CEGT - rating lists November 06th 2016

[Werner]

Hi all,

our actual rating lists are online and can be found under the attached links.

40 / 20:
New games: 3.220; 33 different engines
Total: 974.969

NEW Engines
87 Andcacs 0.88 x64 1CPU: 3031 - 1181 games (+7 to v. 0.871; +19 to 0.872)
33 Deep Shredder 13 x64 1CPU: 3149 - 1012 games (+349 to v. 12)
12 Komodo 10.2 x64 1CPU: 3258 (+-18) - 1161 games (-13 to v. 10.1)
1 Komodo 10.2 x64 4CPU: 3361 (+-44) - 194 games (startrating)

UPDATES
99 Fritz 15 x64 1CPU: 3019 - 3403 games (+-0)
83 Fizbo 1.8 x64 1CPU: 3036 - 1595 games (+3)
49 Houdini 4.0 x64 1CPU: 3107 - 4413 games (- 3)

40 / 120:
There was an update on 14th of October with +920 games.
New are Andscacs 0.872 x64, Fizbo 1.8 x64, Ginkgo 1.8 x64, Hannibal 1.7 x64, Jonny 8.00 x64, Protector 1.9.0 x64 and Texel 1.06 x64

5'+3'' pb=on
Last update was on Nov. 04th with Rodent II 0.9.64 x64 and Andscacs 0.872 x64; we are now testing Texel 1.06 x64, Stockfsh 8.0 x64 and Deep Shredder 13 x64

40 / 4
no update;
we are testing: Komodo 10.2 x64 1CPU; Stockfish 8.0 x64 1CPU (3338/800); Deep Shredder 13 x64 1CPU (3147/1100) and Andscacs 0.88 x64 1CPU (3025/900)

A big „Thank you“ to all testers as usual!!

Links

40/20: http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/rating.htm
Blitz: http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/blitz.htm
40/120: http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/rating120.htm
Tester: http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/testers/testers.htm
40/20 pb=on: http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/rating4020PBON.htm
5+3 pb=on: http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/rating5plus3pbon.htm
Games of the week: http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/40_40%2 ... on/gow.jpg

Werner Schüle
CEGT-Team

[TShackel]

Hi all,

our actual rating lists are online and can be found under the attached links.

40 / 20:
New games: 3.220; 33 different engines
Total: 974.969

NEW Engines
87 Andcacs 0.88 x64 1CPU: 3031 - 1181 games (+7 to v. 0.871; +19 to 0.872)
33 Deep Shredder 13 x64 1CPU: 3149 - 1012 games (+349 to v. 12)
12 Komodo 10.2 x64 1CPU: 3258 (+-18) - 1161 games (-13 to v. 10.1)
1 Komodo 10.2 x64 4CPU: 3361 (+-44) - 194 games (startrating)

UPDATES
99 Fritz 15 x64 1CPU: 3019 - 3403 games (+-0)
83 Fizbo 1.8 x64 1CPU: 3036 - 1595 games (+3)
49 Houdini 4.0 x64 1CPU: 3107 - 4413 games (- 3)

40 / 120:
There was an update on 14th of October with +920 games.
New are Andscacs 0.872 x64, Fizbo 1.8 x64, Ginkgo 1.8 x64, Hannibal 1.7 x64, Jonny 8.00 x64, Protector 1.9.0 x64 and Texel 1.06 x64

5'+3'' pb=on
Last update was on Nov. 04th with Rodent II 0.9.64 x64 and Andscacs 0.872 x64; we are now testing Texel 1.06 x64, Stockfsh 8.0 x64 and Deep Shredder 13 x64

40 / 4
no update;
we are testing: Komodo 10.2 x64 1CPU; Stockfish 8.0 x64 1CPU (3338/800); Deep Shredder 13 x64 1CPU (3147/1100) and Andscacs 0.88 x64 1CPU (3025/900)

A big „Thank you“ to all testers as usual!!

Links

40/20: http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/rating.htm
Blitz: http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/blitz.htm
40/120: http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/rating120.htm
Tester: http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/testers/testers.htm
40/20 pb=on: http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/rating4020PBON.htm
5+3 pb=on: http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/rating5plus3pbon.htm
Games of the week: http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/40_40%2 ... on/gow.jpg

Werner Schüle
CEGT-Team

Hi,

I was perplexed at your Komodo 10.2 results. Mark and Larry reported a 22 elo gain, and on my own testing of K 10.2 vs. K 10.1, K 10.2 actually had +28 elo for me after over a thousand games. So I'm very perplexed you showed a regression between 10.1 and 10.2. My testing agrees with Mark and Larry's. And IPON also showed an elo gain, although maybe not quite as much as Mark and Larry reported. Very confused by your result especially since you appear to have played over a thousand games.

Sincerely,

Tim Shackel.

[Werner]

Hi,

I was perplexed at your Komodo 10.2 results. Mark and Larry reported a 22 elo gain, and on my own testing of K 10.2 vs. K 10.1, K 10.2 actually had +28 elo for me after over a thousand games. So I'm very perplexed you showed a regression between 10.1 and 10.2. My testing agrees with Mark and Larry's. And IPON also showed an elo gain, although maybe not quite as much as Mark and Larry reported. Very confused by your result especially since you appear to have played over a thousand games.
Sincerely,
Tim Shackel.

I am not too much surprised. This only shows that 1000 games are not enough to show a true difference between two programs with very close strength. And both have ony about 1000 games. If you are interested to find another reason: all games can be downloaded....
regards

[APassionForCriminalJustic]

Hi,

I was perplexed at your Komodo 10.2 results. Mark and Larry reported a 22 elo gain, and on my own testing of K 10.2 vs. K 10.1, K 10.2 actually had +28 elo for me after over a thousand games. So I'm very perplexed you showed a regression between 10.1 and 10.2. My testing agrees with Mark and Larry's. And IPON also showed an elo gain, although maybe not quite as much as Mark and Larry reported. Very confused by your result especially since you appear to have played over a thousand games.
Sincerely,
Tim Shackel.

I am not too much surprised. This only shows that 1000 games are not enough to show a true difference between two programs with very close strength. And both have ony about 1000 games. If you are interested to find another reason: all games can be downloaded....
regards

22 Elo should show itself in 1000 games I would think. Thousands would be needed to test one or two Elo. 22 Elo is pretty substantial though. Nevertheless, your results are what they are.