My test for Mayhem 3.2 x64 (SF-NNUE)

[Sylwy]

Test conditions:
-TC=4'+2"
-Hash=256 MB
-GUI: Arena 3.5.1
-Books: performance.bin (for Mayhem 3.2-x64-NNUE) & Perfect_2010.abk (for Rhetoric_1.4.3_x64_popcnt)
-default settings for both engines
-1 thread-CPU=Intel i5-7400-3GHz (Kaby Lake)
-TBS: none
-OS: Windows 10 Home.





Rhetoric 1.4.3 x64 has 2808 Elo points (CCRL Blitz).

Expected rating for Mayhem 3.2-x64-(SF)NNUE is around 2787 Elo points. The best Mayhem NNUE remains version no. 2.9.

[JohnWoe]

Test conditions:
-TC=4'+2"
-Hash=256 MB
-GUI: Arena 3.5.1
-Books: performance.bin (for Mayhem 3.2-x64-NNUE) & Perfect_2010.abk (for Rhetoric_1.4.3_x64_popcnt)
-default settings for both engines
-1 thread-CPU=Intel i5-7400-3GHz (Kaby Lake)
-TBS: none
-OS: Windows 10 Home.





Rhetoric 1.4.3 x64 has 2808 Elo points (CCRL Blitz).

Expected rating for Mayhem 3.2-x64-(SF)NNUE is around 2787 Elo points. The best Mayhem NNUE remains version no. 2.9.

Thanks!
2787 not too shabby!
This proves my check extension modification was wrong. Extending at the end of path(depth == 1) clearly cost ELO.
It's fixed now. Mayhem 3.4 is going to much much much stronger. Hopefully finally to get pass Rhetoric