Hi there,
as next Andscacs 0.81 POP x64 is still running.
If you like to follow:
http://www.amateurschach.de/ftptrigger/ ... p-x64.html
Have fun!
Best
Frank
FCT League 1: Andscacs 0.81 POP x64 is still running ...
Moderator: Ras
-
Frank Quisinsky
- Posts: 7228
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 7:16 pm
- Location: Gutweiler, Germany
- Full name: Frank Quisinsky
-
cdani
- Posts: 2204
- Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 10:24 am
- Location: Andorra
Re: FCT League 1: Andscacs 0.81 POP x64 is still running ...
Thanks!! 
Daniel José - http://www.andscacs.com
http://www.andscacs.com-
Frank Quisinsky
- Posts: 7228
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 7:16 pm
- Location: Gutweiler, Germany
- Full name: Frank Quisinsky
Re: FCT League 1: Andscacs 0.81 POP x64 after 200 = +34
Hi Daniel Jose,
you are welcome ... thanks for your engine!!
Andscacs isn't esay to test?!
The performance vs. stronger opponents is a bit highter (not vs. SF and Komodo) ... think so. But all works wonderful, no technical problems and the move average (87 moves) isn't high. Also the quantity of fast lost games are clearly better with the new Versions compare to the preview versions. It seems that Andscacs avoid draw ... not many fast draw games.
Andscacs is playing interesting chess and have a safe place in FCT League 1.
What is to do?
On the end of my typical message you will find the complete Rating list. So we can better compare +- Elo to the predecessor 0.72 I have in my list.
+47,7 Elo after 200 games in my rating list!
+36 Elo in my "Frank's Continuous Tourney" FCT after 200 games!
That's what I mean ... 12 Elo more ...
And ...
4x won up to move number 50
1x lost up to move number 50
4x won after 200 games is a lot in this group of engines.
At the moment Andscacs is playing a great seria (between game number 200-300).
But let us wait of the final results ...
200 games is nothing ...
Again, all works wonderful.
I like your engine!
you are welcome ... thanks for your engine!!
Andscacs isn't esay to test?!
The performance vs. stronger opponents is a bit highter (not vs. SF and Komodo) ... think so. But all works wonderful, no technical problems and the move average (87 moves) isn't high. Also the quantity of fast lost games are clearly better with the new Versions compare to the preview versions. It seems that Andscacs avoid draw ... not many fast draw games.
Andscacs is playing interesting chess and have a safe place in FCT League 1.
What is to do?
On the end of my typical message you will find the complete Rating list. So we can better compare +- Elo to the predecessor 0.72 I have in my list.
+47,7 Elo after 200 games in my rating list!
+36 Elo in my "Frank's Continuous Tourney" FCT after 200 games!
That's what I mean ... 12 Elo more ...
And ...
4x won up to move number 50
1x lost up to move number 50
4x won after 200 games is a lot in this group of engines.
At the moment Andscacs is playing a great seria (between game number 200-300).
But let us wait of the final results ...
200 games is nothing ...
Again, all works wonderful.
I like your engine!
Code: Select all
Version : 3.04.L1-02.L2-02
Time : July 12th, 2015 - July 16th, 2015
Performance : Andscacs 0.81 POP x64, 2867 Elo, +34
Calculated with EloStat 1.3
Stats after 100, 200 ... games! Elo Games Score Draws White Black Points w/ d/ l
15. Andscacs 0.72 POP x64 2833 1.000 38.4% 42.2% Predesessor
--. Andscacs 0.81 POP x64 ---- 1.000 --.-% --.-% --,- --,- --,- --/--/--
--. Andscacs 0.81 POP x64 ---- 900 --.-% --.-% --,- --,- --,- --/--/--
--. Andscacs 0.81 POP x64 ---- 800 --.-% --.-% --,- --,- --,- --/--/--
--. Andscacs 0.81 POP x64 ---- 700 --.-% --.-% --,- --,- --,- --/--/--
--. Andscacs 0.81 POP x64 ---- 600 --.-% --.-% --,- --,- --,- --/--/--
--. Andscacs 0.81 POP x64 ---- 500 --.-% --.-% --,- --,- --,- --/--/--
--. Andscacs 0.81 POP x64 ---- 400 --.-% --.-% --,- --,- --,- --/--/--
--. Andscacs 0.81 POP x64 ---- 300 --.-% --.-% --,- --,- --,- --/--/--
14. Andscacs 0.81 POP x64 2867 200 43.2% 44.5% 27,0 17,0 44,0 21/46/33
14. Andscacs 0.81 POP x64 2862 100 42.5% 43.0% 23,5 19,0 42,5 21/43/36
Points Score EloS Ordo + - Draws
01. Komodo 9 x64 752.0/0960 78.3% 3126 3157 18 18 37.1%
02. Stockfish 26Apr2015 BMI2 x64 750.0/0960 78.1% 3124 3155 18 17 38.3%
03. Fire 4 x64 646.5/0960 67.3% 3034 3057 16 16 44.9%
04. GullChess 3.0 BMI2 x64 641.5/0960 66.8% 3030 3053 16 16 47.4%
05. Equinox 3.30 x64 597.0/0960 62.2% 2996 3016 16 16 46.9%
06. Critter 1.6a x64 563.5/0960 58.7% 2972 2989 15 15 52.8%
07. Sting SF 4.8.4 x64 514.0/0960 53.5% 2938 2950 15 15 51.5%
08. Protector 1.8.0 x64 505.0/0960 52.6% 2931 2943 15 15 53.8%
09. Nirvanachess 2.1c POP x64 473.0/0960 49.3% 2909 2918 15 15 50.8%
10. Hannibal 1.5 x64 470.5/0960 49.0% 2908 2917 16 16 46.6%
11. Chiron 2.0 x64 463.5/0960 48.3% 2903 2911 16 16 44.9%
12. Texel 1.05 x64 455.5/0960 47.4% 2897 2905 16 16 45.5%
13. Naum 4.6 x64 443.0/0960 46.1% 2889 2895 16 16 49.4%
14. Andscacs 0.81 POP x64 86.5/0200 43.2% 2867 2872 36 36 44.5%
15. Senpai 1.0 SSE42 x64 365.5/0960 38.1% 2834 2835 17 17 42.8%
16. Hiarcs 14 WCSC w32 353.5/0960 36.8% 2825 2825 17 17 43.9%
17. Shredder 12 x64 337.0/0960 35.1% 2813 2812 17 17 43.3%
18. Junior 13.3.00 x64 335.0/0960 34.9% 2811 2810 17 17 40.2%
19. Vajolet2 2.0 POP x64 319.5/0960 33.3% 2799 2797 17 18 39.1%
20. Sjeng c't 2010 w32 317.0/0960 33.0% 2797 2795 17 17 40.0%
21. Spike 1.4 Leiden w32 311.0/0960 32.4% 2793 2790 17 17 40.2%
Code: Select all
# PLAYER : RATING ERROR POINTS PLAYED (%)
1 Stockfish 26Apr2015 BMI2 x64 : 3149.6 16.2 1537.0 1860 82.6%
2 Komodo 9 x64 : 3147.7 15.6 1534.0 1860 82.5%
3 Stockfish 6 BMI2 x64 : 3136.1 16.9 1424.0 1700 83.8%
4 Stockfish 02Oct2014 BMI2 x64, Contemp 17 : 3107.6 18.7 914.0 1150 79.5%
5 Komodo 8 x64 : 3105.0 14.1 1676.0 2100 79.8%
6 Stockfish 03Aug2014 BMI2 x64 : 3104.9 13.9 1703.0 2100 81.1%
7 Stockfish 26Mar2014 SSE42 x64 : 3085.1 20.3 858.5 1050 81.8%
8 Komodo 7a x64 : 3080.2 18.4 995.5 1250 79.6%
9 Stockfish 5 SSE42 x64 : 3079.1 20.6 796.0 1000 79.6%
10 Komodo TCECr x64 : 3049.4 18.9 824.5 1050 78.5%
11 Fire 4 x64 : 3047.7 12.3 1859.5 2510 74.1%
12 GullChess 3.0 BMI2 x64 : 3039.7 11.2 1899.0 2660 71.4%
13 Equinox 3.30 x64 : 2990.5 11.3 1667.0 2460 67.8%
14 GullChess 2.8 Beta BMI2 x64 : 2989.9 18.5 760.5 1050 72.4%
15 Critter 1.6a x64 : 2980.3 12.9 1182.0 1760 67.2%
16 Fire 3.0 AVX x64 : 2954.0 12.2 1361.0 2100 64.8%
17 Sting SF 4.8.4 x64 : 2935.1 11.7 1264.0 2110 59.9%
18 Protector 1.8.0 x64 : 2933.0 16.7 540.5 1010 53.5%
19 Protector 1.7.0 x64 : 2911.9 11.7 1199.0 2150 55.8%
20 Critter 0.90 SSE4 x64 : 2901.2 11.6 1201.0 2150 55.9%
21 Nirvanachess 2.1c POP x64 : 2900.4 12.6 1018.0 1760 57.8%
22 Hannibal 1.5 x64 : 2899.2 11.8 1254.0 2210 56.7%
23 Texel 1.05 x64 : 2896.8 11.3 1315.5 2310 56.9%
24 Chiron 2.0 x64 : 2894.9 8.3 2565.5 4310 59.5%
25 Protector 1.6.0 x64 : 2883.9 13.4 939.5 1600 58.7%
26 Naum 4.6 x64 : 2882.9 11.1 1466.0 2560 57.3%
27 Hannibal 1.4b x64 : 2863.5 9.0 2011.0 3550 56.6%
28 Andscacs 0.81 POP x64 : 2859.9 36.5 86.5 200 43.3%
29 Texel 1.04 x64 : 2849.4 10.0 1672.5 3000 55.8%
30 Protector 1.5.0 JA x64 : 2848.1 16.0 577.0 1050 55.0%
31 Nirvanachess 2.0a x64 : 2841.8 10.9 1253.5 2400 52.2%
32 Senpai 1.0 SSE42 x64 : 2832.3 8.1 2229.0 4310 51.7%
33 Hiarcs 14 WCSC w32 : 2825.0 7.9 2189.0 4310 50.8%
34 Andscacs 0.72 POP x64 : 2812.2 10.7 1202.5 2500 48.1%
35 Sjeng c't 2010 w32 : 2799.0 11.0 1100.0 2360 46.6%
36 Shredder 12 x64 : 2796.5 10.0 1366.0 3160 43.2%
37 Texel 1.03 x64 : 2789.9 16.1 495.0 1050 47.1%
38 Vajolet2 2.0 POP x64 : 2785.3 11.8 830.0 1860 44.6%
39 Junior 13.3.00 x64 : 2784.5 9.2 1524.5 3360 45.4%
40 Junior 12.5.03 x64 : 2782.2 14.3 591.0 1400 42.2%
41 Junior 13.8.04 Yokohama x64 : 2776.9 13.3 723.5 1700 42.6%
42 Spike 1.4 Leiden w32 : 2772.8 10.0 1121.0 2860 39.2%
43 Deuterium 14.3.34.130 POP x64 : 2759.2 10.0 1181.0 2750 42.9%
44 iCE 2.0 v2240 POP x64 : 2758.8 7.5 2197.5 4600 47.8%
45 Quazar 0.4 x64 : 2757.3 9.3 1432.0 3450 41.5%
46 DiscoCheck 5.2.1 x64 : 2756.3 10.1 1196.0 2900 41.2%
47 Spark 1.0 x64 : 2753.7 7.7 2409.0 5200 46.3%
48 Alfil 15.04 C# Beta 24 x64 : 2753.7 15.0 569.0 1050 54.2%
49 SmarThink 1.70 SSE3 x64 : 2753.2 8.4 1640.5 3850 42.6%
50 Cheng4 0.38 x64 : 2750.8 11.7 980.5 2200 44.6%
51 Fizbo 1.3.1 x64 : 2745.1 11.0 1039.5 2400 43.3%
52 SmarThink 1.60 x64 : 2742.4 16.2 418.0 1100 38.0%
53 Zappa Mexico II x64 : 2741.3 10.0 1197.0 3050 39.2%
54 Thinker 5.4d Inert x64 : 2733.9 11.0 918.5 2350 39.1%
55 Vajolet2 1.45 POP x64 : 2728.5 8.1 1958.5 4500 43.5%
56 Vajolet2 1.28 POP x64 : 2724.5 13.9 533.0 1500 35.5%
57 EXchess 7.71b x64 : 2724.0 15.5 495.0 1000 49.5%
58 Deuterium 14.2.33.276 x64 : 2722.7 9.6 1356.5 3100 43.8%
59 Gaviota 1.0 AVX x64 : 2722.4 7.0 2256.5 5350 42.2%
60 Atlas 3.80 x64 : 2719.8 11.9 862.0 2100 41.0%
61 MinkoChess 1.3 JA POP x64 : 2716.8 11.6 775.0 1800 43.1%
62 Tornado 5.0 SSE4 x64 : 2716.7 11.2 987.0 2300 42.9%
63 Arasan 17.5 POP x64 : 2715.4 12.2 781.5 1800 43.4%
64 Andscacs 0.70 POP x64 : 2703.1 15.3 456.5 1150 39.7%
65 SmarThink 1.50 SSE3 x64 : 2700.0 16.5 371.0 1050 35.3%
66 Nirvanachess 1.7 x64 : 2694.8 10.5 1035.5 2500 41.4%
67 Murka 3 x64 : 2694.1 12.3 719.5 1800 40.0%
68 Rodent 1.7 Build 1 POP x64 : 2693.6 13.0 671.5 1600 42.0%
69 Nemo 1.01 Beta POP x64 : 2687.6 12.2 711.5 1800 39.5%
70 Arasan 17.4 POP x64 : 2684.5 10.7 1048.0 2400 43.7%
71 Fizbo 1.2 x64 : 2683.4 11.6 878.5 2100 41.8%
72 Nirvanachess 1.6 x64 : 2676.9 14.9 406.0 1400 29.0%
73 Cheng4 0.36c x64 : 2676.0 11.4 958.5 2200 43.6%
74 EXchess 7.51b x64 : 2674.5 11.6 767.5 2050 37.4%
75 DisasterArea 1.54 x64 : 2672.1 11.7 759.0 1950 38.9%
76 Pedone 1.1 BMI2 x64 : 2666.1 13.1 637.0 1650 38.6%
77 Rodent 1.6 Build 6 POP x64 : 2657.7 14.0 488.5 1400 34.9%
78 Crafty 24.1 SSE42 x64 : 2650.9 9.8 1159.0 2900 40.0%
79 EXchess 7.31b x64 : 2646.4 15.4 495.5 1100 45.0%
80 Glaurung 2.2 JA x64 : 2637.2 15.9 471.5 1000 47.1%
81 Rodent 1.4 Build 2 POP x64 : 2633.3 15.9 466.0 1000 46.6%
82 Crafty 24.0 SSE42 x64 : 2633.3 18.1 287.0 1050 27.3%
83 Atlas 3.70em x64 : 2631.7 15.7 468.0 1050 44.6%
84 OctoChess r5190 SSE4 x64 : 2628.1 16.7 458.5 1000 45.9%
85 Rhetoric 1.4.1 x64 : 2602.2 12.6 638.0 2000 31.9%
86 Andscacs 0.64 POP x64 : 2600.1 16.5 419.0 1000 41.9%
87 Godel 3.4.9 x64 : 2588.9 17.1 403.5 1000 40.4%
88 Djinn 1.021 POP x64 : 2519.7 17.3 312.0 1000 31.2%
89 ProDeo 1.87 w32 : 2512.9 17.1 303.5 1000 30.4%
White advantage = 40.20 +/- 0.86
Draw rate (equal opponents) = 48.29 % +/- 0.19
Code: Select all
# PLAYER : RATING ERROR POINTS PLAYED (%)
28 Andscacs 0.81 POP x64 : 2859.9 36.5 86.5 200 43.3%
34 Andscacs 0.72 POP x64 : 2812.2 10.7 1202.5 2500 48.1%
64 Andscacs 0.70 POP x64 : 2703.1 15.3 456.5 1150 39.7%
86 Andscacs 0.64 POP x64 : 2600.1 16.5 419.0 1000 41.9%-
Frank Quisinsky
- Posts: 7228
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 7:16 pm
- Location: Gutweiler, Germany
- Full name: Frank Quisinsky
Re: A new main problem in my Rating List ... Hiarcs!
Hi there,
normally my test system works fine with 1000 games only. That is my main interest in testing engines ... great súccess with lesser games.
Means different engines (playing style), many opponents and I have very fast (after around 600-800 games) an safe results. But +-10 to my rating list with more games is normaly, also if I am using 21 opponents for the 1.000 "Main-games". OK, such a case I have not often ... after 1.000 games +-10 ... very rarely.
Main problem I have now with my new League 1 and League 2 are the engine I calculate the ratings.
Hiarcs 14 with 2.825 at the moment.
And Hiarcs have many problems in the group of TOP-21 engines. Is clearly weaker vs. stronger opponents. Lost more and more games very fast.
Nice to see ... for around one year Hiarcs was optimal for calculating ratings. But the group of TOP-21 engines are today very strong in tactic.
I should switched to an other engine for calculating my ratings!!
It must be an older engine, not often updated ...
Chiron (clearly stronger in the first playing phase, not good for calculating ratings). Senpai (too many tactical holes in the first playing phase, not good for calculating ratings). Shredder isn't good with all the holes in tactic and today not strong enough for calculating ratings. Shredder is very strong in endgames but very weak in the first playing phase. To calculate with Shredder will give me each time an unclear result.
Again ... engine must play in the middle of the field.
The only one is Naum 4.6 or Protector 1.8.0 (great is Protector, can be see in my Protector 1.80 test-run ... very constand after 100, 200, 300 games ... and the stats too).
This group of engines are very constant in middlegame / transposition into endgame and endgame. But Protector is often updated and I don't have enough games.
At the moment Naum 4.6 with 2.884 Elo!
I think I switched from Hiarcs 14 with 2.825 to Naum with 2.885.
And in this case in League 2 to Smarthink with 2.755 (5 Elo more).
And the World in testing engines is again OK for me.
After this test-run or the Hakkapeliitta test-run.
To managed a rating list is each time a lot of work.
Best
Frank
normally my test system works fine with 1000 games only. That is my main interest in testing engines ... great súccess with lesser games.
Means different engines (playing style), many opponents and I have very fast (after around 600-800 games) an safe results. But +-10 to my rating list with more games is normaly, also if I am using 21 opponents for the 1.000 "Main-games". OK, such a case I have not often ... after 1.000 games +-10 ... very rarely.
Main problem I have now with my new League 1 and League 2 are the engine I calculate the ratings.
Hiarcs 14 with 2.825 at the moment.
And Hiarcs have many problems in the group of TOP-21 engines. Is clearly weaker vs. stronger opponents. Lost more and more games very fast.
Nice to see ... for around one year Hiarcs was optimal for calculating ratings. But the group of TOP-21 engines are today very strong in tactic.
I should switched to an other engine for calculating my ratings!!
It must be an older engine, not often updated ...
Chiron (clearly stronger in the first playing phase, not good for calculating ratings). Senpai (too many tactical holes in the first playing phase, not good for calculating ratings). Shredder isn't good with all the holes in tactic and today not strong enough for calculating ratings. Shredder is very strong in endgames but very weak in the first playing phase. To calculate with Shredder will give me each time an unclear result.
Again ... engine must play in the middle of the field.
The only one is Naum 4.6 or Protector 1.8.0 (great is Protector, can be see in my Protector 1.80 test-run ... very constand after 100, 200, 300 games ... and the stats too).
This group of engines are very constant in middlegame / transposition into endgame and endgame. But Protector is often updated and I don't have enough games.
At the moment Naum 4.6 with 2.884 Elo!
I think I switched from Hiarcs 14 with 2.825 to Naum with 2.885.
And in this case in League 2 to Smarthink with 2.755 (5 Elo more).
And the World in testing engines is again OK for me.
After this test-run or the Hakkapeliitta test-run.
To managed a rating list is each time a lot of work.
Best
Frank
-
Frank Quisinsky
- Posts: 7228
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 7:16 pm
- Location: Gutweiler, Germany
- Full name: Frank Quisinsky
Re: FCT League 1: And. 0.81 after 400 = +56 unclear
Hi,
interesting test-run if I am looking on the stats.
Between game number 200-300 a very good seria and a good seria from game number 300-400. Now all is unclear ... very rarely. First and second seria give complete other impressions.
Nice to see that the results are unclear too ... different very good and bad results.
http://www.amateurschach.de/ftptrigger/ ... p-x64.html
No idea ...
Situation is to compare with the latest Cheng test-run.
Best way is to wait of the next games ...
Means not each situation should be to explain and without Explanation I can better sleeping.
In my FCT = Frank's Continuous Tourney = +56 Elo
In my Rating List = +73.3 Elo
Clear should be ...
CONGRATULATION to the programmer from Andorra
Andscacs is again clearly improved!
Here the results after 400 games!
interesting test-run if I am looking on the stats.
Between game number 200-300 a very good seria and a good seria from game number 300-400. Now all is unclear ... very rarely. First and second seria give complete other impressions.
Nice to see that the results are unclear too ... different very good and bad results.
http://www.amateurschach.de/ftptrigger/ ... p-x64.html
No idea ...
Situation is to compare with the latest Cheng test-run.
Best way is to wait of the next games ...
Means not each situation should be to explain and without Explanation I can better sleeping.
In my FCT = Frank's Continuous Tourney = +56 Elo
In my Rating List = +73.3 Elo
Clear should be ...
CONGRATULATION to the programmer from Andorra
Andscacs is again clearly improved!
Here the results after 400 games!
Code: Select all
Version : 3.04.L1-02.L2-02
Time : July 12th, 2015 - July 16th, 2015
Performance : Andscacs 0.81 POP x64, 2889 Elo, +56
Calculated with EloStat 1.3
Stats after 100, 200 ... games! Elo Games Score Draws White Black Points w/ d/ l
15. Andscacs 0.72 POP x64 2833 1.000 38.4% 42.2% Predesessor
--. Andscacs 0.81 POP x64 ---- 1.000 --.-% --.-% --,- --,- --,- --/--/--
--. Andscacs 0.81 POP x64 ---- 900 --.-% --.-% --,- --,- --,- --/--/--
--. Andscacs 0.81 POP x64 ---- 800 --.-% --.-% --,- --,- --,- --/--/--
--. Andscacs 0.81 POP x64 ---- 700 --.-% --.-% --,- --,- --,- --/--/--
--. Andscacs 0.81 POP x64 ---- 600 --.-% --.-% --,- --,- --,- --/--/--
--. Andscacs 0.81 POP x64 ---- 500 --.-% --.-% --,- --,- --,- --/--/--
13. Andscacs 0.81 POP x64 2889 400 46.5% 45.0% 27,5 20,5 48,0 27/42/31
14. Andscacs 0.81 POP x64 2887 300 46.0% 46.0% 28,5 23,0 51,5 27/49/24
14. Andscacs 0.81 POP x64 2867 200 43.2% 44.5% 27,0 17,0 44,0 21/46/33
14. Andscacs 0.81 POP x64 2862 100 42.5% 43.0% 23,5 19,0 42,5 21/43/36
Points Score EloS Ordo + - Draws
01. Komodo 9 x64 760.5/0970 78.4% 3126 3157 18 18 37.0%
02. Stockfish 26Apr2015 BMI2 x64 758.5/0970 78.2% 3124 3155 18 17 38.2%
03. Fire 4 x64 652.0/0970 67.2% 3032 3055 16 16 44.7%
04. GullChess 3.0 BMI2 x64 646.5/0970 66.6% 3028 3050 16 16 47.3%
05. Equinox 3.30 x64 605.5/0970 62.4% 2997 3017 16 16 46.7%
06. Critter 1.6a x64 569.5/0970 58.7% 2971 2988 15 15 52.7%
07. Sting SF 4.8.4 x64 519.5/0970 53.6% 2937 2949 15 15 51.4%
08. Protector 1.8.0 x64 508.5/0970 52.4% 2929 2941 15 15 53.7%
09. Nirvanachess 2.1c POP x64 478.5/0970 49.3% 2909 2918 15 15 50.8%
10. Hannibal 1.5 x64 474.5/0970 48.9% 2906 2915 16 16 46.7%
11. Chiron 2.0 x64 466.5/0970 48.1% 2901 2909 16 16 45.1%
12. Texel 1.05 x64 460.0/0970 47.4% 2896 2904 16 16 45.6%
13. Andscacs 0.81 POP x64 186.0/0400 46.5% 2889 2897 25 25 45.0%
14. Naum 4.6 x64 448.0/0970 46.2% 2888 2895 16 16 49.3%
15. Senpai 1.0 SSE42 x64 369.0/0970 38.0% 2833 2834 17 17 43.1%
16. Hiarcs 14 WCSC w32 358.0/0970 36.9% 2825 2825 16 17 43.9%
17. Shredder 12 x64 341.0/0970 35.2% 2812 2811 17 17 43.3%
18. Junior 13.3.00 x64 339.0/0970 34.9% 2811 2810 17 17 40.2%
19. Vajolet2 2.0 POP x64 321.5/0970 33.1% 2797 2795 17 17 39.1%
20. Sjeng c't 2010 w32 321.0/0970 33.1% 2797 2795 17 17 40.0%
21. Spike 1.4 Leiden w32 316.5/0970 32.6% 2793 2791 17 17 40.5%
Code: Select all
# PLAYER : RATING ERROR POINTS PLAYED (%)
1 Stockfish 26Apr2015 BMI2 x64 : 3149.8 15.4 1545.5 1870 82.6%
2 Komodo 9 x64 : 3147.9 15.2 1542.5 1870 82.5%
3 Stockfish 6 BMI2 x64 : 3136.0 15.7 1424.0 1700 83.8%
4 Stockfish 02Oct2014 BMI2 x64, Contemp 17 : 3107.5 18.3 914.0 1150 79.5%
5 Komodo 8 x64 : 3104.8 14.2 1676.0 2100 79.8%
6 Stockfish 03Aug2014 BMI2 x64 : 3104.8 13.2 1703.0 2100 81.1%
7 Stockfish 26Mar2014 SSE42 x64 : 3085.0 21.0 858.5 1050 81.8%
8 Komodo 7a x64 : 3080.1 18.5 995.5 1250 79.6%
9 Stockfish 5 SSE42 x64 : 3078.9 20.6 796.0 1000 79.6%
10 Komodo TCECr x64 : 3049.3 18.6 824.5 1050 78.5%
11 Fire 4 x64 : 3047.0 12.5 1865.0 2520 74.0%
12 GullChess 3.0 BMI2 x64 : 3038.9 11.1 1904.0 2670 71.3%
13 Equinox 3.30 x64 : 2991.2 11.5 1675.5 2470 67.8%
14 GullChess 2.8 Beta BMI2 x64 : 2989.9 18.8 760.5 1050 72.4%
15 Critter 1.6a x64 : 2980.1 13.3 1188.0 1770 67.1%
16 Fire 3.0 AVX x64 : 2953.8 12.0 1361.0 2100 64.8%
17 Sting SF 4.8.4 x64 : 2935.0 12.1 1269.5 2120 59.9%
18 Protector 1.8.0 x64 : 2931.5 16.8 544.0 1020 53.3%
19 Protector 1.7.0 x64 : 2911.8 11.5 1199.0 2150 55.8%
20 Critter 0.90 SSE4 x64 : 2901.1 11.1 1201.0 2150 55.9%
21 Nirvanachess 2.1c POP x64 : 2900.5 12.4 1023.5 1770 57.8%
22 Hannibal 1.5 x64 : 2898.8 11.2 1258.0 2220 56.7%
23 Texel 1.05 x64 : 2896.5 10.8 1320.0 2320 56.9%
24 Chiron 2.0 x64 : 2894.5 7.9 2568.5 4320 59.5%
25 Andscacs 0.81 POP x64 : 2885.3 24.8 186.0 400 46.5%
26 Protector 1.6.0 x64 : 2883.8 13.1 939.5 1600 58.7%
27 Naum 4.6 x64 : 2882.9 10.3 1471.0 2570 57.2%
28 Hannibal 1.4b x64 : 2863.4 8.6 2011.0 3550 56.6%
29 Texel 1.04 x64 : 2849.3 9.2 1672.5 3000 55.8%
30 Protector 1.5.0 JA x64 : 2848.0 16.9 577.0 1050 55.0%
31 Nirvanachess 2.0a x64 : 2841.7 10.9 1253.5 2400 52.2%
32 Senpai 1.0 SSE42 x64 : 2832.1 8.0 2232.5 4320 51.7%
33 Hiarcs 14 WCSC w32 : 2825.0 7.8 2193.5 4320 50.8%
34 Andscacs 0.72 POP x64 : 2812.0 10.4 1202.5 2500 48.1%
35 Sjeng c't 2010 w32 : 2799.0 10.9 1104.0 2370 46.6%
36 Shredder 12 x64 : 2796.5 9.3 1370.0 3170 43.2%
37 Texel 1.03 x64 : 2789.8 16.6 495.0 1050 47.1%
38 Vajolet2 2.0 POP x64 : 2784.6 12.5 832.0 1870 44.5%
39 Junior 13.3.00 x64 : 2784.6 8.8 1528.5 3370 45.4%
40 Junior 12.5.03 x64 : 2782.0 14.3 591.0 1400 42.2%
41 Junior 13.8.04 Yokohama x64 : 2776.8 12.7 723.5 1700 42.6%
42 Spike 1.4 Leiden w32 : 2773.3 9.9 1126.5 2870 39.3%
43 Deuterium 14.3.34.130 POP x64 : 2759.1 10.4 1181.0 2750 42.9%
44 iCE 2.0 v2240 POP x64 : 2758.7 7.8 2197.5 4600 47.8%
45 Quazar 0.4 x64 : 2757.2 9.0 1432.0 3450 41.5%
46 DiscoCheck 5.2.1 x64 : 2756.2 10.0 1196.0 2900 41.2%
47 Spark 1.0 x64 : 2753.6 7.3 2409.0 5200 46.3%
48 Alfil 15.04 C# Beta 24 x64 : 2753.6 16.0 569.0 1050 54.2%
49 SmarThink 1.70 SSE3 x64 : 2753.1 8.5 1640.5 3850 42.6%
50 Cheng4 0.38 x64 : 2750.7 11.1 980.5 2200 44.6%
51 Fizbo 1.3.1 x64 : 2745.0 11.1 1039.5 2400 43.3%
52 SmarThink 1.60 x64 : 2742.3 15.9 418.0 1100 38.0%
53 Zappa Mexico II x64 : 2741.2 9.4 1197.0 3050 39.2%
54 Thinker 5.4d Inert x64 : 2733.8 11.5 918.5 2350 39.1%
55 Vajolet2 1.45 POP x64 : 2728.4 7.7 1958.5 4500 43.5%
56 Vajolet2 1.28 POP x64 : 2724.4 13.8 533.0 1500 35.5%
57 EXchess 7.71b x64 : 2723.8 15.7 495.0 1000 49.5%
58 Deuterium 14.2.33.276 x64 : 2722.6 9.9 1356.5 3100 43.8%
59 Gaviota 1.0 AVX x64 : 2722.3 7.4 2256.5 5350 42.2%
60 Atlas 3.80 x64 : 2719.7 11.6 862.0 2100 41.0%
61 MinkoChess 1.3 JA POP x64 : 2716.7 12.2 775.0 1800 43.1%
62 Tornado 5.0 SSE4 x64 : 2716.5 11.2 987.0 2300 42.9%
63 Arasan 17.5 POP x64 : 2715.3 12.3 781.5 1800 43.4%
64 Andscacs 0.70 POP x64 : 2703.0 15.5 456.5 1150 39.7%
65 SmarThink 1.50 SSE3 x64 : 2699.9 16.4 371.0 1050 35.3%
66 Nirvanachess 1.7 x64 : 2694.7 10.7 1035.5 2500 41.4%
67 Murka 3 x64 : 2694.0 11.9 719.5 1800 40.0%
68 Rodent 1.7 Build 1 POP x64 : 2693.5 13.0 671.5 1600 42.0%
69 Nemo 1.01 Beta POP x64 : 2687.5 12.3 711.5 1800 39.5%
70 Arasan 17.4 POP x64 : 2684.4 10.1 1048.0 2400 43.7%
71 Fizbo 1.2 x64 : 2683.2 11.9 878.5 2100 41.8%
72 Nirvanachess 1.6 x64 : 2676.8 15.4 406.0 1400 29.0%
73 Cheng4 0.36c x64 : 2675.9 11.5 958.5 2200 43.6%
74 EXchess 7.51b x64 : 2674.3 11.4 767.5 2050 37.4%
75 DisasterArea 1.54 x64 : 2671.9 11.8 759.0 1950 38.9%
76 Pedone 1.1 BMI2 x64 : 2666.0 12.7 637.0 1650 38.6%
77 Rodent 1.6 Build 6 POP x64 : 2657.6 14.3 488.5 1400 34.9%
78 Crafty 24.1 SSE42 x64 : 2650.8 9.5 1159.0 2900 40.0%
79 EXchess 7.31b x64 : 2646.2 15.5 495.5 1100 45.0%
80 Glaurung 2.2 JA x64 : 2637.1 16.3 471.5 1000 47.1%
81 Crafty 24.0 SSE42 x64 : 2633.2 18.0 287.0 1050 27.3%
82 Rodent 1.4 Build 2 POP x64 : 2633.2 16.4 466.0 1000 46.6%
83 Atlas 3.70em x64 : 2631.6 15.8 468.0 1050 44.6%
84 OctoChess r5190 SSE4 x64 : 2628.0 16.4 458.5 1000 45.9%
85 Rhetoric 1.4.1 x64 : 2602.1 12.6 638.0 2000 31.9%
86 Andscacs 0.64 POP x64 : 2599.9 16.7 419.0 1000 41.9%
87 Godel 3.4.9 x64 : 2588.8 16.3 403.5 1000 40.4%
88 Djinn 1.021 POP x64 : 2519.6 17.8 312.0 1000 31.2%
89 ProDeo 1.87 w32 : 2512.8 17.6 303.5 1000 30.4%
White advantage = 40.23 +/- 0.88
Draw rate (equal opponents) = 48.29 % +/- 0.18
-
Frank Quisinsky
- Posts: 7228
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 7:16 pm
- Location: Gutweiler, Germany
- Full name: Frank Quisinsky
Re: FCT League 1: And. 0.81 after 700 = +62
Hi there,
now the results are more clear.
Easy, Andscacs 0.81 POP x64 has a bad start after 200 games ...
Different to Version 0.72 after 700 games:
+62 Elo in my FCT = Frank's Continuous Tourney
+73,3 Elo in my Rating List
now the results are more clear.
Easy, Andscacs 0.81 POP x64 has a bad start after 200 games ...
Different to Version 0.72 after 700 games:
+62 Elo in my FCT = Frank's Continuous Tourney
+73,3 Elo in my Rating List
Code: Select all
Version : 3.04.L1-02.L2-02
Time : July 12th, 2015 - July 16th, 2015
Performance : Andscacs 0.81 POP x64, 2895 Elo, +62
Calculated with EloStat 1.3
Stats after 100, 200 ... games! Elo Games Score Draws White Black Points w/ d/ l
15. Andscacs 0.72 POP x64 2833 1.000 38.4% 42.2% Predesessor
--. Andscacs 0.81 POP x64 ---- 1.000 --.-% --.-% --,- --,- --,- --/--/--
--. Andscacs 0.81 POP x64 ---- 900 --.-% --.-% --,- --,- --,- --/--/--
--. Andscacs 0.81 POP x64 ---- 800 --.-% --.-% --,- --,- --,- --/--/--
13. Andscacs 0.81 POP x64 2895 700 47.2% 44.1% 27,0 20,5 47,5 27/41/32
13. Andscacs 0.81 POP x64 2894 600 47.2% 44.7% 27,5 22,5 50,0 27/46/27
13. Andscacs 0.81 POP x64 2890 500 46.6% 44.4% 25,5 21,5 47,0 26/42/32
13. Andscacs 0.81 POP x64 2889 400 46.5% 45.0% 27,5 20,5 48,0 27/42/31
14. Andscacs 0.81 POP x64 2887 300 46.0% 46.0% 28,5 23,0 51,5 27/49/24
14. Andscacs 0.81 POP x64 2867 200 43.2% 44.5% 27,0 17,0 44,0 21/46/33
14. Andscacs 0.81 POP x64 2862 100 42.5% 43.0% 23,5 19,0 42,5 21/43/36
Points Score EloS Ordo + - Draws
01. Komodo 9 x64 773.0/0985 78.5% 3128 3158 18 18 37.0%
02. Stockfish 26Apr2015 BMI2 x64 770.5/0985 78.2% 3126 3155 18 17 38.3%
03. Fire 4 x64 661.5/0985 67.2% 3032 3055 16 16 44.8%
04. GullChess 3.0 BMI2 x64 654.5/0985 66.4% 3027 3049 16 16 47.2%
05. Equinox 3.30 x64 615.0/0985 62.4% 2998 3017 16 16 46.3%
06. Critter 1.6a x64 578.5/0985 58.7% 2973 2988 15 15 52.7%
07. Sting SF 4.8.4 x64 528.0/0985 53.6% 2938 2950 15 15 51.6%
08. Protector 1.8.0 x64 517.5/0985 52.5% 2931 2942 15 15 53.7%
09. Nirvanachess 2.1c POP x64 484.0/0985 49.1% 2908 2917 15 15 51.0%
10. Hannibal 1.5 x64 481.0/0985 48.8% 2906 2915 16 16 46.7%
11. Chiron 2.0 x64 475.0/0985 48.2% 2902 2910 16 16 44.9%
12. Texel 1.05 x64 470.0/0985 47.7% 2899 2907 16 16 45.7%
13. Andscacs 0.81 POP x64 330.5/0700 47.2% 2895 2903 19 19 44.1%
14. Naum 4.6 x64 455.5/0985 46.2% 2889 2896 15 15 49.2%
15. Senpai 1.0 SSE42 x64 374.5/0985 38.0% 2833 2834 16 17 42.9%
16. Hiarcs 14 WCSC w32 363.0/0985 36.9% 2825 2825 16 16 43.9%
17. Junior 13.3.00 x64 346.0/0985 35.1% 2813 2812 17 17 40.0%
18. Shredder 12 x64 345.5/0985 35.1% 2812 2811 16 17 43.4%
19. Vajolet2 2.0 POP x64 327.5/0985 33.2% 2799 2797 17 17 39.1%
20. Sjeng c't 2010 w32 327.0/0985 33.2% 2799 2796 17 17 40.2%
21. Spike 1.4 Leiden w32 322.0/0985 32.7% 2795 2792 17 17 40.4%Code: Select all
Program Elo + - Games Score Av.Op. Draws
1 Stockfish 26Apr2015 BMI2 x64 : 3150 15 15 1885 82.6 % 2850 31.2 %
2 Komodo 9 x64 : 3148 16 16 1885 82.5 % 2851 30.2 %
3 Stockfish 6 BMI2 x64 : 3136 17 17 1700 83.8 % 2825 28.9 %
4 Stockfish 02Oct2014 BMI2 x64, Contemp 17 : 3108 20 20 1150 79.5 % 2847 34.6 %
5 Komodo 8 x64 : 3105 13 13 2100 79.8 % 2838 32.8 %
6 Stockfish 03Aug2014 BMI2 x64 : 3105 15 15 2100 81.1 % 2825 32.5 %
7 Stockfish 26Mar2014 SSE42 x64 : 3085 21 21 1050 81.8 % 2801 31.5 %
8 Komodo 7a x64 : 3080 17 17 1250 79.6 % 2818 31.9 %
9 Stockfish 5 SSE42 x64 : 3079 20 20 1000 79.6 % 2820 35.4 %
10 Komodo TCECr x64 : 3049 19 19 1050 78.5 % 2803 33.0 %
11 Fire 4 x64 : 3047 11 11 2535 73.9 % 2839 35.6 %
12 GullChess 3.0 BMI2 x64 : 3038 11 11 2685 71.2 % 2858 41.0 %
13 Equinox 3.30 x64 : 2991 12 12 2485 67.8 % 2845 42.4 %
14 GullChess 2.8 Beta BMI2 x64 : 2990 18 18 1050 72.4 % 2806 39.3 %
15 Critter 1.6a x64 : 2980 13 13 1785 67.1 % 2845 45.4 %
16 Fire 3.0 AVX x64 : 2954 12 12 2100 64.8 % 2834 41.7 %
17 Sting SF 4.8.4 x64 : 2935 12 12 2135 59.9 % 2859 46.2 %
18 Protector 1.8.0 x64 : 2932 16 16 1035 53.4 % 2908 53.3 %
19 Protector 1.7.0 x64 : 2912 12 12 2150 55.8 % 2870 45.1 %
20 Critter 0.90 SSE4 x64 : 2901 12 12 2150 55.9 % 2858 44.6 %
21 Nirvanachess 2.1c POP x64 : 2900 12 12 1785 57.6 % 2843 48.2 %
22 Hannibal 1.5 x64 : 2899 11 11 2235 56.6 % 2850 45.9 %
23 Texel 1.05 x64 : 2898 11 11 2335 57.0 % 2846 43.1 %
24 Chiron 2.0 x64 : 2895 8 8 4335 59.4 % 2823 40.1 %
25 Andscacs 0.81 POP x64 : 2891 20 20 700 47.2 % 2915 44.1 %
26 Protector 1.6.0 x64 : 2884 13 13 1600 58.7 % 2819 44.4 %
27 Naum 4.6 x64 : 2883 11 11 2585 57.2 % 2829 43.7 %
28 Hannibal 1.4b x64 : 2864 9 9 3550 56.6 % 2815 42.8 %
29 Texel 1.04 x64 : 2849 9 9 3000 55.8 % 2808 41.1 %
30 Protector 1.5.0 JA x64 : 2848 16 16 1050 55.0 % 2813 45.3 %
31 Nirvanachess 2.0a x64 : 2842 11 11 2400 52.2 % 2829 44.1 %
32 Senpai 1.0 SSE42 x64 : 2832 8 8 4335 51.6 % 2824 41.2 %
33 Hiarcs 14 WCSC w32 : 2825 8 8 4335 50.7 % 2824 43.1 %
34 Andscacs 0.72 POP x64 : 2812 11 11 2500 48.1 % 2833 42.7 %
35 Sjeng c't 2010 w32 : 2799 11 11 2385 46.5 % 2832 42.0 %
36 Shredder 12 x64 : 2796 9 9 3185 43.2 % 2856 40.8 %
37 Texel 1.03 x64 : 2790 16 16 1050 47.1 % 2815 41.9 %
38 Junior 13.3.00 x64 : 2785 9 9 3385 45.4 % 2827 39.9 %
39 Vajolet2 2.0 POP x64 : 2785 12 12 1885 44.5 % 2833 41.3 %
40 Junior 12.5.03 x64 : 2782 14 14 1400 42.2 % 2848 38.4 %
41 Junior 13.8.04 Yokohama x64 : 2777 13 13 1700 42.6 % 2842 40.5 %
42 Spike 1.4 Leiden w32 : 2774 10 10 2885 39.2 % 2865 41.5 %
43 Deuterium 14.3.34.130 POP x64 : 2759 10 10 2750 42.9 % 2821 43.1 %
44 iCE 2.0 v2240 POP x64 : 2759 7 7 4600 47.8 % 2782 43.4 %
45 Quazar 0.4 x64 : 2757 10 10 3450 41.5 % 2833 40.8 %
46 DiscoCheck 5.2.1 x64 : 2756 10 10 2900 41.2 % 2832 38.2 %
47 Alfil 15.04 C# Beta 24 x64 : 2754 16 16 1050 54.2 % 2724 36.0 %
48 Spark 1.0 x64 : 2754 7 7 5200 46.3 % 2789 41.5 %
49 SmarThink 1.70 SSE3 x64 : 2753 9 9 3850 42.6 % 2817 37.8 %
50 Cheng4 0.38 x64 : 2751 11 11 2200 44.6 % 2799 42.3 %
51 Fizbo 1.3.1 x64 : 2745 11 11 2400 43.3 % 2803 41.7 %
52 SmarThink 1.60 x64 : 2742 16 16 1100 38.0 % 2843 36.2 %
53 Zappa Mexico II x64 : 2741 10 10 3050 39.2 % 2836 40.3 %
54 Thinker 5.4d Inert x64 : 2734 11 11 2350 39.1 % 2827 41.1 %
55 Vajolet2 1.45 POP x64 : 2729 8 8 4500 43.5 % 2786 41.1 %
56 Vajolet2 1.28 POP x64 : 2725 14 14 1500 35.5 % 2847 38.1 %
57 EXchess 7.71b x64 : 2724 16 16 1000 49.5 % 2728 45.8 %
58 Deuterium 14.2.33.276 x64 : 2723 10 10 3100 43.8 % 2779 39.6 %
59 Gaviota 1.0 AVX x64 : 2723 7 7 5350 42.2 % 2791 37.3 %
60 Atlas 3.80 x64 : 2720 11 11 2100 41.0 % 2796 41.7 %
61 MinkoChess 1.3 JA POP x64 : 2717 12 12 1800 43.1 % 2769 46.0 %
62 Tornado 5.0 SSE4 x64 : 2717 11 11 2300 42.9 % 2779 37.0 %
63 Arasan 17.5 POP x64 : 2715 13 13 1800 43.4 % 2768 43.6 %
64 Andscacs 0.70 POP x64 : 2703 15 15 1150 39.7 % 2785 41.1 %
65 SmarThink 1.50 SSE3 x64 : 2700 16 16 1050 35.3 % 2820 35.8 %
66 Nirvanachess 1.7 x64 : 2695 11 11 2500 41.4 % 2769 38.4 %
67 Murka 3 x64 : 2694 12 12 1800 40.0 % 2770 46.8 %
68 Rodent 1.7 Build 1 POP x64 : 2694 13 13 1600 42.0 % 2753 43.2 %
69 Nemo 1.01 Beta POP x64 : 2688 13 13 1800 39.5 % 2766 43.1 %
70 Arasan 17.4 POP x64 : 2685 11 11 2400 43.7 % 2735 41.4 %
71 Fizbo 1.2 x64 : 2683 12 12 2100 41.8 % 2753 39.0 %
72 Nirvanachess 1.6 x64 : 2677 16 16 1400 29.0 % 2858 33.3 %
73 Cheng4 0.36c x64 : 2676 11 11 2200 43.6 % 2727 41.8 %
74 EXchess 7.51b x64 : 2675 12 12 2050 37.4 % 2773 41.6 %
75 DisasterArea 1.54 x64 : 2672 12 12 1950 38.9 % 2755 43.3 %
76 Pedone 1.1 BMI2 x64 : 2666 12 12 1650 38.6 % 2751 45.0 %
77 Rodent 1.6 Build 6 POP x64 : 2658 15 15 1400 34.9 % 2777 37.4 %
78 Crafty 24.1 SSE42 x64 : 2651 10 10 2900 40.0 % 2729 37.6 %
79 EXchess 7.31b x64 : 2646 16 16 1100 45.0 % 2690 39.0 %
80 Glaurung 2.2 JA x64 : 2637 16 16 1000 47.1 % 2658 40.9 %
81 Rodent 1.4 Build 2 POP x64 : 2633 16 16 1000 46.6 % 2658 40.4 %
82 Crafty 24.0 SSE42 x64 : 2633 17 17 1050 27.3 % 2823 33.3 %
83 Atlas 3.70em x64 : 2632 17 17 1050 44.6 % 2677 38.7 %
84 OctoChess r5190 SSE4 x64 : 2628 16 16 1000 45.9 % 2658 45.5 %
85 Rhetoric 1.4.1 x64 : 2602 13 13 2000 31.9 % 2755 35.8 %
86 Andscacs 0.64 POP x64 : 2600 17 17 1000 41.9 % 2660 39.8 %
87 Godel 3.4.9 x64 : 2589 17 17 1000 40.4 % 2660 39.3 %
88 Djinn 1.021 POP x64 : 2520 18 18 1000 31.2 % 2664 36.6 %
89 ProDeo 1.87 w32 : 2513 18 18 1000 30.4 % 2664 31.3 %
-
Frank Quisinsky
- Posts: 7228
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 7:16 pm
- Location: Gutweiler, Germany
- Full name: Frank Quisinsky
Re: FCP: More HASWELL Cores for my Rating List !!!
Hi there,
at the moment I am working on Hardware cleaning, updating my systems, cooler cleaning and so one.
For FCP I am using at the moment 2x 4770k = 8 cores.
8 games are still running to the same time without ponder.
That was enough for a rating list with a good time control and a good organisation.
Maybe next week I can start with 6 cores more.
A third of my systems will be used for my rating list.
After I start a new League with FCT League 2 ... I need a bit more power for faster testing. Have now 42 engines to test and with Rybka, Houdini and Booot I have to added three missed engines. I think I will added Rybka and Houdini.
New will be an Intel i7 5. Generation with 6 cores (5930k).
Can be run with Noctua cooler with 4.0 - 4.3 Ghz also (max. possible is 4.7Ghz with the Noctua cooler systems I am using).
In summer time my two Haswell 4770k runs with 4.0Ghz, in winter time with 4.3Ghz.
So I have 14 cores for my rating list, around 185 more games per day will be the result. Around 435 games per day can be play if I am ready!
A test-run with 1.000 games will be ready in around 2.5 days.
I am using the time control: 40 moves in 10 minutes repeadly. A game run around 45 minutes without resign mode (move average is around 87-88 moves).
Again, maybe I am ready with the new system start of the next week.
Best
Frank
PS:
Using fast Intel "K" processorcs. For me more important that I have max. power with 1 core. The newer Intel 5. Generation with 8 cores isn't good enough for my rating list, cores runs with 3.0 Ghz, with Noctua cooler system maybe with 3.5Ghz. Same for Xeon processors (not good enough for that what I do). Again, need max. power with 1 core. Much more important for a rating list in my opinion.
at the moment I am working on Hardware cleaning, updating my systems, cooler cleaning and so one.
For FCP I am using at the moment 2x 4770k = 8 cores.
8 games are still running to the same time without ponder.
That was enough for a rating list with a good time control and a good organisation.
Maybe next week I can start with 6 cores more.
A third of my systems will be used for my rating list.
After I start a new League with FCT League 2 ... I need a bit more power for faster testing. Have now 42 engines to test and with Rybka, Houdini and Booot I have to added three missed engines. I think I will added Rybka and Houdini.
New will be an Intel i7 5. Generation with 6 cores (5930k).
Can be run with Noctua cooler with 4.0 - 4.3 Ghz also (max. possible is 4.7Ghz with the Noctua cooler systems I am using).
In summer time my two Haswell 4770k runs with 4.0Ghz, in winter time with 4.3Ghz.
So I have 14 cores for my rating list, around 185 more games per day will be the result. Around 435 games per day can be play if I am ready!
A test-run with 1.000 games will be ready in around 2.5 days.
I am using the time control: 40 moves in 10 minutes repeadly. A game run around 45 minutes without resign mode (move average is around 87-88 moves).
Again, maybe I am ready with the new system start of the next week.
Best
Frank
PS:
Using fast Intel "K" processorcs. For me more important that I have max. power with 1 core. The newer Intel 5. Generation with 8 cores isn't good enough for my rating list, cores runs with 3.0 Ghz, with Noctua cooler system maybe with 3.5Ghz. Same for Xeon processors (not good enough for that what I do). Again, need max. power with 1 core. Much more important for a rating list in my opinion.
-
Frank Quisinsky
- Posts: 7228
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 7:16 pm
- Location: Gutweiler, Germany
- Full name: Frank Quisinsky
Re: FCT League 1: And. 0.81 after 900 = +61
Code: Select all
Version : 3.04.L1-02.L2-02
Time : July 12th, 2015 - July 16th, 2015
Performance : Andscacs 0.81 POP x64, 2894 Elo, +61
Calculated with EloStat 1.3
Stats after 100, 200 ... games! Elo Games Score Draws White Black Points w/ d/ l
15. Andscacs 0.72 POP x64 2833 1.000 38.4% 42.2% Predesessor
--. Andscacs 0.81 POP x64 ---- 1.000 --.-% --.-% --,- --,- --,- --/--/--
13. Andscacs 0.81 POP x64 2894 900 46.9% 44.3% 25,0 25,0 50,0 28/44/28
13. Andscacs 0.81 POP x64 2891 800 46.6% 44.4% 26,0 16,0 42,0 19/46/35
13. Andscacs 0.81 POP x64 2895 700 47.2% 44.1% 27,0 20,5 47,5 27/41/32
13. Andscacs 0.81 POP x64 2894 600 47.2% 44.7% 27,5 22,5 50,0 27/46/27
13. Andscacs 0.81 POP x64 2890 500 46.6% 44.4% 25,5 21,5 47,0 26/42/32
13. Andscacs 0.81 POP x64 2889 400 46.5% 45.0% 27,5 20,5 48,0 27/42/31
14. Andscacs 0.81 POP x64 2887 300 46.0% 46.0% 28,5 23,0 51,5 27/49/24
14. Andscacs 0.81 POP x64 2867 200 43.2% 44.5% 27,0 17,0 44,0 21/46/33
14. Andscacs 0.81 POP x64 2862 100 42.5% 43.0% 23,5 19,0 42,5 21/43/36
Points Score EloS Ordo + - Draws
01. Komodo 9 x64 781.5/0995 78.5% 3129 3159 18 18 36.9%
02. Stockfish 26Apr2015 BMI2 x64 779.5/0995 78.3% 3127 3157 18 17 38.1%
03. Fire 4 x64 669.0/0995 67.2% 3033 3056 16 16 44.8%
04. GullChess 3.0 BMI2 x64 658.5/0995 66.2% 3025 3047 16 16 47.1%
05. Equinox 3.30 x64 623.0/0995 62.6% 2999 3018 16 16 46.0%
06. Critter 1.6a x64 584.0/0995 58.7% 2972 2988 15 15 52.7%
07. Sting SF 4.8.4 x64 533.5/0995 53.6% 2938 2950 15 15 51.8%
08. Protector 1.8.0 x64 524.0/0995 52.7% 2932 2943 15 15 53.5%
09. Nirvanachess 2.1c POP x64 490.5/0995 49.3% 2910 2918 15 15 51.0%
10. Hannibal 1.5 x64 486.5/0995 48.9% 2907 2915 16 16 46.9%
11. Chiron 2.0 x64 478.0/0995 48.0% 2901 2909 16 16 44.8%
12. Texel 1.05 x64 476.0/0995 47.8% 2900 2908 16 16 45.8%
13. Andscacs 0.81 POP x64 422.5/0900 46.9% 2894 2901 17 17 44.3%
14. Naum 4.6 x64 461.5/0995 46.4% 2890 2897 15 15 49.1%
15. Senpai 1.0 SSE42 x64 378.5/0995 38.0% 2833 2834 16 16 43.1%
16. Hiarcs 14 WCSC w32 366.5/0995 36.8% 2825 2825 16 16 43.9%
17. Shredder 12 x64 350.5/0995 35.2% 2813 2813 16 16 43.5%
18. Junior 13.3.00 x64 350.5/0995 35.2% 2813 2812 17 17 39.9%
19. Sjeng c't 2010 w32 331.5/0995 33.3% 2799 2797 17 17 40.3%
20. Vajolet2 2.0 POP x64 330.5/0995 33.2% 2799 2796 17 17 39.3%
21. Spike 1.4 Leiden w32 324.0/0995 32.6% 2794 2791 17 17 40.2%
-
Frank Quisinsky
- Posts: 7228
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 7:16 pm
- Location: Gutweiler, Germany
- Full name: Frank Quisinsky
Re: FCT League 1: Andscacs 0.81 POP x64 ... FINAL +58
Hi there,
Final = +58
And clearly improved with around 90 Elo in transposition into endgame!
Final results and stats can be found here:
You have to click on the Andscacs 0.81 POP x64 link.
http://www.amateurschach.de/main/_fcp-league-1.htm
Download games by players:
http://www.amateurschach.de/main/_sgbp.htm
Opening books, main database other things on my webpages updated in the last two days.
Frank's Chess Page
http://www.amateurschach.de
Best
Frank
Final = +58
And clearly improved with around 90 Elo in transposition into endgame!
Final results and stats can be found here:
You have to click on the Andscacs 0.81 POP x64 link.
http://www.amateurschach.de/main/_fcp-league-1.htm
Download games by players:
http://www.amateurschach.de/main/_sgbp.htm
Opening books, main database other things on my webpages updated in the last two days.
Frank's Chess Page
http://www.amateurschach.de
Best
Frank
-
cdani
- Posts: 2204
- Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 10:24 am
- Location: Andorra
Re: FCT League 1: Andscacs 0.81 POP x64 ... FINAL +58
Thanks!
Is nice to view confirmed the improvement in the game phase I evolved more in this version
A question. Do you consider your rating based on slower or faster time control compared to CCRL, having into account the cpu power also?
Is nice to view confirmed the improvement in the game phase I evolved more in this version
A question. Do you consider your rating based on slower or faster time control compared to CCRL, having into account the cpu power also?
Daniel José - http://www.andscacs.com
http://www.andscacs.com