
R7d3 {[%eval 92,21] [%emt 0:00:08]} Kf5 {[%eval 87,18] [%emt 0:00:16]} 30. b4 {
[%eval 94,22] [%emt 0:00:07] (f3)} b5 {[%eval 87,16] [%emt 0:00:13] (Te8)} 31.
Bd4 {[%eval 105,21] [%emt 0:00:12]} Bxd4 {[%eval 80,19] [%emt 0:00:26]} 32.
Rxd4 {[%eval 120,22] [%emt 0:00:05]} Rf8 {[%eval 99,20] [%emt 0:00:44]} 33. f3
{[%eval 113,22] [%emt 0:00:09]} e5 {[%eval 46,19] [%emt 0:00:13]} 34. Rd7 {
[%eval 117,22] [%emt 0:00:09]} Kf4 {[%eval 72,19] [%emt 0:00:09] (Tac8)} 35.
Rxc7 {[%eval 179,18] [%emt 0:00:05]} Kg3 {[%eval 46,18] [%emt 0:00:10]} 36. Rb7
{[%eval 144,21] [%emt 0:00:11]} Kxg2 {[%eval 47,18] [%emt 0:00:09]} 37. Rxb5 {
[%eval 141,21] [%emt 0:00:11]} Rxf3 {[%eval 77,17] [%emt 0:00:13] (Tf4)} 38. c6
{[%eval 32766,20] [%emt 0:00:07]} Rc8 {[%eval 84,17] [%emt 0:00:20]} 39. Rc5 {
[%eval 32766,100] [%emt 0:00:00] (Td6)} e4 {[%eval 49,17] [%emt 0:00:12]} 40.
Rd2+ {[%eval 32766,100] [%emt 0:00:04] (b5)} Kf1 {[%eval 0,18] [%emt 0:00:12]}
41. Rd1+ {[%eval 32766,56] [%emt 0:00:21] (b5)} Kf2 {[%eval 54,21] [%emt 0:01:
16]} 42. Rd2+ {[%eval 32766,54] [%emt 0:00:34] (b5)} Ke1 {[%eval 69,19] [%emt
0:00:21]} 43. b5 {[%eval 32766,100] [%emt 0:00:00]} e3 {[%eval 74,20] [%emt 0:
00:33]} 44. Rf2 {[%eval 32766,47] [%emt 0:00:18] (Td1+)} exf2 {[%eval -32731,
17] [%emt 0:00:12]} 45. Re5+ {[%eval 32766,27] [%emt 0:00:19]} Kf1 {[%eval
-32745,18] [%emt 0:00:24]} 46. Re1+ {[%eval 32764,34] [%emt 0:00:16] (Te3)}
fxe1=Q {[%eval -32763,3] [%emt 0:00:00]} 47. b6 {[%eval -32765,18] [%emt 0:00:
17] (c7)} Rxc6# {[%eval -32765,1] [%emt 0:00:00]} 0-1[/pgn]
Frank Quisinsky
Posts: 7232
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 7:16 pm
Location: Gutweiler, Germany
Full name: Frank Quisinsky

Re: FCP: Same problem I think, should be checked !!!

Post by Frank Quisinsky »

That should be checked ... I think the same problem.
Not looking in detail how many points Nirvana 2.1c lost with this error.
Frank Quisinsky
Posts: 7232
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 7:16 pm
Location: Gutweiler, Germany
Full name: Frank Quisinsky

Re: FCP: Nirvana 2.1c POP x64 after 1120 / 1600 = +58

Post by Frank Quisinsky »

Code: Select all

 FCP version  : 2.08.1120.s9a
 Time         : May 30th 2015 - June 06th, 2015
 Performance  : Nirvanachess 2.1c POP x64, +58 Elo


 Calculated with Ordo 1.0
 Stats after 100, 200 ... games!       Elo   Games  Score  Draws   White Black Points   w/ d/ l
 13. Nirvanachess 2.0a x64             2838   2300  predecessor
 --. Nirvanachess 2.1c POP x64         ----   1600  --.-%  --.-%   --,-  --,-  ---,-    --/--/--
 --. Nirvanachess 2.1c POP x64         ----   1440  --.-%  --.-%   --,-  --,-  ---,-    --/--/--
 --. Nirvanachess 2.1c POP x64         ----   1280  --.-%  --.-%   --,-  --,-  ---,-    --/--/--
 09. Nirvanachess 2.1c POP x64         2896   1120  56.9%  47.5%   48,0  40,5   88,5    53/71/36
 09. Nirvanachess 2.1c POP x64         2898    960  57.1%  48.0%   46,0  45,5   91,5    52/79/29
 09. Nirvanachess 2.1c POP x64         2898    800  57.1%  47.8%   48,0  42,5   90,5    48/85/27
 09. Nirvanachess 2.1c POP x64         2899    640  57.3%  46.4%   49,5  45,0   94,5    60/69/31
 11. Nirvanachess 2.1c POP x64         2895    480  56.7%  47.5%   50,5  42,5   93,0    55/76/29
 12. Nirvanachess 2.1c POP x64         2889    320  55.9%  47.5%   52,0  39,0   91,0    51/80/29
 13. Nirvanachess 2.1c POP x64         2881    160  55.0%  45.0%   48,5  39,5   88,0    52/72/36

 
 
 Current FCP "TOP 21"

     Program                           Elo    +    -  Games   Score  Av.Op.  Draw
 01. Stockfish 26.04.15 BMI2 x64       3149   15   15  1785   82.9%   2845   30.8%
 02. Komodo 9 x64                      3147   16   16  1785   82.7%   2845   29.6%
 03. Fire 4 x64                        3044   13   13  2035   73.8%   2842   35.9%
 04. GullChess 3.0 BMI2 x64            3037   13   13  1885   71.8%   2856   41.1%
 05. Equinox 3.30 x64                  2989   12   12  2035   67.9%   2843   42.5%
 06. Critter 1.6a x64                  2980   13   13  1685   67.7%   2839   44.5%
 07. Sting SF 4.8.4 x64                2933   12   12  1985   61.0%   2849   45.6%
 08. Protector 1.7.0 x64               2909   12   12  1785   55.7%   2867   45.8%
 09. Hannibal 1.5 x64                  2896   12   12  1985   56.9%   2846   45.5%
 09. Chiron 2.0 x64                    2896    9    9  3035   61.2%   2811   40.8%
 09. Nirvanachess 2.1c POP x64         2896   15   15  1120   56.9%   2846   47.5%
 12. Texel 1.05 x64                    2892   11   11  2035   56.6%   2844   43.0%
 13. Naum 4.6 x64                      2883   11   11  2285   57.6%   2826   43.2%
 --. Nirvanachess 2.0a x64             2838   11   11  2300   52.4%   2824   44.7%
 14. Senpai 1.0 SSE42 x64              2828   10   10  3035   52.6%   2813   42.7%
 15. Hiarcs 14 WCSC w32                2825    9    9  3035   52.1%   2813   43.2%
 16. Andscacs 0.72 POP x64             2813   11   11  2285   48.9%   2827   42.5%
 17. Sjeng c't 2010 w32                2796   11   11  2185   46.2%   2832   42.0%
 18. Shredder 12 x64                   2794   12   12  1935   42.5%   2857   42.3%
 19. Vajolet2 2.0 POP x64              2785   13   13  1685   44.4%   2833   41.0%
 20. Junior 13.3.00 x64                2783    9    9  2935   46.2%   2818   40.3%
 21. Spike 1.4 Leiden w32              2771   12   12  1835   38.6%   2866   41.7%
Frank Quisinsky
Posts: 7232
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 7:16 pm
Location: Gutweiler, Germany
Full name: Frank Quisinsky

Re: FCP: Nirvanachess 2.1c POP x64 final = +61

Post by Frank Quisinsky »

Test-run : http://www.amateurschach.de/ftptrigger/ ... p-x64.html
Included in FCT0 : http://www.amateurschach.de/ftptrigger/fct0-2015.html

Code: Select all

 FCP version      : 2.08.s10
 Time             : May 30th 2015 - June 06th, 2015
 Performance      : Nirvanachess 2.1c POP x64, +61 Elo
 
 Calculated with Ordo 1.0
 Stats after 100, 200 ... games!       Elo   Games  Score  Draws   White Black Points   w/ d/ l
 13. Nirvanachess 2.0a x64             2838   2300  predecessor
 09. Nirvanachess 2.1c POP x64         2899   1600  57.2%  48.1%   49,0  41,0   90,0    51/78/31
 09. Nirvanachess 2.1c POP x64         2899   1440  57.3%  48.1%   51,0  42,5   93,5    55/77/28
 09. Nirvanachess 2.1c POP x64         2898   1280  57.1%  48.0%   50,0  44,5   94,5    53/83/24
 09. Nirvanachess 2.1c POP x64         2896   1120  56.9%  47.5%   48,0  40,5   88,5    53/71/36
 09. Nirvanachess 2.1c POP x64         2898    960  57.1%  48.0%   46,0  45,5   91,5    52/79/29
 09. Nirvanachess 2.1c POP x64         2898    800  57.1%  47.8%   48,0  42,5   90,5    48/85/27
 09. Nirvanachess 2.1c POP x64         2899    640  57.3%  46.4%   49,5  45,0   94,5    60/69/31
 11. Nirvanachess 2.1c POP x64         2895    480  56.7%  47.5%   50,5  42,5   93,0    55/76/29
 12. Nirvanachess 2.1c POP x64         2889    320  55.9%  47.5%   52,0  39,0   91,0    51/80/29
 13. Nirvanachess 2.1c POP x64         2881    160  55.0%  45.0%   48,5  39,5   88,0    52/72/36

 
 Current FCP "TOP 21"

     Program                           Elo    +    -  Games   Score  Av.Op.  Draw
 01. Stockfish 26.04.15 BMI2 x64       3150   16   16  1800   82.9%   2846   30.7%
 02. Komodo 9 x64                      3146   15   15  1800   82.6%   2846   29.8%
 03. Fire 4 x64                        3044   13   13  2050   73.7%   2843   36.0%
 04. GullChess 3.0 BMI2 x64            3037   13   13  1900   71.8%   2856   41.2%
 05. Equinox 3.30 x64                  2989   12   12  2050   67.9%   2844   42.6%
 06. Critter 1.6a x64                  2980   13   13  1700   67.6%   2840   44.5%
 07. Sting SF 4.8.4 x64                2933   12   12  2000   60.9%   2849   45.8%
 08. Protector 1.7.0 x64               2910   12   12  1800   55.8%   2868   46.0%
 09. Nirvanachess 2.1c POP x64         2899   13   13  1600   57.2%   2846   48.1%
 10. Hannibal 1.5 x64                  2897   12   12  2000   56.9%   2846   45.8%
 11. Chiron 2.0 x64                    2896   10   10  3050   61.2%   2811   40.7%
 12. Texel 1.05 x64                    2893   11   11  2050   56.5%   2845   43.0%
 13. Naum 4.6 x64                      2883   11   11  2300   57.5%   2827   43.3%
 --. Nirvanachess 2.0a x64             2838   11   11  2300   52.4%   2824   44.7%
 14. Senpai 1.0 SSE42 x64              2829    9    9  3050   52.5%   2814   42.7%
 15. Hiarcs 14 WCSC w32                2825    9    9  3050   52.0%   2814   43.2%
 16. Andscacs 0.72 POP x64             2813   11   11  2300   48.7%   2828   42.5%
 17. Sjeng c't 2010 w32                2796   11   11  2200   46.1%   2833   42.0%
 18. Shredder 12 x64                   2794   11   11  1950   42.5%   2858   42.5%
 19. Vajolet2 2.0 POP x64              2785   12   12  1700   44.4%   2834   41.2%
 20. Junior 13.3.00 x64                2784    9    9  2950   46.1%   2819   40.4%
 21. Spike 1.4 Leiden w32              2771   12   12  1850   38.6%   2866   41.9%
Frank Quisinsky
Posts: 7232
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 7:16 pm
Location: Gutweiler, Germany
Full name: Frank Quisinsky

Re: FCP: Nirvanachess 2.1c POP x64 stats are interesting !!

Post by Frank Quisinsky »

Hi there,

Note:
The two games, I posted in the last days with the error I found out are replayed (with the same results). I will offer a clearly database for download (for that reason).

Nirvanachess 2.1c POP x64 now with the highest draw quote in my list. Interesting are the stats.

Middlegame = More fast lost games OK but in reality nothing to see here.
Transposition into endgame = +95 Elo ... very clearly improved.
Endgame = +39 Elo, clearly improved.

Comparing to the predecessor Nirvanachess 2.0a x64:

Code: Select all

 FCT0 (Frank's Continuous Tourney 0), games with move number 020-059
 Elostat 1.3,   EloØ = 2.909, Category = 26

     Programs                         Elo   +   - Games Score Av.Op. Draws   Won Draw Lost
 10. Nirvanachess 2.1c POP x64      : 2918  26 25  170  52.4%  2902  76.5%    24  130   16
 08. Nirvanachess 2.0a x64          : 2922  24 22  167  54.5%  2891  80.2%    24  134    9

 = -04 Elo

 FCT0 (Frank's Continuous Tourney 0), games with move number  060-099
 Elostat 1.3,   EloØ = 2.909, Category = 26

     Programs                         Elo   +   - Games Score Av.Op. Draws   Won Draw Lost
 10. Nirvanachess 2.1c POP x64      : 2907  24 24  548  49.3%  2912  31.8%   183  174  191
 14. Nirvanachess 2.0a x64          : 2812  25 25  561  35.5%  2916  29.2%   117  164  280

 = +95 Elo

 FCT0 (Frank's Continuous Tourney 0), games with move number 100-299
 Elostat 1.3,   EloØ = 2.909, Category = 26

     Programs                         Elo   +   - Games Score Av.Op. Draws   Won Draw Lost
 07. Nirvanachess 2.1c POP x64      : 2916  21 21  282  51.4%  2906  73.8%    41  208   33
 15. Nirvanachess 2.0a x64          : 2877  26 26  272  46.3%  2902  61.0%    43  166   63
 
  = +39 Elo
And here the complete stats to my current TOP-21:

Code: Select all

 FCT0 (Frank's Continuous Tourney 0), games with move number 020-059
 Elostat 1.3,   EloØ = 2.909, Category = 26

     Programs                         Elo   +   - Games Score Av.Op. Draws   Won Draw Lost
 01. Komodo 9 x64                   : 3071  42 40  145  74.1%  2888  46.2%    74   67    4
 02. Stockfish 26.04.15 BMI2 x64    : 3049  31 28  188  70.2%  2900  58.5%    77  110    1
 03. Fire 4 x64                     : 2985  31 30  162  61.1%  2906  65.4%    46  106   10
 04. GullChess 3.0 BMI2 x64         : 2970  30 28  150  59.3%  2905  72.0%    35  108    7
 05. Critter 1.6a x64               : 2957  27 25  147  56.1%  2914  78.2%    25  115    7
 06. Sting SF 4.8.4 x64             : 2953  27 24  155  57.4%  2901  77.4%    29  120    6
 07. Texel 1.05 x64                 : 2929  33 32  140  53.9%  2902  67.9%    28   95   17
 08. Chiron 2.0 x64                 : 2928  29 28  161  52.8%  2909  72.0%    27  116   18
 09. Equinox 3.30 x64               : 2920  30 30  134  50.4%  2918  73.9%    18   99   17
 10. Nirvanachess 2.1c POP x64      : 2918  26 25  170  52.4%  2902  76.5%    24  130   16
 11. Protector 1.7.0 x64            : 2909  27 26  163  51.8%  2896  75.5%    23  123   17
 12. Naum 4.6 x64                   : 2896  29 30  152  47.7%  2912  71.7%    18  109   25
 13. Junior 13.3.00 x64             : 2874  33 33  152  44.7%  2911  64.5%    19   98   35
 14. Andscacs 0.72 POP x64          : 2862  33 34  143  42.3%  2916  65.0%    14   93   36
 15. Hannibal 1.5 x64               : 2857  24 27  144  42.4%  2911  79.2%     4  114   26
 16. Sjeng c't 2010 w32             : 2854  30 32  132  40.9%  2918  71.2%     7   94   31
 17. Vajolet2 2.0 POP x64           : 2842  33 34  138  39.9%  2914  65.2%    10   90   38
 17. Hiarcs 14 WCSC w32             : 2842  35 36  138  39.9%  2914  62.3%    12   86   40
 19. Spike 1.4 Leiden w32           : 2825  30 32  161  37.9%  2911  64.6%     9  104   48
 20. Senpai 1.0 SSE42 x64           : 2814  30 32  168  36.6%  2909  63.7%     8  107   53
 21. Shredder 12 x64                : 2807  33 35  173  34.1%  2921  55.5%    11   96   66

 Games         : 1608
 White Perf.   : 54.8%
 Black Perf.   : 45.2%
 White Wins    :  336 Games (20.9%)
 Black Wins    :  182 Games (11.3%)
 Draws         : 1090 Games (67.8%)

 ECO A00-A99   :  260 Games (16.2%)
 ECO B00-B99   :  356 Games (22.1%)
 ECO C00-C99   :  334 Games (20.8%)
 ECO D00-D99   :  337 Games (21.0%)
 ECO E00-E99   :  321 Games (20.0%)
 
 ---
 
 FCT0 (Frank's Continuous Tourney 0), games with move number  060-099
 Elostat 1.3,   EloØ = 2.909, Category = 26

     Programs                         Elo   +   - Games Score Av.Op. Draws   Won Draw Lost
 01. Komodo 9 x64                   : 3195  30 29  604  86.3%  2876  21.5%   456  130   18
 02. Stockfish 26.04.15 BMI2 x64    : 3181  28 27  633  85.5%  2873  24.6%   463  156   14
 03. GullChess 3.0 BMI2 x64         : 3068  27 26  559  73.7%  2889  26.8%   337  150   72
 04. Fire 4 x64                     : 3064  27 27  561  73.9%  2884  26.2%   341  147   73
 05. Equinox 3.30 x64               : 3029  26 25  570  70.0%  2882  28.1%   319  160   91
 06. Critter 1.6a x64               : 2995  24 24  550  64.9%  2888  33.1%   266  182  102
 07. Sting SF 4.8.4 x64             : 2938  24 24  537  55.6%  2899  31.8%   213  171  153
 08. Protector 1.7.0 x64            : 2922  24 24  544  51.5%  2911  33.8%   188  184  172
 09. Hannibal 1.5 x64               : 2914  24 24  548  51.6%  2904  29.7%   201  163  184
 10. Nirvanachess 2.1c POP x64      : 2907  24 24  548  49.3%  2912  31.8%   183  174  191
 11. Texel 1.05 x64                 : 2888  24 24  560  47.1%  2908  30.4%   179  170  211
 11. Chiron 2.0 x64                 : 2888  24 24  583  48.5%  2898  26.4%   206  154  223
 13. Naum 4.6 x64                   : 2864  24 24  565  43.4%  2911  31.9%   155  180  230
 14. Senpai 1.0 SSE42 x64           : 2817  25 25  557  36.4%  2914  28.7%   123  160  274
 15. Hiarcs 14 WCSC w32             : 2799  24 24  604  34.0%  2914  29.0%   118  175  311
 16. Andscacs 0.72 POP x64          : 2790  25 25  584  32.5%  2916  25.7%   115  150  319
 17. Junior 13.3.00 x64             : 2778  24 24  620  30.6%  2920  28.7%   101  178  341
 18. Sjeng c't 2010 w32             : 2770  25 25  613  30.1%  2916  26.6%   103  163  347
 19. Shredder 12 x64                : 2769  26 26  567  30.6%  2911  25.2%   102  143  322
 20. Vajolet2 2.0 POP x64           : 2766  26 26  589  29.4%  2918  22.8%   106  134  349
 21. Spike 1.4 Leiden w32           : 2752  26 27  602  26.9%  2925  22.9%    93  138  371

 Games         : 6049
 White Perf.   : 57.0%
 Black Perf.   : 43.0%
 White Wins    : 2607 Games (43.1%)
 Black Wins    : 1761 Games (29.1%)
 Draws         : 1681 Games (27.8%)

 ECO A00-A99   : 1023 Games (16.9%)
 ECO B00-B99   : 1429 Games (23.6%)
 ECO C00-C99   : 1260 Games (20.8%)
 ECO D00-D99   : 1144 Games (18.9%)
 ECO E00-E99   : 1193 Games (19.7%)
 
 ---
 
 FCT0 (Frank's Continuous Tourney 0), games with move number 100-299
 Elostat 1.3,   EloØ = 2.909, Category = 26

     Programs                         Elo   +   - Games Score Av.Op. Draws   Won Draw Lost
 01. Stockfish 26.04.15 BMI2 x64    : 3039  33 31  179  65.9%  2924  58.1%    66  104    9
 02. Komodo 9 x64                   : 3032  26 25  251  65.7%  2919  62.2%    87  156    8
 03. Fire 4 x64                     : 2985  24 23  277  60.3%  2912  65.7%    76  182   19
 04. GullChess 3.0 BMI2 x64         : 2963  21 21  291  57.7%  2909  71.5%    64  208   19
 05. Equinox 3.30 x64               : 2942  23 22  296  53.9%  2915  67.9%    59  201   36
 06. Critter 1.6a x64               : 2925  21 21  303  51.7%  2914  72.3%    47  219   37
 07. Nirvanachess 2.1c POP x64      : 2916  21 21  282  51.4%  2906  73.8%    41  208   33
 08. Hannibal 1.5 x64               : 2908  23 23  308  49.8%  2909  64.6%    54  199   55
 09. Naum 4.6 x64                   : 2907  23 23  283  50.4%  2905  68.9%    45  195   43
 09. Sting SF 4.8.4 x64             : 2907  20 20  308  49.0%  2913  72.7%    39  224   45
 11. Andscacs 0.72 POP x64          : 2898  24 24  273  49.5%  2902  65.2%    46  178   49
 12. Protector 1.7.0 x64            : 2897  24 24  293  48.8%  2906  62.8%    51  184   58
 13. Shredder 12 x64                : 2895  22 22  260  48.5%  2906  73.8%    30  192   38
 14. Texel 1.05 x64                 : 2889  24 24  300  46.5%  2913  63.7%    44  191   65
 15. Chiron 2.0 x64                 : 2884  24 25  256  45.5%  2915  66.8%    31  171   54
 16. Hiarcs 14 WCSC w32             : 2874  23 23  258  45.7%  2903  70.5%    27  182   49
 17. Senpai 1.0 SSE42 x64           : 2863  26 26  275  44.2%  2903  60.0%    39  165   71
 17. Spike 1.4 Leiden w32           : 2863  26 26  237  44.7%  2900  65.8%    28  156   53
 19. Vajolet2 2.0 POP x64           : 2855  25 25  273  42.9%  2905  63.0%    31  172   70
 20. Junior 13.3.00 x64             : 2841  30 31  228  41.2%  2902  54.4%    32  124   72
 21. Sjeng c't 2010 w32             : 2830  26 27  255  39.4%  2905  60.8%    23  155   77

 Games         : 2843
 White Perf.   : 50.9%
 Black Perf.   : 49.1%
 White Wins    :  506 Games (17.8%)
 Black Wins    :  454 Games (16.0%)
 Draws         : 1883 Games (66.2%)

 ECO A00-A99   :  422 Games (14.8%)
 ECO B00-B99   :  641 Games (22.5%)
 ECO C00-C99   :  619 Games (21.8%)
 ECO D00-D99   :  603 Games (21.2%)
 ECO E00-E99   :  558 Games (19.6%)

 ---