[d] 5r1k/1pq1bpp1/p6p/P1prPR2/8/4B1Q1/1PP3PP/R5K1 w - - 0 25
This is the end position of Vallejo Pons-Le Quang, Tromso 2013. That game was agreed drawn. But White can play Bxh6 here. It appears this isn't winning, but in the main line White comes out with Queen + Pawn vs two Rooks so there is some advantage (that line is Bxh6 gxh6 Qf4 Bg5 Rxg5 hxg5 Qf6+ Kh7 Ra3 Rd1+ Kf2 Rd2+ Ke1 Qd7 Rh3+ Qxh3 gxh3).
--Jon
Deep Bxh6 sac
Moderator: Ras
-
jdart
- Posts: 4434
- Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 5:23 am
- Location: http://www.arasanchess.org
-
peter
- Posts: 3618
- Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 7:38 am
- Full name: Peter Martan
Re: Deep Bxh6 sac
Hi Jon!
5r1k/1pq1bpp1/p6p/P1prPR2/8/4B1Q1/1PP3PP/R5K1 w - - 0 1
Analysis by asmFishW_2016-08-21_base:
25.Taf1 Dxa5 26.Df3 c4 27.Txf7 Txf7 28.Dxf7
+/- (0.71) Tiefe: 7 00:00:00 20kN
...
25.Dh3
+/= (0.38 ++) Tiefe: 26 00:00:07 195MN
25.Lxh6
+/= (0.45 ++) Tiefe: 26 00:00:09 245MN
...
25.Lxh6 gxh6 26.Df4 Dd7 27.Dxh6+ Kg8 28.Dh5 De6 29.Ta3 Td1+ 30.Kf2 Lh4+ 31.Tg3+ Lxg3+ 32.Kxg3 Tfd8 33.Tf6 T8d3+ 34.cxd3 Txd3+ 35.Kh4 Dc4+ 36.g4 Db3 37.Dg5+ Kf8 38.Dh6+ Ke7 39.Df4 Ke8 40.Kg5 Th3 41.Dd2 Th8 42.Td6 Tg8+ 43.Kf4 Da4+ 44.Ke3 Tg6 45.Txg6 fxg6 46.Kf3 Dc6+ 47.Kg3 De4 48.Dc3
+/- (1.06) Tiefe: 26 00:00:12 340MN
...
25.Lxh6 gxh6 26.Df4 Lg5 27.Txg5 hxg5 28.Df6+ Kh7 29.Ta3 Dd7 30.Th3+ Dxh3 31.gxh3 Tdd8 32.h4 gxh4 33.Dxh4+ Kg7 34.Dg4+ Kh6 35.Dh3+ Kg5 36.Df3 Tde8 37.Df6+ Kh5 38.Kf2 Te6 39.Dg7 Tfe8 40.Dxf7+ Kh6 41.Dxb7 Tf8+ 42.Ke3 Txe5+ 43.Kd3 Tf6 44.c3 Kg6 45.Dc8 Tfe6 46.Dg8+ Kf6 47.Df8+ Kg6 48.Df3 Tf6 49.Dg4+ Tg5 50.Dc4 Kg7 51.h4 Tgf5 52.Dg4+ Kh6 53.Kc2
+/- (1.48) Tiefe: 31 00:00:40 1217MN
changed from German to English abbrevations
25.Bxh6
+/- (1.55 ++) Depth: 32 00:00:56 1705MN
25.Bxh6 gxh6 26.Qf4 Bg5 27.Rxg5 hxg5 28.Qf6+ Kh7 29.Ra3 Qd7 30.Rh3+ Qxh3 31.gxh3 Rdd8 32.h4 gxh4 33.Qxh4+ Kg7 34.Qg4+ Kh6 35.Qh3+ Kg5 36.Qf3 f5 37.Qxb7 Rh8 38.Qg2+ Kf4 39.Qe2 Kg5 40.e6 Kf6 41.e7 Ra8 42.Qe3 c4 43.Qc5 Ke6 44.Qxc4+ Kxe7 45.h4 Rhd8 46.Kf2 Rac8 47.Qe2+ Kf7 48.Qxa6 Rxc2+ 49.Kf3
+/- (1.55) Depth: 32 00:00:59 1798MN
...
25.Bxh6 gxh6 26.Qf4 Qd7 27.Qxh6+ Kg8 28.Qh5 Qe6 29.Ra3 Rd1+ 30.Kf2 Bh4+ 31.Rg3+ Bxg3+ 32.Kxg3 Rfd8 33.Rf6 R1d3+ 34.cxd3 Rxd3+ 35.Kh4 Qc4+ 36.g4 Qb3 37.Qg5+ Kf8 38.Qh6+ Ke7 39.Qf4 Ke8 40.Kg5 Rh3 41.Qd2 Rd3 42.Qf2 Rd5 43.Rxf7 Rxe5+ 44.Rf5 Qg8+ 45.Kh4 Qh7+ 46.Kg3 Qe7 47.Rxe5 Qxe5+ 48.Qf4 Qxb2 49.Qe4+ Kf7 50.Qd5+ Kg6 51.Qh5+ Kg7 52.Qg5+ Kf7 53.Qxc5 Qb3+ 54.Kf4 Qb5 55.Qf5+ Kg7
+- (1.69) Depth: 34 00:02:06 3880MN
Peter.
-
Nordlandia
- Posts: 2843
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2015 9:38 pm
- Location: Sortland, Norway
Re: Deep Bxh6 sac
This variation is pretty much forced.
[pgn][Event "?"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "????.??.??"]
[Round "?"]
[White "New game"]
[Black "?"]
[Result "*"]
[SetUp "1"]
[FEN "5r1k/1pq1bpp1/p6p/P1prPR2/8/4B1Q1/1PP3PP/R5K1 w - - 0 25"]
[PlyCount "47"]
25. Bxh6 gxh6 26. Qf4 Bg5 27. Rxg5 hxg5 28. Qf6+ Kh7 29. Ra3 Rd1+ 30. Kf2 Rd2+
31. Ke1 Qd7 32. Rh3+ Qxh3 33. gxh3 Rdd8 34. h4 gxh4 35. Qxh4+ Kg6 36. Qg4+ Kh6
37. Qh3+ Kg7 38. Qg2+ Kh6 39. Qxb7 Rfe8 40. Qxa6+ Re6 41. Qe2 Rd5 42. Qe3+ Kg7
43. Qc3 c4 44. h4 Rexe5+ 45. Kf2 Rxa5 46. Qxc4 Rac5 47. Qg4+ Kf6 48. c4 *
[/pgn]Analysis by asmFishW_2016-08-20_bmi2:
+/- (0.94) (22.08.2016)
[d]8/5p2/5k2/2r1r3/2P3QP/8/1P3K2/8 b - - 0 48
Very complex ending
[pgn][Event "?"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "????.??.??"]
[Round "?"]
[White "New game"]
[Black "?"]
[Result "*"]
[SetUp "1"]
[FEN "5r1k/1pq1bpp1/p6p/P1prPR2/8/4B1Q1/1PP3PP/R5K1 w - - 0 25"]
[PlyCount "47"]
25. Bxh6 gxh6 26. Qf4 Bg5 27. Rxg5 hxg5 28. Qf6+ Kh7 29. Ra3 Rd1+ 30. Kf2 Rd2+
31. Ke1 Qd7 32. Rh3+ Qxh3 33. gxh3 Rdd8 34. h4 gxh4 35. Qxh4+ Kg6 36. Qg4+ Kh6
37. Qh3+ Kg7 38. Qg2+ Kh6 39. Qxb7 Rfe8 40. Qxa6+ Re6 41. Qe2 Rd5 42. Qe3+ Kg7
43. Qc3 c4 44. h4 Rexe5+ 45. Kf2 Rxa5 46. Qxc4 Rac5 47. Qg4+ Kf6 48. c4 *
[/pgn]Analysis by asmFishW_2016-08-20_bmi2:
+/- (0.94) (22.08.2016)
[d]8/5p2/5k2/2r1r3/2P3QP/8/1P3K2/8 b - - 0 48
Very complex ending
-
bob
- Posts: 20943
- Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:30 pm
- Location: Birmingham, AL
Re: Deep Bxh6 sac
I don't follow. Q+P is not "some advantage" over two rooks. It is beyond difficult to win a QP vs RR ending unless the RR side has its king totally out of play, which is not the case in this position.jdart wrote:[d] Very
This is the end position of Vallejo Pons-Le Quang, Tromso 2013. That game was agreed drawn. But White can play Bxh6 here. It appears this isn't winning, but in the main line White comes out with Queen + Pawn vs two Rooks so there is some advantage (that line is Bxh6 gxh6 Qf4 Bg5 Rxg5 hxg5 Qf6+ Kh7 Ra3 Rd1+ Kf2 Rd2+ Ke1 Qd7 Rh3+ Qxh3 gxh3).
--Jon
-
jdart
- Posts: 4434
- Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 5:23 am
- Location: http://www.arasanchess.org
Re: Deep Bxh6 sac
I meant, the material difference is Q+P vs RR, but there is other material present.
The line given by Jon Fredrik Åsvang leads to Q vs 3 pawns vs. RR and 1 pawn. It is by no means clear this is a win. But most engine evals will prefer the side with the Queen.
--Jon
The line given by Jon Fredrik Åsvang leads to Q vs 3 pawns vs. RR and 1 pawn. It is by no means clear this is a win. But most engine evals will prefer the side with the Queen.
--Jon
-
bob
- Posts: 20943
- Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:30 pm
- Location: Birmingham, AL
Re: Deep Bxh6 sac
Then perhaps I took your comment wrong ("there is some advantage"). What a program says is not always correct regarding which side is better, although they generally seem to find the right move most of the time.jdart wrote:I meant, the material difference is Q+P vs RR, but there is other material present.
The line given by Jon Fredrik Åsvang leads to Q vs 3 pawns vs. RR and 1 pawn. It is by no means clear this is a win. But most engine evals will prefer the side with the Queen.
--Jon
Most consider two rooks better than a queen. Two rooks can overpower a queen and win pawns.
-
Vinvin
- Posts: 5334
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 9:40 am
- Full name: Vincent Lejeune
Re: Deep Bxh6 sac
30 Mnodes/sec, what's that machine ?peter wrote:...
+/- (1.55) Depth: 32 00:00:59 1798MN
-
peter
- Posts: 3618
- Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 7:38 am
- Full name: Peter Martan
Re: Deep Bxh6 sac
44.a6 instead of h4:Nordlandia wrote: 25. Bxh6 gxh6 26. Qf4 Bg5 27. Rxg5 hxg5 28. Qf6+ Kh7 29. Ra3 Rd1+ 30. Kf2 Rd2+
31. Ke1 Qd7 32. Rh3+ Qxh3 33. gxh3 Rdd8 34. h4 gxh4 35. Qxh4+ Kg6 36. Qg4+ Kh6
37. Qh3+ Kg7 38. Qg2+ Kh6 39. Qxb7 Rfe8 40. Qxa6+ Re6 41. Qe2 Rd5 42. Qe3+ Kg7
43. Qc3 c4 44. h4 Rexe5+ 45. Kf2 Rxa5 46. Qxc4 Rac5 47. Qg4+ Kf6 48. c4 *
5r1k/1pq1bpp1/p6p/P1prPR2/8/4B1Q1/1PP3PP/R5K1 w - - 0 25
25. Bxh6 gxh6 26. Qf4 Bg5 27. Rxg5 hxg5 28. Qf6+ Kh7 29. Ra3 Rd1+ 30. Kf2 Rd2+
31. Ke1 Qd7 32. Rh3+ Qxh3 33. gxh3 Rdd8 34. h4 gxh4 35. Qxh4+ Kg6 36. Qg4+ Kh6
37. Qh3+ Kg7 38. Qg2+ Kh6 39. Qxb7 Rfe8 40. Qxa6+ Re6 41. Qe2 Rd5 42. Qe3+ Kg7
43. Qc3 c4
44. a6 Rxa6 45. Qxc4 Rxe5+ 46. Kd2 Rd6+ 47. Kc3 Ree6 48. Qh4 f5 49.
b4 Rc6+ 50. Kd2 Rcd6+ 51. Kc1 Rf6 52. Qf4 Rde6 53. b5 Re4 54. Qg3+ Kf8 55. Qa3+
Kg7 56. b6 Re1+ 57. Kd2 Rb1 58. Qe7+ Kg6 59. b7 Rfb6 60. h4 Rxb7 61. Qg5+ Kh7
62. Qxf5+
[d]r5k/8/5Q2/7P/8/2PK4/1r6 b - - 0 1
Analysis by asmFishW_2016-08-21_base:
62...Kg7 63.Qg4+ Kh6 64.Qf4+ Kg6 65.c4 R7b2+ 66.Ke3 Rb3+ 67.Kd4 Rd1+ 68.Kc5 Rbb1 69.Qg5+ Kh7 70.Kc6 Rf1 71.c5 Ra1 72.Qh5+ Kg7 73.Qg4+ Kh7 74.Qe4+ Kh6 75.Qd4 Kg6 76.Qd3+ Kg7 77.Qg3+ Kf7 78.Qb3+ Kg7 79.Qb2+ Rf6+ 80.Kb5 Raa6 81.Qd4 Kh6 82.Qd5 Kg6 83.Qe5 Kh7 84.Qe4+ Kh6 85.Qe3+ Kg7 86.Qc3 Kh6 87.Qc1+ Kg6 88.Qd2 Kh7 89.Qg5 Rae6 90.Qh5+ Kg8 91.Qg4+ Kh8 92.Kc4 Re1 93.Qh5+ Kg7 94.Qg5+ Rg6 95.Qf4 Ree6
+/- (1.52) Depth: 44 00:02:36 6251MN, tb=65371545
but it's a drawn Lomonosov- position
Yet the question for the best 25th white move is to be answered clearly, I guess.
The question, if you want to go on playing at all, if you're not sure, that you will win, is a one of its own always, isn't it?
There are many people for sure, who don't want to play chess, even if they could be sure to win.
Last edited by peter on Mon Aug 22, 2016 11:02 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Peter.
-
peter
- Posts: 3618
- Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 7:38 am
- Full name: Peter Martan