Badly placed knight protecting weak square

Discussion of chess software programming and technical issues.

Moderator: Ras

Henk
Posts: 7251
Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 10:31 am

Badly placed knight protecting weak square

Post by Henk »

In the second half of a game my knight was on b2 because it had to protect a strong enemy square. Otherwise black might have a knight or a bishop on c4. I don't know whether it would have been better to develop the knight on b2 because it looks like you play the game with a knight less.
Daniel Anulliero
Posts: 773
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 4:55 pm
Location: Nice

Re: Badly placed knight protecting weak square

Post by Daniel Anulliero »

Again ,a post without a diagram or an exemple game mean nothing .
Henk
Posts: 7251
Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 10:31 am

Re: Badly placed knight protecting weak square

Post by Henk »

It's about general rule. I am not interested in one position.

So question is what is worse a badly placed knight (protecting weak square) or an enemy outpost.
Henk
Posts: 7251
Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 10:31 am

Re: Badly placed knight protecting weak square

Post by Henk »

Don't think piece square table catches long term effects. A badly placed knight for a move or three may not be harmful but if it stays there all the time. Maybe comparable to a trapped knight.