Kayra 1.1 is ready:
https://www.mediafire.com/file/uwhfmsc0 ... .1.7z/file
1 Kayra 1.1 bmi2 : 2408 750 (+ 19,=729,- 2), 51.1 %
2 Kayra 1.0 bmi2 : 2400 750 (+ 2,=729,- 19), 48.9 %
Game Conditions: Cutechess Gui, 1 Core (Core-i7 9750h), 10 sec + 0.5 sec TC, Balsa 5 Moves Opening Book, 64 Mb Hash, Ponder Off
https://www.mediafire.com/file/6t8lrddt ... 1.pgn/file
1 Kayra 1.1 bmi2 : 2404 550 (+ 5,=545,- 0), 50.5 %
2 Kayra 1.0 bmi2 : 2400 550 (+ 0,=545,- 5), 49.5 %
Game Conditions: Cutechess Gui, 1 Core (Core-i7 9750h), 30 sec + 0.5 sec TC, Balsa 5 Moves Opening Book, 64 Mb Hash, Ponder Off
https://www.mediafire.com/file/py773qfz ... 2.pgn/file
1 Kayra 1.1 bmi2 (Non NNUE) : 2808 200 (+165,= 35,- 0), 91.2 %
2 Kayra 1.0 bmi2 (Non NNUE) : 2400 200 (+ 0,= 35,-165), 8.8 %
Game Conditions: Cutechess Gui, 1 Core (Core-i7 9750h), 10 sec + 0.5 sec TC, Balsa 5 Moves Opening Book, 64 Mb Hash, Ponder Off
Kayra 1.0 is very weak without NNUE but Kayra 1.1 is strong enough without NNUE.
https://www.mediafire.com/file/upc1qh19 ... 3.pgn/file
I focused on the search and evaluation part, mostly the search part at developing Kayra 1.1.
			
			
									
						
							Kayra 1.1
Moderator: Ras
- 
				mehmet123
- Posts: 690
- Joined: Sun Jan 26, 2020 10:38 pm
- Location: Turkey
- Full name: Mehmet Karaman
- 
				DrEinstein
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2021 8:50 pm
- Full name: Albert Einstein
Re: Kayra 1.1
psqt cpp now no more randomly initialized, just replaced by the original SF psqt.cpp. Thus some 100 ELO improvement to 1.0 version.
			
			
									
						
										
						- 
				Damir
- Posts: 2889
- Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 3:53 pm
- Location: Denmark
- Full name: Damir Desevac
Re: Kayra 1.1
Here is alternative link to those that have problems loading with mediafire:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/9ruaj6xr1kyfy ... .1.7z?dl=0
PS: thanks a lot for this new updated version Mehmet. 
  
			
			
									
						
										
						https://www.dropbox.com/s/9ruaj6xr1kyfy ... .1.7z?dl=0
PS: thanks a lot for this new updated version Mehmet.
 
  
- 
				sarona
- Posts: 127
- Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2019 4:14 pm
- Location: Canada
- Full name: Ron Doughie
Re: Kayra 1.1
It is definitely the psqt.cpp from latest Stockfish development version that I have (stockfish_21122211), but not a verbatim copy. He has made a few changes to the values. Seven modifications in total. No change in the bishop table. 
I was skeptical at first - like many others. But my test results with Kayra 1.0 avx2 were very good. Even against Ceres and Lc0 (RTX 3080 Ti) Will definitely take a look at the new 1.1
			
			
									
						
										
						I was skeptical at first - like many others. But my test results with Kayra 1.0 avx2 were very good. Even against Ceres and Lc0 (RTX 3080 Ti) Will definitely take a look at the new 1.1
- 
				DrEinstein
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2021 8:50 pm
- Full name: Albert Einstein
Re: Kayra 1.1
I can't compare files on my phone, so I just looked at the two files.  These seven chances will probably worsen classical eval of v1.1 less than the 700 changes did in v1.0
 These seven chances will probably worsen classical eval of v1.1 less than the 700 changes did in v1.0 
			
			
									
						
										
						 These seven chances will probably worsen classical eval of v1.1 less than the 700 changes did in v1.0
 These seven chances will probably worsen classical eval of v1.1 less than the 700 changes did in v1.0 
- 
				Dicaste
- Posts: 148
- Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2012 7:23 pm
- Location: Istanbul, TURKEY
Re: Kayra 1.1
It's really nice i don't really get how it's improved but it really felt like it so i tested with chessbase marathon suite.
It shares the first place with Fat Titz right now.
			
			
									
						
										
						It shares the first place with Fat Titz right now.

- 
				Eduard
- Posts: 1439
- Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2018 12:58 am
- Location: Germany
- Full name: N.N.
Re: Kayra 1.1
I don't know what the author did, but on Playchess with 12 cores I achieve greater search depths than people with 32 to 64 cores. I know search depth isn't everything, but I've also tested the engine in analysis mode.  There are also very good results.
			
			
									
						
										
						- 
				Sopel
- Posts: 391
- Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2019 11:39 pm
- Full name: Tomasz Sobczyk
Re: Kayra 1.1
Looks strictly worse than stockfish. What's the point? Does it have any useful features?
			
			
									
						
							dangi12012 wrote:No one wants to touch anything you have posted. That proves you now have negative reputations since everyone knows already you are a forum troll.
Maybe you copied your stockfish commits from someone else too?
I will look into that.
- 
				Eduard
- Posts: 1439
- Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2018 12:58 am
- Location: Germany
- Full name: N.N.
Re: Kayra 1.1
Can you explain this in simple terms to people like me?
I am testing different engines on servers. It is important to me that the engines play with Ponder ON and not less than 5m + 0s. Kayra certainly doesn't play any worse than Stockfish. I'm 800 games in a row undefeated with Kayra. Oh, I haven't even lost a game and I play a lot. Kayra had to play all kinds of openings, from Pirc to King's Gambit to Volga Gambit.
I saw a Kayra 1.0 BUG in a kibitz game. With me Kayra is flawless. Kayra 1.1 is better than 1.0 and I'm sure Stockfish dev. does not play better (I also tested that).
			
			
									
						
										
						I am testing different engines on servers. It is important to me that the engines play with Ponder ON and not less than 5m + 0s. Kayra certainly doesn't play any worse than Stockfish. I'm 800 games in a row undefeated with Kayra. Oh, I haven't even lost a game and I play a lot. Kayra had to play all kinds of openings, from Pirc to King's Gambit to Volga Gambit.
I saw a Kayra 1.0 BUG in a kibitz game. With me Kayra is flawless. Kayra 1.1 is better than 1.0 and I'm sure Stockfish dev. does not play better (I also tested that).
- 
				Sopel
- Posts: 391
- Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2019 11:39 pm
- Full name: Tomasz Sobczyk
Re: Kayra 1.1
Hmm? It obviously plays worseEduard wrote: ↑Mon Dec 27, 2021 4:00 pm Can you explain this in simple terms to people like me?
I am testing different engines on servers. It is important to me that the engines play with Ponder ON and not less than 5m + 0s. Kayra certainly doesn't play any worse than Stockfish. I'm 800 games in a row undefeated with Kayra. Oh, I haven't even lost a game and I play a lot. Kayra had to play all kinds of openings, from Pirc to King's Gambit to Volga Gambit.
I saw a Kayra 1.0 BUG in a kibitz game. With me Kayra is flawless. Kayra 1.1 is better than 1.0 and I'm sure Stockfish dev. does not play better (I also tested that).
Code: Select all
Score of stockfish_dev vs kayra_1_1: 1210 - 901 - 1889 [0.539]
...      stockfish_dev playing White: 1189 - 3 - 808  [0.796] 2000
...      stockfish_dev playing Black: 21 - 898 - 1081  [0.281] 2000
...      White vs Black: 2087 - 24 - 1889  [0.758] 4000
Elo difference: 26.9 +/- 7.8, LOS: 100.0 %, DrawRatio: 47.2 %
4000 of 10000 games finished.dangi12012 wrote:No one wants to touch anything you have posted. That proves you now have negative reputations since everyone knows already you are a forum troll.
Maybe you copied your stockfish commits from someone else too?
I will look into that.