A comparison between CCRL and GRL

Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.

Moderator: Ras

User avatar
Rebel
Posts: 7475
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2011 12:04 pm
Full name: Ed Schröder

A comparison between CCRL and GRL

Post by Rebel »

From - Ratings of chess engines are well established on the known rating lists. Will anything change when we feed engines with only (playable) gambit positions?

With the start of the Gambit Rating List I modeled the ratings to be compatible with CCRL. Now with over 90,000 games played I can make a comparison and conclude it does. Consider:

Code: Select all

   # PLAYER                :  RATING PLAYED  CCRL Gambit
   1 Stockfish 13          :  3667.5  3500   3506  161
   2 Komodo-Dragon 1       :  3581.3  3000   3469  112
   3 Lc0 v27               :  3529.8   800   ----
   4 SlowChess 2.6         :  3421.9  2400   3379   42
   5 RubiChess 2.1         :  3380.5  2900   3338   42
   6 Pedone 3.1            :  3361.7  2900   3334   27
One conclusion is that the top engines profit the most.

Full list at - http://rebel13.nl/ccrl-vs-grl.txt

Engines listed with "----" aren't present on the CCRL 40/15
90% of coding is debugging, the other 10% is writing bugs.