Stockfish alternative compile
Moderator: Ras
-
Nay Lin Tun
- Posts: 710
- Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 6:34 am
Stockfish alternative compile
This website claim that their compile is about 8.5 % faster than abrok compile. Do you guys agreed? What is your opinion?http://chess.ultimaiq.net/stockfish.html
-
Nordlandia
- Posts: 2843
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2015 9:38 pm
- Location: Sortland, Norway
Re: Stockfish alternative compile
Ultimaiq is better than standard abrok compiles.
I find BYO (build your own) even better than Ultimaiq compiles
Stockfish Build Your Own (BYO) on Rybka forum.
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforu ... 30622;pg=3
I find BYO (build your own) even better than Ultimaiq compiles
Stockfish Build Your Own (BYO) on Rybka forum.
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforu ... 30622;pg=3
-
Dariusz
- Posts: 379
- Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2015 10:08 am
- Location: Poland
- Full name: Dariusz Domagała
Re: Stockfish alternative compile
In my mac I always build my own stockfish. It's simple, only few clicks 
Regards, Darius
https://chessengeria.eu
https://chessengeria.eu
-
BeyondCritics
- Posts: 416
- Joined: Sat May 05, 2012 2:48 pm
- Full name: Oliver Roese
Re: Stockfish alternative compile
Under Linux with x86 architecture you can simply do:
If this doesn't work, try
I doubt they really improve on that, better compile your own executable.
In principle, someone could try this: https://github.com/Acovea/libacovea
Code: Select all
make -j profile-build ARCH=x86-64-bmi2
make stripCode: Select all
make -j profile-build ARCH=x86-64-modern
make stripIn principle, someone could try this: https://github.com/Acovea/libacovea