LTC vs SF ID 230

[epanek]

230 w TB 180' 2" TC against Latest SF Dev
Twitch
Edosani - Twitch

[Stockfish_18050107_x64_bmi2]
Debug Log File=
Contempt=12
Analysis Contempt=Both
Threads=4
Hash=24500
Ponder=false
MultiPV=1
Skill Level=20
Move Overhead=30
Minimum Thinking Time=20
Slow Mover=84
nodestime=0
UCI_Chess960=false
SyzygyPath=%ArenaDrive%\Users\Desktop\TB2\dtz
SyzygyProbeDepth=1
Syzygy50MoveRule=true
SyzygyProbeLimit=6

[Milos]

230 w TB 180' 2" TC against Latest SF Dev
Twitch
Edosani - Twitch

[Stockfish_18050107_x64_bmi2]
Debug Log File=
Contempt=12
Analysis Contempt=Both
Threads=4
Hash=24500
Ponder=false
MultiPV=1
Skill Level=20
Move Overhead=30
Minimum Thinking Time=20
Slow Mover=84
nodestime=0
UCI_Chess960=false
SyzygyPath=%ArenaDrive%\Users\Desktop\TB2\dtz
SyzygyProbeDepth=1
Syzygy50MoveRule=true
SyzygyProbeLimit=6

That makes no sense at all because on that hardware you use (2000nps for LC0) and that TC SF is at least 500 Elo stronger, so it would take tens of games before you see a first draw, and a win by LC0 is virtually impossible.

[Jhoravi]

How am I going to see the finished games?

[epanek]

She lost but it was interesting for a bit https://lichess.org/wY5l665y

[Jhoravi]

Resignation is too early. In the final position, even thought SF is up two pawns, his Bishop is pinned at a4. If SF plays b5 to defend it, the bishop is permanently trapped there. Just my analysis cuz I'm not using an engine.
[pgn]
[Event "217TB.at"]
[Site "https://lichess.org/wY5l665y"]
[Date "2018.05.01"]
[Round "1"]
[White "LczeroTB_ID230 (2850)"]
[Black "Stockfish_18050107_x64_bmi2 (3600)"]
[Result "0-1"]
[WhiteElo "?"]
[BlackElo "?"]
[Variant "Standard"]
[TimeControl "10800+2"]
[ECO "B10"]
[Opening "Caro-Kann Defense: Two Knights Attack"]
[Termination "Unknown"]
[Annotator "lichess.org"]

1. e4 c6 2. Nf3 d5 3. Nc3 { B10 Caro-Kann Defense: Two Knights Attack } Nf6 4. e5 Ne4 5. d4 Nxc3 6. bxc3 c5 7. Bd3 c4 8. Be2 e6 9. O-O Nd7 10. Ng5 Nb6 11. Bd2 h6 12. Nh3 g6 13. f4 Ba3 14. Bf3 Qc7 15. g4 Qc6 16. g5 h5 17. f5 exf5 18. Nf4 Be6 19. Ne2?! { (-0.75 → -1.66) Inaccuracy. Best move was h4. } (19. h4 Qa4 20. Bc1 O-O-O 21. Bg2 Kb8 22. Bxa3 Qxa3 23. Rf3 Rhe8 24. Qc1 Qa5 25. Qb2 Bd7) 19... h4 20. h3 Qa4 21. Bc1 Be7 22. Bd2 O-O-O 23. Kf2?! { (-1.26 → -2.06) Inaccuracy. Best move was Nf4. } (23. Nf4 Ba3 24. Rb1 Kb8 25. Kh1 Na8 26. Bc1 Be7 27. Qe2 Nc7 28. Qg2 Qa5 29. Bd2 b6) 23... Na8 24. Rg1 Nc7 25. Nf4 Kb8 26. a3 Qa5 27. a4 Bd7 28. Ke3?! { (-1.86 → -2.43) Inaccuracy. Best move was Ra2. } (28. Ra2 Bc6 29. Qa1 Ne6 30. Nxe6 fxe6 31. Bc1 Rc8 32. Ba3 Bxa3 33. Rxa3 Ka8 34. Ra2 Rb8) 28... Ne6 29. Nxe6 fxe6 30. Qc1 Rc8 31. Bd1 Rc7?! { (-3.08 → -2.57) Inaccuracy. Best move was Rc6. } (31... Rc6) 32. Kf4 Rc6 33. Ra2 Ra6 34. Bf3 Bxa4 35. Qa1 { Black wins. } 0-1
[/pgn]